Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: Supplement, 88 - 93, 25.03.2022

Esin Murrja , Şeyda Hergüner Siso , Merve Aydemir , Hatice Nihal Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1032911

Abstract

References

  • Referans1. Millar, B., Robinson, P.,Davies, B. (1992) Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on Class II cavities. British Dental Journal, 173 (6), 210-212.
  • Referans2. Kader MA, Altheeb A, Al-Asmry AA, Luqman M. Microleakage evaluation of class II composite restoration with incremental and bulk fill technique. J Dent Res Rev 2015;2:153-5.
  • Referans3. R J Sword, W Bachand, B Mears, L Quibeuf, S Looney, R B Price, F A Rueggeberg. Effect of Operator Experience on Ability to Place Sequential, 2-mm-thick Increments of Composite. Oper Dent 2021 May 1;46(3):327-338.
  • Referans4. McHugh LEJ, Politi I, Al-Fodeh RS, Fleming GJP. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 329-335
  • Referans5. Miletic V, Peric D, Milosevic M, Manojlovic D, Mitrovic N. Local deformation fields and marginal integrity of sculptable bulk-fill, low-shrinkage and conventional composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 1441-1451.
  • Referans6. Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 575-581
  • Referans7. Do T, Church B, Veríssimo C, Hackmyer SP, Tantbirojn D, Simon JF. Cuspal flexure, depth of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites. Pediatr Dent 2014; 36: 468-473
  • Referans8. Agarwal R, Hiremath H, Agarwal J, Garg A. Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015; 18: 56-61
  • Referans9. Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A. Marginal quality of Class II composite restorations placed in bulk compared to an incremental technique: Evaluation with SEM and stereomicroscope. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17: 147-154.
  • Referans10. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. Conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent 2011; 39: 643- 647
  • Referans11. G. W. Marshall and J. M. White, “The Effects of Storage after Extraction of the Teeth on Human Dentine Permeability in Vitro,” Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1991, pp. 561-566. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(91)90105-4
  • Referans12. M J Taylor 1, E Lynch Microleakage J Dent1992 Feb;20(1):3-10.
  • Referans13. Mueninghoff, L., Dunn, S., & Leinfelder, K. (1990). Comparison ofdye and ion microleakage tests. Am J Dent, 3(5), 192–194.
  • Referans14. McHugh LEJ, Politi I, Al-Fodeh RS, Fleming GJP. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration oncuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material. Dent Mater2017; 33: 329-335
  • Referans15. Jung JH, Park SH. Comparison of polymerization shrinkage, physical properties and marginal daptation of fowable and restorative bulk fill resin-based composites. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 375–386.
  • Referans16. Shahidi C, Krejci I, Dietschi D. In Vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation of direct class II composite restorations made of different “‘Low-Shrinkage’” systems. Oper Dent. 2017; 42:273–283.
  • Referans17. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525-36.
  • Referans18. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memo-rial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35.
  • Referans19. Ritter AV, Swift EJ, Jr., Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Jr. An eight-yearclinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc2009;140:28–37; quiz 111–2.
  • Referans20. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of currentclinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864–81.
  • Referans21. Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bertini F, Pierleoni F, Nieri M. Epub 2006 Nov 20. Effect of operator skill in relation to microleakage of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems. J Dent. 2007 Apr;35(4):289-93.
  • Referans22. Guéders A , Geerts S. Relationship between Operator Skill and In Vitro Microleakage of Different Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations. International Scholarly Research Network Vol 2011, Article ID 285624.
  • Referans23. Karaman E, Yazici AR, Aksoy B, Karabulut E, Ozgunaltay G,Dayangac B Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. Eur J Dent. 2013 Sep;7(Suppl 1):S060-S065. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119075.
  • Referans24. Adebayo OA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Bond strength test: Role of operator skill. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:145–50.
  • Referans25. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000;13:101–4.
  • Referans26. Behery H, El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Nabih SM. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. Dental and Medical Problems 55(4):383-38.
  • Referans27. Mosharrafian S , Heidari A 1, Rahbar P. Microleakage of Two Bulk Fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth J Dent (Tehran) 2017 May;14(3):123-131.
  • Referans28. García Marí L, Climent Gil A, Llena Puy C In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites.. Dent Mater J. 2019 Jun 21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-160.
  • Referans29. Hoseinifar R, Mofidi M, Malekhosseini N. The Effect of Occlusal Loading on Gingival Microleakage of Bulk Fill Composites Compared with a Conventional Composite. 2020 Jun;21(2):87-94.

Relationship Between Operator Experience And In Vitro Microleakage of Different Composite Materials in Class II Restorations

Year 2022, Volume: 25 Issue: Supplement, 88 - 93, 25.03.2022

Esin Murrja , Şeyda Hergüner Siso , Merve Aydemir , Hatice Nihal Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1032911

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of operator experience on microleakage in class II restorations performing by different restorative materials.
Material and Method: 2 cavities of 4x4x3mm dimensions were carried out on the mesial and distal surfaces of 20 molar teeth by one operator. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups according to the operator’s skill: student group and expert group. It was divided into subgroups as specialist bulk-fill composite: Group 1A, student bulk-fill composite: Group 2A, specialist micro-hybrid composite: Group 1B, student micro-hybrid composite: Group 2B, Prime bond nt, a total-etch adhesive system, is used in all restorations. Each operator restored the mesial cavities with the bulk technique using a bulk-fill composite (Tetric-N-Ceram-Bulk) and the distal cavities with the layering technique using a micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE). After 24 hour of water storage and thermocycling the marginal microleage was evaluted using dye penetration technique and data were analyzed.
Results: When the restorative materials were evaluated without considering the applying operator, and when the scores of the operator who applied the restorations were evaluated without considering the restorative materials used, no statistically significant difference was found between them (p>0.05).When the occlusal and gingival leakage scores of Group 2A were evaluated, more gingival leakage was observed than occlusal (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the in-group occlusal and gingival leak scores of the other groups (p>0,05).
Conclusion: There was no difference between the expert and the student in terms of microleakage values.

