Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 21 - 28, 28.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1447652

Abstract

References

  • 1. Siewert B, Parra M. A new group of materials in dentistry. Zeitschrift für zahnärztliche Implantologie. 2013; 29:148-159.
  • 2. Karunagaran S, Paprocki GJ, Wicks R, Markose S. A review of implant abutments--abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2013 Fall-Winter;93(2):18-23; quiz 23-4. PMID: 24611217.
  • 3. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Aug;16(4):383-92. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a32570. PMID: 25133270.
  • 4. Bechir ES, Bechir A, Gioga C, Manu R, Burcea A, Dascalu IT. The advantages of BioHPP polymer as superstructure material in oral implantology. Materiale Plastice. 2016; 53:394-398.
  • 5. Sloan R, Hollis W, Selecman A, Jain V, Versluis A. Bond strength of lithium disilicate to polyetheretherketone. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Apr; 10:S0022-3913(21)00110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.025. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33846011.
  • 6. Georgiev J, Vlahova A, Kissov H, Aleksandrov S, Kazakova R. Possible application of BioHPP in prosthetic dentistry: A literature review. Journal of IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers. 2018; 24:1896-1898.
  • 7. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Oct;16(5):465-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a32806. PMID: 25264546.
  • 8. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001. PMID: 26520679.
  • 9. Liebermann A, Keul C, Bähr N, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Impact of plasma treatment of PMMA-based CAD/CAM blanks on surface properties as well as on adhesion to self-adhesive resin composite cements. Dent Mater. 2013 Sep;29(9):935-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 21. PMID: 23880323.
  • 10. Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning. 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):64-75. doi: 10.1002/sca.21089. Epub 2013 Apr 3. PMID: 23553954.
  • 11. Stawarczyk B, Thrun H, Eichberger M, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Schmidlin PR. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Sep 4. PMID: 26344191.
  • 12. Prado M, Menezes MSO, Gomes BPFA, Barbosa CAM, Athias L, Simão RA. Surface modification of gutta-percha cones by non-thermal plasma. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Nov 1;68:343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.062. Epub 2016 May 16. PMID: 27524029.
  • 13. Chen M, Zhang Y, Sky Driver M, Caruso AN, Yu Q, Wang Y. Surface modification of several dental substrates by non-thermal, atmospheric plasma brush. Dent Mater. 2013 Aug;29(8):871-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 4. PMID: 23755823; PMCID: PMC3730850.
  • 14. Zhang Y, Yu Q, Wang Y. Non-thermal atmospheric plasmas in dental restoration: improved resin adhesive penetration. J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):1033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent. 2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 21. PMID: 24859333; PMCID: PMC4211626.
  • 15. Chen M, Zhang Y, Dusevich V, Liu Y, Yu Q, Wang Y. Non-thermal atmospheric plasma brush induces HEMA grafting onto dentin collagen. Dent Mater. 2014 Dec;30(12):1369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 11. PMID: 25458523; PMCID: PMC4254614.
  • 16. Dong X, Ritts AC, Staller C, Yu Q, Chen M, Wang Y. Evaluation of plasma treatment effects on improving adhesive-dentin bonding by using the same tooth controls and varying cross-sectional surface areas. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Aug;121(4):355-62. doi: 10.1111/eos.12052. Epub 2013 May 4. PMID: 23841788; PMCID: PMC3711654.
  • 17. Ritts AC, Li H, Yu Q, Xu C, Yao X, Hong L, Wang Y. Dentin surface treatment using a non-thermal argon plasma brush for interfacial bonding improvement in composite restoration. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Oct;118(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00761.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16. PMID: 20831586; PMCID: PMC2939732.
  • 18. Gunes B, Yeter KY, Terlemez A, Seker B, Altay Y. Dentinal tubule penetration of endodontic sealers after nonthermal plasma treatment: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Jun;82(6):903-908. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23237. Epub 2019 Feb 27. PMID: 30811819.
  • 19. Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater. 2014 Aug;30(8):e209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 24. PMID: 24768752.
  • 20. Williams T, Yu H, Woo R, Grigoriev M, Cheng D, Hicks R.F. Atmospheric pressure plasma as a method for improving adhesive bonding. Aerosp Mater Process LLC, 2014, 2631.
  • 21. Labriaga W, Song SY, Park JH, Ryu JJ, Lee JY, Shin SW. Effect of non-thermal plasma on the shear bond strength of resin cements to Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Dec;10(6):408-414. doi: 10.4047/jap. 2018.10.6.408. Epub 2018 Dec 19. PMID: 30584469; PMCID: PMC6302079.
  • 22. Dede DÖ, Küçükekenci AS, Kahveci Ç. Influence of chairside surface treatments on the shear bond strength of PEKK polymer to veneering resin materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Apr;125(4):703.e1-703.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020. 10.031. Epub 2021 Feb 5. PMID: 33551138.
  • 23. Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):e246-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PMID: 29935768.
  • 24. Schwitalla AD, Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD. The impact of argon/oxygen low-pressure plasma on shear bond strength between a veneering composite and different PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2017 Sep;33(9):990-994. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 24. PMID: 28655478.
  • 25. Schmidlin PR, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B (2016) Glycine: A potential coupling agent to bond to helium plasma treated PEEK?. Dent Mater, 32, 2, 305-310.
  • 26. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Oct;101(7):1209-16. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32932. Epub 2013 Apr 6. PMID: 23564476.
  • 27. Bogle MA, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology in low-energy full-facial rejuvenation. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Feb;143(2):168-74. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.2.168. PMID: 17309997.
  • 28. Han GJ, Chung SN, Chun BH, Kim CK, Oh KH, Cho BH. Effect of the applied power of atmospheric pressure plasma on the adhesion of composite resin to dental ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(5):461-9. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a25688. PMID: 22724108.
  • 29. Duske K, Koban I, Kindel E, Schröder K, Nebe B, Holtfreter B, Jablonowski L, Weltmann KD, Kocher T. Atmospheric plasma enhances wettability and cell spreading on dental implant metals. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Apr;39(4):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01853.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PMID: 22324415.
  • 30. Jha S., Bhowmik S., Bhatnagar N., Bhattacharya N. K., Deka U., Iqbal H. M. S., Benedictus R. Experimental investigation into the effect of adhesion properties of PEEK modified by atmospheric pressure plasma and low pressure plasma. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2010; 118(1), 173-179.
  • 31. Iqbal H. M. S., Bhowmik S., Benedictus R. Surface modification of high performance polymers by atmospheric pressure plasma and failure mechanism of adhesive bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2010; 30(6), 418-424.
  • 32. International organization for standardization, ISO TS 11405. Dental materials. Testing of adhesion to tooth structure, 2003.
  • 33. Türkkal F. Farklı yüzey modifikasyon yöntemlerinin; polieter eter keton (peek) materyalinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü, ıslanabilirliği ve kompozit veneer materyali ile bağlanma dayanımı üzerine olan etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Uzmanlık Tezi, Kırıkkale, 2019.

