Review
BibTex RIS Cite

POST SİSTEMLERİNE GENEL BAKIŞ.DERLEME

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 87 - 96, 26.03.2023

Mustafa Kocacıklı

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1236585

Abstract

Pulpası alınmış dişler, konservatif endodontik tedaviden sonra sıklıkla nispeten sağlam kalır. Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerin sağlıklı dişlere göre daha kırılgan olduğu gösterilmemesine rağmen, pulpasız dişlerin çiğneme sırasında kırıldığı bilinmektedir. Diş hekimleri, bu deneyimin bir sonucu olarak pulpasız dişlerin kırılmasını önlemek için strateji aradılar. Endodontik tedavide, pulpasız dişlerin restorasyonu ve güçlendirilmesi çok önemli bir koruyucu adımdır. Sağlıklı bir endodontik tedavi görmüş dişi güçlendirmek için kök kanalına bir post yerleştirilir. Postun, dişin kırılmasını önlemek için dişe güç verir. Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişleri onarmak için yaygın olarak kullanılan bir teknik, post ve corelardır.
Son restorasyonun köke retansiyonu, alt yapı olarak post ve core restorasyon kullanılarak yapılabilir. Bu nedenle, postu köke yerleştirmek çok önemlidir. Sabit bir restorasyon için retansiyonu sağlamak amacıyla, endodontik tedavi görmüş dişler sıklıkla post ve corelarla tedavi edilir. Endodontik tedavi görmüş dişlerde koronal hasar sıklıkla şiddetlidir. Bu dişler, tam veya kısmi bir kaplama restorasyonunun tutulması için bir koronal altyapı veya core gerektirebilir. Bir core’un birincil tutucu özelliği genellikle bir intraradiküler posttur. Postlar ve corelar rutin olarak endodontik dişleri restore etmek için kullanılır. Bu makale post sistemlerinin pulpasız dişlerde kullanımını gözden geçirerek sunmaktadır.

