Öz
Objectives: The aim of the present study was toevaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) ofself-etch adhesive system to dentin surfacecontaminated with three different hemostatic agentsin the presence of blood and saliva.Materials and Methods: Twelve extractedhuman carious-free permanent molar teeth wereused to obtain flat occlusal dentin surfaces. Thedentin surfaces were grinded with 600 gridsandpaper under water irrigation. Teeth weredivided into four groups (I: Kontrol, II: Ankaferd,III: ViscoStat Clear and IV: Transamine). Thehemostatic agents were aplicated in the presence ofblood and saliva, then were rinsed and dried. Teethwere restored with self-etch adhesive system(Clearfil SE Bond) 2mm thick composite resin(Quadrant Universal LC). Then specimens werestored 37C distilled water during 24 hours. Fivemicrotensile specimens from each tooth measuring1.00 + 0.003 mm were prepared with a slow-speeddiamond saw sectioning machine with a diamondrim blade (n=15). These specimens were attached toopposing arms of the microtensile testing devicewith cyanoacrylate adhesive and fractured undertension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.Statistical analysis was made with one-way analysisof variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests (α=0.05).Results: μTBS values of groups were (mean ±SD in MPa); I: 28.81±6.84, II: 27.38±4.89, III:24.89±5.80, IV: 24.73±7.14. There was nosignificant differences between μTBS of groups(p>0.05).Conclusions: Contamination of dentin withhemostatic agents didn’t affect the μTBS ofself-etch adeziv sistemlerin bağlanma dayanımınıolumsuzyönde etkilememektedir. Kanamadurdurucu ajanlar self etch adeziv sistemlerinbağlanma dayanımını azaltmaksızın kanamakontrolünde kullanılabilirler.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- KAYNAKLAR
- Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dental Materials. 1993;9(5):295-9.
- Chung CWM, Yiu CKY, King NM, Hiraishi N, Tay FR. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin. Journal of Dentistry. 2009;37(12):923-31.
- Kimmes NS, Olson TL, Shaddy RS, Latta MA. Effect of ViscoStat and ViscoStat Plus on composite shear bond strength in the presence and absence of blood. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(6):363-6.
- Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Dayangac B, Ozgunaltay G, Onen A. The effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(3):305-9.
- Land MF, Couri CC, Johnston WM. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(5):477-82.
- Kuphasuk W, Harnirattisai C, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Bond Strengths of Two Adhesive Systems to Dentin Contaminated with a Hemostatic Agent. Operative Dentistry. 2007; 32(4):399-405.
- Woronko G, Germain H, Meiers J. Effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1996;21:116-121.
- O’Keefe KL, Pinzon LM, Rivera B, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent. 2005;18:168-72.
- Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M & Pashley DH. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. Journal of Dental Research 2004;83(11):843-848.
- Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y & Akamine A. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity. American Journal of Dentistry 2004;17(3):191-195.
- Harnirattisai C, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P, J Tagami. Bond Strengths of Resin Cements to Astringent-contaminated Dentin. Operative Dentistry 2009;34-4:415-422.
- Ünlü N, Çetin A, Cebe M, Karabekiroğlu S. [Comparison of Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin Contaminated with Haemostatic Agents]. Hacettepe Dişhek Fak Derg 2010;34:3-4
- Land MF, Rosenstiel SF, Sandrik JL. Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. J Prosth Dent 1994;72:4-7.
- Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: A systematic review. Dent Mater 2005; 21:895–910.
- Arslan S, Ertaş H, Zorba YO. Influence of Ankaferd Blood Stopper on shear bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater J 2012;31(2):226-31.
