Abstract
References
- 1. Shaw RJ, Negus TW, Mellor TK. A prospective clinical evaluation of the longevity of resorbable sutures in oral mucosa. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34: 252-254.
- 2. Moy RL, Lee A, Zalka A. Commonly used suturing techniques in skin surgery. Am Fam Physician 1991; 44: 1625-1634.
- 3. Altınyazar HC. Dermatolojik Cerrahide Sık Kullanılan Sütür Materyalleri. Dermatose 2004: 13-17.
- 4. Dölenmem S. Dikiş Materyalleri. Ege University Dentistry, Periodontology, 2000.
- 5. Vasanthan A, Satheesh K, Hoopes W, Lucaci P, Williams K, Rapley J. Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 618-624.
- 6. Y. M. Adali TG, Çiplak G. . Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geriye Dönük Olarak Değerlendirilmesi The Journal of Faculty of Dentistry of Atatürk University 2018; 28: 174-181.
- 7. Becerik S, Nizam N. Periodontal Cerrahide Kullanılan Dikiş Teknikleri ve Materyalleri. Ege University Dental Journal 2017; 38: 140-150.
- 8. Zarge JI, Husak V, Huang P, Greisler HP. Fibrin glue containing fibroblast growth factor type 1 and heparin decreases platelet deposition. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 188-192.
- 9. Joshi AD, Saluja H, Mahindra U, Halli R. A comparative study: efficacy of tissue glue and sutures after impacted mandibular third molar removal. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011; 10: 310-315.
- 10. Gemci RV. Farklı Çözeltilerde Bekletilen Ameliyat İpliklerinin Düğüm Mukavemetlerinin İncelenmesi. Elektronic journal of textile technologies 2010; 4: 25-34.
- 11. Naleway SE, Lear W, Kruzic JJ, Maughan CB. Mechanical properties of suture materials in general and cutaneous surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015; 103: 735-742.
- 12. Öztürk M, Tonguç MÖ. Alveoler kret defekti olgularında sabit bölümlü protez estetiğinin onley dişeti grefti ile arttırılması. Suleyman Demırel Unıversıty Journal of Health Sciences 2011; 2: 83-88.
- 13. Arce J, Palacios A, Alvitez-Temoche D, Mendoza-Azpur G, Romero-Tapia P, Mayta-Tovalino F. Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon(R)) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Dent 2019; 2019: 7419708.
- 14. Şensoy E. Deneysel Sıçan Modelinde Sistemik Meperidin Uygulamasının Fasya İyileşmesi Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Erciyes University, Medicine 2013.
- 15. Chu CC. Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices. CRC Press
- 16. Szarmach RR, Livingston J, Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Edlich R. A Review on the Innovative Surgical Suture and Needle Evaluation and Selection Program. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2017; 27: 319-337.
- 17. Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 785-795.
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the tensile strength of different types of surgical suture materials.
Materials and Methods: Current study, the tensile strengths of 4 different suture materials made of different materials were compared. [(1-4/0 silk suture 2- 4/0 propylene suture 3-4/0 Polyamide suture 4- 4/0 Poly[Glycolide-Co-L-Lactide](90%:10%) (PGLA) suture)] The tensile strength of a total of 40 samples was calculated, with 10 samples in each group. In the study, the tensile strength of the sutures was calculated using a universal tester, the sutures were tightened to both poles of the test device and fixed with a distance of 15 mm between the poles, tensile force was applied so that both poles of the test device moved away from each other at a speed of 25cm/min until the sutures broke, and the force value of the sutures at the moment of brake was recorded in Newton units (N) as the tensile strength of suture.Statistical analysis of the data was evaluated by One-Way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests.
Results: In the statistical analysis of the tensile strength of the suture materials, the difference between the tension resistance of the PGLA and Polyamide suture was not statistically significant, but the difference between all other suture materials was statistically significant (p <0.05). Tensile strength of suture materials were determined as propylene, polyamide, pgla and silk suture, respectively.
Conclusion:Within the limitation of this study.It has been stated that propylene suture may be more advantageous than PGLA, silk ,polyamide suture.
Keywords: Sutures ,Tensile ,Break
References
- 1. Shaw RJ, Negus TW, Mellor TK. A prospective clinical evaluation of the longevity of resorbable sutures in oral mucosa. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34: 252-254.
- 2. Moy RL, Lee A, Zalka A. Commonly used suturing techniques in skin surgery. Am Fam Physician 1991; 44: 1625-1634.
- 3. Altınyazar HC. Dermatolojik Cerrahide Sık Kullanılan Sütür Materyalleri. Dermatose 2004: 13-17.
- 4. Dölenmem S. Dikiş Materyalleri. Ege University Dentistry, Periodontology, 2000.
- 5. Vasanthan A, Satheesh K, Hoopes W, Lucaci P, Williams K, Rapley J. Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 618-624.
- 6. Y. M. Adali TG, Çiplak G. . Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geriye Dönük Olarak Değerlendirilmesi The Journal of Faculty of Dentistry of Atatürk University 2018; 28: 174-181.
- 7. Becerik S, Nizam N. Periodontal Cerrahide Kullanılan Dikiş Teknikleri ve Materyalleri. Ege University Dental Journal 2017; 38: 140-150.
- 8. Zarge JI, Husak V, Huang P, Greisler HP. Fibrin glue containing fibroblast growth factor type 1 and heparin decreases platelet deposition. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 188-192.
- 9. Joshi AD, Saluja H, Mahindra U, Halli R. A comparative study: efficacy of tissue glue and sutures after impacted mandibular third molar removal. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2011; 10: 310-315.
- 10. Gemci RV. Farklı Çözeltilerde Bekletilen Ameliyat İpliklerinin Düğüm Mukavemetlerinin İncelenmesi. Elektronic journal of textile technologies 2010; 4: 25-34.
- 11. Naleway SE, Lear W, Kruzic JJ, Maughan CB. Mechanical properties of suture materials in general and cutaneous surgery. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015; 103: 735-742.
- 12. Öztürk M, Tonguç MÖ. Alveoler kret defekti olgularında sabit bölümlü protez estetiğinin onley dişeti grefti ile arttırılması. Suleyman Demırel Unıversıty Journal of Health Sciences 2011; 2: 83-88.
- 13. Arce J, Palacios A, Alvitez-Temoche D, Mendoza-Azpur G, Romero-Tapia P, Mayta-Tovalino F. Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon(R)) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study. Int J Dent 2019; 2019: 7419708.
- 14. Şensoy E. Deneysel Sıçan Modelinde Sistemik Meperidin Uygulamasının Fasya İyileşmesi Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Erciyes University, Medicine 2013.
- 15. Chu CC. Wound Closure Biomaterials and Devices. CRC Press
- 16. Szarmach RR, Livingston J, Rodeheaver GT, Thacker JG, Edlich R. A Review on the Innovative Surgical Suture and Needle Evaluation and Selection Program. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2017; 27: 319-337.
- 17. Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 785-795.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 3, 2022 |
| Submission Date | August 3, 2021 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021Volume: 24 Issue: 4 |
Cited By
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.