Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the simulated canal shaping efficiencies of five different NiTi rotary file systems.
Materials and Methods: In the study, 100 transparent resin blocks with J-shaped canals were randomly divided into five groups (n=20). Simulated canals were shaped with VDW.Rotate (VR), TruNatomy (TRN), HyFlex CM (HF), EdgeFile X7 (EF), or ProTaper Next (PTN) files. Ten measuring points were detected on the pre- and post-preparation images taken from the blocks and superimposed. After preparation, the total canal width and the amount of transportation were calculated for the determined measuring levels. Zipping and ledge formation, instrument fracture and deformation, and change in working length were evaluated. The data were statistically analyzed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, Chi-Square test, and a Monte Carlo version of the Fisher Exact tests. The error level was taken as 0.05.
Results: There were significant differences between the groups at all measuring levels in terms of total canal width after instrumentation (p = 0.001). Significant differences in the amount of transportation were found between the groups (p = 0.001) except at levels 4 (p = 0.169) and 10 (p = 0.054). Zip and instrument fractures did not occur in any group. 3 EF size 25/.04 files were deformed (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of ledge formation and working length change (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: According to findings obtained in the study, transportation occurred at all 10 measuring levels with all file systems used. HF and EF systems were found to be more reliable in terms of transportation in the middle and coronal regions. Wider canal preparation was obtained with the PTN system in the middle and coronal regions.
Root canal transportation NiTi shaping efficiency simulated canal Kök kanal transportasyonu şekillendirme etkinliği yapay kanal
the Scientific Research Project Fund of Sivas Cumhuriyet University
DİŞ-259
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, beş farklı NiTi döner eğe sisteminin yapay kanalları şekillendirme etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 100 adet J şekilli kanala sahip şeffaf rezin blok, rastgele beş gruba ayrıldı (n=20). Yapay kanallar VDW.Rotate (VR), TruNatomy (TRN), HyFlex CM (HF), EdgeFile X7 (EF) veya ProTaper Next (PTN) eğeleriyle şekillendirildi. Bloklardan alınan ve çakıştırılan preparasyon öncesi ve sonrası görüntülerinin üzerinde 10 ölçüm seviyesi tespit edildi. Preparasyon sonrası toplam kanal genişliği ve transportasyon miktarı belirlenen ölçüm seviyeleri için hesaplandı. Zip, basamak oluşumu, alet kırığı, deformasyon ve çalışma boyunda meydana gelen değişim değerlendirildi. Veriler Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi, Tukey testi, Khi-Kare testi ve Fisher Exact testlerden Monte Carlo modeliyle istatistiksel olarak analiz edilerek yanılma düzeyi 0,05 olarak alındı.
Bulgular: Tüm ölçüm seviyelerinde preparasyon sonrası toplam kanal genişliği yönünden gruplar arasında anlamlı farklar bulundu (p = 0,001). Seviye 4 (p = 0,169) ve 10 (p = 0,054) dışındaki ölçüm seviyelerinde gruplar arasında transportasyon miktarı açısından önemli farklılıklar bulundu (p = 0,001). Hiçbir grupta zip ve alet kırığı oluşmadı. 3 tane EF 25/.04 boyutlu eğe deforme oldu (p = 0,021). Basamak oluşumu ve çalışma boyu değişimi yönünden ise gruplar arasında anlamlı fark gözlenmedi (p > 0,05).
Sonuçlar: Çalışmada elde edilen bulgulara göre kullanılan tüm eğe sistemleriyle 10 ölçüm seviyesinde de transportasyon meydana geldi. HF ve EF sistem orta ve koronal bölgede transportasyon yönünden daha güvenilir bulundu. PTN sistemiyle orta ve koronal bölgede daha geniş kanal preparasyonu elde edildi.
DİŞ-259
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
Authors | |
Project Number | DİŞ-259 |
Publication Date | December 30, 2022 |
Submission Date | November 14, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: 4 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.