Farklı yumuşak astar malzemelerinin uzama miktarlarının ve PMMA kaideye bağlanma dayanımının karşılaştırılması
Öz
Objectives: The bond strength and elongation amount of different soft lining materials were evaluated in the current study.
Material and Methods: Following the flasking of wax specimens in dental stone, wax removal and processing of polymethylmetacrylate (Meliodent) denture material, 3 different soft relining materials (Molloplast-B, Mollosil Plus, Vertex Soft) were placed within the space prepared in the center of polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) specimens (n=8). Using a crosshead speed of 5mm/min, tensile test was continued until failure was occurred. Mean tensile strength (MPa) and mean elongation (mm) was measured. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test (α=0.05).
Results: Significant differences were found among the tensile bond strength results (p<0.05). The highest bond strength value was observed for acrylic base soft lining material (1.6 (0.2) MPa), while the lowest value was observed for autopolymerized silicon based material (0.9 (0.1) MPa). A significant difference was not found between the heat polymerized acrylic and the silicon based soft lining materials. All three materials showed similar values in terms of elongation amounts (p<0.05). The elongation amounts were 6 (2.1) mm for acrylic based soft lining material, 7.1 (1.8) mm for autopolymerized silicon soft lining material and 4.8 (2.3) mm for heat polymerized silicon material.
Conclusions: No significant difference was found between the heat polymerized acrylic and the silicone based soft lining materials. Autopolymerizing silicone based soft lining material has the lowest bond strength value. No significant difference was found for elongation amounts.
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmada farklı yumuşak astar malzemelerinin akrilik kaideye bağlanma dayanımları ve uzama oranları değerlendirilmiştir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Mum örneklerin mufla içine gömülmesi, mum atımı ve polimetilmetakrilat (Meliodent) kaide materyalinin tepimini takiben üç farklı yumuşak astar materyali (Molloplast-B, Mollosil Plus, Vertex Soft) mufla içerisindeki polimetilmetakrilat (PMMA) örneklerin ortasında oluşturulan boşluklara yerleştirildi (n=8). Çekme testi üniversal test cihazında 5mm/dak hızla örneklerde kopma meydana gelene kadar devam ettirildi. Ortalama çekme dayanımı (MPa) ve ortalama uzama miktarları (mm) ölçüldü. Sonuçlar tek-yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanılarak değerlendirildi (α=0,05).
Bulgular: Farklı astar materyallerinin çekme dayanımları arasında istatistiksel açıdan önemli fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Akril kaideye en yüksek bağlanma dayanımı akrilik esaslı yumuşak astar materyalinde (1,6 (0,2) MPa), en düşük bağlanma dayanımı ise otopolimerize silikon esaslı yumuşak astar materyalinde (0,9 (0,1) MPa) bulunmuştur. Isı ile polimerize olan akrilik ve silikon esaslı yumuşak astar materyallerinin bağlanma dayanımları arasında fark bulunamamıştır. Üç materyalin uzama miktarları arasında anlamlı fark bulunamamıştır. (p>0,05). Uzama miktarı akrilik esaslı yumuşak astar materyali için 6 (2,1) mm, otopolimerize silikon materyali için 7,1 (1,8) mm, ısı ile polimerize olan silikon materyali için ise 4,8 (2,3) mm bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: Isı ile polimerize olan akrilik ve silikon esaslı yumuşak astar malzemelerinin bağlanma dayanımları değerleri birbirine çok yakındır. Otopolimerizan silikon esaslı yumuşak astar materyalinin bağlanma dayanımı daha düşüktür. Grupların uzama miktarları açısından bir fark bulunamamıştır.
Anahtar kelimler: Yumuşak astar, kaide materyali, bağlanma dayanımı, uzama miktarı
Anahtar Kelimeler
Yumuşak astar kaide materyali bağlanma dayanımı uzama miktarı
Kaynakça
- Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam protezler. Üçüncü baskı. İstanbul: Teknografik Matbaacılar Sitesi; 1998. p. 677-688. 2.
- Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2006. 3.
- Brown D. Resilient soft liners and tissue conditioners. Br Dent J 1988;164:357-360.[CrossRef] 4.
- Sarac D, Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Yapici O, Yuzbasioglu E. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 5.
- Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, Sarac D, Yapici O. Effect of denture base
- microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-287.[CrossRef]
- Emmer TJ Jr, Emmer TJ Sr, Vaidynathan J, Vaidynathan TK. Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:595- 601.[CrossRef] Doğan
- materyallerin klinik endikasyonları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;15(1):70-75.
- Kulak-Özkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-310.[CrossRef]
- Meşe A, Güzel K. Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone- and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:153- 159.[CrossRef]
- El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:356-361. [CrossRef]
- Takahashi Y, Chai J, Kawaguchi M. Strength of relined denture base polymers subjected to long-term water immersion. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 205-208.
- Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material.
- ;76:535-540.[CrossRef]
- Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG, Jerolimov V. Bone strength of resilient lining materials to various denture base resins. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:167- 170.
- Baysan A, Parker S, Wright PS. Adhesion and tear energy of a long- term soft lining material activated by rapid microwave energy. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:182-187.[CrossRef]
- Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3:163- 174.
- Kutay O, Bilgin T, Sakar O, Beyli M. Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1994;2:123-126.
- Kutay O. Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:525- 531.[CrossRef]
- Mack PJ. Denture soft linings: materials available. Aust Dent J 1989;34:517-521.[CrossRef]
- McCabe JF. A polyvinylsiloxane denture soft lining material. J Dent 1998;26:521-526.[CrossRef]
- McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials.
- ;23:1347-1352.[CrossRef]
- Mese A, Guzel KG, Uysal E. Effect of storage duration on tensile bond strength of acrylic or silicone-based softdenture liners to a processed denture base polymer. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:31-35.
- Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, de Arruda Nobilo MA. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:516- 521.[CrossRef]
- Qudah S, Harrison A, Huggett R. Soft lining materials in prosthetic dentistry: a review. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:477-483.
- Sertgoz A, Kulak Y, Gedik H, Taskonak
- thermocycling on peel strength of six soft lining materials. J Oral Rehabil Wright PS. Characterization of the adhesion of soft lining materials to poly (methyl methacrylate). J Dent Res 1982;61:1002-1005.[CrossRef]
- Wright PS. Observations on long- term use of a soft-lining material for mandibular complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:385-392. [CrossRef]
- Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-346. 28.
- Schenk I, Schroder V, Ju¨ de HD. Bewertung der Haftfestigkeit von weichbleibenden
- tterungskunststoffen auf A-Silikonbasis zu PMMA-Prothesenbasiskunststoffen. Dtsch Zahn¨ arztl Z 2002;57:241-245.
- Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A 3rd, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J. Prosthet Dent 1992;68:368-371.[CrossRef]
- Evlioğlu G, Derviş E. Yumuşak astar maddeleri. Dişhekimliğinde Klinik Derg 1997; 10: 159-161.
- Graham BS, George DW, Burke J, Thomson JP. In vivo fungal presence and growth on two resilient denture lining. J Prosthet Dent 1991;4:528- 532.
- Canay ER, Hersek NE, Çerikçioğlu N. Color stability and microbiologic comparasion of two soft lining materials in vivo. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg 1995;19:134-138.
- Okita N, Orstavik D, Orstavik J, Ostby K. In vivo and in vitro studies on soft denture materials: microbial adhesion and tests for antibacterial activity. Dent Mater 1991;7:155-160. [CrossRef]
- Bal BT, Yavuzyılmaz H. Yumuşak Astar Maddeleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006: Suppl.53-60. Zarb Prosthodontic edentulous dentures
- prostheses. 12 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2004. p. 190-207.
