Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 125 - 130, 30.06.2022

Kerem Engin Akpınar , Gizem Kutlu Cengiz

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1098476

Abstract

Supporting Institution

CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ BİLİMSEL ARAŞTIRMA PROJELERİ

Project Number

DİŞ-155

References

  • 1. Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed. London: BC Decker Inc; 2002.
  • 2. Spanaki-Voreadi AP, Kerezoudis NP, Zinelis S. Failure mechanism of ProTaperNiTi rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. IntEndod J 2006;39: 171-8.
  • 3. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer . Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod2000;26:161-5.
  • 4. Crump MC, Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc1970;80:1341-7.
  • 5. Arens FC, Hoen MM, Steiman HR, Dietz GC Jr. et al. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2003;29:664-6.
  • 6. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod2005;31:845-50.
  • 7. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, et al. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod2007;33:276-9.
  • 8. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod1997;23:77-85.
  • 9. Pelton AR, Fino-Decker J, Vien L, et al. Rotary-bending fatigue characteristics of medical-grade nitinol wire. J MechBehav Biomed Mater 2013;27:19-32.
  • 10. Plotino G, Costanzo A, Grande NM, Petrovic R,Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Experimental evaluation on the influence of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue of new nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod2012;38:222-5.
  • 11. Oh SR, Chang SW, Lee Y, et al. A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod2010;109:622-8
  • 12. Burklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. IntEndod J 2012;45:449-61.
  • 13. Perez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels. J Endod2014;40:1477-81.
  • 14. Castello-Escriva R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Roman-Richon S, Faus-Llacer VJ. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files. J Endod, 2012;38(11):1521-4.
  • 15. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39(2):258-61.
  • 16. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36(12):1991-4.
  • 17. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. IntEndod J 2010;43(12):1063-8.
  • 18. Dobo-Nagy C, Serban T, Szabo J, Nagy G, Madlena M. A comparison of the shaping characteristics of two nickel-titanium endodontic hand instruments. IntEndod J 2002;35(3):283-8.
  • 19. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38(4):541-4.
  • 20. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32(2):271-5.
  • 21. Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: Strain-life relationship. IntEndod J 2007;40(8):612-8.
  • 22. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015;41(6):913-5.
  • 23. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne systems, Turk Endod J 2016;1(1):30-4.
  • 24. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. IntEndod J 2001;34(5):386-9.
  • 25. Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: Strain-life relationship. IntEndod J 2007;40(8):612-8.
  • 26. O'Hoy PY, Messer HH, Palamara JE. The effect of cleaning procedures on fracture properties and corrosion of NiTi files. IntEndod J 2003;36(11):724-32.
  • 27. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32(1):61-5.
  • 28. Aydin C, Inan U, Tunca YM. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of used and new RaCe instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2010;109(3):131-4.
  • 29. Yared GM, BouDagher FE, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. IntEndod J 2000;33(3):204-7.
  • 30. Yared GM, BouDagher FE, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of Profile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. IntEndod J 1999;32(2):115-9.
  • 31. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015; 41(6):913-5.
  • 32. Nguyen HH, Fong H, Paranjpe A, Flake NM, Johnson JD, Peters OA. Evaluation of the resistance to cyclic fatigue among ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and Vortex Blue rotary instruments. J Endod 2014;40(8):1190-3.
  • 33. Chaves Craveiro de Melo M, Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia M, Lopes Buono VT. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002;28(11):765-9.
  • 34. Fife D, Gambarini G, BrittoLr L. Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaperNiTi rotary instruments after clinical use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2004;97(2):251-6.
  • 35. Yared GM, Kulkarni GK. Failure of ProFile Ni-Ti instruments used by an inexperienced operator under access limitations. IntEndod J 2002;35(6):536-41.
  • 36. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36(12):1991-4.
  • 37. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. IntEndod J 2010;43(12):1063-8.
  • 38. Varela-Patino P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36(1):157-9.
  • 39. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39(2):258-61.
  • 40. Ertas H, Capar ID, Arslan H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne systems. Turk Endod J 2016;1(1):30-4.
  • 41. Altun F, Uzun O. A comparison of reciprocating and rotary file systems: operation time, working length change, and file fracture. ActaOdontolTurc 2014;31(2):61-7.
  • 42. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34(11):1406-9.

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE METAL FATIGUE OF DIFFERENT NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS AFTER PROLONGED USE

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 125 - 130, 30.06.2022

Kerem Engin Akpınar , Gizem Kutlu Cengiz

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1098476

Abstract

Objective:This study aimed to compare the cyclic fatigue (CF) resistance of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) endodontic instruments from ProTaper (PTU), ProTaper Next (PTN), Wave One (WO), and Reciproc (RPC).
Materials and Methods:In our study, PTU, PTN, WO, and RPC rotary files were divided into the experimental and control groups containing an equal number of samples. The experimental group files were used in the shaping of 80 extracted human lower premolar and lower molar teeth. The experimental and control group kits were then placed in the test apparatus and observed until they fractured. Fracture times were recorded and statistically evaluated.
Results:In the one-to-one comparisons of the experimental and control group files, while the differences between the fracture times of the experimental and control group files were found to be statistically insignificant in RPC, WO, PTU, and PTN X1 files (p>0.05), fracture time differences were statistically significant in all PTN X2 files (p<0.05). As a result of the pairwise comparison of the experimental and control groups, the difference between the experimental and control groups of the WO and RPC files used with reciprocal movement was found to be statistically insignificant (p>0.05).
Conclusion:The files used with reciprocal movement were found to be safer in terms of metal fatigue when compared to the other files used with rotational movement after the preparation.