Öz
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üç farklı kanama durdurucu ajanın self-etch bir adezivin mikro-gerilim bağlanma dayanımına etkilerinin değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: Son altı ay içinde çekilmiş, on iki adet çürüksüz daimi molar diş kullanıldı. Dişlerin okluzal kesitlerinden düzgün dentin yüzeyleri elde edildi. Homojen bir dentin yüzeyi elde etmek amacıyla, dentin yüzeyleri 600 gritlik su zımparası ile zımparalandı. Bu yüzeyler kan ve tükürük ile kontamine edildi. Dişler dört gruba ayrıldı. (I:Kontrol, II:Ankaferd, III:ViscoStat Clear, IV:Transamine). Kan ve tükürüklü yüzeye kanama durdurucu ajanlar uygulandı, sonra durulandı ve kurutuldu. Dişlere self etch adeziv sistem (Clearfil SE Bond) uygulamasının ardından dişler kompozit rezinle (Quadrant Universal LC ) 2 mm kalınlığında restore edildi. Örnekler 24 saat boyunca 37 0C distile suda bekletildi. Her bir dişten düşük hızda çalışan elmas separe yardımı ile 1.00 ± 0.003 mm kalınlığında beş adet mikro gerilim örneği elde edildi. Örnekler mikro gerilim test cihazına her iki uçlarından siyanoakrilat adezivle yapıştırıldı ve 1 mm/dk yükleme hızı altında koparıldı. Veriler Tek Yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey Çoklu Karşılaştırma testleriyle analiz edildi (α=0.05).
Bulgular: Grupların bağlanma değerleri (ortalama ± SS (MPa)); I: 28.81±6.84, II: 27.38±4.89, III: 24.89±5.80, IV: 24.73±7.14 şeklinde bulunmuştur. Kanama durdurucu ajanlar ve kontrol grubu arasında istatiksel açıdan önemli fark gözlenmemiştir (p>0.05).
Sonuç: Kanama durdurucu ajanlar kullanılarak dentin yüzeyinin kontamine edilmesi self etch adeziv sistemlerin bağlanma dayanımını olumsuz yönde etkilememektedir. Kanama durdurucu ajanlar self etch adeziv sistemlerin bağlanma dayanımını azaltmaksızın kanama kontrolünde kullanılabilirler.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- KAYNAKLAR
- Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dental Materials. 1993;9(5):295-9.
- Chung CWM, Yiu CKY, King NM, Hiraishi N, Tay FR. Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin. Journal of Dentistry. 2009;37(12):923-31.
- Kimmes NS, Olson TL, Shaddy RS, Latta MA. Effect of ViscoStat and ViscoStat Plus on composite shear bond strength in the presence and absence of blood. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(6):363-6.
- Yazici AR, Tuncer D, Dayangac B, Ozgunaltay G, Onen A. The effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(3):305-9.
- Land MF, Couri CC, Johnston WM. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(5):477-82.
- Kuphasuk W, Harnirattisai C, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Bond Strengths of Two Adhesive Systems to Dentin Contaminated with a Hemostatic Agent. Operative Dentistry. 2007; 32(4):399-405.
- Woronko G, Germain H, Meiers J. Effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1996;21:116-121.
- O’Keefe KL, Pinzon LM, Rivera B, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent. 2005;18:168-72.
- Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M & Pashley DH. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. Journal of Dental Research 2004;83(11):843-848.
- Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y & Akamine A. Self-etching adhesives and postoperative sensitivity. American Journal of Dentistry 2004;17(3):191-195.
- Harnirattisai C, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P, J Tagami. Bond Strengths of Resin Cements to Astringent-contaminated Dentin. Operative Dentistry 2009;34-4:415-422.
- Ünlü N, Çetin A, Cebe M, Karabekiroğlu S. [Comparison of Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems to Dentin Contaminated with Haemostatic Agents]. Hacettepe Dişhek Fak Derg 2010;34:3-4
- Land MF, Rosenstiel SF, Sandrik JL. Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. J Prosth Dent 1994;72:4-7.
- Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel–dentin adhesives: A systematic review. Dent Mater 2005; 21:895–910.
- Arslan S, Ertaş H, Zorba YO. Influence of Ankaferd Blood Stopper on shear bond strength of bonding systems. Dent Mater J 2012;31(2):226-31.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 24 Ocak 2014 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 8 Nisan 2013 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2014Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.