- Zaimoğlu A, Can G, Ersoy E, Aksu L. Diş hekimliğinde maddeler bilgisi. 1. baskı. Ankara: A.Ü. 1993.
- Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam protezler. 3. baskı, Cilt 2. İstanbul: Protez Akademisi ve Gnatoloji Derneği 2. Bilimsel Yayını; 1998.
- Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater [CrossRef]
- Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akinay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211-218. [CrossRef]
- Wagner WC, Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of processed soft denture liners. PartI: Initial properties. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:471-477.
- Murata H., Haberham R., Hamada T. Setting and stress relaxation behavior of resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 714-722.[CrossRef]
- Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:153-158.
Farklı yumuşak astar malzemelerinin uzama miktarlarının ve PMMA kaideye bağlanma dayanımının karşılaştırılması
Öz
Amaç: Bu çalışmada farklı yumuşak astar malzemelerinin dayanımları ve uzama oranları değerlendirilmiştir.akrilik kaideye bağlanma Gereç ve Yöntem: Mum örneklerin mufla içine gömülmesi, mum atımı ve polimetilmetakrilat (Meliodent) kaide materyalinin tepimini takiben üçfarklı yumuşak astar materyali (Molloplast-B, Mollosil Plus, Vertex Soft) mufla içerisindeki polimetilmetakrilat (PMMA) örneklerin ortasında oluşturulan boşluklara yerleştirildi (n=8). Çekme testi üniversal test cihazında 5mm/dak hızla örneklerde kopma meydana gelene kadar devam ettirildi. Ortalama çekme dayanımı (MPa) ve ortalama uzama miktarları (mm) ölçüldü. Sonuçlar tek-yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi kullanılarak değerlendirildi (α=0,05).Bulgular: Farklı astar materyallerinin çekme dayanımları arasında istatistiksel açıdan önemli fark bulunmuştur (p0,05). Uzama miktarı akrilik esaslı yumuşak astar materyali için 6 (2,1) mm, otopolimerize silikon materyali için 7,1 (1,8) mm, ısı ile polimerize olan silikon materyali için ise 4,8 (2,3) mm bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Isı ile polimerize olan akrilik ve silikon esaslı yumuşak astar malzemelerinin bağlanma
Anahtar Kelimeler
Yumuşak astar kaide materyali bağlanma dayanımı uzama miktarı
Kaynakça
- Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam protezler. Üçüncü baskı. İstanbul: Teknografik Matbaacılar Sitesi; 1998. p. 677-688. 2.
- Anusavice KJ. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2006. 3.
- Brown D. Resilient soft liners and tissue conditioners. Br Dent J 1988;164:357-360.[CrossRef] 4.
- Sarac D, Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Yapici O, Yuzbasioglu E. The evaluation of microleakage and bond strength of a silicone-based resilient liner following denture base surface pretreatment. J Prosthet Dent 5.
- Sarac YS, Basoglu T, Ceylan GK, Sarac D, Yapici O. Effect of denture base
- microleakage of a silicone-based resilient liner. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:283-287.[CrossRef]
- Emmer TJ Jr, Emmer TJ Sr, Vaidynathan J, Vaidynathan TK. Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:595- 601.[CrossRef] Doğan
- materyallerin klinik endikasyonları. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005;15(1):70-75.
- Kulak-Özkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone-based, resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:303-310.[CrossRef]
- Meşe A, Güzel K. Effect of storage duration on the hardness and tensile bond strength of silicone- and acrylic resin-based resilient denture liners to a processed denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:153- 159.[CrossRef]
- El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparative study of water sorption, solubility, and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:356-361. [CrossRef]
- Takahashi Y, Chai J, Kawaguchi M. Strength of relined denture base polymers subjected to long-term water immersion. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 205-208.
- Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material.
- ;76:535-540.[CrossRef]
- Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG, Jerolimov V. Bone strength of resilient lining materials to various denture base resins. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:167- 170.
- Baysan A, Parker S, Wright PS. Adhesion and tear energy of a long- term soft lining material activated by rapid microwave energy. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:182-187.[CrossRef]
- Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3:163- 174.
