Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Investigation of the Effect of Mouthwash on Bonding Temporary Crown Materials with Various Temporary Cements

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 4, 359 - 366, 31.12.2023

Sebahat Fındık Aydıner , Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş , Nuran Yanıkoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1228240

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effects of surface treatments and mouthwash on the bond strength of different temporary restorative materials with provisional cements.
Methods: A total of 252 samples 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were prepared from three different provisional restorative materials. Each temporary crown material was randomly divided into three separate groups, and surface treatments were applied. (no surface treatment, air abrasion, or hydrofluoric acid etching). Two types of temporary cements were bonded to the surface. Half of them were treated with mouthwash; the other half were kept in distilled water as a control group.
Results: As the result of the analysis of variance; the interaction of the material used, the type of cement and the material*cement*retained medium was statistically very significant (p<0.001), the interaction of the stored medium, material* held medium and the held medium*cement was statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Within the context of the limitations of this in vitro study, oral rinse showed a positive effect on cement bond in samples for which sanding applied eugenol-containing cement was used, in conventionally obtained samples and in samples for which calcium-containing cement prepared with cad glass was used, and oral rinse showed a negative effect in other samples. The sanding procedure was identified as a factor of increasing of bond strength.

Keywords

Temporary Dental Restoration Luting Agents Dental Bonding Surface Properties Mouth Wash

Supporting Institution

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

  • 1. Yannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Caroni C. Color stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:533-539.
  • 2. Bayindir F, Kürklü D, Yanikoğlu ND. The effect of staining solutions on the color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Dent 2012;40:e41-46.
  • 3. Turgut S, Bagis B, Aydogan Ayaz E, Utku Ulusoy K, Han Altintas S, et al. Discoloration of provisional restorations after oral rinses. Int J Med Sci 2013;10:1503-1509
  • 4. Prajapati P, Sethuraman R, Naveen Y, Patel A, Patel J. A comparative analysis of staining characteristics of mouthrinses on provisional acrylic resin: An in vitro study. J Interdiscip Dent 2013;3:167.
  • 5. Naqash TA, Alfarsi M, Hussain MW. Marginal accuracy of provisional crowns using three material systems and two techniques: A scanning electron microscope study. Pakistan J Med Sci 2019;35:55-60
  • 6. Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114:414-9
  • 7. Nemetz H. Tissue management in fixed prosthodontics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1974, 31: 628-636.
  • 8. Lakade LS, Shah P, Shirol D. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and combination mouth rinse in reducing the Mutans streptococcus count in plaque. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 2014, 32: 91.
  • 9. Öngül D, Mim A, Sahin H, Deger S. The effect of mouthrinses on color stability of the restorative materials. European Oral Research, 2012, 46: 13.
  • 10. Festuccia MS, Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Pires-De-Souza Fde C. Color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of composites submitted to mouthrinsing action. J Appl Oral Sci, 2012, 20: 200-205.
  • 11. Ji B, Tang P, Yan K, Sun G. Catalytic actions of alkaline salts in reactions between 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid and cellulose: II. Esterification. Carbohydr Polym, 2015, 132: 228-236.
