Hassasiyet Giderici Diş Macunlarının Farklı Restoratif Materyallerin Kron ve Kök Dentinine Bağlanma Kuvveti Üzerine Etkisi

Kıvanç Yamanel; Neslihan Arhun

doi:10.7126/cumudj.408762

TR EN

Hassasiyet Giderici Diş Macunlarının Farklı Restoratif Materyallerin Kron ve Kök Dentinine Bağlanma Kuvveti Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı hassasiyet giderici diş macununun kompozit rezin ve cam iyonomer restoratif materyallerin kron ve kök dentinine makaslama bağlanma dayanımları üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: 108 adet insan üçüncü molar dişinin meziyal veya distal yüzeyleri zımpara yardımıyla düzleştirildi. Örnekler aşağıdaki diş macunlarıyla fırçalanmak üzere rastgele 3 ana gruba ayrıldı (N=36): A Grubu: Sensodyne Rapid Relief; B Grubu: Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief; C Grubu: Colgate Total 12. Fırçalama işlemi, bir fırçalama simülatöründe toplam 10 gün süreyle, günde 2 kez ve her fırçalamada 10 fırça darbesi şeklinde gerçekleştirildi. Örnekler daha sonra kron ve kök dentinine aşağıdaki adezyon protokollerinin uygulanması için üçer alt gruba (n=12) ayrıldı. Grup 1: Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Z250 kompozit; Group2: Adper Single Bond2 + Filtek Z250 kompozit; Group3: Riva cam iyonomer siman. Örnekler 24 saat süreyle distile suda bekletildi. Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi üniversal test cihazıyla gerçekleştirildi(kafa hızı 0.5 mm/s). Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Bütün restoratif teknikler değerlendirildiğinde en düşük makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri, Sensodyne Rapid Relief kullanımından sonra elde edilmiştir. Riva cam iyonomer siman, kompozit rezinden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük makaslama bağlanma dayanımı değerleri sergilemiştir.

Sonuç:Hassasiyet giderici diş macunu kullanımı sonrası self etch sistemlerin kullanılması adezyon açısından daha uygun olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hassasiyet giderici diş macunu,kron dentini,kök dentini,bağlanma dayanımı.

References

1. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin Hypersensitivity.Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity.J Can Dent Assoc. 2003 Apr;69(4):221-6.
2. Chu CH, Lo ECM. Dentin hypersensitivity: a review. Hong Kong Dent J 2010;7:15-22.
3. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D.Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine.J Clin Periodontol. 1987 May;14(5):280-4.
4. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. The development and evaluation of a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine.J Clin Periodontol. 1989 Mar;16(3):190-5.
5. Cummins D. Dentin Hypersensitivity: From Diagnosis to a Breakthrough Therapy for Everyday Sensitivity Relief. J Clin Dent 20 (Spec Iss):1–9, 2009.
6. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity.J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jul;137(7):990-8.
7. Cortiano FM, Rached RN, Mazur RF, Vieira S, Freire A, de Souza EM. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2016; 124: 309-315.
8. Sabatini C, Wu Z. Effect of desensitizing agents on the bond strength of mild and strong self-ethching adhesives. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 548-57.

