Abstract
Background: Discoloration of dental composite restoration is a common problem that usually results in refurbishing or replacement or even removal of the restoration. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the color stability of polished composite resin material with different filler technologies. Methodology: Three composites were studied; Filtek™ Z350 XT (3M, ESPE, St. Paul, USA) [Group-I] that has nano-cluster filler particles, Brilliant EverGlow™ (Coltene/Whaledent® AG, Altstatten, Switzerland) [Group-II] which consists of submicron barium glass fillers and pre-polymerized fillers and Ceram.X® Sphere TEC™ (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) [Group-III] with advanced granulated filler technology composite. Twenty standardized composite discs were prepared with each composite resin, and it was polished with Sof-Lex disks (3M, ESPE, St. Paul, USA). The baseline color was then recorded using a spectrophotometer (X-Rite PANTONE® iPro-2, Michigan). Eight samples from each group were then subdivided and immersed into freshly prepared solutions of turmeric, coffee, and four samples into distilled water for a total period of 3 hours/day for 30 days. Following this, the color was again recorded. Statistical analysis: The change in color (ΔE) was calculated, and the data obtained were subjected to Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney test. Results: A significant difference was seen between the staining characteristics of Group-III and Group-I (p<0.05). The mean color change in the values was highest in Ceram.X that was clinically unacceptable (ΔE>3.3). Conclusion: Though all composites revealed color changes after their immersion into the staining solutions, the amount of stain varied based on their constituents and filler characteristics.
References
- 1. Malhotra N, Shenoy RP, Acharya S, Shenoy R, Mayya S. Effect of three indigenous food stains on resin-based, microhybrid, and nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23(4): 250- 257.
- 2. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 2: e64‐e70.
- 3. Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95(2): 137‐142.
- 4. Guler AU, Kurt S, Kulunk T. Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93(5): 453‐458.
- 5. Kroeze HJ, Plasschaert AJ, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Prevalence and need for replacement of amalgam and composite restorations in Dutch adults. J Dent Res. 1990; 69(6): 1270‐1274.
- 6. Mitra SB, Sakaguchi RL. Restorative materials- composite and polymers. In. Sakaguchi Rl, Powers JM, eds. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012: 161- 198.
- 7. Walker R, Burgess JO. Comparing resin-based composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004; 25(6): 424- 428.
- 8. Lu H, Lee YK, Oguri M, Powers JM. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Oper Dent. 2006; 31(6): 734‐740.
- 9. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005; 17(2): 102‐109.
- 10. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134(10): 1382‐1390.
- 11. Tantanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Peerasukprasert T, Chanmanee N, Chaisomboonphun P, Rodklai A. Surface roughness and erosion of nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites after immersion in red and white wine. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19(1): 51‐55.
- 12. Lopes IAD, Monteiro PJVC, Mendes JJB, Gonçalves JMR, Caldeira FJF. The effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of two nanocomposites. Saudi Dent J. 2018; 30(3): 197‐207.
- 13. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(5): 819–822
- 14. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97(4): 200‐208.
- 15. Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 1970; 24(2): 166‐173.
- 16. Miller LL. Shade matching. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5(4): 143‐153.
- 17. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994; 10(6): 353‐362.
- 18. Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Lima FA, Bachmann L, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Color stability, opacity and degree of conversion of pre-heated composites. J Dent. 2011; 39 Suppl 1: e25‐e29.
- 19. Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50(4): 480‐488.
- 20. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005; 33(5): 389‐398.
- 21. Schmitt VL, Puppin‐Rontani RM, Naufel FS, Nahsan FP, Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti M, Baseggio W. Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins. ISRN Dent 2011; 2011: 617672.
- 22. Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18(3): 249–254
- 23. Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangaç B, Ozgünaltay G. The effect of curing units and staining solutions on the color stability of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(6): 616‐622.
- 24. Ertaş E, Güler AU, Yücel AC, Köprülü H, Güler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25(2): 371‐376.
- 25. Usha C, Rao SR, George GM. A comparative evaluation of the staining capacity of microhybrid and nanohybrid resin-based composite to indian spices and food colorants: An In vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29(2): 201‐205.
