BibTex RIS Cite

Sınıf II kavitelerdeki üç farklı adeziv sistemin mikrosızıntılarının sem ile in vitro olarak incelenmesi

Year 2009, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 111 - 118, 30.10.2011

Bayram İnce Mehmet Dalli Emrullah Bahşi Cafer Sahbaz Hakan Çolak Ertugrul Ercan

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate microleakage of three different self etching adhesive systems in class II cavities comparatively.

Material and Method: In this study 45 caries free human maxillary premolar teeth were used. Standard class II cavities were prepared on mesial surfaces of all. Teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups of each 15. Group 1: Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) + Quixfill (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), Group 2: Xeno V (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) + Quixfill, Group 3: G Bond (20) + gradia direct (GC-Fuji Japan). All restorations were applied incrementally according to manufacturers’ recommendations and were polymerized with LED (Elipar Freelight II, 3M-ESPE, Germany). All samples were immersed in distile water for 24hr at 37°C and then were thermocycled at 5° and 55°C for 10000 cycles of 30 seconds each, stained (24 hr) in 0.5% methylene blue, and sectioned mesio-distally following stain development. Microleakage of occlusal and gingival walls were scored from 0 to 4 under stereomicroscope.

Results: In terms of occlusal assessment; statistically there was significance in intergroups (p<0.05). Less microleakage scores were determined in Group 1(Prime&Bond NT). In comparison of Group 2 (Xeno V) and Group 3 (G Bond) there was no significance among occlusal and gingival scores. And statistically no significance was found in gingival scores(p>0.05).

Conclusions: In comparison of applied adhesives; in decreasing gingival and occlusal microleakage, total etch adhesive system (Prime&Bond NT) was found more succesful than the other two self etching adhesive systems (Xeno V, G Bond).

 

ÖZET

Amaç: Bu çalı            manın amacı üç farklı adeziv sistemin (Prime&Bond NT, Xeno V, G Bond) Sınıf II kavitelerdeki mikro sızıntılarının karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektir.

Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada çürüksüz 45 adet insan üst çene küçük azı dişi kullanıldı. Dişlerin mezial yüzeylerinde birer adet standart Sınıf II kavite açıldı. Sonra dişler her grupta 15 diş olacak şekilde rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı. Grup 1: Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) ve Quixfill (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), Grup 2: Xeno V (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) ve Quixfill ile restore edildi, Grup 3: G Bond ve Gradia Direct (GC-Fuji, Tokyo, Japan) uygulandı. Tüm restorasyonlar üretici firmaların önerileri doğrultusunda tabakalama yöntemi ile yerleştirildi ve LED (Elipar Freelight II,3M-ESPE, Germany) ışık kaynağı kullanılarak polimerize edildi. Örnekler etüvde 370C de 24 saat distile su içerisinde bekletildi. 30 saniye kalacak şekilde 5 ve 55°C termal siklus işlemi 10000 kez uygulandı. Bütün dişler 24 saat % 0.5’lik metilen mavisi içerisinde bekletildi. Dişler mesio-distal yönde kesildi, stereo mikroskop altında oklüzal ve gingival duvarlar 0 ile 4 arasındaki skorlar ile değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler Kruskal Wallis ve Mann Whitney testleri ile değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Oklüzal mikro sızıntının değerlendirilmesinde gruplar arasında istatistiksel anlamlılık bulundu (P<0.05). Grup 1 (Prime&Bond NT) de daha düşük mikro sızıntı skorları tespit edildi. Grup 2 (Xeno V) ve Grup 3 (G Bond) birbirleriyle kıyaslandığında oklüzal ve gingival değerler arasında farklılık bulunmadı (p>0.05). Gingival de ise üç grup arasında istatistiksel anlamlılık bulunmadı (p>0.05).

Sonuç: Uygulanan adezivlerin karşılaştırılmasında; oklüzal ve gingival de total etch (Prime&Bond NT) adeziv sistem mikro sızıntıyı azaltmada diğer iki self etching (Xeno V, G Bond) adeziv sistemden daha başarılı bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Class II cavity; microleakage; thermocycling; self etching adhesive