Keywords

post classification advantages of post post indication

References

  • 1. Kenneth M Hargreaves LHB. Cohen's Pathways on the Pulp. 11 ed. Rotstein I, editor: Elsevier; 2016.
  • 2. Keyf F. Flexi-Post’un Çekme ve Basma Kesme Kuvvetlerine Karşı Retansiyonunun Diğer İki Prefabrik Post- Core Sistemiyle Karşılaştırılması. ANKARA: Hacettepe Üniv. ; 1990.
  • 3. Saraç ŞY. İki Farklı Kanal Dolgu Patı İle Doldurulmuş Dişlerde Değişik Post Boşluğu Hazırlama Yöntemlerinin Apikal Sızdırmazlığa Etkisinin Spektrofotometrik Yöntem İle İncelenmesi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniv. ; 1995.
  • 4. Tjan AHL, Abbate, MF. Temperature Rise at Root Surface During Post Space Preparation. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;691:41-45.
  • 5. Akkayan B, Caniklioğlu, M. B. Farklı Post Tiplerinin Kök Kırıklarına Etkileri ve Post Seçim Kriterleri. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Dergisi. 1997;21:75-84.
  • 6. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical Success of Cast-Metal Posts and Cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;701:11-16.
  • 7. Yoldaş HO. Aşırı Harabiyet Gösteren Diş Köklerinin Işık İleten Post Sistemiyle Restore Edilmesi, . Ankara: Gazi Üniv; 1998.
  • 8. Federick DR. An application of the dowel and composite resin core technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 324:420-424.
  • 9. Tylman SD. Theory and Practise of Crown and Bridge Prosthesis. 2 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1947.
  • 10. Reosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 2 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1995.
  • 11. Schillingburg HT, Hobo S., Whitsett LD., Jacobi, R., BrackETT SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3 ed. Chicago: Quıntessence Co.; 1997.
  • 12. Alaçam T, Nalbant, L., Alaçam, A. İleri Restorasyon Teknikleri. 1 ed. Ankara Polat Yayınları; 1998.
  • 13. Reosenstiel SF, Land MF., Junkei F. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1988.
  • 14. Desort KD. The Prosthodontic Use of Endodontically Treated Teeth; Theory and Biomechanics of Post Preparation. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;492:203-206.
  • 15. Cohen BI, Condos S., Musikant, B. L., Deutsch, A. S. Retention Properties of a Splint Shaft Threaded Post Cut at Different Apical Lengths. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;686:894-898.
  • 16. Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Principles and Practise of Endodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 1989.
  • 17. Perel M, Muraff FI. linical Criteria for Posts and Cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;284:405-411.
  • 18. Sorensen JA MJ. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;516:780-784.
  • 19. Mumford JM, Jednynakiewicz NM. Principles of Endodontic. Philadelphia: Quıntessence Co.; 1988.
  • 20. Caputo AA, Standlee, P. J. Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1987.
  • 21. Cohen S, Burns, C. R. Pathways of The Pulp. St. Louis: Mosby Co; 1991.
  • 22. Lui JL. Composite Resin Reinforcement of Flared Canals Using Light Transmitting Posts: Quintessence Int.; 1994. 313-319 p.
  • 23. Charbengou GT. Principles and Practise of Operative Dentistry. 3 ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1998.
  • 24. Ingle JI, Bakland, L. K. Endodontics. 4 ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994.
  • 25. Chandra A, Singh SV. A new classification of post and core. Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry. 2015;4:56-58.
  • 26. Sabu J, Vanamala, N., & Prasad, B. S. K. “Monoblock Effect” – A Review of the Concept, Types, and Sealability. Asian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2022;54:137-146.
  • 27. Zhou LL, Wang Q. [Meta analysis of the comparison between cast metal posts' and fiber posts' clinical results]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012;216:709-613.
  • 28. Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2013;391:11-15.
  • 29. Parlar ÖZ Ö SA, Aydin C. Post systems in prosthetic dentistry. Gaziantep Medical Journal. 2015;211:51-55.
  • 30. Ring ME. Dentistry, An İllustreated History. Newyork: Mosby Co; 1992.
  • 31. Morgano SM. Restoration of Pulpless Teeth Aplication Of Traditional Principals İn Present and Future Contexts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;754:379-380.
  • 32. Silvers JE, Johnson MF., Fujimoto, J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 2 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1995.
  • 33. Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to Root Fracture of Dowel Channels with Various Thickness of Buccal Dentin Walls. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;534:496-500.
  • 34. Carter DR, Donnelly, JC. The Effect of Dowel Lubrication on Retention of Resin Cemented Dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;723:255-8.
  • 35. Hudis SI, Goldstein, GR. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Review of The Literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;551:33-38.
  • 36. Kurer HG. Factors Influencing The Retention of Dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;385:515-518.
  • 37. Standlee JP, Caputo, A. A. Endodontic Dowel Retention with Resin Luting Systems. J Dent Res. 1994;70:446-448.
  • 38. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 4 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co; 1989.
  • 39. Amarnath GS, Swetha MU, Muddugangadhar BC, Sonika R, Garg A, Rao TR. Effect of Post Material and Length on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars: An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;77:22-28.