The Effect of Various Durations of Plasma Treatment on The Surface Roughness and The Bond Strength of Polyetheretherketone

Year 2025, Volume: 28 Issue: 1, 21 - 28, 28.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1447652

Abstract

ÇEŞİTLİ SÜRELERDEKİ PLAZMA İŞLEMİNİN POLİETER-ETER-KETONUN YÜZEY PÜRÜZLÜLÜĞÜNE VE KOMPOZİT REZİNİNE BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA ETKİSİ
Amaç: Bu çalışma, farklı sürelerdeki plazma işleminin polietereterketonun yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve kompozit rezine bağlanma dayanımı üzerindeki etkisini araştırmayı amaçladı.
Yöntemler: Al2O3 ile kumlanan yüzeyler, silisyum karbür zımpara kağıdı ile zımparalanarak standardizasyonu sağlanan 36 adet numune (7x7x2 mm boyutunda) PEEK hazırlandı. Örnekler rastgele dört gruba ayrıldılar: (A)kumlama (kontrol), 1 dakika plazma(B), 2 dakika plazma(C) ve 4 dakika plazma(D). Kompozit rezinle adezyonu sağlanan numunelerin bağlanma dayanımı değerleri ölçüldü. Veriler varyans analizi ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testinin yanı sıra yüzey pürüzlülüğü ile yapışma mukavemeti arasındaki Pearson Korelasyon Katsayısı kullanılarak değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Varyans analizi ile değişen plazma tedavisi sürelerinin pürüzlülük (p=0,182) ve bağlanma kuvveti (p=0,345) üzerinde anlamlı bir etki göstermedi.
Sonuç: En yüksek ve en düşük pürüzlülük değerleri sırasıyla kontrol grubunda (A) ve 2 dakikalık tedavi grubunda (C) bulundu. En yüksek ve en düşük bağlanma mukavemeti değerleri sırasıyla 4 dakikalık tedavi grubunda (D) ve 1 dakikalık tedavi grubunda (B) bulundu. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü ile bağlanma dayanımı arasında herhangi bir korelasyon bulunamadı.
Anahtar Kelimeler: PEEK, kompozit rezin, plazma, yüzey pürüzlülüğü, bağlanma dayanımı