Keywords

bulk-fill microleakage operator experience micro hybrid composite resin total-etch adhesive

References

  • Referans1. Millar, B., Robinson, P.,Davies, B. (1992) Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on Class II cavities. British Dental Journal, 173 (6), 210-212.
  • Referans2. Kader MA, Altheeb A, Al-Asmry AA, Luqman M. Microleakage evaluation of class II composite restoration with incremental and bulk fill technique. J Dent Res Rev 2015;2:153-5.
  • Referans3. R J Sword, W Bachand, B Mears, L Quibeuf, S Looney, R B Price, F A Rueggeberg. Effect of Operator Experience on Ability to Place Sequential, 2-mm-thick Increments of Composite. Oper Dent 2021 May 1;46(3):327-338.
  • Referans4. McHugh LEJ, Politi I, Al-Fodeh RS, Fleming GJP. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration on cuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 329-335
  • Referans5. Miletic V, Peric D, Milosevic M, Manojlovic D, Mitrovic N. Local deformation fields and marginal integrity of sculptable bulk-fill, low-shrinkage and conventional composites. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 1441-1451.
  • Referans6. Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 575-581
  • Referans7. Do T, Church B, Veríssimo C, Hackmyer SP, Tantbirojn D, Simon JF. Cuspal flexure, depth of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites. Pediatr Dent 2014; 36: 468-473
  • Referans8. Agarwal R, Hiremath H, Agarwal J, Garg A. Evaluation of cervical marginal and internal adaptation using newer bulk fill composites: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2015; 18: 56-61
  • Referans9. Heintze SD, Monreal D, Peschke A. Marginal quality of Class II composite restorations placed in bulk compared to an incremental technique: Evaluation with SEM and stereomicroscope. J Adhes Dent 2015; 17: 147-154.
  • Referans10. Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. Conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent 2011; 39: 643- 647
  • Referans11. G. W. Marshall and J. M. White, “The Effects of Storage after Extraction of the Teeth on Human Dentine Permeability in Vitro,” Archives of Oral Biology, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1991, pp. 561-566. doi:10.1016/0003-9969(91)90105-4
  • Referans12. M J Taylor 1, E Lynch Microleakage J Dent1992 Feb;20(1):3-10.
  • Referans13. Mueninghoff, L., Dunn, S., & Leinfelder, K. (1990). Comparison ofdye and ion microleakage tests. Am J Dent, 3(5), 192–194.
  • Referans14. McHugh LEJ, Politi I, Al-Fodeh RS, Fleming GJP. Implications of resin-based composite (RBC) restoration oncuspal deflection and microleakage score in molar teeth: Placement protocol and restorative material. Dent Mater2017; 33: 329-335
  • Referans15. Jung JH, Park SH. Comparison of polymerization shrinkage, physical properties and marginal daptation of fowable and restorative bulk fill resin-based composites. Oper Dent. 2017; 42: 375–386.
  • Referans16. Shahidi C, Krejci I, Dietschi D. In Vitro evaluation of marginal adaptation of direct class II composite restorations made of different “‘Low-Shrinkage’” systems. Oper Dent. 2017; 42:273–283.
  • Referans17. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525-36.
  • Referans18. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memo-rial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-35.
  • Referans19. Ritter AV, Swift EJ, Jr., Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Jr. An eight-yearclinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc2009;140:28–37; quiz 111–2.
  • Referans20. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B.Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of currentclinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864–81.
  • Referans21. Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bertini F, Pierleoni F, Nieri M. Epub 2006 Nov 20. Effect of operator skill in relation to microleakage of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems. J Dent. 2007 Apr;35(4):289-93.
  • Referans22. Guéders A , Geerts S. Relationship between Operator Skill and In Vitro Microleakage of Different Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations. International Scholarly Research Network Vol 2011, Article ID 285624.
  • Referans23. Karaman E, Yazici AR, Aksoy B, Karabulut E, Ozgunaltay G,Dayangac B Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. Eur J Dent. 2013 Sep;7(Suppl 1):S060-S065. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119075.
  • Referans24. Adebayo OA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Bond strength test: Role of operator skill. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:145–50.
  • Referans25. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000;13:101–4.
  • Referans26. Behery H, El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Nabih SM. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. Dental and Medical Problems 55(4):383-38.
  • Referans27. Mosharrafian S , Heidari A 1, Rahbar P. Microleakage of Two Bulk Fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth J Dent (Tehran) 2017 May;14(3):123-131.
  • Referans28. García Marí L, Climent Gil A, Llena Puy C In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites.. Dent Mater J. 2019 Jun 21. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-160.
  • Referans29. Hoseinifar R, Mofidi M, Malekhosseini N. The Effect of Occlusal Loading on Gingival Microleakage of Bulk Fill Composites Compared with a Conventional Composite. 2020 Jun;21(2):87-94.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Esin Murrja 0000-0002-5398-4555

Şeyda Hergüner Siso 0000-0002-0728-948X

Merve Aydemir 0000-0002-4021-296X

Hatice Nihal Öztürk 0000-0001-6422-3287

Publication Date March 25, 2022
Submission Date December 6, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: Supplement

Cite

EndNote Murrja E, Hergüner Siso Ş, Aydemir M, Öztürk HN (March 1, 2022) Relationship Between Operator Experience And In Vitro Microleakage of Different Composite Materials in Class II Restorations. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 Supplement 88–93.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.