9. Kobler A, Schaller HG, Gernhardt CD. Effects of the desensitizing agents Gluma and Hyposen on the tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2008, 21:388-392.
10. Van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, Van der Velden U.Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):413-6.
11. Volpenhein DW, Walsh ME, Dellerman PA, Burkett TA.A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes. J Clin Dent. 1994;5(1):27-33.
12. ISO. Dental materials—guidance on testing of wear resistance. Part 1. Wear by tooth brushing. Technical Specification 1999; No. 14569-1.
13. Neme, A.L., Frazier, K.B., Roeder, L.B., Debner, T.L. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002;27:50–58.
14. dos Santos, P.H., Consani, S., Correr Sobrinho, L., Coelho Sinhoreti, M.A. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins. Am J Dent. 2003;16:197–201.
15. Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Vergani EC, Pavarina AC, Salles DSL, Jorge JH. Weight loss and changes in surface roughness of denture base and reline materials after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e121-7.
16. Volpenhein DW,Walsh ME, Dellerman PA, Burkett TA. A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes. J Clin Dent 1994;5:27–33.
17. Macgregor ID, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Toothbrushing duration in 60 uninstructed young adults. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985;13:121–2.
18. Saxer UP, Barbakow J, Yankell SL. New studies on estimated and actual toothbrushing times and dentifrice use. J Clin Dent 1998;9:49–51.
19. da Costa J, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane JL. The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2010;38:E123–8.
20. Arnold WH, Prange M, Naumova EA. Effectiveness of various toothpastes on dentine tubule occlusion. J Dent 2015;43;440-9.
21. Addy, M., Mostafa, P. Dentine hypersensitivity. I. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of metal ions, fluoride and formaldehyde onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:575–585.
22. Addy, M., Mostafa, P. Dentine hypersensitivity. II. Effects produced by the uptake in vitro of toothpastes onto dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 1989;16:35–48.
23. Joshi, S., Gowda, A.S., Joshi, C. Comparative evaluation of NovaMin desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer on dentinal tubule occlusion: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Perio & Implant Sci. 2013;43:269–275.
24. Petrou, I., Heu, R., Stranick, M., Lavender, S., Zaidel, L., Cummins, D. et al, A breakthrough therapy for dentin hypersensitivity: how dental products containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate work to deliver effective relief of sensitive teeth. JClin Dent. 2009;20:23–31.
25. Lavender, S.A., Petrou, I., Heu, R., Stranick, M.A., Cummins, D., Kilpatrick-Liverman, L. et al, Mode of action studies on a new desensitizing dentifrice containing 8.0% arginine, a high cleaning calcium carbonate system and 1450 ppm fluoride. Am J Dent. 2010;23:14A–19A.
26. Parkinson CR, Butler A, Wilson RJ. Development of an acid-challange based in vitro dentin disc occlusion model. J Clin Dent. 2010;21:31-36.
27. Parkinson CR, Wilson RJ. An in vitro investigation of two currently marketed dentin tubule occlusion dentifrices. J Clin Dent. 2011; 22: 6-10.
28. Ayad, F., Ayad, N., Zhang, Y.P., DeVizio, W., Cummins, D., Mateo, L.R. Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a commercial sensitive toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: an eight-week clinical study on Canadian adults. J Clin Dent. 2009;20:10–16.
29. Docimo, R., Montesani, L., Maturo, P., Costacurta, M., Bartolino, M., Zhang, Y.P. et al, Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a benchmark commercial desensitizing toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: an eight-week clinical study in Rome, Italy. JClin Dent. 2009;20:137–143.
30. Earl, J.S., Leary, R.K., Muller, K.H., Langford, R.M., Greenspan, D.C. Physical and chemical characterization of dentin surface following treatment with NovaMin technology. J Clin Dent. 2011;22:62–67.
31. Akagawa, H., Nikaido, T., Takada, T., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J. Shear bond strengths to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin. Am J Dent. 2002;15:383–388.
32. Foxton, R.M., Nakajima, M., Tagami, J., Miura, H. Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28:543–551.
33. Pereira, P.N., Okuda, M., Sano, H., Yoshikawa, T., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 1999;15:46–53.
34. Yoshikawa, T., Sano, H., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J., Pashley, D.H. Effect of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res. 1999;78:898–905.
35. Giannini, M., Carvalho, R.M., Martins, L.R., Dias, C.T., Pashley, D.H. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent.2001;3:315–324.
36. De Goes MF, Giannini M, Foxton RM, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strengthbetween crown and root dentin and two adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 223-8.
37. Powis DR, Folleras T, Merson AS & Wilson AD. Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J Dent Res. 1982; 61: 1416–1422.
38. Lin A, Mcintyre NS & Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 1836-1841.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Kıvanç Yamanel ^*
Türkiye

Neslihan Arhun
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 29, 2018

Submission Date

March 22, 2018

Acceptance Date

April 19, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 21 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.408762

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97BC39JT

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Yamanel K, Arhun N (July 1, 2018) Hassasiyet Giderici Diş Macunlarının Farklı Restoratif Materyallerin Kron ve Kök Dentinine Bağlanma Kuvveti Üzerine Etkisi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 21 2 93–102.

The Effect of Desensitizing-Toothpastes on the Bond Strength of Different Restoratives on Coronal/Root Dentin

Hassasiyet Giderici Diş Macunlarının Farklı Restoratif Materyallerin Kron ve Kök Dentinine Bağlanma Kuvveti Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Effect of Desensitizing-Toothpastes on the Bond Strength of Different Restoratives on Coronal/Root Dentin

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite