Abstract
References
- 1. Neuhaus KW, Ciucchi P, Donnet M, Lussi A. Removal of enamel caries with an air abrasion powder. Oper Dent 2010;35:538-546
- 2. McCabe JF, Yan Z, Al Naimi OT, et al. Smart materials in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:3-10
- 3. Benetti AR, Michou S, Larsen L, Peutzfeldt A, Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6:90-98
- 4. Sonarkar SS, Purba R. Bioactive materials in conservative dentistry. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews, 2015, Article ID: 340115
- 5. Yürekten D, Erdem A. Importance of bıoactıvıty ın restoratıve dentıstry and a revıew of current studıes about thıs subject. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2020;30:337-345
- 6. The Future of Dentistry Now in Your Hands. PULPDENT' publication 2014; XF-VWP REV: 05/2014. Watertown,MA: Pulpdent Corporation
- 7. Alrahlah A. Diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, and surface microhardness of bioactive bulk fill restorative. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:13-19
- 8. Kaushik M, Yadav M. Marginal microleakage properties of Activa Bıoactıve Restoratıve and nanohybrıd composıte resın usıng two dıfferent adhesıves ın non carıous cervıcal lesıons - an ın vıtro study. Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. 2017;7:1-14
- 9. Bansal R, Burgess J, Lawson NC. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Am J Dent. 2016;29:171-174
- 10. Activa BioActive-Restorative. Two year clinical performance. The dental Advisor. https://www.dentaladvisor.com/evaluations/activa-bioactive-restorative-2-yr
- 11. van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, Benetti A. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dent Mater. 2019;35:335-343
- 12. Tedesco TK, Montagner AF, Skupien JA, Soares FZ, Susin AH, Rocha RO. Starch tubing: An alternative method to build up micro shear bond test specimens Journal of Adhesive Dentisry 2013;15:311-315
- 13. Oltramare R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Short- and Long-Term Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Glass-Modified Dental Adhesives. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1894
- 14. Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP, Dursun E. Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review and a proposal for classification. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:2313
- 15. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces Journal of Dental Research 2000;79:709-714
- 16. Alkhudhairy F, Vohra F, Naseem M. Influence of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser dentin conditioning on the bond strength of bioactive and conventional bulk-fill dental restorative material. Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery. 2020;38:30-35
- 17. Firat E, Gurgan S, Gutknecht N. Micro tensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to enamel and dentin after Er: YAG laser pretreatment with different pulse durations. Lasers in medical science. 2012;27:15-21
- 18. Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry 2013;34:12-14
- 19. Activa Bioactive Restorative. The Dental Advisor; 2017. Available from: https://www.dentaladvisor.com/evaluations/activa bioactiverestorative-1-yr/).
- 20. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. Journal of Oral Science. 2021;63:139-144
- 21. Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjaderhane L, Tay FR. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84:741-746
- 22. de Almeida Neves A, Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Current concepts and techniques for caries excavation and adhesion to residual dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2011;13:7-22
- 23. Mobarak EH, El-Badrawy WH. Micro shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin identified using the dye permeability test. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2012;14:245-250
- 24. Wei S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentisry. 2008;10:431-440
- 25. Sami OM, Naguib EA, Afifi RH, Nagi SM. Effect of Different Adhesion Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems to Sound and Artificial Caries-Affected Dentin. European Journal of General Dentistry. 2021
- 26. Alves FB, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, Guglielmi Cde A, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Carvalho TS, Raggio DP. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to caries-affected primary tooth dentin. Pediatric Dentistry 2013;5:320-324
- 27. Özduman ZC, Oğlakçı B, Dalkılıç E. Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Pulp Capping Materials to Caries-Affected Dentin. 10th ConsEuro, 22-24 April 2021, ss.82
- 28. Choi K, Oshida Y, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Matis BA, & Yi K Micro tensile bond strength of glass ionomer cement to artificially created carious dentin. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:590-597
EFFECT OF ADHESIVE ON MICRO SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF A NEW BIOACTIVE, RESTORATIVE MATERIAL ON NORMAL AND CARIES-AFFECTED DENTINE
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Activa BioActive-Restorative is defined as a self-adhesive dual-cured resin-modified glass ionomer. The suggested application method includes only conditioning to the dentine with acid and keeps bonding optional. This study aims to evaluate the micro shear bond strength in the presence and absence of the bonding agent application after acid conditioning for different dentin surfaces.
Materials and Methods: 30 posterior molars having occlusal caries were used. The flat dentin surfaces involving normal dentin (ND) and caries affected dentin (CAD) were prepared and randomly divided into three groups: Activa BioActive-Restorative (Pulpdent, USA) with only 10 seconds of acid application (Act), Activa with acid and bonding application (Optibond All in one, USA) (Act B), GC G-aenial Universal posterior composite with acid and bonding application (GC, Japan). A total of 6 groups were formed, as each group had normal and caries-affected dentin surfaces. Universal test machines were used to calculate micro shear bond strength at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and failure modes were determined by stereomicroscope.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between test values of each group neither for ND (p:0,065; p>0,05) nor for CAD (p:0,110; p>0,05). There is no statistically significant difference between μ-SBS values of the ND and CAD subgroup for any of the groups (Act p:0,933; Act B p:0,684; GC p:0,863; p>0,05). Adhesive failure dominated the other failure modes.