Ethical Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  • 1. Siewert B, Parra M. A new group of materials in dentistry. Zeitschrift für zahnärztliche Implantologie. 2013; 29:148-159.
  • 2. Karunagaran S, Paprocki GJ, Wicks R, Markose S. A review of implant abutments--abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2013 Fall-Winter;93(2):18-23; quiz 23-4. PMID: 24611217.
  • 3. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Aug;16(4):383-92. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a32570. PMID: 25133270.
  • 4. Bechir ES, Bechir A, Gioga C, Manu R, Burcea A, Dascalu IT. The advantages of BioHPP polymer as superstructure material in oral implantology. Materiale Plastice. 2016; 53:394-398.
  • 5. Sloan R, Hollis W, Selecman A, Jain V, Versluis A. Bond strength of lithium disilicate to polyetheretherketone. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Apr; 10:S0022-3913(21)00110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.025. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33846011.
  • 6. Georgiev J, Vlahova A, Kissov H, Aleksandrov S, Kazakova R. Possible application of BioHPP in prosthetic dentistry: A literature review. Journal of IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers. 2018; 24:1896-1898.
  • 7. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Oct;16(5):465-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a32806. PMID: 25264546.
  • 8. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):12-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001. PMID: 26520679.
  • 9. Liebermann A, Keul C, Bähr N, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Impact of plasma treatment of PMMA-based CAD/CAM blanks on surface properties as well as on adhesion to self-adhesive resin composite cements. Dent Mater. 2013 Sep;29(9):935-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Jul 21. PMID: 23880323.
  • 10. Ourahmoune R, Salvia M, Mathia TG, Mesrati N. Surface morphology and wettability of sandblasted PEEK and its composites. Scanning. 2014 Jan-Feb;36(1):64-75. doi: 10.1002/sca.21089. Epub 2013 Apr 3. PMID: 23553954.
  • 11. Stawarczyk B, Thrun H, Eichberger M, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Schmidlin PR. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Sep 4. PMID: 26344191.
  • 12. Prado M, Menezes MSO, Gomes BPFA, Barbosa CAM, Athias L, Simão RA. Surface modification of gutta-percha cones by non-thermal plasma. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Nov 1;68:343-349. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.062. Epub 2016 May 16. PMID: 27524029.
  • 13. Chen M, Zhang Y, Sky Driver M, Caruso AN, Yu Q, Wang Y. Surface modification of several dental substrates by non-thermal, atmospheric plasma brush. Dent Mater. 2013 Aug;29(8):871-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 4. PMID: 23755823; PMCID: PMC3730850.
  • 14. Zhang Y, Yu Q, Wang Y. Non-thermal atmospheric plasmas in dental restoration: improved resin adhesive penetration. J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):1033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent. 2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 21. PMID: 24859333; PMCID: PMC4211626.
  • 15. Chen M, Zhang Y, Dusevich V, Liu Y, Yu Q, Wang Y. Non-thermal atmospheric plasma brush induces HEMA grafting onto dentin collagen. Dent Mater. 2014 Dec;30(12):1369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 11. PMID: 25458523; PMCID: PMC4254614.
  • 16. Dong X, Ritts AC, Staller C, Yu Q, Chen M, Wang Y. Evaluation of plasma treatment effects on improving adhesive-dentin bonding by using the same tooth controls and varying cross-sectional surface areas. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Aug;121(4):355-62. doi: 10.1111/eos.12052. Epub 2013 May 4. PMID: 23841788; PMCID: PMC3711654.
  • 17. Ritts AC, Li H, Yu Q, Xu C, Yao X, Hong L, Wang Y. Dentin surface treatment using a non-thermal argon plasma brush for interfacial bonding improvement in composite restoration. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Oct;118(5):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00761.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16. PMID: 20831586; PMCID: PMC2939732.
  • 18. Gunes B, Yeter KY, Terlemez A, Seker B, Altay Y. Dentinal tubule penetration of endodontic sealers after nonthermal plasma treatment: A confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Jun;82(6):903-908. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23237. Epub 2019 Feb 27. PMID: 30811819.
