COMPARISON TENSILE STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT SUTUR MATERIALS
Abstract
Keywords
References
- 1. Shaw RJ, Negus TW, Mellor TK. A prospective clinical evaluation of the longevity of resorbable sutures in oral mucosa. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34: 252-254.
- 2. Moy RL, Lee A, Zalka A. Commonly used suturing techniques in skin surgery. Am Fam Physician 1991; 44: 1625-1634.
- 3. Altınyazar HC. Dermatolojik Cerrahide Sık Kullanılan Sütür Materyalleri. Dermatose 2004: 13-17.
- 4. Dölenmem S. Dikiş Materyalleri. Ege University Dentistry, Periodontology, 2000.
- 5. Vasanthan A, Satheesh K, Hoopes W, Lucaci P, Williams K, Rapley J. Comparing suture strengths for clinical applications: a novel in vitro study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 618-624.
- 6. Y. M. Adali TG, Çiplak G. . Farkli Dental İmplantlarin Başari Oranlarinin Geriye Dönük Olarak Değerlendirilmesi The Journal of Faculty of Dentistry of Atatürk University 2018; 28: 174-181.
- 7. Becerik S, Nizam N. Periodontal Cerrahide Kullanılan Dikiş Teknikleri ve Materyalleri. Ege University Dental Journal 2017; 38: 140-150.
- 8. Zarge JI, Husak V, Huang P, Greisler HP. Fibrin glue containing fibroblast growth factor type 1 and heparin decreases platelet deposition. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 188-192.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Turan Emre Kuzu
*
0000-0002-9478-1578
Türkiye
Publication Date
January 3, 2022
Submission Date
August 3, 2021
Acceptance Date
October 28, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 24 Number: 4
Cited By
Evaluating and Comparing the Tensile Strength and Clinical Behavior of Monofilament Polyamide and Multifilament Silk Sutures: A Systematic Review
Surgeries
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5020029