Öz
Objectives: The purpose of this study was toinvestigate the effect of different surface treatmentson shear bond strength between PanaviaF 2.0 andTurkom-Cera.Materials and Methods: All ceramic, 10x10x2mm sized, 40 Turkom-Cera specimens wereprepared. These specimens were randomly assignedto 5 groups (n=8) according to different surfacetreatments untreated or control (group C),sandblasted (group SB) Rocatec applied (group R)hydrofluoric acid-etched (group HF), and Z Primerapplied (group Z). The resin cement blocks with 2mm height and 8 mm diameter were prepared withPanavia F2.0 from teflon mould. Then they werecemented to Turkom-Cera full ceramic specimens.The prepared specimens were kept in water in roomtemperature for 1week and then shear bond strengthtest was performed at 0,5 mm/min crosshead speedwith universal test machine. One way ANOVA andTukey post-hoc tests were performed for statisticalanalysis.Results: Groups SB and R showed statisticallysignificant higher bond strengths than other groups(p<0.001), but the difference between them was notstatistically significant. (p>0.05). Furthermore, thebond strength difference between groups C, HF andZ were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Anahtar Kelimeler
Turkom-Cera sandblasting silicacoating shear bond strength.Conlusions: For the adhesive cementation ofTurkom-Cera full ceramics; sandblasting with 50µm particle sized AlO and coating with silicaexhibit sufficient and satisfactory outcomes.
Kaynakça
- 1. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all- ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-661.
- 2. Wall JG, Cipra DL. Alternative crown systems. Is the metal-ceramic crown always the restoration of choice? Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:765-782.
- 3. Gökçe H. In-Ceram core destekli porselen kronlarda core tasarımının dayanıklılığa etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 1999.
- 4. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-249.
- 5. http://www.turkom- cera.com.tr/download/catalog.pdf 27.09.2012. 6. Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:196-200.
- 7. Akin H, Ozkurt Z, Kirmali O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2011;29:797-802.
- 8. Akin H, Tugut F, Akin GE, Guney U, Mutaf B. Effect of Er:YAG laser application on the shear bond strength and microleakage between resin cements and Y-TZP ceramics. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:333-338.
- 9. Uludamar A, Akalın B, Özkan YK. Zirkonyum esaslı tam seramik restorasyonlarda simantasyon öncesi yüzey hazırlıkları. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2011;14:140-153.
- 10. AL-Makramani BMA, Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI. Comparison of the Load at Fracture of Turkom-Cera to Procera AllCeram and In-Ceram All- Ceramic Restorations. J Prosthodont 2009;18:484-488.
- 11. Fleming GJ, Narayan O. The effect of cement type and mixing on the bi- axial fracture strength of cemented aluminous core porcelain discs. Dent Mater 2003;19:69-76.
- 12. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389- 404.
- 13. al-Salehi SK, Burke FJ. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int 1997;28:717-723.
- 14. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:45-50.
- 15. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2012.
- 16. Roman-Rodriguez JL, Fons-Font A, Amigo-Borras V, Granell-Ruiz M, Busquets-Mataix D, Panadero RA, Sola-Ruiz MF. Bond strength of selected composite resin-cements to zirconium-oxide ceramic. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012.
- 17. Burke FJT, AlSalehi SK. A review of test methods in 50 dentine bond test publications. J Dent Res 1997;76:191-191.
- 18. Altay N, Akça T. Invitro bağlantı kuvveti ölçme testlerinin değerlerndirilmesi. HÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002;26:32-38.
- 19. Ho AC, Akyalcin S, Bonstein T, Wiltshire WA. In vitro shearing force testing of two seventh generation self-etching primers. J Orthod 2011;38:269-274.
- 20. Dalby R, Ellakwa A, Millar B, Martin FE. Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 310702.
- 21. Haneda IG, Fonseca RG, Abi- Rached Fde O, Adabo GL, Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of different repair systems to titanium after water aging. Oper Dent 2012;37:253-262.
- 22. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Carrilho MR. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain-dentin bonding using dual-cure cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:285-289.
- 23. Chang JC, Nguyen T, Duong JH, Ladd GD. Tensile bond strengths of dual-cured cements between a glass- ceramic and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:503-507.
- 24. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Blatz U. The effect of silica coating on the resin bond to the intaglio surface of Procera AllCeram restorations. Quintessence Int 2003;34:542-547.
- 25. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:356-362.
- 26. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-855.
- 27. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848-856.
- 28. Torres SM, Borges GA, Spohr AM, Cury AA, Yadav S, Platt JA. The effect of surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of a resin luting agent and four all-ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2009;34:399- 407.
- 29. Ozcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:335-339. 98
Öz
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength between PanaviaF 2.0 and Turkom-Cera.
Materials and Methods: All ceramic, 10x10x2 mm sized, 40 Turkom-Cera specimens were prepared. These specimens were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=8) according to different surface treatments untreated or control (group C), sandblasted (group SB) Rocatec applied (group R) hydrofluoric acid-etched (group HF), and Z Primer applied (group Z). The resin cement blocks with 2 mm height and 8 mm diameter were prepared with Panavia F2.0 from teflon mould. Then they were cemented to Turkom-Cera full ceramic specimens. The prepared specimens were kept in water in room temperature for 1week and then shear bond strength test was performed at 0,5 mm/min crosshead speed with universal test machine. One way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests were performed for statistical analysis.
Results: Groups SB and R showed statistically significant higher bond strengths than other groups (p<0.001), but the difference between them was not statistically significant. (p>0.05). Furthermore, the bond strength difference between groups C, HF and Z were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Conlusions: For the adhesive cementation of Turkom-Cera full ceramics; sandblasting with 50 µm particle sized Al2O3 and coating with silica exhibit sufficient and satisfactory outcomes.
