THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DESENSITIZERS AND THEIR COMBINATIONS WITH ER, CR: YSGG LASER ON DENTIN TUBULES, AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN

Güneş Bulut Eyüboğlu; Tuğba Serin Kalay

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1032878

EN TR

THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DESENSITIZERS AND THEIR COMBINATIONS WITH ER, CR: YSGG LASER ON DENTIN TUBULES, AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effectiveness of Sodium Fluoride, Propolis and Er,Cr:YSGG laser alone and in combination with laser applications on dentin tubules by SEM and to examine the effects of these applications on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a universal adhesive to dentin. METHODS: Dentin samples obtained by removing the buccal enamel of 72 caries-free permanent, mandibular third molars were randomly divided into six groups (n:12): Control, Sodium Fluoride (Enamelast, Ultradent), Propolis (Fanus Propolis), Er,Cr:YSGG Laser (Biolase, Waterlase), Enamelast-Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, Propolis-Er,Cr:YSGG Laser. While the agents were applied to the dentin surfaces in the agents alone groups, laser was applied after the agent applications in the combination groups. No application was performed to the control group. After storing the samples in artificial saliva for 14 days, Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal (Kuraray) and composite resin (Estelite Sigma Quick, Tokuyama) were applied to their surfaces. SBS tests were conducted using the Universal Tensile-Compression Test System (Instron 3382, USA). The tubule plugging efficiencies of the agents were examined on two dentin samples from each group by SEM. One-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) was performed for statistical analysis of the data. For p<0.05, the results were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in any comparison between all the test groups (p>0.05). In SEM examinations, occluded dentinal tubules were observed more frequently in the groups where the applications were performed in combination with laser, compared to the application of the agents alone. In the propolis group too, the tubules were usually closed, as well as open dentin tubules. CONCLUSIONS: Although combination applications of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser with Sodium Fluoride and Propolis showed greater dentin tubule plugging efficiency, these applications did not have a negative effect on the SBS of Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal compared to the control group. The changes caused by the laser application on the dentin surface and the content of adhesive system may have prevented the SBS from being adversely affected.

Keywords

FARKLI HASSASİYET GİDERİCİLERİN VE ER, CR: YSGG LAZER İLE KOMBİNASYONLARININ DENTİN TÜBÜLLERİ ÜZERİNE VE DENTİNE MAKASLAMA BAĞLANMA DAYANIMINA ETKİSİ

Öz

AMAÇ: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı Sodyum Florid, Propolis ve Er,Cr:YSGG lazerin tek başına ve lazerle kombine uygulamalarının dentin tübülleri üzerindeki etkinliğinin SEM ile incelenmesi ve bu uygulamaların bir üniversal adezivin dentine makaslama bağlanma dayanımına (MBD) etkisinin incelenmesidir. YÖNTEM: 72 adet çürüksüz daimi alt 3. molar dişin bukkal mine dokusu uzaklaştırılarak elde edilen dentin örnekleri rastgele altı gruba (n:12) ayrıldı: Kontrol, Sodyum Florid (Enamelast, Ultradent), Propolis (Fanus Propolis), Er,Cr:YSGG Lazer (Biolase, Waterlase), Enamelast-Er,Cr:YSGG Lazer, Propolis-Er,Cr:YSGG Lazer. Ajanların tek başına uygulandığı gruplarda dentin yüzeylerine ajan uygulanırken kombine gruplarda ajan uygulamasından sonra lazer uygulandı. Kontrol grubuna herhangibir uygulama yapılmadı. Örnekler 14 gün boyunca yapay tükrük içinde bekletildikten sonra yüzeylerine Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal (Kuraray) ve kompozit rezin (Estelite Sigma Quick, Tokuyama) uygulandı. MBD testleri Universal Çekme-Basma Test Sistemi (Instron 3382, Amerika) kullanılarak yapıldı. Ajanların tübül tıkaç etkinlikleri, her gruptan iki adet dentin örneği üzerinde SEM ile incelenmiştir. Verilerin istatistiksel analizi için Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi (One-way ANOVA) yapıldı. p<0.05 için sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı kabul edildi. BULGULAR: Tüm test grupları arasında hiç bir karşılaştırmada istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmemiştir (p>0.05). SEM incelemelerinde, lazerin kombine uygulandığı gruplarda ajanların tek başına uygulanmasına göre tıkalı dentin tübüllerine daha sık rastlandı. Propolis grubunda da yer yer açık dentin tübülleri yanında genellikle tübüller kapalıydı. SONUÇLAR: Er,Cr:YSGG Lazer'in Sodyum Florid ve Propolis'le kombine uygulamaları daha fazla dentin tübül tıkaç etkinliği göstermekle birlikte, Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal'in MBD'si üzerinde kontrol grubuna göre olumsuz bir etki oluşturmamıştır. Lazer uygulamasının dentin yüzeyinde oluşturduğu değişimler ve kullanılan adeziv sistemin içeriği MBD'nin olumsuz etkilenmesini önlemiş olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