Keywords

Cyclic fatigue Ni-Ti files Wave One Reciprocating movement

Project Number

DİŞ-155

References

  • 1. Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. 5th ed. London: BC Decker Inc; 2002.
  • 2. Spanaki-Voreadi AP, Kerezoudis NP, Zinelis S. Failure mechanism of ProTaperNiTi rotary instruments during clinical use: fractographic analysis. IntEndod J 2006;39: 171-8.
  • 3. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer . Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod2000;26:161-5.
  • 4. Crump MC, Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc1970;80:1341-7.
  • 5. Arens FC, Hoen MM, Steiman HR, Dietz GC Jr. et al. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2003;29:664-6.
  • 6. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod2005;31:845-50.
  • 7. Wei X, Ling J, Jiang J, et al. Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use. J Endod2007;33:276-9.
  • 8. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod1997;23:77-85.
  • 9. Pelton AR, Fino-Decker J, Vien L, et al. Rotary-bending fatigue characteristics of medical-grade nitinol wire. J MechBehav Biomed Mater 2013;27:19-32.
  • 10. Plotino G, Costanzo A, Grande NM, Petrovic R,Testarelli L,Gambarini G. Experimental evaluation on the influence of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue of new nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod2012;38:222-5.
  • 11. Oh SR, Chang SW, Lee Y, et al. A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod2010;109:622-8
  • 12. Burklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. IntEndod J 2012;45:449-61.
  • 13. Perez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Peters OA. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal instruments at different levels. J Endod2014;40:1477-81.
  • 14. Castello-Escriva R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Roman-Richon S, Faus-Llacer VJ. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files. J Endod, 2012;38(11):1521-4.
  • 15. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39(2):258-61.
  • 16. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36(12):1991-4.
  • 17. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. IntEndod J 2010;43(12):1063-8.
  • 18. Dobo-Nagy C, Serban T, Szabo J, Nagy G, Madlena M. A comparison of the shaping characteristics of two nickel-titanium endodontic hand instruments. IntEndod J 2002;35(3):283-8.
  • 19. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38(4):541-4.
  • 20. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32(2):271-5.
  • 21. Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: Strain-life relationship. IntEndod J 2007;40(8):612-8.
  • 22. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015;41(6):913-5.
  • 23. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne systems, Turk Endod J 2016;1(1):30-4.
  • 24. Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. IntEndod J 2001;34(5):386-9.
  • 25. Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: Strain-life relationship. IntEndod J 2007;40(8):612-8.
  • 26. O'Hoy PY, Messer HH, Palamara JE. The effect of cleaning procedures on fracture properties and corrosion of NiTi files. IntEndod J 2003;36(11):724-32.
  • 27. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. J Endod 2006;32(1):61-5.
  • 28. Aydin C, Inan U, Tunca YM. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of used and new RaCe instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2010;109(3):131-4.
  • 29. Yared GM, BouDagher FE, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use. IntEndod J 2000;33(3):204-7.
  • 30. Yared GM, BouDagher FE, Machtou P. Cyclic fatigue of Profile rotary instruments after simulated clinical use. IntEndod J 1999;32(2):115-9.
  • 31. Higuera O, Plotino G, Tocci L, Carrillo G, Gambarini G, Jaramillo DE. Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals. J Endod 2015; 41(6):913-5.
  • 32. Nguyen HH, Fong H, Paranjpe A, Flake NM, Johnson JD, Peters OA. Evaluation of the resistance to cyclic fatigue among ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and Vortex Blue rotary instruments. J Endod 2014;40(8):1190-3.
  • 33. Chaves Craveiro de Melo M, Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia M, Lopes Buono VT. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 2002;28(11):765-9.
  • 34. Fife D, Gambarini G, BrittoLr L. Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaperNiTi rotary instruments after clinical use. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 2004;97(2):251-6.
  • 35. Yared GM, Kulkarni GK. Failure of ProFile Ni-Ti instruments used by an inexperienced operator under access limitations. IntEndod J 2002;35(6):536-41.
  • 36. You SY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. J Endod 2010;36(12):1991-4.
  • 37. De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. IntEndod J 2010;43(12):1063-8.
  • 38. Varela-Patino P, Ibanez-Parraga A, Rivas-Mundina B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instrument life. J Endod 2010;36(1):157-9.
  • 39. Pedulla E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013;39(2):258-61.
  • 40. Ertas H, Capar ID, Arslan H. Cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, Twisted File Adaptive, Reciproc and WaveOne systems. Turk Endod J 2016;1(1):30-4.
  • 41. Altun F, Uzun O. A comparison of reciprocating and rotary file systems: operation time, working length change, and file fracture. ActaOdontolTurc 2014;31(2):61-7.
  • 42. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34(11):1406-9.
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Kerem Engin Akpınar 0000-0001-8900-9519

Gizem Kutlu Cengiz 0000-0002-7925-709X

Project Number DİŞ-155
Publication Date June 30, 2022
Submission Date April 5, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Akpınar KE, Kutlu Cengiz G (June 1, 2022) AN INVESTIGATION OF THE METAL FATIGUE OF DIFFERENT NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS AFTER PROLONGED USE. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 2 125–130.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.