Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals

Ömer Bilgin; Demet Altunbaş

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1204170

TR EN

Beş Farklı Nikel-Titanyum Döner Eğe Sisteminin Yapay Kanallarda Şekillendirme Etkinliklerinin Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, beş farklı NiTi döner eğe sisteminin yapay kanalları şekillendirme etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 100 adet J şekilli kanala sahip şeffaf rezin blok, rastgele beş gruba ayrıldı (n=20). Yapay kanallar VDW.Rotate (VR), TruNatomy (TRN), HyFlex CM (HF), EdgeFile X7 (EF) veya ProTaper Next (PTN) eğeleriyle şekillendirildi. Bloklardan alınan ve çakıştırılan preparasyon öncesi ve sonrası görüntülerinin üzerinde 10 ölçüm seviyesi tespit edildi. Preparasyon sonrası toplam kanal genişliği ve transportasyon miktarı belirlenen ölçüm seviyeleri için hesaplandı. Zip, basamak oluşumu, alet kırığı, deformasyon ve çalışma boyunda meydana gelen değişim değerlendirildi. Veriler Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi, Tukey testi, Khi-Kare testi ve Fisher Exact testlerden Monte Carlo modeliyle istatistiksel olarak analiz edilerek yanılma düzeyi 0,05 olarak alındı. Bulgular: Tüm ölçüm seviyelerinde preparasyon sonrası toplam kanal genişliği yönünden gruplar arasında anlamlı farklar bulundu (p = 0,001). Seviye 4 (p = 0,169) ve 10 (p = 0,054) dışındaki ölçüm seviyelerinde gruplar arasında transportasyon miktarı açısından önemli farklılıklar bulundu (p = 0,001). Hiçbir grupta zip ve alet kırığı oluşmadı. 3 tane EF 25/.04 boyutlu eğe deforme oldu (p = 0,021). Basamak oluşumu ve çalışma boyu değişimi yönünden ise gruplar arasında anlamlı fark gözlenmedi (p > 0,05). Sonuçlar: Çalışmada elde edilen bulgulara göre kullanılan tüm eğe sistemleriyle 10 ölçüm seviyesinde de transportasyon meydana geldi. HF ve EF sistem orta ve koronal bölgede transportasyon yönünden daha güvenilir bulundu. PTN sistemiyle orta ve koronal bölgede daha geniş kanal preparasyonu elde edildi.

Keywords

Project Number

DİŞ-259

Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the simulated canal shaping efficiencies of five different NiTi rotary file systems. Materials and Methods: In the study, 100 transparent resin blocks with J-shaped canals were randomly divided into five groups (n=20). Simulated canals were shaped with VDW.Rotate (VR), TruNatomy (TRN), HyFlex CM (HF), EdgeFile X7 (EF), or ProTaper Next (PTN) files. Ten measuring points were detected on the pre- and post-preparation images taken from the blocks and superimposed. After preparation, the total canal width and the amount of transportation were calculated for the determined measuring levels. Zipping and ledge formation, instrument fracture and deformation, and change in working length were evaluated. The data were statistically analyzed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, Chi-Square test, and a Monte Carlo version of the Fisher Exact tests. The error level was taken as 0.05. Results: There were significant differences between the groups at all measuring levels in terms of total canal width after instrumentation (p = 0.001). Significant differences in the amount of transportation were found between the groups (p = 0.001) except at levels 4 (p = 0.169) and 10 (p = 0.054). Zip and instrument fractures did not occur in any group. 3 EF size 25/.04 files were deformed (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of ledge formation and working length change (p > 0.05). Conclusions: According to findings obtained in the study, transportation occurred at all 10 measuring levels with all file systems used. HF and EF systems were found to be more reliable in terms of transportation in the middle and coronal regions. Wider canal preparation was obtained with the PTN system in the middle and coronal regions.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

the Scientific Research Project Fund of Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Project Number