  • 12. Soygun K, Varol O, Ozer A, Bolayir G. Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics. J Adv Prosthodont, 2017, 9: 200-207.
  • 13. Ha SR. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type. J Adv Prosthodont, 2015, 7: 475-483.
  • 14. Román-Rodríguez JL, Millan-Martínez D, Fons-Font A, Agustín-Panadero R, Fernández-Estevan L. Traction test of temporary dental cements. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9: e564-e568.
  • 15. Jeong KW, Kim SH. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM temporary restorations. J Adv Prosthodont, 2019, 11: 95-104.
  • 16. Yanikoglu N, Denizoglu S. The effect of different solutions on the bond strength of soft lining materials to acrylic resin. Dent Mater J, 2006, 25: 39-44.
  • 17. Li Chin H, Han S, Shin S, Aljammali Z, Latifa Z, Khedda B, Algiers O. Luting Agents in Prosthodontics. 2021: 76127.
  • 18. Rocha, R. F., Anami, L. C., Campos, T. M., Melo, R. M., Souza, R. O. ve Bottino, M. A., 2016. Bonding of the Polymer Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to Human Dentin: Effect of Surface Treatments. Brazilian Dental Journal, 27(6), 693-699.
  • 19. Kern, M. ve Lehmann, F., 2012. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dental Materials, 28(12), 1280-1283.
  • 20. Stawarczyk, B., Keul, C., Beuer, F., Roos, M. ve Schmidlin, P. R., 2013. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dental Materials Journal, 32(3), 41-448.
  • 21. Keul, C., Liebermann, A., Schmidlin, P. R., Roos, M., Sener, B. ve Stawarczyk, B., 2014. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 16(4), 383-392.
  • 22. Saha, R., & Taha, A. (2021). Contemporary pulpotomy agents in pediatric dentistry: a review. South-Asian Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial & Dental Surgery, 1(1), 21-25.
  • 23. Kelmendi T, Koçani F, Kurti A, Kamberi B, Kamberi A. Comparison of Sealing Abilities Among Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root-Canal Filling Cement, Antibacterial Bioceramic Paste, and Epoxy Resin, using Enterococcus faecalis as a Microbial Tracer. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2022 Jun 1;28:e936319. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.936319. PMID: 35771490; PMCID: PMC9169682.
  • 24. Külekçi G, Çintan S, Dülger O. Diş hekimliğinde antimikrobiyel ağız gargaralarının kullanılması. Ankem Derg. 1999;13:208-213.
  • 25. Di Hipólito V, Rodrigues FP, Piveta FB, Azevedo Lda C, Bruschi Alonso RC, Silikas N, Carvalho RM, De Goes MF, Perlatti D'Alpino PH. Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentin. Dent Mater. 2012 May;28:495-501.
  • 26. Bulut N. B. Klorheksidin Glukonat İçeren Antibakteriyel Ajanların Tam Seramiklerin Dentine Bağlantısına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, 2013
  • 27. Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys. Dent Mater J, 2012, 31: 249-255.
  • 28. Jugdev J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Lynch E. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29: 784-790.
  • 29. Degirmenci K, Saridag S. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020, 12: 75-82.
  • 30. Lepe X, Bales DJ, Johnson GH. Retention of temporary crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 81: 469-475.
  • 31. Karpiński T, Szkaradkiewicz A. Chlorhexidine–pharmaco-biological activity and application. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2015, 19: 1321-1326.
  • 32. Karbach J, Ebenezer S, Warnke P, Behrens E, Al-Nawas B. Antimicrobial effect of Australian antibacterial essential oils as alternative to common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant oral pathogens. Clin Lab, 2015, 61: 61-68.
  • 33. http://www.drogsan.com.tr/pdf/02899e1a-2ab7-44f8-b0d4-14ad24e2723a.pdf.
  • 34. James P, Worthington HV, Parnell C, Harding M, Lamont T, Cheung A, Whelton H, Riley P. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 3: Cd008676.
  • 35. Retief DH. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. Am J Dent, 1991, 4: 231-236.

