Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Repair of Aged Bulk-Fill Composites: An In Vitro Study

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 4, 451 - 460, 29.12.2019

Soner Şişmanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.646705
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the efficiency of different surface treatments
on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of aged bulk-fill composite.

Materials and Methods: Sixty bulk-fill resin-based
composite (RBC) specimens in 5 x 5 x 5 dimensions were prepared. After the
aging by thermal cycling for 5000 times between 5 and
55°C, substrate surfaces were abraded with SiC abrasive papers. Specimens
were divided into 6 groups according to the surface treatment protocol: no
surface treatment (control), control + Single Bond Universal (SBU; 3M ESPE)
application, phosphoric acid etching (PA) + SBU, hydrofluoric acid  etching (HF) + SBU, aluminum oxide air
abrasion (AlO) + SBU, and tribochemical silica coating (TSC) + SBU. Surface roughness values were measured in five different
directions using a contact profilometer (n=10). Then, specimens were repaired
with a conventional RBC. After the repair, bonded specimens were cut into 1 mm2
beams and µTBS values were determined until failure at a crosshead speed of 0.5
mm/min. Specimen surfaces after surface treatments were observed by SEM.
Data were analyzed using  ANOVA and Tukey
tests (p<0.05).

Results: One-way ANOVA revealed significant difference
(p<0.001) among the surface
treatments. The lowest repair µTBS values were observed for the control group. SBU
application alone significantly improved repair µTBS values (p<0.001). The highest µTBS values
were obtained for the AlOand TSC, and HF followed. The surface
roughness ranking for the five surface treatment protocols was as follows: TSC
> AlO > HF > PA = Control.







Conclusions: Aged bulk-fill RBCs can be successfully
repaired if effective and safe repair protocol is chosen. The highest µTBS
values were obtained for the AlO and TSC. The use of universal adhesive alone is
promising to facilitate the repair of bulk-fill RBCs.

Keywords

composite resins dental restoration repair dental adhesives surface properties

Supporting Institution

None.

Project Number

None.

Thanks

The author would like to express his thanks and appreciation to Dr. Pınar ERÇAL for reviewing the manuscript in terms of English grammar.

References

  • Lee M-R, Cho B-H, Son H-H, Um C-M, Lee I-B. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):288–295.
  • Taha NA, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites. J Dent. 2009;37(9):724–730
  • Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1501–1505.
  • Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(4):439–449.
  • Ilie N, Stark K. Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):271–279.
  • Campodonico CE, Tantbirojn D, Olin PS, Versluis A. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(10):1176–1182.
  • Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDRTM technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):348–355.
  • Frauscher KE, Ilie N. Degree of conversion of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(2):635–642.
  • Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. 2014;18(8):1991–2000.
  • Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6(4):302–318.
  • Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):227–235.
  • Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(5):481–508.
  • Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):221–233.
  • Fornazari I, Wille I, Meda E, Brum R, Souza E. Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs. Oper Dent. 2017;42(4):367–374.
  • Hemadri M, Saritha G, Rajasekhar V, Pachlag KA, Purushotham R, Reddy VKK. Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In vitro Study. J Int oral Heal JIOH. 2014;6(6):22–25.
  • Souza MO de, Leitune VCB, Rodrigues SB, Samuel SMW, Collares FM. One-year aging effects on microtensile bond strengths of composite and repairs with different surface treatments. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e4.
  • Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(7):547.
  • Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, Erdemir F. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: Effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(3):246-252.
  • Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: Selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59(2):57–62.
  • Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31(8):521–525.
  • Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1547–1558.
  • Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BAC, Huysmans M-CDNJM. Longevity of repaired restorations: A practice based study. J Dent. 2012;40(10):829–835.
  • Atalay C, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G. Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(9):921–930.
  • Batista GR, Kamozaki MBB, Gutierrez NC, Caneppele TMF, Rocha Gomes Torres C. Effects of Different Surface Treatments on Composite Repairs. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(5):421–426.
  • Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;24(5):358–360.
  • Truffier-Boutry D, Place E, Devaux J, Leloup G. Interfacial layer characterization in dental composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):74–77.
  • Yap AUJ, Wee KEC, Teoh SH. Effects of cyclic temperature changes on hardness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2002;27(1):25–29.
  • Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):211–222.
  • Lino Carracho AJ, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Purk JH, Eick JD. The effect of storage and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of three dentinal adhesives. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(9):745–752.
  • Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(9):911–917.
  • De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater. 2005;21(11):999–1007.
  • Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(5):625–633.
  • Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008;36(12):969–976.
  • Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent. 2007;32(4):363–371.
  • Dall’Oca S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Suh BI, Tay FR, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition on composite repair strength over time. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81(2):493–498.
  • Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent. 2010;38(1):29–38.
  • Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(4):316–322.
  • Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral Repair of Direct and Indirect Restorations: Procedures and Guidelines. Oper Dent. 2016;41(7):68–78.
  • Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):7–26.
  • Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):64–71.
  • Tantbirojn D, Fernando C, Versluis A. Failure Strengths of Composite Additions and Repairs. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):364–371.
  • Ozcan M, Barbosa S, Melo R, Galhano G, Bottino M. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1276–1282.
  • Fonseca RG, Martins SB, de Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Dos Santos Cruz CA. Effect of different airborne-particle abrasion/bonding agent combinations on the bond strength of a resin cement to a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(5):316–323.
  • Loomans BAC, Vivan Cardoso M, Roeters FJM, Opdam NJM, De Munck J, Huysmans MCDNJM, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701–709.
  • da Costa TRF, Serrano AM, Atman APF, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40(6):513–521.

