Comparison of a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite for luting of indirect restorative materials; the effect of thickness and material factors on translucence, monomer conversion and resin-dentin bond strength

Sezer Demirbuğa; Hacer Balkaya; Aysun Tuğçe Akbaş

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1468171

EN

Comparison of a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite for luting of indirect restorative materials; the effect of thickness and material factors on translucence, monomer conversion and resin-dentin bond strength

Abstract

Introduction: With developing technology, the search for the most ideal material to be used in the cementation of indirect restorations continues. To determine the effect of thickness and material factors on monomer conversion, translucency, and resin-dentin bond strength in luting indirect restorative materials (IRM) of different thicknesses using a resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite. Materials and methods: Samples of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic material (IPS e.max) and ceramic-resin hybrid material (Lava Ultimate) in 2 and 4 mm thicknesses, were luted using RelyX U200 (a self-adhesive resin cement), X-tra fil (a bulk-fill resin composite) and Z250 (a conventional microhybride resin composite) to the dentin surface and subjected to bond strength test after thermal cycle. In addition, the translucency parameter (TP) of the prepared blocks and the degree of conversion (DC) of the luting materials were investigated. The data was statistically analyzed. Results: The bond strength of X-tra fil and Z250 was statistically higher than RelyX U200 (p<0.05). Thickness (2mm vs 4mm) and material factor (E.max vs Lava) did not change the bond strength (p>0.05). The increase in thickness decreased the TP of IRMs and the DC of resins underlying Lava (p<0.05). The material factor did not affect TP and DC (p>0.05). Conclusion: Conventional and bulk-fill resin composites can be alternative luting materials to resin cements. Thickness increase did not change bond strength, while decreased TP, and DC only for Lava Ultimate.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Erciyes University Scientific Research and Project Foundation

Project Number

TDH-2017-7218

Ethical Statement

Before conducting the study, the study protocol was approved by the Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval number: 2017/513).

References

1. Putzeys E, Vercruyssen C, Duca RC, et al. Monomer release from direct and indirect adhesive restorations: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2020;36:1275-1281.
2. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-393.
3. Phan AC, Behin P, Stoclet G, Dorin Ruse N, Nguyen JF, Sadoun M. Optimum pressure for the high-pressure polymerization of urethane dimethacrylate. Dent Mater 2015;31:406-412.
4. Phan AC, Tang ML, Nguyen JF, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. High temperature high-pressure polymerized urethane dimethacrylate mechanical properties and monomer release. Dent Mater 2014;30:350-356.
5. Fron Chabouis H, Smail Faugeron V, Attal JP. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2013;29:1209-1218.
6. Kameyama A, Bonroy K, Elsen C, et al. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement. Biomed Mater Eng 2015;25:279-288.
7. Urcuyo Alvarado MS, Escobar García DM, Pozos Guillén AJ, Flores Arriaga JC, Romo Ramírez GF, Ortiz Magdaleno M. Evaluation of the Bond Strength and Marginal Seal of Indirect Restorations of Composites Bonded with Preheating Resin. Eur J Dent 2020;14:644-650.
8. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.

9. Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1991-2000. 10. Pacheco RR, Carvalho AO, André CB, et al. Effect of indirect restorative material and thickness on light transmission at different wavelengths. J Prosthodont Res 2019;63:232-238.
11. Harris JS, Jacobsen PH, O’Doherty DM. The effect of curing light intensity and test temperature on the dynamic mechanical properties of two polymer composites. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:635-639.
12. Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G. The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent Mater 2005;21:608-615.
13. Ayres AP, Andre CB, Pacheco RR, et al. Indirect Restoration Thickness and Time after Light-Activation Effects on Degree of Conversion of Resin Cement. Braz Dent J 2015;26:363-367.
14. de Jesus RH, Quirino AS, Salgado V, Cavalcante LM, Palin WM, Schneider LF. Does ceramic translucency affect the degree of conversion of luting agents? Appl Adhes Sci 2020;8:4.
15. Ilie N, Hickel R. Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:908-914.
16. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Water aging reverses residual stresses in hydrophilic dental composites. J Dent Res 2014;93:195-200.
17. Hoorizad M, Valizadeh S, Heshmat H, Tabatabaei SF, Shakeri T. Influence of resin cement on color stability of ceramic veneers: in vitro study. Biomater Investig Dent 2021;8:11-17.
18. Yin Z, Zhan DS, Fu JL. Effects of adhesive and primer on the bonding strength of zirconia to resin cement. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020;38:376-379.
19. Mai S, Kim YK, Arola DD, et al. Differential aggressiveness of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid in causing canal wall erosion in the presence of sodium hypochlorite. J Dent 2010;38:201-206.
20. Zhang K, Tay FR, Kim YK, et al. The effect of initial irrigation with two different sodium hypochlorite concentrations on the erosion of instrumented radicular dentin. Dent Mater 2010;26:514-523.
21. Wahsh, MM, Ghallab OH. Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. Tanta Dent J 2015;12:178-184.
22. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:430-436.
23. Lee JJ, Choi JY, Seo JM. Influence of nano-structured alumina coating on shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and various dual-cured resin cements. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:130-137.
24. Chrisostomo DA, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Briso ALF, Dos Santos PH. Efficacy of Polyacrylic Acid as a Conditioning Agent on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cements to Dental Enamel. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020;18:747-756.
25. Maaßen M, Wille S, Kern M. Bond strength of adhesive luting systems to human dentin and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:182-188.
26. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006;22:195-200.
27. de Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 2009;25:172-179.
28. Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:911-917.
29. Imazato S, McCabe JF, Tarumi H, Ehara A, Ebisu S. Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater 2001;17:178-183.
30. Salem HN, Hefnawy SM, Nagi SM. Degree of Conversion and Polymerization Shrinkage of Low Shrinkage Bulk-Fill Resin Composites. Contemp Clin Dent 2019;10:465-470.
31. Marovic D, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Panduric V, Tarle Z. Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:474-480.
32. Hirata R, Clozza E, Giannini M, et al. Shrinkage assessment of low shrinkage composites using micro-computed tomography. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015;103:798-806.
33. Primus CM, Chu CC, Shelby JE, Buldrini E, Heckle CE. Opalescence of dental porcelain enamels. Quintessence Int 2002;33:439-449.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Restorative Dentistry , Dental Materials

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sezer Demirbuğa
0000-0001-6013-974X
Türkiye

Hacer Balkaya ^*
0000-0001-9180-5610
Türkiye

Aysun Tuğçe Akbaş
0000-0003-0896-6558
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 30, 2024

Submission Date

April 15, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 28, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 27 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1468171

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA78WE56FB

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Demirbuğa S, Balkaya H, Akbaş AT (September 1, 2024) Comparison of a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite for luting of indirect restorative materials; the effect of thickness and material factors on translucence, monomer conversion and resin-dentin bond strength. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 27 3 173–183.

Cited By

Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental cements containing resin: Effects of the degree of conversion on cellular responses

Journal of Prosthodontic Research

https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00299

Öz

Comparison of a self-adhesive resin cement, a conventional and a bulk-fill resin composite for luting of indirect restorative materials; the effect of thickness and material factors on translucence, monomer conversion and resin-dentin bond strength

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Ethical Statement

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental cements containing resin: Effects of the degree of conversion on cellular responses