DİŞ-259

References

Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Evaluation of root canal obturation: a three-dimensional in vitro study. J Endod 2009;35:541-544.
Yang L, Chen X, Tian C, Han T, Wang Y. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root canal morphology and locate root canal orifices of maxillary second premolars in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod 2014;40:630-634.
Al Omari T, El-Farraj H, Arican B, Atav Ates A. Apical debris extrusion of full-sequenced rotary systems in narrow ribbon-shaped canals. Aust Endod J 2022;48:245-250.
Ertugrul IF, Orhan EO. Cyclic fatigue and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy examination of the novel ROTATE instrument. Microsc Res Tech 2019;82:2042-2048.
Mustafa R, Al Omari T, Al-Nasrawi S, Al Fodeh R, Dkmak A, Haider J. Evaluating In Vitro Performance of Novel Nickel-Titanium Rotary System (TruNatomy) Based on Debris Extrusion and Preparation Time from Severely Curved Canals. J Endod 2021;47:976-981.
Burklein S, Borjes L, Schafer E. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J 2014;47:470-476.
Gambarini G, Galli M, Seracchiani M, Di Nardo D, Versiani MA, Piasecki L, et al. In Vivo Evaluation of Operative Torque Generated by Two Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments during Root Canal Preparation. Eur J Dent 2019;13:556-562.
Ashok L, Krishnan V, Nair RS, Angelo MC. An Overview of Thermomechanically Heat-treated Nickel–Titanium Alloy Used in Endodontics. Cons Dent Endod J 2019;4:34-38.

Arias A, Singh R, Peters OA. Torque and force induced by ProTaper universal and ProTaper next during shaping of large and small root canals in extracted teeth. J Endod 2014;40:973-976.
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275.
Altunbas D, Kutuk B, Kustarci A. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems in simulated curved canals. Eur J Dent 2015;9:346-351.
Keskin C, Sariyilmaz E, Demiral M. Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2018;12:63-67.
Piț AB, Borcean IA, Vărgatu IA, Mai A, Shyblak M, Mokdad S, et al. Evaluation of the time and efficiency of trunatomy, vdw. rotate, protaper gold and reciproc blue in shaping root canals-an in vitro study. Rom J Oral Rehabil 2020;12.
Lopez FU, Fachin EV, Camargo Fontanella VR, Barletta FB, So MV, Grecca FS. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters. J Endod 2008;34:1545-1548.
Schafer E, Dzepina A, Danesh G. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:757-763.
Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, Haapasalo M. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments. J Endod 2013;39:385-388.
Ozer SY. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:244-250.
Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schafer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48:131-136.
Huang Z, Quan J, Liu J, Zhang W, Zhang X, Hu X. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the shaping ability of three thermally-treated nickel-titanium rotary file systems in curved canals. J Int Med Res 2019;47:325-334.
Kim H, Jeon SJ, Seo MS. Comparison of the canal transportation of ProTaper GOLD, WaveOne GOLD, and TruNatomy in simulated double-curved canals. BMC Oral Health 2021;21:533.
Wu MK, Fan B, Wesselink PR. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26:210-216.
Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Critical evaluation of root canal transportation by instrumentation. Endod Top 2013;29:110-124.
Alodeh MH, Dummer PM. A comparison of the ability of K-files and Hedstrom files to shape simulated root canals in resin blocks. Int Endod J 1989;22:226-235.
Radwański M, Łęski M, Pawlicka H. The influence of the manufacturing process of rotary files on the shaping of L-shaped canals. Dent Med Probl 2018;55:389-394.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ömer Bilgin
0000-0001-6578-3868
Türkiye

Demet Altunbaş ^*
0000-0002-7532-4785
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2022

Submission Date

November 14, 2022

Acceptance Date

December 16, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 25 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1204170

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA85HP39KM

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bilgin, Ö., & Altunbaş, D. (2022). Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 25(4), 318-322. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1204170

AMA

1.Bilgin Ö, Altunbaş D. Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2022;25(4):318-322. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1204170

Chicago

Bilgin, Ömer, and Demet Altunbaş. 2022. “Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 (4): 318-22. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1204170.

EndNote

Bilgin Ö, Altunbaş D (December 1, 2022) Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 4 318–322.

IEEE

[1]Ö. Bilgin and D. Altunbaş, “Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals”, Cumhuriyet Dent J, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 318–322, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.7126/cumudj.1204170.

ISNAD

Bilgin, Ömer - Altunbaş, Demet. “Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25/4 (December 1, 2022): 318-322. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1204170.

JAMA

1.Bilgin Ö, Altunbaş D. Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2022;25:318–322.

MLA

Bilgin, Ömer, and Demet Altunbaş. “Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 318-22, doi:10.7126/cumudj.1204170.

Vancouver

1.Ömer Bilgin, Demet Altunbaş. Comparative Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of Five Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems in Simulated Canals. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2022 Dec. 1;25(4):318-22. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1204170

Cited By

Transportation and centering abilities of the race evo, edge file X7, fanta AF-F one, and 2shape Ni-Ti systems in simulated root canals: A comparative study

Endodontology

https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_125_23