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 4, 451 - 460, 29.12.2019

Soner Şişmanoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.646705
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Project Number

None.

References

  • Lee M-R, Cho B-H, Son H-H, Um C-M, Lee I-B. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):288–295.
  • Taha NA, Palamara JEA, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites. J Dent. 2009;37(9):724–730
  • Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: Incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1501–1505.
  • Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42(4):439–449.
  • Ilie N, Stark K. Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(2):271–279.
  • Campodonico CE, Tantbirojn D, Olin PS, Versluis A. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(10):1176–1182.
  • Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDRTM technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):348–355.
  • Frauscher KE, Ilie N. Degree of conversion of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(2):635–642.
  • Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. 2014;18(8):1991–2000.
  • Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1995;6(4):302–318.
  • Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):227–235.
  • Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29(5):481–508.
  • Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):221–233.
  • Fornazari I, Wille I, Meda E, Brum R, Souza E. Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs. Oper Dent. 2017;42(4):367–374.
  • Hemadri M, Saritha G, Rajasekhar V, Pachlag KA, Purushotham R, Reddy VKK. Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In vitro Study. J Int oral Heal JIOH. 2014;6(6):22–25.
  • Souza MO de, Leitune VCB, Rodrigues SB, Samuel SMW, Collares FM. One-year aging effects on microtensile bond strengths of composite and repairs with different surface treatments. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e4.
  • Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(7):547.
  • Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, Erdemir F. Repair of aged bulk-fill composite with posterior composite: Effect of different surface treatments. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(3):246-252.
  • Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: Selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59(2):57–62.
  • Tezvergil A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31(8):521–525.
  • Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations. J Dent. 2015;43(12):1547–1558.
  • Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BAC, Huysmans M-CDNJM. Longevity of repaired restorations: A practice based study. J Dent. 2012;40(10):829–835.
  • Atalay C, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G. Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(9):921–930.
  • Batista GR, Kamozaki MBB, Gutierrez NC, Caneppele TMF, Rocha Gomes Torres C. Effects of Different Surface Treatments on Composite Repairs. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(5):421–426.
  • Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;24(5):358–360.
  • Truffier-Boutry D, Place E, Devaux J, Leloup G. Interfacial layer characterization in dental composite. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):74–77.
  • Yap AUJ, Wee KEC, Teoh SH. Effects of cyclic temperature changes on hardness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2002;27(1):25–29.
  • Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):211–222.
  • Lino Carracho AJ, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Purk JH, Eick JD. The effect of storage and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of three dentinal adhesives. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(9):745–752.
  • Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Koliniotou-Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(9):911–917.
  • De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater. 2005;21(11):999–1007.
  • Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(5):625–633.
  • Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent. 2008;36(12):969–976.
  • Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent. 2007;32(4):363–371.
  • Dall’Oca S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Suh BI, Tay FR, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition on composite repair strength over time. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81(2):493–498.
  • Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent. 2010;38(1):29–38.
  • Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119(4):316–322.
  • Loomans B, Özcan M. Intraoral Repair of Direct and Indirect Restorations: Procedures and Guidelines. Oper Dent. 2016;41(7):68–78.
  • Ozcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):7–26.
  • Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):64–71.
  • Tantbirojn D, Fernando C, Versluis A. Failure Strengths of Composite Additions and Repairs. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):364–371.
  • Ozcan M, Barbosa S, Melo R, Galhano G, Bottino M. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1276–1282.
  • Fonseca RG, Martins SB, de Oliveira Abi-Rached F, Dos Santos Cruz CA. Effect of different airborne-particle abrasion/bonding agent combinations on the bond strength of a resin cement to a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(5):316–323.
  • Loomans BAC, Vivan Cardoso M, Roeters FJM, Opdam NJM, De Munck J, Huysmans MCDNJM, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27(7):701–709.
  • da Costa TRF, Serrano AM, Atman APF, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40(6):513–521.
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Soner Şişmanoğlu 0000-0002-1272-5581

Project Number None.
Publication Date December 29, 2019
Submission Date November 14, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 4

Cite

EndNote Şişmanoğlu S (December 1, 2019) Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Repair of Aged Bulk-Fill Composites: An In Vitro Study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 4 451–460.

Cited By

Scoping Review: Effect of Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Composite Repair
Journal of Dentistry
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104737
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.