İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması

Ceyda Tomruk; Zeynep Ozkurt; Kemal Sencift; Ender Kazazoglu

doi:10.7126/cdj.2012.1405

EN TR

-

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were toevaluate satisfaction of patients used implantretained overdentures and conventional completedentures, and to investigate the effect ofsociodemographic properties on satisfaction.Materials and Methods: Forty two patients, 27female and 15 male,used implant-retainedoverdentures and conventional complete dentureswere included in this study, who attended toUniversity of Yeditepe, Faculty of Dentistry in2011. A questionnaire was prepared and distrubutedto evaluate the patient satisfaction levels about theirdentures and sociodemographic properties such asage, gender, education, marital and income status.The answers were asked to give as not satisfied,satisfied, very satisfied. Chi-square test and Fisher’sExact Chi-square test were used to analyze thequantitative data. An alpha level of 0.05 was usedfor all statistical analyses.Results: The mean age of the 42 patients(64.3% female, 35.7% male) was 62.26. It wasobserved that patients with higher educational levelprefered implant-retained overdentures, comparedto conventional complete dentures.In theconventionalcomplete denture group, highernumbers of patients were very satisfied with thecleanabilitycompared to implant-retainedoverdenture group. (p=0.039). There was nostatistically significant differences betweenimplant-retained overdentures and conventionalcomplete denture groups with regard to satisfactionlevel of esthetic, chewing, speech, retention andcomfort.Conclusions:It can be concluded thatsociodemographic factors did not affect thesatisfaction of different denture types. The patientswith conventional complete dentures were moresatisfied with the cleanability, compared to implantretained overdentures.

Keywords

Conventional complete dentures,implant-retained overdentures, satisfaction.

İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, klasik tam protez ve implant destekli tam protez kullanan hastaların memnuniyetlerini değerlendirmek ve demografik özelliklerin memnuniyet üzerine etkisini incelemekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya, 2011 yılında Yeditepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi’nde, alt-üst klasik tam protez ve üst klasik-alt implant destekli tam protez uygulanan, 27’si kadın ve 15’i erkek, toplam 42 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalara, sosyodemografik özelliklerini (cinsiyet, yaş, ömedeni durum, öğrenim durumu, gelir düzeyi) içeren ve protezlerinin memnuniyetini değerlendiren anket formları dağıtıldı. Cevapların, memnun değilim/memnunum/çok memnunum şeklinde verilmesi istendi. Niteliksel verilerin karşılaştırılmasında Ki-Kare testi ve Fisher’s Exact Ki-Kare testi kullanıldı. Anlamlılık p

Keywords

Klasik tam protez, implant destekli overdenture, memnuniyet

References

The glossary of prosthodontics, 8 th ed. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(1):68.
Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, et al. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:467-473.
Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:117-122.
Assunção WG, Barão VA, Delben JA, Gomes EA, Tabata LF. A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review. Gerodontology 2010;27:154-162.
Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1455-1458.
Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, et al. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1167-1173. Awad MA, Locker D, KornerBitensky N, et al. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000;79:1659-1663.
Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:574-581.
Clancy JMS, Buchs AU, Ardjmand H. A retrospective analysis of one implant system in an oral surgery practice. Phase I: patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:265-271.

