Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Influence of Surface Properties on Candida albicans Adhesion to Denture Base Materials Fabricated by Different Techniques

Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 427 - 434, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1744874

Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the surface roughness, wettability (contact angle), and Candida albicans (C. albicans) adhesion of denture base materials fabricated using different techniques.
Materials and Methods: Six materials were tested: conventional PMMA, CAD-CAM PMMA, PEEK, polyamide, titanium, and cobalt-chromium. Surface roughness (Ra) and contact angle (°) were measured, and Candida albicans adhesion was assessed by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL). Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction. Spearman’s correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between surface properties and fungal adhesion.
Results: Significant differences were found among the materials in surface roughness, contact angle, and Candida adhesion (p < 0.0001). Conventional PMMA, polyamide, and PEEK showed the highest surface roughness, whereas Co-Cr and titanium exhibited the smoothest surfaces. Contact angle measurements indicated that Co-Cr was the most hydrophobic, while titanium was the most hydrophilic. The highest Candida adhesion was observed on polyamide and PEEK, and the lowest on Co-Cr. Positive correlation was found between surface roughness and fungal adhesion (ρ = 0.625), while a negative correlation was found between contact angle and adhesion (ρ = –0.533).
Conclusion: Both surface roughness and wettability significantly influence C. albicans adhesion. Materials with smoother and more hydrophilic surfaces, such as CAD-CAM PMMA and titanium, demonstrated reduced fungal colonization, highlighting the importance of material selection in preventing prosthesis-related infections.

References

  • 1. Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus conventional denture base resins: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:581-588.
  • 2. Hada T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Soeda Y, Katheng A, Minakuchi S. Effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of CAD/CAM PMMA to auto-polymerizing resin. J Prosthodont Res 2021;65:247-253.
  • 3. Benli M, Şahin S, Başaran EG. Evaluation of surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion on PEEK and PMMA denture base materials. Polymers 2020;12:1446.
  • 4. Güneş F, Kocacıklı M, Korkmaz T. Dental implantolojide polietereterketon (PEEK): Geleneksel derleme. Selcuk Dent J 2023;10:611-617.
  • 5. Karam AA, El-Sheikh MM. Evaluation of microbial adhesion and level of secretory immunoglobulin A in saliva in patients wearing conventional and flexible complete dentures. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2019;21:73-80.
  • 6. Uçar Y, Akova T, Aysan İ. Mechanical properties of polyamide versus different PMMA denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2012;21:173-176.
  • 7. Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2010;29:353-61.
  • 8. Sultana N, Ahmed S, Nandini VV, Lathief J, Boruah S. An in vitro comparison of microbial adhesion on three different denture base materials and its relation to surface roughness. Cureus 2023;15:e370600254.
  • 9. Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S, Nomura N. Fabrication of titanium alloy frameworks for complete dentures by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1441-1447.
  • 10. Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang Y. Development of lightweight and high-strength hollow titanium-plated denture material using three-dimensional printing. Odontology 2024;112:45-53.
  • 11. Danchik C, Casadevall A. Role of cell surface hydrophobicity in the pathogenesis of medically significant fungi. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;10:594973.
  • 12. Saygın AG, Tugut F, Tunc T, Okutan ENK. Evaluation of surface treatment on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion of denture base materials in common beverages. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2025;28:54-61
  • 13. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-269.