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 4, 359 - 366, 31.12.2023

Sebahat Fındık Aydıner , Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş , Nuran Yanıkoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1228240

Abstract

References

  • 1. Yannikakis SA, Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Caroni C. Color stability of provisional resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:533-539.
  • 2. Bayindir F, Kürklü D, Yanikoğlu ND. The effect of staining solutions on the color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Dent 2012;40:e41-46.
  • 3. Turgut S, Bagis B, Aydogan Ayaz E, Utku Ulusoy K, Han Altintas S, et al. Discoloration of provisional restorations after oral rinses. Int J Med Sci 2013;10:1503-1509
  • 4. Prajapati P, Sethuraman R, Naveen Y, Patel A, Patel J. A comparative analysis of staining characteristics of mouthrinses on provisional acrylic resin: An in vitro study. J Interdiscip Dent 2013;3:167.
  • 5. Naqash TA, Alfarsi M, Hussain MW. Marginal accuracy of provisional crowns using three material systems and two techniques: A scanning electron microscope study. Pakistan J Med Sci 2019;35:55-60
  • 6. Rayyan MM, Aboushelib M, Sayed NM, Ibrahim A, Jimbo R. Comparison of interim restorations fabricated by CAD/CAM with those fabricated manually. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114:414-9
  • 7. Nemetz H. Tissue management in fixed prosthodontics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 1974, 31: 628-636.
  • 8. Lakade LS, Shah P, Shirol D. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and combination mouth rinse in reducing the Mutans streptococcus count in plaque. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 2014, 32: 91.
  • 9. Öngül D, Mim A, Sahin H, Deger S. The effect of mouthrinses on color stability of the restorative materials. European Oral Research, 2012, 46: 13.
  • 10. Festuccia MS, Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Pires-De-Souza Fde C. Color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of composites submitted to mouthrinsing action. J Appl Oral Sci, 2012, 20: 200-205.
  • 11. Ji B, Tang P, Yan K, Sun G. Catalytic actions of alkaline salts in reactions between 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid and cellulose: II. Esterification. Carbohydr Polym, 2015, 132: 228-236.
  • 12. Soygun K, Varol O, Ozer A, Bolayir G. Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics. J Adv Prosthodont, 2017, 9: 200-207.
  • 13. Ha SR. Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type. J Adv Prosthodont, 2015, 7: 475-483.
  • 14. Román-Rodríguez JL, Millan-Martínez D, Fons-Font A, Agustín-Panadero R, Fernández-Estevan L. Traction test of temporary dental cements. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9: e564-e568.
  • 15. Jeong KW, Kim SH. Influence of surface treatments and repair materials on the shear bond strength of CAD/CAM temporary restorations. J Adv Prosthodont, 2019, 11: 95-104.
  • 16. Yanikoglu N, Denizoglu S. The effect of different solutions on the bond strength of soft lining materials to acrylic resin. Dent Mater J, 2006, 25: 39-44.
  • 17. Li Chin H, Han S, Shin S, Aljammali Z, Latifa Z, Khedda B, Algiers O. Luting Agents in Prosthodontics. 2021: 76127.
  • 18. Rocha, R. F., Anami, L. C., Campos, T. M., Melo, R. M., Souza, R. O. ve Bottino, M. A., 2016. Bonding of the Polymer Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to Human Dentin: Effect of Surface Treatments. Brazilian Dental Journal, 27(6), 693-699.
  • 19. Kern, M. ve Lehmann, F., 2012. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dental Materials, 28(12), 1280-1283.
  • 20. Stawarczyk, B., Keul, C., Beuer, F., Roos, M. ve Schmidlin, P. R., 2013. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dental Materials Journal, 32(3), 41-448.
  • 21. Keul, C., Liebermann, A., Schmidlin, P. R., Roos, M., Sener, B. ve Stawarczyk, B., 2014. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 16(4), 383-392.
  • 22. Saha, R., & Taha, A. (2021). Contemporary pulpotomy agents in pediatric dentistry: a review. South-Asian Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial & Dental Surgery, 1(1), 21-25.
  • 23. Kelmendi T, Koçani F, Kurti A, Kamberi B, Kamberi A. Comparison of Sealing Abilities Among Zinc Oxide Eugenol Root-Canal Filling Cement, Antibacterial Bioceramic Paste, and Epoxy Resin, using Enterococcus faecalis as a Microbial Tracer. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2022 Jun 1;28:e936319. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.936319. PMID: 35771490; PMCID: PMC9169682.
  • 24. Külekçi G, Çintan S, Dülger O. Diş hekimliğinde antimikrobiyel ağız gargaralarının kullanılması. Ankem Derg. 1999;13:208-213.
  • 25. Di Hipólito V, Rodrigues FP, Piveta FB, Azevedo Lda C, Bruschi Alonso RC, Silikas N, Carvalho RM, De Goes MF, Perlatti D'Alpino PH. Effectiveness of self-adhesive luting cements in bonding to chlorhexidine-treated dentin. Dent Mater. 2012 May;28:495-501.
  • 26. Bulut N. B. Klorheksidin Glukonat İçeren Antibakteriyel Ajanların Tam Seramiklerin Dentine Bağlantısına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, 2013
  • 27. Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys. Dent Mater J, 2012, 31: 249-255.
  • 28. Jugdev J, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Lynch E. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29: 784-790.
  • 29. Degirmenci K, Saridag S. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020, 12: 75-82.
  • 30. Lepe X, Bales DJ, Johnson GH. Retention of temporary crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 81: 469-475.
  • 31. Karpiński T, Szkaradkiewicz A. Chlorhexidine–pharmaco-biological activity and application. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2015, 19: 1321-1326.
  • 32. Karbach J, Ebenezer S, Warnke P, Behrens E, Al-Nawas B. Antimicrobial effect of Australian antibacterial essential oils as alternative to common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant oral pathogens. Clin Lab, 2015, 61: 61-68.
  • 33. http://www.drogsan.com.tr/pdf/02899e1a-2ab7-44f8-b0d4-14ad24e2723a.pdf.
  • 34. James P, Worthington HV, Parnell C, Harding M, Lamont T, Cheung A, Whelton H, Riley P. Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 3: Cd008676.
  • 35. Retief DH. Standardizing laboratory adhesion tests. Am J Dent, 1991, 4: 231-236.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Sebahat Fındık Aydıner 0000-0003-3476-5135

Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş 0000-0002-9767-0080

Nuran Yanıkoğlu 0000-0001-7677-1248

Publication Date December 31, 2023
Submission Date January 2, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 26 Issue: 4

Cite

EndNote Fındık Aydıner S, Yeşil Duymuş Z, Yanıkoğlu N (December 1, 2023) Investigation of the Effect of Mouthwash on Bonding Temporary Crown Materials with Various Temporary Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26 4 359–366.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.