  • 40. Colman HL. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;234:647-661.
  • 41. Krupp JD, Caputo, AA., Trabert, DC., Standlee, JP. Dowel Retention with Glass- Ionemer Cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;412:163-166.
  • 42. Ruemping DR, Lumd, MR., Schirnel, RJ. Retention of Dowels Subjected To Tensile and Torsional Forces. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;412:159-163.
  • 43. Sidoli CE, King, PA., Setchel, DJ. An Invitro Evaluation of a Carbon Fiber Based Post and Core System. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;781:5-9.
  • 44. Mattison GD. Photoelasyic Stress Analysis of Cast-Gold Endodontic Posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;484:407-411.
  • 45. Hanson EC, Caputo AA. Cementing mediums and retentive characteristics of dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;325:551-557.
  • 46. Standlee J, Caputo, AA., Hanson, EC. Retention of Endodontic Dowels Effects of Cement Dowel Length Diameter and Design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;394:400-405.
  • 47. Snoek PA, Crougers, N. H. J. The Bond Strength of a Resin Cement to a Coated Titanium Post,. J Dent Res. 1997;96:182.
  • 48. Mansfield B, Gallburt, R., Aboushala, A. Tensile Bond Strength Comparison for Endodontic Posts and Luting Agents. J Dent Res. 1997;76:69.
  • 49. Jacobi R, Schillingburg, H. T. Pins Dowels and Other Retentive Devices in Posterior Teeth. Dent Clin North Amer. 1993;373:367-390.
  • 50. Ingle JI, Teel, S., Wands, D. H. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth and Preparation for Overdenture. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994.
  • 51. Schnell EJ. Effect of Immediate Dowel Space Preparation on The Apical Seal of Endodontically Filled Teeth. J Oral Surg. 1998;453:470-473.
  • 52. Trope M, Maltz, DO., Tronstad, L. Resistance to Fractures of Restored Endodontically Treated Teeth. Endodon Dent Traumatol. 1985;13:108-111.
  • 53. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod. 2012;381:11-19.
  • 54. Fontana PE, Bohrer TC, Wandscher VF, Valandro LF, Limberger IF, Kaizer OB. Effect of Ferrule Thickness on Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored With a Glass Fiber Post or Cast Post. Oper Dent. 2019;446:E299-e308.
  • 55. Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay F, Ferrari M. Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;203:293-298.
  • 56. Signore A, Kaitsas V, Ravera G, Angiero F, Benedicenti S. Clinical evaluation of an oval-shaped prefabricated glass fiber post in endodontically treated premolars presenting an oval root canal cross-section: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;243:255-263.
  • 57. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res. 2007;868:729-734.
  • 58. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, Cagidiaco MC, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012;917 Suppl:72s-78s.
  • 59. AlSaleh E, Dutta A, Dummer PMH, Farnell DJJ, Vianna ME. Influence of remaining axial walls on of root filled teeth restored with a single crown and adhesively bonded fibre post: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021;114:103813.
  • 60. Guzy GE, Nicholls, JI. In vitro Comparison of Intact Endodontically Treated Teeth With and Without Endo-Post Reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;421:39-44.
  • 61. Huang TJG, Schilder, H., Nathanson, D. Effect of Moisture Content and Endodontic Treatment on Some Mechanical Properties of Human Dentin. J Endod. 1992;185:209-215.
  • 62. Sheets C. Dowels and Core Foundations. J Prosthet Dent. 1970;231:58-67.
  • 63. Kantor ME, Pines, M. S. A Comperative Study of Restorative Techniques for Pulpless Teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;384:405-412.
  • 64. Trabert KC, Caputo, A. A., ABOU-RASS, M. Tooth Fracture; A Comparison of Endodontic and Restorative Treatments. J Endod. 1978;411:341-345.
  • 65. Karaçolak G. TLŞ. Geçmişten Günümüze Postlar, Yapiştirici Simanlar Ve Kor Materyalleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;253:0.
  • 66. Trabert KC, Cooney JP. The endodontically treated tooth. Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 1984;284:923-951.
  • 67. Grayson WM. Dental Amalgam; Structure and Properties, In: Anusavice. 10 ed. ed. KJ, editor. Philadelphia1996. 361-365 p.
  • 68. Mahler DB, Engle JH, Simms LE, Terkla LG. One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;1273:345-349, quiz 91.
  • 69. Donald HL, Jeansonne BG, Gardiner DM, Sarkar NK. Influence of dentinal adhesives and a prefabricated post on fracture resistance of silver amalgam cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;771:17-22.
  • 70. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;1283:309-314.
  • 71. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;765:487-495.
  • 72. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;684:584-590.
  • 73. Ziebert AJ, Dhuru VB. The fracture toughness of various core materials. J Prosthodont. 1995;41:33-37.
  • 74. Christensen GJ. Compomers vs. resin-reinforced glass ionomers. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;1284:479-480.
  • 75. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;764:883-894.
  • 76. Kane JJ, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;636:607-613.
  • 77. Yanıkoğlu PN. BD. Post-Kor Yapiminda Kullanilan Restoratif Materyaller Ve Özellikleri. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2004;3.

