Abstract
References
- 1. Cicek E, Koçak MM, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Türker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:20–26.
- 2. Alves Vde O. Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:68–72.
- 3. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple- visit endodontic treatment: a systematic rewiew. Int Endod J 2008;41:191–196.
- 4. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012;38:850–852.
- 5. Caviedes- Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2016;49:255–270.
- 6. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38:541–544.
- 7. Bürklein S, Mayhey D, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Protaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48:774–781.
- 8. Koçak MM, Çicek E, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Yılmaz N. Apical extrusion of debris using Protaper Universal and Protaper Next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015;48:283–289.
- 9. Akbulut MB, Akman M, Terlemez A, Magat G, Sener S, Shetty H. Efficacy of Twisted file Adaptive, Resiproc and Protaper Universal Retreatment instruments for root-canal-filling removal: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Dent Mater J 2016;35:126–131.10. McCrirrick A, Hunter S. Pain on injection of propofol: the effect of injectate temperature. Anaesthesia 1990;45:443–444.
- 11. Sue Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:125–132.
- 12. Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:429–438.
- 13. El Mubarak AH, Abu-bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Postoperative pain in multiple-visit and single-visit root canal treatment. J Endod 2010;36:36–39.
- 14. Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J 2004;37:531–541.
- 15. Comparin D, Moreira EJL, Souza EM, De-Deus G, Arias A, Silva EJNL. Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2017;43:1084–1088.
- 16. Gambarini G, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, Guerra F, Di Giorgio G, Glassman G, Piasecki L, Testarelli L. The Influence of a New Clinical Motion for Endodontic Instruments on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain. Clin Ter 2017;168:23–27.
- 17. Yaylali IE, Kurnaz S, Tunca YM. Maintaining Apical Patency Does Not Increase Postoperative Pain in Molars with Necrotic Pulp and Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod 2018;44:335–340.
- 18. Seltzer S. Pain in endodontics. 1986. J Endod 2004; 30:501–503.
- 19. Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J 2015;41:78–87.
- 20. Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro MR, Coutinho-Filho Tde S. Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2013;39:173–176.
- 21. Wang C, Xu P, Ren L, Dong G, Ye L. Comparison of postobturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 2010;43:692–697.
- 22. Siqueira JF, Rocas IN, Fvieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457–458.
- 23. Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2016;42:171–176.
- 24. Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Sannino G. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol 2013;20:152–155.
- 25. Relvas JB, Bastos MM, Marques AA, Garrido AD, Sponchiado EC Jr. Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1987-1993.
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of instrumentation techniques on the
postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatment.
Materials and Methods: Sixty patients having
an indication of endodontic treatment were included. Only single rooted teeth
were selected The patients were
randomly divided into 2 groups. In
group 1; the root canals were instrumented using ProTaper Next instruments with rotational motion, in group
2 TF Adaptive instruments with adaptive motion were used
during instrumentation. Treatments were completed in a single
appointment. Postoperative pain questionnaires were scored by patients using a
four-point pain intensity scale for 12, 24, and 48 hours. Mann Whitney-U,
Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were used for analyzing the final data.
Results: The comparison of time intervals between groups demonstrated no
difference between both groups (p>.05). In both groups, the postoperative
pain values of 12h time period were significantly higher than both other
periods, and significant difference was found between 24h and 48h time periods
(p<0.05). The postoperative pain values of 48h time period were
significantly lower than the other two time periods (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Both instrumentation techniques caused
postoperative pain. The pain scores indicated that both techniques caused
limited discomfort associated with slight pain which did not require any
additional treatment and medication.
References
- 1. Cicek E, Koçak MM, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Türker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci 2017;25:20–26.
- 2. Alves Vde O. Endodontic flare-ups: a prospective study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:68–72.
- 3. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple- visit endodontic treatment: a systematic rewiew. Int Endod J 2008;41:191–196.
- 4. Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012;38:850–852.
- 5. Caviedes- Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2016;49:255–270.
- 6. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012;38:541–544.
- 7. Bürklein S, Mayhey D, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Protaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48:774–781.
- 8. Koçak MM, Çicek E, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Yılmaz N. Apical extrusion of debris using Protaper Universal and Protaper Next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015;48:283–289.
- 9. Akbulut MB, Akman M, Terlemez A, Magat G, Sener S, Shetty H. Efficacy of Twisted file Adaptive, Resiproc and Protaper Universal Retreatment instruments for root-canal-filling removal: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Dent Mater J 2016;35:126–131.10. McCrirrick A, Hunter S. Pain on injection of propofol: the effect of injectate temperature. Anaesthesia 1990;45:443–444.
- 11. Sue Y, Wang C, Ye L. Healing rate and post-obturation pain of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment for infected root canals: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:125–132.
- 12. Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod 2011;37:429–438.
- 13. El Mubarak AH, Abu-bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Postoperative pain in multiple-visit and single-visit root canal treatment. J Endod 2010;36:36–39.
- 14. Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J 2004;37:531–541.
- 15. Comparin D, Moreira EJL, Souza EM, De-Deus G, Arias A, Silva EJNL. Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2017;43:1084–1088.
- 16. Gambarini G, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, Guerra F, Di Giorgio G, Glassman G, Piasecki L, Testarelli L. The Influence of a New Clinical Motion for Endodontic Instruments on the Incidence of Postoperative Pain. Clin Ter 2017;168:23–27.
- 17. Yaylali IE, Kurnaz S, Tunca YM. Maintaining Apical Patency Does Not Increase Postoperative Pain in Molars with Necrotic Pulp and Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endod 2018;44:335–340.
- 18. Seltzer S. Pain in endodontics. 1986. J Endod 2004; 30:501–503.
- 19. Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial. Aust Endod J 2015;41:78–87.
- 20. Silva EJ, Menaged K, Ajuz N, Monteiro MR, Coutinho-Filho Tde S. Postoperative pain after foraminal enlargement in anterior teeth with necrosis and apical periodontitis: a prospective and randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2013;39:173–176.
- 21. Wang C, Xu P, Ren L, Dong G, Ye L. Comparison of postobturation pain experience following one-visit and two-visit root canal treatment on teeth with vital pulps: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J 2010;43:692–697.
- 22. Siqueira JF, Rocas IN, Fvieri A, Machado AG, Gahyva SM, Oliveira JC, Abad EC. Incidence of postoperative pain after intracanal procedures based on antimicrobial strategy. J Endod 2002;28:457–458.
- 23. Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod 2016;42:171–176.
- 24. Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Sannino G. The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol 2013;20:152–155.
- 25. Relvas JB, Bastos MM, Marques AA, Garrido AD, Sponchiado EC Jr. Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1987-1993.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 9, 2019 |
| Submission Date | May 15, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 3 |
Cited By
The Editor’s recommendation of this issue’s article to readers
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Burak Buldur
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.617264
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.