Effect of Dentin Desensitizers and Nd:YAG Laser Pre-Treatment on Microshear Bond Strength of Adhesive Resin Cement to Dentin
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate how microshear bond strength of different adhesive resin cements are affected by dentin desensitizers application and preparation depth.
Materials and Methods: One hundred and forty-four maxillary incisors were randomly divided into two groups according to dentin preparation depth (0.8 and 1 mm) and each group subdivided into four dentin desensitizers, Nd:YAG (Neodymium-doped Yttrium aluminum Garnet) laser and control groups. The dentin desensitizers used were Gluma [Glutaraldehyde/ Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)], BisBlock (Oxalate) Vivasens-Potassium Fluoride (KF) and Admira Protect (Ormocer/HEMA), respectively. Three dual cure resin based luting cement (RelyX ARC; Variolink II and Maxcem Elite) were used to create a 0,7 mm diameter and 1 mm height cylindirical shape buid-up in tygon tubes (n=10). Micro-shear bond strength (µSBS) test was performed at a crosshead of speed of 0.5 mm/min using a Universal testing device. Then tooth surface was investigated by steromicroscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Chi-Square (X2) tests. (p = 0.05)
Results: There was no statistically difference between the groups at 0.8 mm preparation depth. At 1 mm preparation dept RelyX ARC + Gluma groups’ mean bond strength value (23.96 ± 6.66 MPa) was found statistically lower according to the other groups (p<0.05). RelyX ARC + Laser groups’ mean bond strength value (37.33 ± 7.39 MPa) was found statistically higher according to the other groups (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The use of desensitizing agents affected the bond strength of the resin cements to superficial dentin. Gluma desensitizer affected negatively µSBS of RelyX ARC resin cement at 1 mm depth. Application of Nd:YAG laser to superficial dentin showed positive effects to the dentin surface and bond strength. Other desensitizing agents showed no significant effects on the resin bond strength (p>0.05).
Keywords
References
- Brännström M. Sensitivity of dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966;21:517–526.
- Brännström M, Aström A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972;22:219-27.
- Bartold P. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J 2006;51(3):212–218
- Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: new perspectives on an old problem. Int Dent J 2002;52(5):375-87.
- Vano M, Derchi G, Barone A, Covani U. Effectiveness of nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste in re- ducing dentin hypersensitivity: a double-blind random- ized controlled trial Quintessence Int 2014;45(8) 703-711.
- Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(2),229-31.
- Markowitz K. Pashley DH. Discovering new treatments for sensitive teeth: the long path from biology to therapy. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:300–315
- Grossman LI. A systematic method for the treatment of hypersensitivity dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1935;22:592–602.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Fatih Sarı
*
0000-0002-4818-8562
Türkiye
Onur Şahin
0000-0002-8018-6946
Türkiye
Ali Kemal Özdemir
0000-0002-2430-5170
Türkiye
Publication Date
May 31, 2019
Submission Date
March 11, 2019
Acceptance Date
March 22, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 22 Number: 2