References

  • Ten Cate JM. Remineralization of caries lesions extending into polymerization of oral biomaterials. Dent Mater 2004;20: 80-7.
  • Van Meerberk B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M,Vjay P. Adhesion on enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28 :215-35.
  • Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. No-bottle vs muti-bottle dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 373-80.
  • Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems.Oper Dent 2000;25:75-80.
  • Abo T, Uno S, Sano H. Comparison of bonding efficacy of an all- in-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci ;112:286-92. Ozok AR, Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater 2004;20:479-86.
  • De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesive to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent ;30:39-49. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Co. 1998:1-106.
  • Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Analysis of dentin-resin interface by use of laser raman spectroscopy.Dent Mater ;18:576-80
  • Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212
  • Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997;25:355-72.
  • Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999; :333–41.
  • Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentin fluid. Am J Dent 2000;13:195–200.
  • Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM, Robles-Gijon V, Navajas JM. Influence of time and thermocycling on marginal sealing of several dentine adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 550-5.
  • Van Meerbeek B, Pertigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
  • Zorba YO, Bay nd r YZ, Y ld z M. Geçmi ten günümüze dentin bonding ajanlar. Atatürk Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2004;14:70-8. 38. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N,
  • Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002;18:269-75. 39.Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A.
  • Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent ;30:371-82. 40. Zorba YO. Dört farkl self-etching bonding ajan n biyouyumlulu unun Tnfc ve di er inflamasyon kriterleri kullan larak kar la t r lmas . 2006, Erzurum 41.Kiremitçi A, Yalç n F, Gökalp S. Bonding to enamel to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quint. Int 2004; 35: 367-70.
  • Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003;82:141
  • Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 229-42.
  • Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the nfiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-73.
  • Ar kan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2005:8;63-70
  • Borges MA, Matos IC, Dias KR. Influence of two self-etching primer systems on enamel adhesion. Braz Dent J 2007;18:113-8.
  • Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.Oper Dent 1999;24:172-80.
  • Kanca J. Bonding to tooth structure. A rationale for a clinical protocol.J Esthet Dent 1989:1:135-138.
  • Gvvinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:73
  • Perdigab J, Swift EJ. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electromicroscopy. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 349-359
  • Hürmüzlü F, Siso 2H, I n D. S n f II restorasyonlarda be restoratif materyalin mikros z nt de erlendirmesi Cumhuriyet Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2002;5:67-70
  • Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A, Kastali S, García- Godoye F. Microleakage of a microhybrid composite resin using three different adhesive placement techniques. J Adhes Dent 2004 ;6:135-9.
  • Ar kan S, Alpaslan G, Turgut MD. Farkl tekniklerle yap lan S n f II restorasyonlar n mikros z nt ve kenar uyumu aç s ndan de erlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2005;29: 33-41.
  • Grossman ES, Sparrius O. Marginal adaptation of composite resin-restored dentinal cavities. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:519–522.
  • Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:194–203.
  • Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper Dent. ;25:451–459. [PubMed] Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2002;18:111–
  • Erdilek D, Dörter C, Koray F, Kunzelmann KH, Efes BG, Gomec Y. Effect of thermo-mechanical load cycling on microleakage in class II ormocer restorations. Eur J Dent. 2009; 3: 200–205. Yaz<Ema Adresi: Dr. Mehmet DALLI
  • Dicle Üniversitesi Di Hekimli i Fakültesi Di Hastal klar ve Tedavisi Anabilim Dal Diyarbak r Tel : 0 412 2488101 Faks
  • E-posta : mdalli@dicle.edu.tr

SINIF II KAV TELERDEK ÜÇ FARKLI ADEZ V S STEM N M KROSIZINTILARININ SEM LE N V TRO OLARAK NCELENMES

Year 2009, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 111 - 118, 30.10.2011

Bayram İnce Mehmet Dalli Emrullah Bahşi Cafer Sahbaz Hakan Çolak Ertugrul Ercan

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çal man n amac üç farkl adeziv sistemin (Prime&Bond NT, Xeno V, G Bond) S n f II kavitelerdeki mikro s z nt lar n nkar la t rmal olarak incelemektir. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çal mada çürüksüz 45 adet insan üst çene küçük az di i kullan ld . Di lerin mezial yüzeylerinde birer adet standart S n f II kavite aç ld . Sonra di ler her grupta 15 di olacak ekilde rastgele 3 gruba ayr ld . Grup 1: Prime&Bond NT (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) ve Quixfill (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), Grup 2: Xeno V (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) ve Quixfill ile restore edildi, Grup 3: G Bond ve Gradia Direct (GC-Fuji, Tokyo, Japan) uyguland . Tüm restorasyonlar üretici firmalar n önerileri do:rultusunda tabakalama yöntemi ile yerle tirildi ve LED (Elipar Freelight II,3M-ESPE, Germany) kkayna: kullan larak polimerize edildi. Örnekler etüvde 37oC de 24 saat distile su içerisinde bekletildi. 30 saniye kalacak ekilde 5 ve 55°C termal siklus i lemi 10000 kez uyguland . Bütün di ler 24 saat % 0.5’lik metilen mavisi içerisinde bekletildi. Di ler mesio-distal yönde kesildi, stereo mikroskop alt nda oklüzal ve gingival duvarlar 0 ile 4 aras ndaki skorlar ile de:erlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler Kruskal Wallis ve Mann Whitney testleri ile de:erlendirildi. Bulgular: Oklüzal mikro s z nt n n de:erlendirilmesinde gruplar aras nda istatistiksel anlaml l k bulundu (P0.05). Gingival de ise üç grup aras nda istatistiksel anlaml l k bulunmad (p>0.05). Sonuç: Uygulanan adezivlerin kar la t r lmas nda; oklüzal ve gingival de total etch (Prime&Bond NT) adeziv sistem mikro s z nt yazaltmada di:er iki self etching (Xeno V, G Bond) adeziv sistemden daha ba ar l bulunmu tur

