Evaluation of Morphometric Characteristics of Mandibular Foramen and Mandibular Ramus in Different Vertical Growth Patterns: a CBCT Study
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study is to reveal the morphometric characteristics of the mandibular ramus area and mandibular foramen in non-growing patients with different vertical facial types and clinically balanced skeletal pattern in sagittal direction.
Materials and Methods: Sixty adult patients were divided into three groups by FMA angle. Groups were created as 20 high-angle (HA), 20 normal-angle (NA) and 20 low-angle (LA). Mandibular foramen location (MFL), mandibular foramen width (MFW), ramus height and ramus width were determined using CBCT images.
Results: In the LA group, MFL was observed to be closest to the mandibular notch, and furthest from the posterior border of the ramus on both sides (p<.000). MFW was observed to be significantly smaller in the LA group. (p<000). The ramus width measurements were found to be insignificant among the groups (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Vertical facial types may give a clue regarding the morphometric characteristics of the mandibular foramen and mandibular ramus area.
Ethical Statement
Ethics declarations Ethics approval was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval and consent to participate This study is approved of by the Ethics Committee of the Akdeniz University (ethic approval no: 2023/640). Participants were included in the study after written informed consent obtained from the participants.
Supporting Institution
None
Thanks
None
References
- 1. Verhelst PJ, Van der Cruyssen F, De Laat, R. Jacobs A, Politis C. The biomechanical effect of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the temporomandibular joint: Current perspectives on the remodeling spectrum. Front Physiol 2019;10:1021.
- 2. Park J, Hong KE, Yun JE, Shin ES, Kim CH, Kim BJ, Kim JH. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle in unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy combined with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for asymmetric class III malocclusion. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;47:373–381.
- 3. Wolford LM. The sagittal split ramus osteotomy as the preferred treatment for mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;58:310–312.
- 4. Park JH, Jung HD, Kim HJ, Jung YS. Anatomical study of the location of the antilingula, lingula, and mandibular foramen for vertical ramus osteotomy. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;40:1–6.
- 5. Gustinna Wadu S, Penhall B, Townsend GC. Morphological variability of the human inferior alveolar nerve. Clinical Anatomy 1997;10:82–87.
- 6. Yu SK, Lee MH, Jeon YH, Chung YY, Kim HJ. Anatomical configuration of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle: a histomorphometric analysis. Surg Radiol Anat 2016;38:195–201.
- 7. Alves N, Deana NF. Morphometric study of mandibular foramen in macerated skulls to contribute to the development of sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) technique. Surg Radiol Anat 2014;36:839–845.
- 8. Correa S, Lopes Motta RH, Silva MBF, Figueroba SR, Groppo FC, Ramacciato JC. Position of the mandibular foramen in different facial shapes assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-A cross-sectional retrospective study. Open Dent J 2020;13:544–550.
- 9. Epars JF, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S. Changes in the location of the human mandibular foramen as a function of growth and vertical facial type. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:375–379.
- 10. Matveeva N, Popovska L, Evrosimovska B, Chadikovska E, Nikolovska J. Morphological alterations in the position of the mandibular foramen in dentate and edentate mandibles. Anat Sci Int 2014;93:340–350.
- 11. Park HS, Lee JH. A comparative study on the location of the mandibular foramen in CBCT of normal occlusion and skeletal class II and III malocclusion. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;37:244–251.
- 12. Da Fontoura RA, Vasconcellos HA, Campos AES. Morphologic basis for the intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: Anatomic and radiographic localization of the mandibular foramen. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60:660–665.
- 13. Kim SG, Park SS. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2438–2444.
- 14. Iwanaga J, Kikuta S, Ibaragi S, Watanabe K, Kusukawa J, Tubbs RS. Clinical anatomy of the accessory mandibular foramen: application to mandibular ramus osteotomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2020;42:41–47.
- 15. Sahoo NK, Kaur P, Roy ID, Sharma R. Complications of sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2017;29:100–104.
- 16. Lee CH, Lee BS, Choi BJ, Lee JW, Ohe JY, Yoo HY, Kwon YD. Recovery of inferior alveolar nerve injury after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO): A retrospective study. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;38:1–4.
- 17. Findik Y, Yildirim D, Baykul T. Three-dimensional anatomic analysis of the lingula and mandibular foramen: A cone beam computed tomography study. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:607–610.
- 18. Daw Jr JL, de la Paz MG, Aitken ME, Patel PK. The mandibular foramen: An anatomic study and its relevance to the sagittal ramus osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg 1994;10:475–479.
- 19. Kaffe I, Ardekian L, Gelerenter I, Taicher S. Location of the mandibular foramen in panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:662–669.
- 20. Rashid SA, Ali J. Sex determination using linear measurements related to the mental and mandibular foramina vertical positions on digital panoramic images. J Bagh Coll Dent 2011;23:59–64.
- 21. Eliasova H, Dostalova T, Prochazka A, Sediva E, Horacek M, Urbanova P, Hlinakova P. Comparison of 2D OPG image versus orthopantomogram from 3D CBCT from the forensic point of view. Leg Med 2021;48:101802.
- 22. Güneş N, Güler R, Ağın HD, Dündar S, Eratilla V. A retrospective evaluation of bifid mandibular canal prevalence of Southeastern Anatolia population by cone-beam computed tomography. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2022;25:42-46.
- 23. Ramirez-Yañez GO, Stewart A, Franken E, Campos K. Prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in growing patients. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:236–242.
- 24. Celik S, Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Sekerci AE. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthod 2016;86:271–277.
- 25. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Nixon WL. Occlusal forces in normal and long-face adults. J Dent Res 1983;62:566–570.
- 26. Sella-Tunis T, Pokhojaev A, Sarig R, O'Higgins P, May. Human mandibular shape is associated with masticatory muscle force. Sci Rep 2018;8:6042.
- 27. Mann RW, Manabe J, Byrd JE. Relationship of the parietal foramen and complexity of the human sagittal suture. Int. J. Morphol 2019;27:553–564.
- 28. Sassouni V. Diagnosis and treatment planning via roentgenographic cephalometry. Am J Orthod 1958;44:433–463
- 29. Muller G. Growth and development of the middle face. J Dent Res 1963;42:385–389.
- 30. Schudy F. Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment. Angle Orthod 1964;34:75–93
- 31. Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2:200.
- 32. Hayward J, Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. The mandibular foramen: its anteroposterior position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44:837-843.
- 33. Nicholson ML. A study of the position of the mandibular foramen in the adult human mandible. Anat Rec 1985;212:110–112.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics |
| Journal Section | RA |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 30, 2025 |
| Submission Date | January 21, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | June 16, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 28 Issue: 3 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.