- Kutay O, Bilgin T, Sakar O, Beyli M. Tensile bond strength of a soft lining with acrylic denture base resins. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1994;2:123-126.
- Kutay O. Comparison of tensile and peel bond strengths of resilient liners. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:525- 531.[CrossRef]
- Mack PJ. Denture soft linings: materials available. Aust Dent J 1989;34:517-521.[CrossRef]
- McCabe JF. A polyvinylsiloxane denture soft lining material. J Dent 1998;26:521-526.[CrossRef]
- McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials.
- ;23:1347-1352.[CrossRef]
- Mese A, Guzel KG, Uysal E. Effect of storage duration on tensile bond strength of acrylic or silicone-based softdenture liners to a processed denture base polymer. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63:31-35.
- Pinto JR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, de Arruda Nobilo MA. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of 4 long-term soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:516- 521.[CrossRef]
- Qudah S, Harrison A, Huggett R. Soft lining materials in prosthetic dentistry: a review. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:477-483.
- Sertgoz A, Kulak Y, Gedik H, Taskonak
- thermocycling on peel strength of six soft lining materials. J Oral Rehabil Wright PS. Characterization of the adhesion of soft lining materials to poly (methyl methacrylate). J Dent Res 1982;61:1002-1005.[CrossRef]
- Wright PS. Observations on long- term use of a soft-lining material for mandibular complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:385-392. [CrossRef]
- Amin WM, Fletcher AM, Ritchie GM. The nature of the interface between polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials and soft lining materials. J Dent 1981;9:336-346. 28.
- Schenk I, Schroder V, Ju¨ de HD. Bewertung der Haftfestigkeit von weichbleibenden
- tterungskunststoffen auf A-Silikonbasis zu PMMA-Prothesenbasiskunststoffen. Dtsch Zahn¨ arztl Z 2002;57:241-245.
- Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A 3rd, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J. Prosthet Dent 1992;68:368-371.[CrossRef]
- Evlioğlu G, Derviş E. Yumuşak astar maddeleri. Dişhekimliğinde Klinik Derg 1997; 10: 159-161.
- Graham BS, George DW, Burke J, Thomson JP. In vivo fungal presence and growth on two resilient denture lining. J Prosthet Dent 1991;4:528- 532.
- Canay ER, Hersek NE, Çerikçioğlu N. Color stability and microbiologic comparasion of two soft lining materials in vivo. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg 1995;19:134-138.
- Okita N, Orstavik D, Orstavik J, Ostby K. In vivo and in vitro studies on soft denture materials: microbial adhesion and tests for antibacterial activity. Dent Mater 1991;7:155-160. [CrossRef]
- Bal BT, Yavuzyılmaz H. Yumuşak Astar Maddeleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2006: Suppl.53-60. Zarb Prosthodontic edentulous dentures
- prostheses. 12 th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2004. p. 190-207.
- Zaimoğlu A, Can G, Ersoy E, Aksu L. Diş hekimliğinde maddeler bilgisi. 1. baskı. Ankara: A.Ü. 1993.
- Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam protezler. 3. baskı, Cilt 2. İstanbul: Protez Akademisi ve Gnatoloji Derneği 2. Bilimsel Yayını; 1998.
- Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater [CrossRef]
- Aydin AK, Terzioglu H, Akinay AE, Ulubayram K, Hasirci N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999;15:211-218. [CrossRef]
- Wagner WC, Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of processed soft denture liners. PartI: Initial properties. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:471-477.
- Murata H., Haberham R., Hamada T. Setting and stress relaxation behavior of resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 714-722.[CrossRef]
- Jacobsen NL, Mitchell DL, Johnson DL, Holt RA. Lased and sandblasted denture base surface preparations affecting resilient liner bonding. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:153-158.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Original Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 19 Nisan 2012 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 25 Ekim 2011 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2012 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.