References

Referans1. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:808-813.
Referans2. Que K, Ruan J, Fan X, Liang X, Hu D. A multi-centre and cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:631-637.
Referans3. Al-Sabbagh M, Brown A, Thomas MV. In-office treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 2009;53:47-60.
Referans4. Porto IC, Andrade AK, Montes MA. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci 2009;51:323-332.
Referans5. Addy M, Hunter ML. Can tooth brushing damage your health? Effects on oral and dental tissues. Int Dent J 2003;53:177-86.
Referans6. Bartold PM. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. Aust Dent J 2006;51:212-218.
Referans7. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity--the effect of toothbrushing and dietary compounds on dentine in vitro: an SEM study. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:101-110.
Referans8. Dababneh RH, Khouri AT, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? A review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management. Br Dent J 1999;187:606-611.

Referans9. Canadian Advisory Board on Dentin H. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:221-226.
Referans10. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999;49:139-143.
Referans11. Lin PY, Cheng YW, Chu CY, Chien KL, Lin CP, Tu YK. In-office treatment for dentin hypersensitivity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:53-64.
Referans12. West N, Seong J, Davies M. Dentine hypersensitivity. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:108-22.
Referans13. West NX. Dentine hypersensitivity: preventive and therapeutic approaches to treatment. Periodontol 2000. 2008;48:31-41.
Referans14. Gillam DG. A New Perspective on Dentine Hypersensitivity - Guidelines for General Dental Practice. Dent Update 2017;44: 9-42.
Referans15. Ritter AV, de LDW, Miguez P, Caplan DJ, Swift EJ, Jr. Treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity with fluoride varnish: a randomized clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1013-1120.
Referans16. Hoang-Dao BT, Hoang-Tu H, Tran-Thi NN, Koubi G, Camps J, About I. Clinical efficiency of a natural resin fluoride varnish (Shellac F) in reducing dentin hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:124-131.
Referans17. West NX, Seong J, Davies M. Management of dentine hypersensitivity: efficacy of professionally and self-administered agents. J Clin Periodontol 2015;42:256-302.
Referans18. Ozen T, Orhan K, Avsever H, Tunca YM, Ulker AE, Akyol M. Dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical comparison of three different agents in a short-term treatment period. Oper Dent 2009;34:392-398.
Referans19. Corona SA, Nascimento TN, Catirse AB, Lizarelli RF, Dinelli W, Palma-Dibb RG. Clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy and fluoride varnish for treating cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1183-1189.
Referans20. Eyuboglu GB, Yesilyurt C, Erturk M. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Dentin Desensitizing Products. Oper Dent 2015;40:503-514.
Referans21. Gomez-Caravaca AM, Gomez-Romero M, Arraez-Roman D, Segura-Carretero A, Fernandez-Gutierrez A. Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2006;41:1220-1234.
Referans22. Tuğba Nigar Bozkuş, Orhan Değer, Ahmet Yaşar. Chemical characterization of water and ethanolic extracts of Turkish propolis by HPLC-DAD and GCMS Leuk Res. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 2021;44:77-86.
Referans23. Santos FA, Bastos EM, Uzeda M, Carvalho MA, Farias LM, Moreira ES, et al. Antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis and fractions against oral anaerobic bacteria. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;80:1-7.
Referans24. Nolkemper S, Reichling J, Sensch KH, Schnitzler P. Mechanism of herpes simplex virus type 2 suppression by propolis extracts. Phytomedicine. 2010;17:132-138.
Referans25. Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Y, Bankova V, Christov R, Popov S. Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin. J Ethnopharmacol 1999;64:235-240.
Referans26. Ikeno K, Ikeno T, Miyazawa C. Effects of propolis on dental caries in rats. Caries Res 1991;25:347-351.
Referans27. Dodwad V, Kukreja BJ. Propolis mouthwash: A new beginning. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2011;15:121-125.
