Abstract
Project Number
TDH-2017-7218
References
- 1. Putzeys E, Vercruyssen C, Duca RC, et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020;36:1275-1281.
- 2. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-393.
- 3. Phan AC, Behin P, Stoclet G, Dorin Ruse N, Nguyen JF, Sadoun M. Optimum pressure for the high-pressure polymerization of urethane dimethacrylate. Dent Mater 2015;31:406-412.
- 4. Phan AC, Tang ML, Nguyen JF, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. High temperature high-pressure polymerized urethane dimethacrylate mechanical properties and monomer release. Dent Mater 2014;30:350-356.
- 5. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2013;29:1209-1218.
- 6. Kameyama A, Bonroy K, Elsen C, et al. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement. Biomed Mater Eng 2015;25:279-288.
- 7. Urcuyo Alvarado MS, Escobar García DM, Pozos Guillén AJ, Flores Arriaga JC, Romo Ramírez GF, Ortiz Magdaleno M. Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin. Eur J Dent 2020;14:644-650.
- 8. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
- 9. Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1991-2000. 10. Pacheco RR, Carvalho AO, André CB, et al. Effect of indirect restorative material and thickness on light transmission at different wavelengths. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:232-238.
- 11. Harris JS, Jacobsen PH, O’Doherty DM. The effect of curing light intensity and test temperature on the dynamic mechanical properties of two polymer composites. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:635-639.
- 12. Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G. The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent Mater 2005;21:608-615.
- 13. Ayres AP, Andre CB, Pacheco RR, et al. Indirect Restoration Thickness and Time after Light-Activation Effects on Degree of Conversion of Resin Cement. Braz Dent J 2015;26:363-367.
- 14. de Jesus RH, Quirino AS, Salgado V, Cavalcante LM, Palin WM, Schneider LF. Does ceramic translucency affect the degree of conversion of luting agents? Appl Adhes Sci 2020;8:4.
- 15. Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:908-914.
- 16. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Water aging reverses residual stresses in hydrophilic dental composites. J Dent Res 2014;93:195-200.
- 17. Hoorizad M, Valizadeh S, Heshmat H, Tabatabaei SF, Shakeri T. Influence of resin cement on color stability of ceramic veneers: in vitro study. Biomater Investig Dent 2021;8:11-17.
- 18. Yin Z, Zhan DS, Fu JL. Effects of adhesive and primer on the bonding strength of zirconia to resin cement. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020;38:376-379.
- 19. Mai S, Kim YK, Arola DD, et al. Differential aggressiveness of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid in causing canal wall erosion in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. J Dent 2010;38:201-206.
- 20. Zhang K, Tay FR, Kim YK, et al. The effect of initial irrigation with two different sodium hypochlorite concentrations on the erosion of instrumented radicular dentin. Dent Mater 2010;26:514-523.
- 21. Wahsh, MM, Ghallab OH. Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. Tanta Dent J 2015;12:178-184.
- 22. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:430-436.
- 23. Lee JJ, Choi JY, Seo JM. Influence of nano-structured alumina coating on shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and various dual-cured resin cements. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:130-137.
- 24. Chrisostomo DA, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Briso ALF, Dos Santos PH. Efficacy of Polyacrylic Acid as a Conditioning Agent on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements to Dental Enamel. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020;18:747-756.
- 25. Maaßen M, Wille S, Kern M. Bond strength of adhesive luting systems to human dentin and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:182-188.
- 26. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195-200.
- 27. de Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 2009;25:172-179.
- 28. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:911-917.
- 29. Imazato S, McCabe JF, Tarumi H, Ehara A, Ebisu S. Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater 2001;17:178-183.
- 30. Salem HN, Hefnawy SM, Nagi SM. Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Low Shrinkage Bulk-Fill Resin Composites. Contemp Clin Dent 2019;10:465-470.
- 31. Marovic D, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Panduric V, Tarle Z. Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:474-480.
- 32. Hirata R, Clozza E, Giannini M, et al. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103:798-806.
- 33. Primus CM, Chu CC, Shelby JE, Buldrini E, Heckle CE. Opalescence of dental porcelain enamels. Quintessence Int 2002;33:439-449.
Comparison of a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite for luting of indirect restorative materials; the effect of thickness and material factors on translucence, monomer conversion and resin-dentin bond strength
Abstract
Introduction: With developing technology, the search for the most ideal material to be used in the cementation of indirect restorations continues. To determine the effect of thickness and material factors on monomer conversion, translucency, and resin-dentin bond strength in luting indirect restorative materials (IRM) of different thicknesses using a resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite.
Materials and methods: Samples of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic material (IPS e.max) and ceramic-resin hybrid material (Lava Ultimate) in 2 and 4 mm thicknesses, were luted using RelyX U200 (a self-adhesive resin cement), X-tra fil (a bulk-fill resin composite) and Z250 (a conventional microhybride resin composite) to the dentin surface and subjected to bond strength test after thermal cycle. In addition, the translucency parameter (TP) of the prepared blocks and the degree of conversion (DC) of the luting materials were investigated. The data was statistically analyzed.