Grogone A, Lancaster D, Finger I. Dental implants: a survey of patients’ attitudes. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:573-576.
Harle TJ, Anderson JD. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:153-162.
Pera P, Bassi F, Schierano G, et al. Implant anchored complete mandibular denture: evaluation of masticatory efficiency, oral function and degree of satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:462-467.
Kent G, Johns R. A controlled longitudinal study on the psychological effects of osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:470-474.
Kiyak A, Beach B, Worthington P, et al. The psychological impact of osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:616 Douglas CW. Prosthodontics. Clinical practice–delivery of services. Review of the literatures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:275-283.
Hamlet S, Stone M, Mc Carty T. Conditioning prostheses viewed from the standpoint of speech adaptation. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:60-66.
Müller F, Hasse-Sander I. Experimental studies of adaptation to complete dentures related to ageing. Gerodontology 1993;10:23-27.
Boretti G, Bickel M, Geering AH. A review of masticatory ability and efficiency. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:400-403.
Bergman B, Carlsson GE. Review of 54 complete denture wearers. Patients’ opinions 1 year after treatment. Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30:399-414.
Torres BL, Costa FO, Modena CM, Cota LO, Côrtes MI, Seraidarian PI. Association between personality traits and quality of life in patients treated with conventional mandibular dentures or implant-supported overdentures. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:454-461.
Berg E. Acceptance of full dentures. Review. Int Dent J 1993;43(Suppl 1):299-306.
Johansson A, Unell L, Johansson AK, Carlsson GE. A 10-year longitudinal study of self assessed chewing ability and dental status in 50-year-old subjects. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:643-645.
Bellini D, Dos Santos MB, De Paula Prisco Da Cunha V, Marchini L. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction of complete denture therapy and correlation with locus of control. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:68268
Carlsson GE, Otterland A, Wennstrom A. Patient factors in appreciation of complete denture. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17:322-328.
Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:143-156. Narhi TO,Hevinga M,Voorsmit RA,KalkW. Maxillary overdentures retained by splinted and unsplinted implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:259-266.
Geertman ME, Boerrigter EM, Van Waas MA, Van Oort RP. Clinical aspects of a multi-center clinical trial of implant retained mandibular overdentures in patients with severely resorbed mandibles. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:194-204.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Hof VMA. Comparison of implantretained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 2003;18:879-885.
Sclar AG. Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:90-105.
Özkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E. Treatment modalities of single-tooth missing in a Turkish subpopulation: Implant, fixed partial denture or no restoration. J Dent Sci. 2010;5:18318 Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:173-179.
Ozdemir AK, Turgut M, Polat T. Demografik faktörlerin hareketli protez memnuniyetine etkisi. Cumhuriyet Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002;6:115-119.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Ceyda Tomruk

Zeynep Ozkurt

Kemal Sencift

Ender Kazazoglu

Publication Date

January 31, 2013

Submission Date

February 27, 2012

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 16 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1405

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA87EM23PZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tomruk, C., Ozkurt, Z., Sencift, K., & Kazazoglu, E. (2013). İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 16(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1405

AMA

1.Tomruk C, Ozkurt Z, Sencift K, Kazazoglu E. İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2013;16(1):8-19. doi:10.7126/cdj.2012.1405

Chicago

Tomruk, Ceyda, Zeynep Ozkurt, Kemal Sencift, and Ender Kazazoglu. 2013. “İmplant Destekli Overdenture Ve Klasik Tam Protezlerin Hasta Memnuniyeti Açısından Karşılaştırılması”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 16 (1): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1405.

EndNote

Tomruk C, Ozkurt Z, Sencift K, Kazazoglu E (January 1, 2013) İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 16 1 8–19.

IEEE

[1]C. Tomruk, Z. Ozkurt, K. Sencift, and E. Kazazoglu, “İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması”, Cumhuriyet Dent J, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 8–19, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.7126/cdj.2012.1405.

ISNAD

Tomruk, Ceyda - Ozkurt, Zeynep - Sencift, Kemal - Kazazoglu, Ender. “İmplant Destekli Overdenture Ve Klasik Tam Protezlerin Hasta Memnuniyeti Açısından Karşılaştırılması”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 16/1 (January 1, 2013): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1405.

JAMA

1.Tomruk C, Ozkurt Z, Sencift K, Kazazoglu E. İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2013;16:8–19.

MLA

Tomruk, Ceyda, et al. “İmplant Destekli Overdenture Ve Klasik Tam Protezlerin Hasta Memnuniyeti Açısından Karşılaştırılması”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 8-19, doi:10.7126/cdj.2012.1405.

Vancouver

1.Ceyda Tomruk, Zeynep Ozkurt, Kemal Sencift, Ender Kazazoglu. İmplant destekli overdenture ve klasik tam protezlerin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2013 Jan. 1;16(1):8-19. doi:10.7126/cdj.2012.1405

Cited By

Effect of peri‐implant disease on oral health–related quality of life in geriatric patients

Gerodontology

https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12556