Referans28. Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:564-582.
Referans29. Murray MC, Worthington HV, Blinkhorn AS. A study to investigate the effect of a propolis-containing mouthrinse on the inhibition of de novo plaque formation. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:796-798.
Referans30. Sales-Peres SH, Carvalho FN, Marsicano JA, Mattos MC, Pereira JC, Forim MR, et al. Effect of propolis gel on the in vitro reduction of dentin permeability. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:318-323.
Referans31. Hongal S, Torwane NA, Goel P, Chandrashekar B. The effect of 30% ethanolic extract of Indian propolis on replica of human dentin compared against commercially available desensitizing agent: A methodological SEM study in vitro. Pharmacognosy Res 2014;6:113-119.
Referans32. Chen CL, Parolia A, Pau A, Celerino de Moraes Porto IC. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of desensitizing agents in dentine tubule occlusion using scanning electron microscopy. Aust Dent J 2015;60:65-72.
Referans33. Olivi G, Angiero F, Benedicenti S, Iaria G, Signore A, Kaitsas V. Use of the erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on human enamel tissues. Influence of the air-water spray on the laser-tissue interaction: scanning electron microscope evaluations. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:793-797.
Referans34. Yilmaz HG, Cengiz E, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Leblebicioglu B. Effectiveness of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dentine hypersensitivity: a controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:341-346.
Referans35. Yilmaz HG, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Bayindir H, Aykac Y. Clinical evaluation of Er,Cr:YSGG and GaAlAs laser therapy for treating dentine hypersensitivity: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent 2011;39:249-254.
Referans36. Gholami GA, Fekrazad R, Esmaiel-Nejad A, Kalhori KA. An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er;Cr:YSGG, Nd:YAG, CO(2) and diode lasers on dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscope in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 2011;29:115-121.
Referans37. Arantes BF, de Oliveira Mendonca L, Palma-Dibb RG, Faraoni JJ, de Castro DT, Geraldo-Martins VR, et al. Influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, associated or not to desensitizing agents, in the prevention of acid erosion in bovine root dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2019;34:893-900.
Referans38. Lopes AO, Eduardo Cde P, Aranha AC. Clinical evaluation of low-power laser and a desensitizing agent on dentin hypersensitivity. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30:823-829.
Referans39. Oncu E, Karabekiroglu S, Unlu N. Effects of different desensitizers and lasers on dentine tubules: An in-vitro analysis. Microsc Res Tech 2017;80:737-744.
Referans40. Pashley EL, Tao L, Pashley DH. Effects of oxalate on dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:116-118.
Referans41. Akca T, Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. The effect of desensitizing treatments on the bond strength of resin composite to dentin mediated by a self-etching primer. Oper Dent 2007;32:451-456.
Referans42. Borges AB, Scaramucci T, Lippert F, Zero DT, Hara AT. Erosion protection by calcium lactate/sodium fluoride rinses under different salivary flows in vitro. Caries Res 2014;48:193-199.
Referans43. Ipci SD, Cakar G, Kuru B, Yilmaz S. Clinical evaluation of lasers and sodium fluoride gel in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Photomed Laser Surg 2009;27:85-91.
Referans44. Dantas EM, Amorim FK, Nobrega FJ, Dantas PM, Vasconcelos RG, Queiroz LM. Clinical Efficacy of Fluoride Varnish and Low-Level Laser Radiation in Treating Dentin Hypersensitivity. Braz Dent J 2016;27:79-82.
Referans45. Arisu HD, Dalkihc E, Uctasli MB. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of a two-step self-etch adhesive to dentin. Oper Dent 2011;36:153-161.
Referans46. Krithi B, Vidhya S, Mahalaxmi S. Microshear bond strength of composite resin to demineralized dentin after remineralization with sodium fluoride, CPP-ACP and NovaMin containing dentifrices. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10:122-127.