Conclusions: There is no difference between adherence of the material to ND and CAD. Acid application is sufficient for adequate binding. However, an optional bond application can be recommended, especially for dentin cavities.
Keywords: Micro shear bond strength, bioactivity, adhesion
Keywords
References
- 1. Neuhaus KW, Ciucchi P, Donnet M, Lussi A. Removal of enamel caries with an air abrasion powder. Oper Dent 2010;35:538-546
- 2. McCabe JF, Yan Z, Al Naimi OT, et al. Smart materials in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:3-10
- 3. Benetti AR, Michou S, Larsen L, Peutzfeldt A, Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. Adhesion and marginal adaptation of a claimed bioactive, restorative material. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6:90-98
- 4. Sonarkar SS, Purba R. Bioactive materials in conservative dentistry. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews, 2015, Article ID: 340115
- 5. Yürekten D, Erdem A. Importance of bıoactıvıty ın restoratıve dentıstry and a revıew of current studıes about thıs subject. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2020;30:337-345
- 6. The Future of Dentistry Now in Your Hands. PULPDENT' publication 2014; XF-VWP REV: 05/2014. Watertown,MA: Pulpdent Corporation
- 7. Alrahlah A. Diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, and surface microhardness of bioactive bulk fill restorative. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:13-19
- 8. Kaushik M, Yadav M. Marginal microleakage properties of Activa Bıoactıve Restoratıve and nanohybrıd composıte resın usıng two dıfferent adhesıves ın non carıous cervıcal lesıons - an ın vıtro study. Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. 2017;7:1-14
- 9. Bansal R, Burgess J, Lawson NC. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Am J Dent. 2016;29:171-174
- 10. Activa BioActive-Restorative. Two year clinical performance. The dental Advisor. https://www.dentaladvisor.com/evaluations/activa-bioactive-restorative-2-yr
- 11. van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, Benetti A. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dent Mater. 2019;35:335-343
- 12. Tedesco TK, Montagner AF, Skupien JA, Soares FZ, Susin AH, Rocha RO. Starch tubing: An alternative method to build up micro shear bond test specimens Journal of Adhesive Dentisry 2013;15:311-315
- 13. Oltramare R, Par M, Mohn D, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Tauböck TT. Short- and Long-Term Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Glass-Modified Dental Adhesives. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1894
- 14. Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP, Dursun E. Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review and a proposal for classification. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:2313
- 15. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Wakasa K. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces Journal of Dental Research 2000;79:709-714
- 16. Alkhudhairy F, Vohra F, Naseem M. Influence of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser dentin conditioning on the bond strength of bioactive and conventional bulk-fill dental restorative material. Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery. 2020;38:30-35
- 17. Firat E, Gurgan S, Gutknecht N. Micro tensile bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to enamel and dentin after Er: YAG laser pretreatment with different pulse durations. Lasers in medical science. 2012;27:15-21
- 18. Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry 2013;34:12-14
- 19. Activa Bioactive Restorative. The Dental Advisor; 2017. Available from: https://www.dentaladvisor.com/evaluations/activa bioactiverestorative-1-yr/).
- 20. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal JP, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. Journal of Oral Science. 2021;63:139-144
- 21. Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjaderhane L, Tay FR. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. Journal of Dental Research. 2005;84:741-746
- 22. de Almeida Neves A, Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Current concepts and techniques for caries excavation and adhesion to residual dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2011;13:7-22
- 23. Mobarak EH, El-Badrawy WH. Micro shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin identified using the dye permeability test. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2012;14:245-250
- 24. Wei S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives. Journal of Adhesive Dentisry. 2008;10:431-440
- 25. Sami OM, Naguib EA, Afifi RH, Nagi SM. Effect of Different Adhesion Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems to Sound and Artificial Caries-Affected Dentin. European Journal of General Dentistry. 2021
- 26. Alves FB, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, Guglielmi Cde A, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Carvalho TS, Raggio DP. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to caries-affected primary tooth dentin. Pediatric Dentistry 2013;5:320-324
- 27. Özduman ZC, Oğlakçı B, Dalkılıç E. Shear Bond Strength of Indirect Pulp Capping Materials to Caries-Affected Dentin. 10th ConsEuro, 22-24 April 2021, ss.82
- 28. Choi K, Oshida Y, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Matis BA, & Yi K Micro tensile bond strength of glass ionomer cement to artificially created carious dentin. Operative Dentistry. 2006;31:590-597
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 25, 2022 |
| Submission Date | November 1, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022Volume: 25 Issue: 1 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.