Comparison of the Microtensile Bond Strength Of Four Different Bulk-Fill Resin Composites Of Class I Cavities With Dentin
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of our study is
to compare the microtensile bond strengths of four different bulk-fill
composites and a microhybrid composite to the dentin.
Materials
and methods: 4
bulk-fill composites and a microhybrid composite were tested. Class I occlusal
cavities were prepared on 25 freshly drawn intact human molar teeth, randomly
divided into five groups [G-aenial posterior(Control group), Estelite Bulk Fill
flow, GrandioSO x-tra, Beautiful Bulk Restorative, Fill-Up] and the cavities
were restorated with five composite systems by using their own adhesive
systems. Completed restoration teeth bukkolingual and mesiodistal sections were
taken, three samples were obtained from each tooth(n:15). Microtensile bond
strength values of groups were measured by universal test machine. Microscopic
changes were examined by SEM. The data were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and
Tukey tests.
Results: While the control group showed the highest microtensile bond strength, Fill-Up group showed the lowest. The control group was statistically significant when compared to the four different bulk-fill groups used in the study(p<0.05). Although the GrandioSO x-tra group showed the highest bonding strength among the bulk-fill composites, the differences between the Beautifil Bulk Restorative and Estelite Bulk Fill flow were statistically insignificant(p>0.05). Fill-Up was found to be statistically significant when compared to the other bulk-fill groups(p<0.05). In SEM analyzes a regular gap is seen along the hybrid layer only in Estelite Bulk Fill flow.
Conclusions: No bulk-fill composite group could reach the value of the bond strength of microhybrid composite. Although the Fill-Up group was used with the etch and rinse adhesive system among the bulk-fill composites, it showed the lowest bond strength.results: While the control group showed the highest microtensile bond strength, Fill-Up group showed the lowest. The control group was statistically significant when compared to the four different bulk-fill groups used in the study(p<0.05). Although the GrandioSO x-tra group showed the highest bonding strength among the bulk-fill composites, the differences between the Beautifil Bulk Restorative and Estelite Bulk Fill flow were statistically insignificant(p>0.05). Fill-Up was found to be statistically significant when compared to the other bulk-fill groups(p<0.05). In SEM analyzes a regular gap is seen along the hybrid layer only in Estelite Bulk Fill flow.Conclusions: No bulk-fill composite group could reach the value of the bond strength of microhybrid composite. Although the Fill-Up group was used with the etch and rinse adhesive system among the bulk-fill composites, it showed the lowest bond strength.
Results: While the control group showed the highest microtensile bond strength, Fill-Up group showed the lowest. The control group was statistically significant when compared to the four different bulk-fill groups used in the study(p<0.05). Although the GrandioSO x-tra group showed the highest bonding strength among the bulk-fill composites, the differences between the Beautifil Bulk Restorative and Estelite Bulk Fill flow were statistically insignificant(p>0.05). Fill-Up was found to be statistically significant when compared to the other bulk-fill groups(p<0.05). In SEM analyzes a regular gap is seen along the hybrid layer only in Estelite Bulk Fill flow.
Conclusions: No bulk-fill composite group could reach the value of the bond strength of microhybrid composite. Although the Fill-Up group was used with the etch and rinse adhesive system among the bulk-fill composites, it showed the lowest bond strength.
Supporting Institution
CÜBAP
Project Number
DİŞ-214
References
- REFERENCES1. Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes J, Ribeiro N, Reis A, Loguercio A. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 2006;31:409-417.2. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 2008;24:1501-1505.3. Petrovic LM, Atanackovic TM. A model for shrinkage strain in photo polymerization of dental composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:556-560.4. Petrovic LM, Drobac MR, Stojanac IL, Atanackovic TM. A method of improving marginal adaptation by elimination of singular stress point in composite restorations during resin photo-polymerization. Dent Mater 2010;26:449-455.5. Burgess J, Walker R, Davidson J. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pedıatr Dent 2002;24:465-479.6. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 2011;27:29-38.7. Lazarchik DA, Hammond BD, Sikes CL, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins. The J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:129-140.8. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011;27:348-355.9. Moorthy A, Hogg C, Dowling A, Grufferty B, Benetti AR, Fleming G. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. Int J Dent 2012;40:500-505.10. Vasquez D. A New Generation Bulk-Fill Composite For Direct Posterior Restorations. Inside Dentistry 2012;8:11. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:789-795. 12. Dhull K, Nandlal B, Dentistry P. Effect of low-concentration daily topical fluoride application on fluoride release of giomer and compomer: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:39. 13. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjör IA. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:621-627. 14. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, Hamada K, Asaoka K, Tanaka E, Yamamoto E. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent Mater 2010;29:193-198.15. Murayama R, Furuichi T, Yokokawa M, Takahashi F, Kawamoto R, Takamizawa T ve ark. Ultrasonic investigation of the effect of S-PRG filler-containing coating material on bovine tooth demineralization. Dent Mater 2012;31:954-959.16. Ünal M. The Comparison of Shear Bond Strenght of Different Bulk-Fill Composites to a Bioactive Dentine Substitute. CDJ 2018;21:274-283.17. Buldur B, Öznurhan F, Kayabaşı M, Şahin F. Shear Bond Strength Of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Cements to Compomer.CDJ 2018;21:18-23.18. Sakaguchi RL. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006.19. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LHA, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e50-e62.20. Colak H, Ercan E, Hamidi MM. Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin. Eur J Dent 2016;10:40-45.21. Almeida Junior L, Lula ECO, Penha KJS, Correia VS, Magalhaes FAC, Lima DM, Firoozmand LM. Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk Fill Composites and its Correlation with Bond Strength. Braz Dent J 2018;29:261-267. 22. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites. Dent Mater 2017;36:205-213.23. Monterubbianesi R, Orsini, G, Tosi G, Conti C, Librando V, Procaccini M, Putignano A. Spectroscopic and Mechanical Properties of a New Generation of Bulk Fill Composites. Front Physiol 2016;7:652.24. Gupta SK, Mann NS, Kaur SP, Singh JP. Bulk fill vs Conventional Composites: A Microleakage Study. J Periodontal Med Clin Prac 2016;3:122-127.
Abstract
Project Number
DİŞ-214
References
- REFERENCES1. Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes J, Ribeiro N, Reis A, Loguercio A. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 2006;31:409-417.2. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 2008;24:1501-1505.3. Petrovic LM, Atanackovic TM. A model for shrinkage strain in photo polymerization of dental composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:556-560.4. Petrovic LM, Drobac MR, Stojanac IL, Atanackovic TM. A method of improving marginal adaptation by elimination of singular stress point in composite restorations during resin photo-polymerization. Dent Mater 2010;26:449-455.5. Burgess J, Walker R, Davidson J. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pedıatr Dent 2002;24:465-479.6. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater 2011;27:29-38.7. Lazarchik DA, Hammond BD, Sikes CL, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins. The J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:129-140.8. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011;27:348-355.9. Moorthy A, Hogg C, Dowling A, Grufferty B, Benetti AR, Fleming G. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. Int J Dent 2012;40:500-505.10. Vasquez D. A New Generation Bulk-Fill Composite For Direct Posterior Restorations. Inside Dentistry 2012;8:11. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:789-795. 12. Dhull K, Nandlal B, Dentistry P. Effect of low-concentration daily topical fluoride application on fluoride release of giomer and compomer: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:39. 13. Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Watson RE, Garvan C, Mjör IA. A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: results at eight years. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:621-627. 14. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, Hamada K, Asaoka K, Tanaka E, Yamamoto E. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent Mater 2010;29:193-198.15. Murayama R, Furuichi T, Yokokawa M, Takahashi F, Kawamoto R, Takamizawa T ve ark. Ultrasonic investigation of the effect of S-PRG filler-containing coating material on bovine tooth demineralization. Dent Mater 2012;31:954-959.16. Ünal M. The Comparison of Shear Bond Strenght of Different Bulk-Fill Composites to a Bioactive Dentine Substitute. CDJ 2018;21:274-283.17. Buldur B, Öznurhan F, Kayabaşı M, Şahin F. Shear Bond Strength Of Two Calcium Silicate-Based Cements to Compomer.CDJ 2018;21:18-23.18. Sakaguchi RL. Craig's Restorative Dental Materials. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2006.19. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LHA, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “micro” bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e50-e62.20. Colak H, Ercan E, Hamidi MM. Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin. Eur J Dent 2016;10:40-45.21. Almeida Junior L, Lula ECO, Penha KJS, Correia VS, Magalhaes FAC, Lima DM, Firoozmand LM. Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk Fill Composites and its Correlation with Bond Strength. Braz Dent J 2018;29:261-267. 22. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites. Dent Mater 2017;36:205-213.23. Monterubbianesi R, Orsini, G, Tosi G, Conti C, Librando V, Procaccini M, Putignano A. Spectroscopic and Mechanical Properties of a New Generation of Bulk Fill Composites. Front Physiol 2016;7:652.24. Gupta SK, Mann NS, Kaur SP, Singh JP. Bulk fill vs Conventional Composites: A Microleakage Study. J Periodontal Med Clin Prac 2016;3:122-127.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Project Number | DİŞ-214 |
| Publication Date | September 9, 2019 |
| Submission Date | July 30, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 3 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.