Keywords: Turkom-Cera, sandblasting silica coating, shear bond strength.
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı yüzey işlemlerinin alumina içerikli Turkom-Cera tam seramik materyalinin Panavia F 2.0 rezin simanla makaslama bağlantı direnci üzerine etkisinin araştırılmasıdır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Boyutları 10x10x2 mm olan toplam 40 adet Turkom-Cera tam seramik örnekler hazırlandı. Farklı yüzey hazırlıklarına tabi tutulmak üzere örnekler rastgele 8’erli 5 gruba ayrıldı; hiçbir yüzey işleminin uygulanmadığı kontrol grubu (grup C), kumlama grubu (grup SB), Rocatec uygulanan grup (grup R), hidroflorik asitle pürüzlendirilen grup (grup HF) ve Z Primer uygulanan grup (grup Z).Yüksekliği 2 mm ve çapı 8 mm olan rezin siman bloklar Panavia F 2.0 rezin simandan teflon kalıp ile üretildi ve Turkom-Cera tam seramik örneklere simante edildi. Hazırlanan örnekler 1 hafta süreyle oda sıcaklığındaki suda bekletildi ve universal test cihazında 0,5 mm/dak hızla makaslama testine tabi tutuldu. İstatistiksel değerlendirme tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile yapıldı.
Bulgular: Grup SB ve grup R istatistiksel olarak diğer gruplara göre anlamlı derecede yüksek bağlantı dayanımı gösterirken (p<0,001) kendi aralarındaki farklılık anlamlı olarak bulunmadı (p>0,05). Grup C, grup HF ve grup Z arasındaki makaslama bağlanma dayanımı farklılığı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmadı (p>0,05).
Sonuçlar: Turkom-Cera tam seramiklerin adeziv simantasyonunda 50 µm’luk Al2O3 kumlama ve silika kaplama bağlanma dayanımı açısından yeterli ve tatmin edici sonuçlar vermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Anahtar Kelimeler: Turkom-Cera yüzey işlemi makaslama bağlantı dayanımı
Kaynakça
- 1. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all- ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-661.
- 2. Wall JG, Cipra DL. Alternative crown systems. Is the metal-ceramic crown always the restoration of choice? Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:765-782.
- 3. Gökçe H. In-Ceram core destekli porselen kronlarda core tasarımının dayanıklılığa etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 1999.
- 4. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-249.
- 5. http://www.turkom- cera.com.tr/download/catalog.pdf 27.09.2012. 6. Usumez A, Inan O, Aykent F. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:196-200.
- 7. Akin H, Ozkurt Z, Kirmali O, Kazazoglu E, Ozdemir AK. Shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic after aluminum oxide sandblasting and various laser treatments. Photomed Laser Surg 2011;29:797-802.
- 8. Akin H, Tugut F, Akin GE, Guney U, Mutaf B. Effect of Er:YAG laser application on the shear bond strength and microleakage between resin cements and Y-TZP ceramics. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:333-338.
- 9. Uludamar A, Akalın B, Özkan YK. Zirkonyum esaslı tam seramik restorasyonlarda simantasyon öncesi yüzey hazırlıkları. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 2011;14:140-153.
- 10. AL-Makramani BMA, Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI. Comparison of the Load at Fracture of Turkom-Cera to Procera AllCeram and In-Ceram All- Ceramic Restorations. J Prosthodont 2009;18:484-488.
- 11. Fleming GJ, Narayan O. The effect of cement type and mixing on the bi- axial fracture strength of cemented aluminous core porcelain discs. Dent Mater 2003;19:69-76.
- 12. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389- 404.
- 13. al-Salehi SK, Burke FJ. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: an analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int 1997;28:717-723.
- 14. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:45-50.
- 15. Yavuz T, Dilber E, Kara HB, Tuncdemir AR, Ozturk AN. Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems. Lasers Med Sci 2012.
- 16. Roman-Rodriguez JL, Fons-Font A, Amigo-Borras V, Granell-Ruiz M, Busquets-Mataix D, Panadero RA, Sola-Ruiz MF. Bond strength of selected composite resin-cements to zirconium-oxide ceramic. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012.
- 17. Burke FJT, AlSalehi SK. A review of test methods in 50 dentine bond test publications. J Dent Res 1997;76:191-191.
- 18. Altay N, Akça T. Invitro bağlantı kuvveti ölçme testlerinin değerlerndirilmesi. HÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002;26:32-38.
- 19. Ho AC, Akyalcin S, Bonstein T, Wiltshire WA. In vitro shearing force testing of two seventh generation self-etching primers. J Orthod 2011;38:269-274.
- 20. Dalby R, Ellakwa A, Millar B, Martin FE. Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 310702.
- 21. Haneda IG, Fonseca RG, Abi- Rached Fde O, Adabo GL, Cruz CA. Shear bond strength of different repair systems to titanium after water aging. Oper Dent 2012;37:253-262.
- 22. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Carrilho MR. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain-dentin bonding using dual-cure cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:285-289.
- 23. Chang JC, Nguyen T, Duong JH, Ladd GD. Tensile bond strengths of dual-cured cements between a glass- ceramic and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:503-507.
- 24. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Blatz U. The effect of silica coating on the resin bond to the intaglio surface of Procera AllCeram restorations. Quintessence Int 2003;34:542-547.
- 25. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:356-362.
- 26. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-855.
- 27. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 2009;37:848-856.
- 28. Torres SM, Borges GA, Spohr AM, Cury AA, Yadav S, Platt JA. The effect of surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of a resin luting agent and four all-ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2009;34:399- 407.
- 29. Ozcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:335-339. 98
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Mayıs 2013 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 6 Temmuz 2012 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2013Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.