General Consideration of Post Systems

Year 2023, Volume: 26 Issue: 1, 87 - 96, 26.03.2023

Mustafa Kocacıklı

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1236585

Abstract

More often than not pulpless teeth remain relatively intact after conservative endodontic treatment. Although it hasn't been shown that endodontically treated teeth are more brittle than healthy ones, pulpless teeth are known to crack during mastication. As a result of this known phenomenon, dental professionals have been looking for strategies to prevent pulpless teeth from breaking. Restoration and reinforcement of pulpless teeth is a crucial preventative step in endodontic therapy. A post is cemented into the root canal to reinforce a healthy endodontically treated tooth. The post is supposed to reinforce the tooth and keep it from breaking. A widely used technique for repairing teeth that have undergone endodontic treatment is post and cores.
Retention applied onto the root thorough final restoration using the post and core restoration as a substructure. Therefore, post placement in the root is crucial. In order to ensure retention for a fixed restoration, endodontically treated teeth are frequently treated with posts and cores. Teeth that had gone through endodontic treatment often suffer from severe coronal damage. In order to ensure retention for full or partial coverage restoration, these teeth may require a coronal substructure or core for retention of a full or partial bonding restoration. Generally, primary retention feature of a core is an intraradicular post. Posts and cores are routinely used for endodontical teeth restoration. This article provides a review presentation about utilization of post systems on the pulpless tooth.