  • 19. Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater. 2014 Aug;30(8):e209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 24. PMID: 24768752.
  • 20. Williams T, Yu H, Woo R, Grigoriev M, Cheng D, Hicks R.F. Atmospheric pressure plasma as a method for improving adhesive bonding. Aerosp Mater Process LLC, 2014, 2631.
  • 21. Labriaga W, Song SY, Park JH, Ryu JJ, Lee JY, Shin SW. Effect of non-thermal plasma on the shear bond strength of resin cements to Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Dec;10(6):408-414. doi: 10.4047/jap. 2018.10.6.408. Epub 2018 Dec 19. PMID: 30584469; PMCID: PMC6302079.
  • 22. Dede DÖ, Küçükekenci AS, Kahveci Ç. Influence of chairside surface treatments on the shear bond strength of PEKK polymer to veneering resin materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Apr;125(4):703.e1-703.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020. 10.031. Epub 2021 Feb 5. PMID: 33551138.
  • 23. Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD, Schwitalla AD. Influence of different low-pressure plasma process parameters on shear bond strength between veneering composites and PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):e246-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 20. PMID: 29935768.
  • 24. Schwitalla AD, Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller WD. The impact of argon/oxygen low-pressure plasma on shear bond strength between a veneering composite and different PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2017 Sep;33(9):990-994. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 24. PMID: 28655478.
  • 25. Schmidlin PR, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B (2016) Glycine: A potential coupling agent to bond to helium plasma treated PEEK?. Dent Mater, 32, 2, 305-310.
  • 26. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Oct;101(7):1209-16. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32932. Epub 2013 Apr 6. PMID: 23564476.
  • 27. Bogle MA, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Evaluation of plasma skin regeneration technology in low-energy full-facial rejuvenation. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Feb;143(2):168-74. doi: 10.1001/archderm.143.2.168. PMID: 17309997.
  • 28. Han GJ, Chung SN, Chun BH, Kim CK, Oh KH, Cho BH. Effect of the applied power of atmospheric pressure plasma on the adhesion of composite resin to dental ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2012 Aug;14(5):461-9. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a25688. PMID: 22724108.
  • 29. Duske K, Koban I, Kindel E, Schröder K, Nebe B, Holtfreter B, Jablonowski L, Weltmann KD, Kocher T. Atmospheric plasma enhances wettability and cell spreading on dental implant metals. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Apr;39(4):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01853.x. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PMID: 22324415.
  • 30. Jha S., Bhowmik S., Bhatnagar N., Bhattacharya N. K., Deka U., Iqbal H. M. S., Benedictus R. Experimental investigation into the effect of adhesion properties of PEEK modified by atmospheric pressure plasma and low pressure plasma. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2010; 118(1), 173-179.
  • 31. Iqbal H. M. S., Bhowmik S., Benedictus R. Surface modification of high performance polymers by atmospheric pressure plasma and failure mechanism of adhesive bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2010; 30(6), 418-424.
  • 32. International organization for standardization, ISO TS 11405. Dental materials. Testing of adhesion to tooth structure, 2003.
  • 33. Türkkal F. Farklı yüzey modifikasyon yöntemlerinin; polieter eter keton (peek) materyalinin yüzey pürüzlülüğü, ıslanabilirliği ve kompozit veneer materyali ile bağlanma dayanımı üzerine olan etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Uzmanlık Tezi, Kırıkkale, 2019.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Oral Implantology, Prosthodontics, Dental Materials
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş 0000-0002-9767-0080

Sebahat Fındık Aydıner 0000-0003-3476-5135

Publication Date March 28, 2025
Submission Date March 6, 2024
Acceptance Date January 5, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025Volume: 28 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Yeşil Duymuş Z, Fındık Aydıner S (March 1, 2025) The Effect of Various Durations of Plasma Treatment on The Surface Roughness and The Bond Strength of Polyetheretherketone. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 28 1 21–28.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.