Abstract
Objectives: This study was examined thesurface microhardness of three kind of bulk fillcomposites Surefil SDR flow, Tetric, EvoCeram,X-tra base)Materials and Methods: Ten specimens of2mm, 4mm thickness and 4mm diameter of eachbulk fill composite were polymerized using ahalogen light and a blue light-emitted diode.Microhardness evaluation was performed at the topand bottom surfaces for each specimen using aVickers microhardness tester.Results: All of the materials were cured withthe light sources and the values obtained for thebottom surfaces were found to be lower than thevalues of top surfaces. Highest microhardness level(40.02±4.06)among all composite materialsbelonged to Xtra base composite group, whereaslowest microhardness level (5.80±0.83) was ofSDR composite specimens.Conclusions: Hardness ratio range was between0.19±0.3 and 0.72±0.06. Hardness ratio value wasfound to be lower than 0.80 for all compositegroups.
Keywords
References
- Kaynaklar
- Dayangaç B. Kompozit Restorasyonlar. Quintessence 2011: 1-25.
- Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1992; 20: 183–188.
- Pilo R, Oelgiesser D, Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent 1999; 27: 235–41.
- Surefil SDR flow Directions For Use. Dentsply Caulk; 2009.
- Venus Bulk Fill Product Profile. Heraeus Kulzer; 2011.
- Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill Press Release. Ivoclar Vivadent; 2011.
- Price RBT, Ehrnford L, Andreou P, Felix CA. Comparasion of quartz-tungsten-halogen, light-emitting diode, and plasma arc curing lights. J.Adhes Dent 2003; 5(3): 193-207.
- Voltarelli FR, Claudia Daroz BS, Alves MC, Peris AR, Marchi GM. Effect of different light-curing devices and aging procedures on composite knoop microhardness. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23(4): 473-479
- McCabe, J.F. applied dental materials. Diş hekimliği maddeler bilgisi, (Çeviri: Nayır, E.) İstanbul Üni. Basımevi, İstanbul: 1999.
- Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 932–937.
- Zaimoğlu, A., Can, G., Ersoy, A.E. ve Aksu, L. Diş Hekimliğinde Maddeler Bilgisi. A.Ü. Basımevi, Ankara: 1993.
- Hubbezoglu I, Bolayir G, Dogan OM, Dogan A, Ozer A and Bulent B. Microhardness Evaluation of Resin Composites Polymerized by Three Different Light Sources. Dental Materials Journal 2007; 26: 845-853.
- Topcu FT, Erdemir U, Sahinkesen G, Yildiz E,2 Uslan I, Acikel C. Evaluation of Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Wear Behavior of Different Types of Resin Composites Polymerized With Two Different Light Sources. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2010; 92B: 470–478.
- Assmussen E, Peutsfeldt A. Light emitting diode curing: influence on selected properties of resin composites. Quintessence Int 2003; 34(1): 71-5.
- Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scan J Dent Res 1982; 90: 490–496.
- Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polimerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 1165-1173.
- Neo BJ, Soh MS, Teo JW, Yap AUJ. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different light –curing regimes. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 671-675.
- Salerno M, Derchi G, Thorat S, Ceseraciu L, Ruffilli R, Barone AC. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 1221-1228.
- Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Hüslerb J, Lussia A. Depth of cure of resin composites: Is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 2012; 28: 521–528.
- Hammouda IM. Effect of light-curing method on wear and hardness of composite resin. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Mater 2010; 3: 216-222.
Abstract
Özet
Amaç: bu çalışma üç farklı bulk fill kompozit (Surefil SDR flow, Dentsply, Caulk, USA and Tetric, EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein, X-tra base, Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) mikrosertliklerinin araştırılmasıdır.
Gereç Yöntem: Çalışma için 4mm ve 2mm kalınlığında 4mm yarı çapında hazırlanan herbir bulk fill kompozit Plama ark ışık kayanağı kullanılarak polimerize edildi. Her bir örneğin alt ve üst mikrosertlik değerlendirmeleri Vickers mikrosertlik test cihazı kullanılarak yapıldı
Bulgular: çalışmada kullanılan tüm materyallerin polimerizasyonu ışık kaynağı ile yapıldıktan sonra alt yüzeylere ait sertlik değeri üst yüzeylerden daha düşük bulundu. Tüm komozitler arasında en yüksek Vickers sertlik değeri (40.02±4.06) olan grup üst Xtra base bulk fill kompozitine aitdir. En düşük Vickers sertlik değeri (5.80±0.83) alt ölçüm yapılan SDR bulk fill grubuna aittir.
Sonuç: Tüm örnek gruplarına ait sertlik oranı 0.80 den daha düşük bulundu.örnek gruplarına ait sertlik oranı 0,19±0,3 ile 0,72±0,06 arasındadır.
Anahtar kelimeler: mikrosertlik, akışkan kompositler, sertlik oranı
Keywords
References
- Kaynaklar
- Dayangaç B. Kompozit Restorasyonlar. Quintessence 2011: 1-25.
- Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1992; 20: 183–188.
- Pilo R, Oelgiesser D, Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent 1999; 27: 235–41.
- Surefil SDR flow Directions For Use. Dentsply Caulk; 2009.
- Venus Bulk Fill Product Profile. Heraeus Kulzer; 2011.
- Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill Press Release. Ivoclar Vivadent; 2011.
- Price RBT, Ehrnford L, Andreou P, Felix CA. Comparasion of quartz-tungsten-halogen, light-emitting diode, and plasma arc curing lights. J.Adhes Dent 2003; 5(3): 193-207.
- Voltarelli FR, Claudia Daroz BS, Alves MC, Peris AR, Marchi GM. Effect of different light-curing devices and aging procedures on composite knoop microhardness. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23(4): 473-479
- McCabe, J.F. applied dental materials. Diş hekimliği maddeler bilgisi, (Çeviri: Nayır, E.) İstanbul Üni. Basımevi, İstanbul: 1999.
- Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 932–937.
- Zaimoğlu, A., Can, G., Ersoy, A.E. ve Aksu, L. Diş Hekimliğinde Maddeler Bilgisi. A.Ü. Basımevi, Ankara: 1993.
- Hubbezoglu I, Bolayir G, Dogan OM, Dogan A, Ozer A and Bulent B. Microhardness Evaluation of Resin Composites Polymerized by Three Different Light Sources. Dental Materials Journal 2007; 26: 845-853.
- Topcu FT, Erdemir U, Sahinkesen G, Yildiz E,2 Uslan I, Acikel C. Evaluation of Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Wear Behavior of Different Types of Resin Composites Polymerized With Two Different Light Sources. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2010; 92B: 470–478.
- Assmussen E, Peutsfeldt A. Light emitting diode curing: influence on selected properties of resin composites. Quintessence Int 2003; 34(1): 71-5.
- Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scan J Dent Res 1982; 90: 490–496.
- Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polimerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 1165-1173.
- Neo BJ, Soh MS, Teo JW, Yap AUJ. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different light –curing regimes. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 671-675.
- Salerno M, Derchi G, Thorat S, Ceseraciu L, Ruffilli R, Barone AC. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 1221-1228.
- Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Hüslerb J, Lussia A. Depth of cure of resin composites: Is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fill materials? Dent Mater 2012; 28: 521–528.
- Hammouda IM. Effect of light-curing method on wear and hardness of composite resin. J Mechanical Behavior Biomedical Mater 2010; 3: 216-222.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 24, 2014 |
| Submission Date | September 15, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2014 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.