ReferansReferans47. Nakajima M, Okuda M, Ogata M, Pereira PN, Tagami J, Pashley DH. The durability of a fluoride-releasing resin adhesive system to dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:186-192.
Referans48. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458.
Referans49. de Goes MF, Shinohara MS, Freitas MS. Performance of a new one-step multi-mode adhesive on etched vs non-etched enamel on bond strength and interfacial morphology. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:243-250.
Referans50. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484.
Referans51. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28.
Referans52. Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Falconi M, Petschelt A, et al. Influence of preliminary etching on the stability of bonds created by one-step self-etch bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:239-248.
Referans53. Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J 2011;56:31-44.
Referans54. Bakry AS, Abbassy MA. Application Modes Affect Two Universal Adhesive Systems' Nanoleakage Expression and Shear Bond Strength. Biomed Res Int 2021;7375779.
Referans55. Goracci C, Rengo C, Eusepi L, Juloski J, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Influence of selective enamel etching on the bonding effectiveness of a new "all-in-one" adhesive. Am J Dent 2013;26:99-104.
Referans56. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent 2014;42:603-612.
Referans57. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1-16.
Referans58. Magalhaes AC, Dos Santos MG, Comar LP, Buzalaf MA, Ganss C, Schlueter N. Effect of a Single Application of TiF4 Varnish versus Daily Use of a Low-Concentrated TiF4/NaF Solution on Tooth Erosion Prevention in vitro. Caries Res 2016;50:462-470.
Referans59. Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol 1998;36:347-363.
Referans60. Park YK, Koo MH, Abreu JA, Ikegaki M, Cury JA, Rosalen PL. Antimicrobial activity of propolis on oral microorganisms. Curr Microbiol 1998;36:24-28.
Referans61. Duarte S, Rosalen PL, Hayacibara MF, Cury JA, Bowen WH, Marquis RE, et al. The influence of a novel propolis on mutans streptococci biofilms and caries development in rats. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:15-22.
Referans62. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Gogulnath D, Kindo AJ. Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidone iodine, and calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 2010;43:419-423.
Referans63. Koo H, Cury JA, Rosalen PL, Ambrosano GM, Ikegaki M, Park YK. Effect of a mouthrinse containing selected propolis on 3-day dental plaque accumulation and polysaccharide formation. Caries Res 2002;36:445-448.
Referans64. Liberio SA, Pereira AL, Araujo MJ, Dutra RP, Nascimento FR, Monteiro-Neto V, et al. The potential use of propolis as a cariostatic agent and its actions on mutans group streptococci. J Ethnopharmacol 2009;125:1-9.
Referans65. Koo H, Vacca Smith AM, Bowen WH, Rosalen PL, Cury JA, Park YK. Effects of Apis mellifera propolis on the activities of streptococcal glucosyltransferases in solution and adsorbed onto saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Caries Res. 2000;34:418-426.
Referans66. Sabir A, Tabbu CR, Agustiono P, Sosroseno W. Histological analysis of rat dental pulp tissue capped with propolis. J Oral Sci 2005;47:135-138.
Referans67. Ahangari Z, Ghassemi A, Shamszadeh S, Naseri M. The effects of propolis on discoloration of teeth. J Dent School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,2013;31:33–41.
Referans68. Arslan S, Yazici AR, Gorucu J, Ertan A, Pala K, Üstün Y, Antonson SA, Donald E Antonson DE. Effects of Different Cavity Disinfectants on Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-based Resin Composite. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2011;12:279-286.
Referans69. Kalyoncuoglu E, Gonulol N, Ozsezer Demiryurek E, Bodrumlu E. Effect of propolis as a root canal irrigant on bond strength to dentin. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015;13:e362-366.
Referans70. Matochek MHM, Tomaz PLS, Oliveira TS, Polassi MR, Alonso RCB, Scremin FM, et al. Influence of a propolis-based irrigant solution on gap formation and bond strength of posts bonded to root canal dentin using different resin cements. Dent Mater J 2020;39:490-499.