Results: The bond strength of X-tra fil and Z250 was statistically higher than RelyX U200 (p<0.05). Thickness (2mm vs 4mm) and material factor (E.max vs Lava) did not change the bond strength (p>0.05). The increase in thickness decreased the TP of IRMs and the DC of resins underlying Lava (p<0.05). The material factor did not affect TP and DC (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Conventional and bulk-fill resin composites can be alternative luting materials to resin cements. Thickness increase did not change bond strength, while decreased TP, and DC only for Lava Ultimate.
Keywords
Bond strength Indirect restorative material Luting agents Monomer conversion Thickness Translucency
Ethical Statement
Before conducting the study, the study protocol was approved by the Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval number: 2017/513).
Supporting Institution
Erciyes University Scientific Research and Project Foundation
Project Number
TDH-2017-7218
References
- 1. Putzeys E, Vercruyssen C, Duca RC, et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020;36:1275-1281.
- 2. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-393.
- 3. Phan AC, Behin P, Stoclet G, Dorin Ruse N, Nguyen JF, Sadoun M. Optimum pressure for the high-pressure polymerization of urethane dimethacrylate. Dent Mater 2015;31:406-412.
- 4. Phan AC, Tang ML, Nguyen JF, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. High temperature high-pressure polymerized urethane dimethacrylate mechanical properties and monomer release. Dent Mater 2014;30:350-356.
- 5. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2013;29:1209-1218.
- 6. Kameyama A, Bonroy K, Elsen C, et al. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement. Biomed Mater Eng 2015;25:279-288.
- 7. Urcuyo Alvarado MS, Escobar García DM, Pozos Guillén AJ, Flores Arriaga JC, Romo Ramírez GF, Ortiz Magdaleno M. Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin. Eur J Dent 2020;14:644-650.
- 8. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
- 9. Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1991-2000. 10. Pacheco RR, Carvalho AO, André CB, et al. Effect of indirect restorative material and thickness on light transmission at different wavelengths. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:232-238.
- 11. Harris JS, Jacobsen PH, O’Doherty DM. The effect of curing light intensity and test temperature on the dynamic mechanical properties of two polymer composites. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:635-639.
- 12. Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G. The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent Mater 2005;21:608-615.
- 13. Ayres AP, Andre CB, Pacheco RR, et al. Indirect Restoration Thickness and Time after Light-Activation Effects on Degree of Conversion of Resin Cement. Braz Dent J 2015;26:363-367.
- 14. de Jesus RH, Quirino AS, Salgado V, Cavalcante LM, Palin WM, Schneider LF. Does ceramic translucency affect the degree of conversion of luting agents? Appl Adhes Sci 2020;8:4.
- 15. Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:908-914.
- 16. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Water aging reverses residual stresses in hydrophilic dental composites. J Dent Res 2014;93:195-200.
- 17. Hoorizad M, Valizadeh S, Heshmat H, Tabatabaei SF, Shakeri T. Influence of resin cement on color stability of ceramic veneers: in vitro study. Biomater Investig Dent 2021;8:11-17.
- 18. Yin Z, Zhan DS, Fu JL. Effects of adhesive and primer on the bonding strength of zirconia to resin cement. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020;38:376-379.
- 19. Mai S, Kim YK, Arola DD, et al. Differential aggressiveness of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid in causing canal wall erosion in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. J Dent 2010;38:201-206.
- 20. Zhang K, Tay FR, Kim YK, et al. The effect of initial irrigation with two different sodium hypochlorite concentrations on the erosion of instrumented radicular dentin. Dent Mater 2010;26:514-523.
- 21. Wahsh, MM, Ghallab OH. Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. Tanta Dent J 2015;12:178-184.
- 22. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:430-436.
- 23. Lee JJ, Choi JY, Seo JM. Influence of nano-structured alumina coating on shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and various dual-cured resin cements. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:130-137.
- 24. Chrisostomo DA, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Briso ALF, Dos Santos PH. Efficacy of Polyacrylic Acid as a Conditioning Agent on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements to Dental Enamel. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020;18:747-756.
- 25. Maaßen M, Wille S, Kern M. Bond strength of adhesive luting systems to human dentin and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:182-188.
- 26. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195-200.
- 27. de Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 2009;25:172-179.
- 28. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:911-917.
- 29. Imazato S, McCabe JF, Tarumi H, Ehara A, Ebisu S. Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater 2001;17:178-183.
- 30. Salem HN, Hefnawy SM, Nagi SM. Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Low Shrinkage Bulk-Fill Resin Composites. Contemp Clin Dent 2019;10:465-470.
- 31. Marovic D, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Panduric V, Tarle Z. Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:474-480.
- 32. Hirata R, Clozza E, Giannini M, et al. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103:798-806.
- 33. Primus CM, Chu CC, Shelby JE, Buldrini E, Heckle CE. Opalescence of dental porcelain enamels. Quintessence Int 2002;33:439-449.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | TDH-2017-7218 |
| Publication Date | September 30, 2024 |
| Submission Date | April 15, 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | July 28, 2024 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024Volume: 27 Issue: 3 |
Cite
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.