Keywords

post classification advantages of post post indication

References

  • 1. Kenneth M Hargreaves LHB. Cohen's Pathways on the Pulp. 11 ed. Rotstein I, editor: Elsevier; 2016.
  • 2. Keyf F. Flexi-Post’un Çekme ve Basma Kesme Kuvvetlerine Karşı Retansiyonunun Diğer İki Prefabrik Post- Core Sistemiyle Karşılaştırılması. ANKARA: Hacettepe Üniv. ; 1990.
  • 3. Saraç ŞY. İki Farklı Kanal Dolgu Patı İle Doldurulmuş Dişlerde Değişik Post Boşluğu Hazırlama Yöntemlerinin Apikal Sızdırmazlığa Etkisinin Spektrofotometrik Yöntem İle İncelenmesi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniv. ; 1995.
  • 4. Tjan AHL, Abbate, MF. Temperature Rise at Root Surface During Post Space Preparation. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;691:41-45.
  • 5. Akkayan B, Caniklioğlu, M. B. Farklı Post Tiplerinin Kök Kırıklarına Etkileri ve Post Seçim Kriterleri. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Dergisi. 1997;21:75-84.
  • 6. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical Success of Cast-Metal Posts and Cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;701:11-16.
  • 7. Yoldaş HO. Aşırı Harabiyet Gösteren Diş Köklerinin Işık İleten Post Sistemiyle Restore Edilmesi, . Ankara: Gazi Üniv; 1998.
  • 8. Federick DR. An application of the dowel and composite resin core technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 324:420-424.
  • 9. Tylman SD. Theory and Practise of Crown and Bridge Prosthesis. 2 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1947.
  • 10. Reosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 2 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1995.
  • 11. Schillingburg HT, Hobo S., Whitsett LD., Jacobi, R., BrackETT SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3 ed. Chicago: Quıntessence Co.; 1997.
  • 12. Alaçam T, Nalbant, L., Alaçam, A. İleri Restorasyon Teknikleri. 1 ed. Ankara Polat Yayınları; 1998.
  • 13. Reosenstiel SF, Land MF., Junkei F. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1988.
  • 14. Desort KD. The Prosthodontic Use of Endodontically Treated Teeth; Theory and Biomechanics of Post Preparation. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;492:203-206.
  • 15. Cohen BI, Condos S., Musikant, B. L., Deutsch, A. S. Retention Properties of a Splint Shaft Threaded Post Cut at Different Apical Lengths. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;686:894-898.
  • 16. Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Principles and Practise of Endodontics. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 1989.
  • 17. Perel M, Muraff FI. linical Criteria for Posts and Cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;284:405-411.
  • 18. Sorensen JA MJ. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;516:780-784.
  • 19. Mumford JM, Jednynakiewicz NM. Principles of Endodontic. Philadelphia: Quıntessence Co.; 1988.
  • 20. Caputo AA, Standlee, P. J. Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1987.
  • 21. Cohen S, Burns, C. R. Pathways of The Pulp. St. Louis: Mosby Co; 1991.
  • 22. Lui JL. Composite Resin Reinforcement of Flared Canals Using Light Transmitting Posts: Quintessence Int.; 1994. 313-319 p.
  • 23. Charbengou GT. Principles and Practise of Operative Dentistry. 3 ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1998.
  • 24. Ingle JI, Bakland, L. K. Endodontics. 4 ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994.
  • 25. Chandra A, Singh SV. A new classification of post and core. Indian Journal Of Restorative Dentistry. 2015;4:56-58.
  • 26. Sabu J, Vanamala, N., & Prasad, B. S. K. “Monoblock Effect” – A Review of the Concept, Types, and Sealability. Asian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2022;54:137-146.
  • 27. Zhou LL, Wang Q. [Meta analysis of the comparison between cast metal posts' and fiber posts' clinical results]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012;216:709-613.
  • 28. Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2013;391:11-15.
  • 29. Parlar ÖZ Ö SA, Aydin C. Post systems in prosthetic dentistry. Gaziantep Medical Journal. 2015;211:51-55.
  • 30. Ring ME. Dentistry, An İllustreated History. Newyork: Mosby Co; 1992.
  • 31. Morgano SM. Restoration of Pulpless Teeth Aplication Of Traditional Principals İn Present and Future Contexts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;754:379-380.
  • 32. Silvers JE, Johnson MF., Fujimoto, J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 2 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1995.
  • 33. Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to Root Fracture of Dowel Channels with Various Thickness of Buccal Dentin Walls. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;534:496-500.
  • 34. Carter DR, Donnelly, JC. The Effect of Dowel Lubrication on Retention of Resin Cemented Dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;723:255-8.
  • 35. Hudis SI, Goldstein, GR. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Review of The Literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;551:33-38.
  • 36. Kurer HG. Factors Influencing The Retention of Dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;385:515-518.
  • 37. Standlee JP, Caputo, A. A. Endodontic Dowel Retention with Resin Luting Systems. J Dent Res. 1994;70:446-448.
  • 38. Weine FS. Endodontic Therapy. 4 ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co; 1989.
  • 39. Amarnath GS, Swetha MU, Muddugangadhar BC, Sonika R, Garg A, Rao TR. Effect of Post Material and Length on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Premolars: An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;77:22-28.
  • 40. Colman HL. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;234:647-661.
  • 41. Krupp JD, Caputo, AA., Trabert, DC., Standlee, JP. Dowel Retention with Glass- Ionemer Cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;412:163-166.