Referans71. Almadi K, Alkahtany M, Alamam Y, Alaql F, Alaqil A, Almutairi M, et al. Influence of Propolis, Ozone and Photodynamic therapy in root canal disinfection on resin bond strength to radicular dentin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2021;33:102131.
Referans72. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto K. Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in human enamel and dentin: ablation and morphological studies. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999;17:155-159.
Referans73. Hadley J, Young DA, Eversole LR, Gornbein JA. A laser-powered hydrokinetic system for caries removal and cavity preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:777-785.
Referans74. Ting CC, Fukuda M, Watanabe T, Aoki T, Sanaoka A, Noguchi T. Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the root surface: morphologic analysis and efficiency of calculus removal. J Periodontol 2007;78:2156-2164.
Referans75. Pourshahidi S, Ebrahimi H, Mansourian A, Mousavi Y, Kharazifard M. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG and diode laser effects on dentin hypersensitivity: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:4051-4058.
Referans76. Ozlem K, Esad GM, Ayse A, Aslihan U. Efficiency of Lasers and a Desensitizer Agent on Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment: A Clinical Study. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:225-230.
Referans77. Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Gorucu J, Alpaslan T, Yazici E, et al. Shear bond strength of composite bonded to Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2008;26:495-500.
Referans78. Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:213-222.
Referans79. Hibst R, Keller U. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 1989;9:338-344.
Referans80. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003;28:647-660.
Referans81. Kameyama A, Kawada E, Takizawa M, Oda Y, Hirai Y. Influence of different acid conditioners on the tensile bond strength of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to Er:YAG laser-irradiated bovine dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:297-304.
Referans82. Ergucu Z, Celik EU, Unlu N, Turkun M, Ozer F. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the microtensile bond strength of two different adhesives to the sound and caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:460-466.
Referans83. Fehrenbach J, Isolan CP, Munchow EA. Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater 2021;37:1463-85.
Referans84. Tulga A, Sarac D. Effects of Dentin Surface Treatments on Hypersensitivity to Bond Strength of Restorations: An In Vitro Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35:e66-74.
Referans85. Lan WH, Liu HC, Lin CP. The combined occluding effect of sodium fluoride varnish and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on human dentinal tubules. J Endod 1999;25:424-426.
Referans86. Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P. In vitro effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dentine hypersensitivity. Dentine permeability and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:827-834.
Referans87. Gao XL, Pan JS, Hsu CY. Laser-fluoride effect on root demineralization. J Dent Res 2006;85:919-923.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Güneş Bulut Eyüboğlu ^*
0000-0002-0033-7135
Türkiye

Tuğba Serin Kalay
0000-0003-1197-4858
Türkiye

Publication Date

March 25, 2022

Submission Date

December 6, 2021

Acceptance Date

February 8, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 25 Number: Supplement

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1032878

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97BJ56JH

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Bulut Eyüboğlu G, Serin Kalay T (March 1, 2022) THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DESENSITIZERS AND THEIR COMBINATIONS WITH ER, CR: YSGG LASER ON DENTIN TUBULES, AND SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25 Supplement 47–56.

Cited By

Do AI Chatbots Tell the Truth About Dentin Hypersensitivity? A Comparative Evaluation of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1848545