- 26. Yap AU, Low JS, Ong LF. Effect of food-simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2000; 25(3): 170‐176
- 27. Shree Roja RJ, Sriman N, Prabhakar V, Minu K, Subha A, Ambalavanan P. Comparative evaluation of color stability of three composite resins in mouthrinse: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22(2): 175‐180.
- 28. Yu B, Lim HN, Lee YK. Influence of nano-and micro-filler proportions on the optical property stability of experimental dental resin composites. Mater Des. 2010; 31(10): 4719-24.
- 29. Manabe A1, Kato Y, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Komatsu M. Discoloration of coating resins exposed to staining solutions in vitro. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28(3): 338– 343
- 30. Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63(10):1248‐1254.
Abstract
References
- 1. Malhotra N, Shenoy RP, Acharya S, Shenoy R, Mayya S. Effect of three indigenous food stains on resin-based, microhybrid, and nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23(4): 250- 257.
- 2. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012;40 Suppl 2: e64‐e70.
- 3. Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95(2): 137‐142.
- 4. Guler AU, Kurt S, Kulunk T. Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93(5): 453‐458.
- 5. Kroeze HJ, Plasschaert AJ, van 't Hof MA, Truin GJ. Prevalence and need for replacement of amalgam and composite restorations in Dutch adults. J Dent Res. 1990; 69(6): 1270‐1274.
- 6. Mitra SB, Sakaguchi RL. Restorative materials- composite and polymers. In. Sakaguchi Rl, Powers JM, eds. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012: 161- 198.
- 7. Walker R, Burgess JO. Comparing resin-based composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004; 25(6): 424- 428.
- 8. Lu H, Lee YK, Oguri M, Powers JM. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. Oper Dent. 2006; 31(6): 734‐740.
- 9. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005; 17(2): 102‐109.
- 10. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134(10): 1382‐1390.
- 11. Tantanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Peerasukprasert T, Chanmanee N, Chaisomboonphun P, Rodklai A. Surface roughness and erosion of nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites after immersion in red and white wine. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19(1): 51‐55.
- 12. Lopes IAD, Monteiro PJVC, Mendes JJB, Gonçalves JMR, Caldeira FJF. The effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of two nanocomposites. Saudi Dent J. 2018; 30(3): 197‐207.
- 13. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989; 68(5): 819–822
- 14. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97(4): 200‐208.
- 15. Culpepper WD. A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 1970; 24(2): 166‐173.
- 16. Miller LL. Shade matching. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5(4): 143‐153.
- 17. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994; 10(6): 353‐362.
- 18. Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Lima FA, Bachmann L, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Color stability, opacity and degree of conversion of pre-heated composites. J Dent. 2011; 39 Suppl 1: e25‐e29.
- 19. Lutz F, Phillips RW. A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50(4): 480‐488.
- 20. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005; 33(5): 389‐398.
- 21. Schmitt VL, Puppin‐Rontani RM, Naufel FS, Nahsan FP, Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti M, Baseggio W. Effect of the polishing procedures on color stability and surface roughness of composite resins. ISRN Dent 2011; 2011: 617672.
- 22. Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18(3): 249–254
- 23. Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangaç B, Ozgünaltay G. The effect of curing units and staining solutions on the color stability of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(6): 616‐622.
- 24. Ertaş E, Güler AU, Yücel AC, Köprülü H, Güler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25(2): 371‐376.
- 25. Usha C, Rao SR, George GM. A comparative evaluation of the staining capacity of microhybrid and nanohybrid resin-based composite to indian spices and food colorants: An In vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29(2): 201‐205.
- 26. Yap AU, Low JS, Ong LF. Effect of food-simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2000; 25(3): 170‐176
- 27. Shree Roja RJ, Sriman N, Prabhakar V, Minu K, Subha A, Ambalavanan P. Comparative evaluation of color stability of three composite resins in mouthrinse: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019; 22(2): 175‐180.
- 28. Yu B, Lim HN, Lee YK. Influence of nano-and micro-filler proportions on the optical property stability of experimental dental resin composites. Mater Des. 2010; 31(10): 4719-24.
- 29. Manabe A1, Kato Y, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Komatsu M. Discoloration of coating resins exposed to staining solutions in vitro. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28(3): 338– 343
- 30. Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984;63(10):1248‐1254.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 25, 2022 |
| Submission Date | August 2, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: 1 |
Cited By
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.