  • 14. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man: a review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
  • 15. Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent 1998;26:577-583.
  • 16. Murat S, Alp G, Alp S, Yilmaz B. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion of CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:623-628.
  • 17. Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Khan SQ. Hydrophobicity of denture base resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2022;12:139-159.
  • 18. Srivastava G, Padhiary SK, Schimmel M, Schenk N, Cakmak G, Roccuzzo A, Molinero - Mourelle P. Performance of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus cobalt chromium to fabricate removable partial denture frameworks: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2025;134: 652.e1-652.e10
  • 19. Liu Y, Fang M, Zhao R, Liu H, Li K, Tian M, Niu L, Xie R, Bai S. Clinical applications of polyetheretherketone in removable dental prostheses: accuracy, characteristics, and performance. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14:4615.
  • 20. Al-Dwairi ZN, Al Haj E, Al-Masri M, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Öztürk AN. In vitro Candida adhesion to denture base materials: a comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:821-828.
  • 21. Chladek G, Pakieła W, Żmudzki J. Antifungal and mechanical properties of denture soft lining material modified by silver nanoparticles. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:276-282.
  • 22. Urban VM, Seo RS, Giampaolo ET, Jorge JH, Campanha NH, Machado AL. Effect of microwave disinfection on the flexural strength of hard chairside reline resins. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:312-319.
  • 23. Gendreau L, Loewy ZG. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. J Prosthodont 2021;30:305-313.
  • 24. Arutyunov SD, Arutyunov AS, Shagaliev RM, Arutyunov SS, Ibragimov RR. Comparative evaluation of fungal adhesion on denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2022;31:520-527.
  • 25. Li Y, Lee CH, Tang G, Chye FY. Effect of salivary pellicle on biofilm formation of Candida albicans on denture base acrylic resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:742-749.
  • 26. Hannig C, Hannig M. The pellicle and erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2021;29:206-215.
  • 27. Jakubovics NS, Goodman SD, Mashburn-Warren L, Stafford GP, Cieplik F. The dental plaque biofilm matrix. Periodontol 2000 2021;86:32-56.
  • 28. Vukosavljevic D, Custodio W, Buzalaf MAR, Siqueira WL. The salivary proteome and its role in host–microbe interactions. J Dent Res 2020;99:613-622.
  • 29. Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2021;40:1030-1036.
  • 30. Al-Thobity AM, Gad MM, ArRejaie AS, Alnassar T, Akhtar S. Comparative effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion to flexible denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2020;29:422-429.
  • 31. Singh S, Palaskar JN, Mittal S. Comparative evaluation of water sorption and solubility of polyamide and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020;20:377-383.
  • 32. Osman RB, Ma S, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Comparative evaluation of Candida albicans biofilm formation on 3D-printed, milled, and conventional denture base resins. Polymers 2023;15:1836.
  • 33. Al-Fouzan AF, Al-Mejrad LA, Albarrag AM. Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: a comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:402-408.
  • 34. Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological and aesthetic outcomes. J Prosthodont 2018;27:535-543.
  • 35. Bahig DE, Fahmy BS, Zaki LF. Biological assessment and patient satisfaction of PEKK versus Co-Cr framework in mandibular fixed hybrid prosthesis. Adv Dent J 2023;5:563-572.
  • 36. Ohkubo C, Hanatani S, Hosoi T. Present status of titanium removable dentures – a review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:706-714.
  • 37. Baena-Monroy T, Moreno-Maldonado V, Franco-Martínez F. Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans colonization in patients wearing dental prosthesis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10:27-39.

Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 3, 427 - 434, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1744874

Abstract

References

  • 1. Kalberer N, Mehl A, Schimmel M, Müller F, Srinivasan M. CAD-CAM milled versus conventional denture base resins: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:581-588.
  • 2. Hada T, Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Arakida T, Soeda Y, Katheng A, Minakuchi S. Effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of CAD/CAM PMMA to auto-polymerizing resin. J Prosthodont Res 2021;65:247-253.
  • 3. Benli M, Şahin S, Başaran EG. Evaluation of surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion on PEEK and PMMA denture base materials. Polymers 2020;12:1446.
  • 4. Güneş F, Kocacıklı M, Korkmaz T. Dental implantolojide polietereterketon (PEEK): Geleneksel derleme. Selcuk Dent J 2023;10:611-617.
  • 5. Karam AA, El-Sheikh MM. Evaluation of microbial adhesion and level of secretory immunoglobulin A in saliva in patients wearing conventional and flexible complete dentures. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2019;21:73-80.
  • 6. Uçar Y, Akova T, Aysan İ. Mechanical properties of polyamide versus different PMMA denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2012;21:173-176.
  • 7. Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2010;29:353-61.
  • 8. Sultana N, Ahmed S, Nandini VV, Lathief J, Boruah S. An in vitro comparison of microbial adhesion on three different denture base materials and its relation to surface roughness. Cureus 2023;15:e370600254.
  • 9. Kanazawa M, Iwaki M, Minakuchi S, Nomura N. Fabrication of titanium alloy frameworks for complete dentures by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1441-1447.
  • 10. Zhou Y, Li Y, Zhang Y. Development of lightweight and high-strength hollow titanium-plated denture material using three-dimensional printing. Odontology 2024;112:45-53.
  • 11. Danchik C, Casadevall A. Role of cell surface hydrophobicity in the pathogenesis of medically significant fungi. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;10:594973.
  • 12. Saygın AG, Tugut F, Tunc T, Okutan ENK. Evaluation of surface treatment on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion of denture base materials in common beverages. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2025;28:54-61
  • 13. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-269.
  • 14. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man: a review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
  • 15. Radford DR, Sweet SP, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials with different surface finishes. J Dent 1998;26:577-583.
  • 16. Murat S, Alp G, Alp S, Yilmaz B. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion of CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:623-628.
  • 17. Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Khan SQ. Hydrophobicity of denture base resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2022;12:139-159.
  • 18. Srivastava G, Padhiary SK, Schimmel M, Schenk N, Cakmak G, Roccuzzo A, Molinero - Mourelle P. Performance of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus cobalt chromium to fabricate removable partial denture frameworks: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2025;134: 652.e1-652.e10
  • 19. Liu Y, Fang M, Zhao R, Liu H, Li K, Tian M, Niu L, Xie R, Bai S. Clinical applications of polyetheretherketone in removable dental prostheses: accuracy, characteristics, and performance. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14:4615.
  • 20. Al-Dwairi ZN, Al Haj E, Al-Masri M, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Öztürk AN. In vitro Candida adhesion to denture base materials: a comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:821-828.
  • 21. Chladek G, Pakieła W, Żmudzki J. Antifungal and mechanical properties of denture soft lining material modified by silver nanoparticles. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:276-282.
  • 22. Urban VM, Seo RS, Giampaolo ET, Jorge JH, Campanha NH, Machado AL. Effect of microwave disinfection on the flexural strength of hard chairside reline resins. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:312-319.
  • 23. Gendreau L, Loewy ZG. Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis. J Prosthodont 2021;30:305-313.
  • 24. Arutyunov SD, Arutyunov AS, Shagaliev RM, Arutyunov SS, Ibragimov RR. Comparative evaluation of fungal adhesion on denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2022;31:520-527.
  • 25. Li Y, Lee CH, Tang G, Chye FY. Effect of salivary pellicle on biofilm formation of Candida albicans on denture base acrylic resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:742-749.
  • 26. Hannig C, Hannig M. The pellicle and erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2021;29:206-215.
  • 27. Jakubovics NS, Goodman SD, Mashburn-Warren L, Stafford GP, Cieplik F. The dental plaque biofilm matrix. Periodontol 2000 2021;86:32-56.
  • 28. Vukosavljevic D, Custodio W, Buzalaf MAR, Siqueira WL. The salivary proteome and its role in host–microbe interactions. J Dent Res 2020;99:613-622.
  • 29. Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2021;40:1030-1036.
  • 30. Al-Thobity AM, Gad MM, ArRejaie AS, Alnassar T, Akhtar S. Comparative effect of different surface treatments on surface roughness and Candida albicans adhesion to flexible denture base materials. J Prosthodont 2020;29:422-429.
  • 31. Singh S, Palaskar JN, Mittal S. Comparative evaluation of water sorption and solubility of polyamide and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020;20:377-383.
  • 32. Osman RB, Ma S, Alharbi N, Wismeijer D. Comparative evaluation of Candida albicans biofilm formation on 3D-printed, milled, and conventional denture base resins. Polymers 2023;15:1836.
  • 33. Al-Fouzan AF, Al-Mejrad LA, Albarrag AM. Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: a comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:402-408.
  • 34. Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological and aesthetic outcomes. J Prosthodont 2018;27:535-543.
  • 35. Bahig DE, Fahmy BS, Zaki LF. Biological assessment and patient satisfaction of PEKK versus Co-Cr framework in mandibular fixed hybrid prosthesis. Adv Dent J 2023;5:563-572.
  • 36. Ohkubo C, Hanatani S, Hosoi T. Present status of titanium removable dentures – a review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:706-714.
  • 37. Baena-Monroy T, Moreno-Maldonado V, Franco-Martínez F. Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus mutans colonization in patients wearing dental prosthesis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10:27-39.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Prosthodontics
Journal Section RA
Authors

Onur Topaloğlu 0000-0002-4261-4815

Ayhan Gürbüz 0000-0003-4066-9609

Sema Murat 0000-0003-0632-5095

Publication Date September 30, 2025
Submission Date July 18, 2025
Acceptance Date September 3, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 28 Issue: 3

Cite

EndNote Topaloğlu O, Gürbüz A, Murat S (September 1, 2025) Influence of Surface Properties on Candida albicans Adhesion to Denture Base Materials Fabricated by Different Techniques. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 28 3 427–434.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.