  • 42. Ruemping DR, Lumd, MR., Schirnel, RJ. Retention of Dowels Subjected To Tensile and Torsional Forces. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;412:159-163.
  • 43. Sidoli CE, King, PA., Setchel, DJ. An Invitro Evaluation of a Carbon Fiber Based Post and Core System. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;781:5-9.
  • 44. Mattison GD. Photoelasyic Stress Analysis of Cast-Gold Endodontic Posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;484:407-411.
  • 45. Hanson EC, Caputo AA. Cementing mediums and retentive characteristics of dowels. J Prosthet Dent. 1974;325:551-557.
  • 46. Standlee J, Caputo, AA., Hanson, EC. Retention of Endodontic Dowels Effects of Cement Dowel Length Diameter and Design. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;394:400-405.
  • 47. Snoek PA, Crougers, N. H. J. The Bond Strength of a Resin Cement to a Coated Titanium Post,. J Dent Res. 1997;96:182.
  • 48. Mansfield B, Gallburt, R., Aboushala, A. Tensile Bond Strength Comparison for Endodontic Posts and Luting Agents. J Dent Res. 1997;76:69.
  • 49. Jacobi R, Schillingburg, H. T. Pins Dowels and Other Retentive Devices in Posterior Teeth. Dent Clin North Amer. 1993;373:367-390.
  • 50. Ingle JI, Teel, S., Wands, D. H. Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth and Preparation for Overdenture. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1994.
  • 51. Schnell EJ. Effect of Immediate Dowel Space Preparation on The Apical Seal of Endodontically Filled Teeth. J Oral Surg. 1998;453:470-473.
  • 52. Trope M, Maltz, DO., Tronstad, L. Resistance to Fractures of Restored Endodontically Treated Teeth. Endodon Dent Traumatol. 1985;13:108-111.
  • 53. Juloski J, Radovic I, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Ferrule effect: a literature review. J Endod. 2012;381:11-19.
  • 54. Fontana PE, Bohrer TC, Wandscher VF, Valandro LF, Limberger IF, Kaizer OB. Effect of Ferrule Thickness on Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored With a Glass Fiber Post or Cast Post. Oper Dent. 2019;446:E299-e308.
  • 55. Cagidiaco MC, Radovic I, Simonetti M, Tay F, Ferrari M. Clinical performance of fiber post restorations in endodontically treated teeth: 2-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;203:293-298.
  • 56. Signore A, Kaitsas V, Ravera G, Angiero F, Benedicenti S. Clinical evaluation of an oval-shaped prefabricated glass fiber post in endodontically treated premolars presenting an oval root canal cross-section: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;243:255-263.
  • 57. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res. 2007;868:729-734.
  • 58. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, Cagidiaco MC, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012;917 Suppl:72s-78s.
  • 59. AlSaleh E, Dutta A, Dummer PMH, Farnell DJJ, Vianna ME. Influence of remaining axial walls on of root filled teeth restored with a single crown and adhesively bonded fibre post: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021;114:103813.
  • 60. Guzy GE, Nicholls, JI. In vitro Comparison of Intact Endodontically Treated Teeth With and Without Endo-Post Reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;421:39-44.
  • 61. Huang TJG, Schilder, H., Nathanson, D. Effect of Moisture Content and Endodontic Treatment on Some Mechanical Properties of Human Dentin. J Endod. 1992;185:209-215.
  • 62. Sheets C. Dowels and Core Foundations. J Prosthet Dent. 1970;231:58-67.
  • 63. Kantor ME, Pines, M. S. A Comperative Study of Restorative Techniques for Pulpless Teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;384:405-412.
  • 64. Trabert KC, Caputo, A. A., ABOU-RASS, M. Tooth Fracture; A Comparison of Endodontic and Restorative Treatments. J Endod. 1978;411:341-345.
  • 65. Karaçolak G. TLŞ. Geçmişten Günümüze Postlar, Yapiştirici Simanlar Ve Kor Materyalleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;253:0.
  • 66. Trabert KC, Cooney JP. The endodontically treated tooth. Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 1984;284:923-951.
  • 67. Grayson WM. Dental Amalgam; Structure and Properties, In: Anusavice. 10 ed. ed. KJ, editor. Philadelphia1996. 361-365 p.
  • 68. Mahler DB, Engle JH, Simms LE, Terkla LG. One-year clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;1273:345-349, quiz 91.
  • 69. Donald HL, Jeansonne BG, Gardiner DM, Sarkar NK. Influence of dentinal adhesives and a prefabricated post on fracture resistance of silver amalgam cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;771:17-22.
  • 70. Belcher MA, Stewart GP. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;1283:309-314.
  • 71. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;765:487-495.
  • 72. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;684:584-590.
  • 73. Ziebert AJ, Dhuru VB. The fracture toughness of various core materials. J Prosthodont. 1995;41:33-37.
  • 74. Christensen GJ. Compomers vs. resin-reinforced glass ionomers. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;1284:479-480.
  • 75. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;764:883-894.
  • 76. Kane JJ, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;636:607-613.
  • 77. Yanıkoğlu PN. BD. Post-Kor Yapiminda Kullanilan Restoratif Materyaller Ve Özellikleri. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2004;3.
There are 77 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Review
Authors

Mustafa Kocacıklı 0000-0002-2417-588X

Publication Date March 26, 2023
Submission Date January 16, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 26 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Kocacıklı M (March 1, 2023) General Consideration of Post Systems. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 26 1 87–96.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.