Keywords

S n f II kavite mikro s z nt termal siklus self etching adeziv

References

  • Ten Cate JM. Remineralization of caries lesions extending into polymerization of oral biomaterials. Dent Mater 2004;20: 80-7.
  • Van Meerberk B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M,Vjay P. Adhesion on enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28 :215-35.
  • Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. No-bottle vs muti-bottle dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 373-80.
  • Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems.Oper Dent 2000;25:75-80.
  • Abo T, Uno S, Sano H. Comparison of bonding efficacy of an all- in-one adhesive with a self-etching primer system. Eur J Oral Sci ;112:286-92. Ozok AR, Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater 2004;20:479-86.
  • De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesive to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent ;30:39-49. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Co. 1998:1-106.
  • Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Analysis of dentin-resin interface by use of laser raman spectroscopy.Dent Mater ;18:576-80
  • Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212
  • Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997;25:355-72.
  • Brunton PA, Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. A three-year evaluation of restorations placed with a smear layer-mediated dentin bonding agent in non-carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 1999; :333–41.
  • Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentin fluid. Am J Dent 2000;13:195–200.
  • Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM, Robles-Gijon V, Navajas JM. Influence of time and thermocycling on marginal sealing of several dentine adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 550-5.
  • Van Meerbeek B, Pertigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
  • Zorba YO, Bay nd r YZ, Y ld z M. Geçmi ten günümüze dentin bonding ajanlar. Atatürk Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2004;14:70-8. 38. Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N,
  • Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002;18:269-75. 39.Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A.
  • Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent ;30:371-82. 40. Zorba YO. Dört farkl self-etching bonding ajan n biyouyumlulu unun Tnfc ve di er inflamasyon kriterleri kullan larak kar la t r lmas . 2006, Erzurum 41.Kiremitçi A, Yalç n F, Gökalp S. Bonding to enamel to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quint. Int 2004; 35: 367-70.
  • Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003;82:141
  • Pashley DH. The effects of acid etching on the pulpodentin complex. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 229-42.
  • Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the nfiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-73.
  • Ar kan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2005:8;63-70
  • Borges MA, Matos IC, Dias KR. Influence of two self-etching primer systems on enamel adhesion. Braz Dent J 2007;18:113-8.
  • Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.Oper Dent 1999;24:172-80.
  • Kanca J. Bonding to tooth structure. A rationale for a clinical protocol.J Esthet Dent 1989:1:135-138.
  • Gvvinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:73
  • Perdigab J, Swift EJ. Analysis of dental adhesive systems using scanning electromicroscopy. Int Dent J 1994; 44: 349-359
  • Hürmüzlü F, Siso 2H, I n D. S n f II restorasyonlarda be restoratif materyalin mikros z nt de erlendirmesi Cumhuriyet Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2002;5:67-70
  • Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Papathanasiou A, Kastali S, García- Godoye F. Microleakage of a microhybrid composite resin using three different adhesive placement techniques. J Adhes Dent 2004 ;6:135-9.
  • Ar kan S, Alpaslan G, Turgut MD. Farkl tekniklerle yap lan S n f II restorasyonlar n mikros z nt ve kenar uyumu aç s ndan de erlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniv Di Hek Fak Derg 2005;29: 33-41.
  • Grossman ES, Sparrius O. Marginal adaptation of composite resin-restored dentinal cavities. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:519–522.
  • Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S. Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: Effect of load cycling, thermal cycling and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:194–203.
  • Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycling on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper Dent. ;25:451–459. [PubMed] Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2002;18:111–
  • Erdilek D, Dörter C, Koray F, Kunzelmann KH, Efes BG, Gomec Y. Effect of thermo-mechanical load cycling on microleakage in class II ormocer restorations. Eur J Dent. 2009; 3: 200–205. Yaz<Ema Adresi: Dr. Mehmet DALLI
  • Dicle Üniversitesi Di Hekimli i Fakültesi Di Hastal klar ve Tedavisi Anabilim Dal Diyarbak r Tel : 0 412 2488101 Faks
  • E-posta : mdalli@dicle.edu.tr
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Bayram İnce

Mehmet Dalli

Emrullah Bahşi

Cafer Sahbaz

Hakan Çolak

Ertugrul Ercan

Publication Date October 30, 2011
Submission Date October 30, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2009Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote İnce B, Dalli M, Bahşi E, Sahbaz C, Çolak H, Ercan E (October 1, 2011) Sınıf II kavitelerdeki üç farklı adeziv sistemin mikrosızıntılarının sem ile in vitro olarak incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 12 2 111–118.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.