Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 3, 351 - 357, 09.09.2019

İnci Kırmızıgül , Pınar Demir

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.554999
Cited By: 3

Abstract

References

  • 1. Brustolin JP, Mariath AA, Ardenghi TM, Casagrande L. Survival and factors associated with failure of pulpectomies performed in primary teeth by dental students. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(1):121-8.
  • 2. Garip G, Nur BG, Altunsoy M, Ok E. Süt dişlerinde nikel titanyum döner aletlerinin kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;25(2):249-57.
  • 3. George S, Anandaraj S, Issac JS, John SA, Harris A. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth - a review. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(1):12-7.
  • 4. Katge F, Chimata VK, Poojari M, Shetty S, Rusawat B. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between rotary and manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(2):124-7.
  • 5. Arıkan V, Akçay M, Zeren AE, Sarı Ş, Çelik BN. Süt dişi kök kanal tedavisinde Hero 642 Protaper Ni-Ti döner sistemler ve K tipi eğenin preparasyon güvenliği ve süresi açısından in-vitro olarak karşılaştırılması. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2010;37(2):89-96.
  • 6. Asgary S, Fazlyab M. Endodontic management of an infected primary molar in a child with agenesis of the permanent premolar. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(1):119-22.
  • 7. Kuo C, Wang Y, Chang H, Huang G, Lin C, Li U, Guo M. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent. 2006;1(1):10.
  • 8. Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(4):186-91.
  • 9. de Melo Ribeiro MV, Silva-Sousa YT, Versiani MA, Lamira A, Steier L, Pecora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and rotary systems in the apical third of oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2013;39(3):398-401.
  • 10. Ramezanali F, Afkhami F, Soleimani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Rafiee F. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars: Mtwo rotary instruments vs. hand K-files. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(4):240-3.
  • 11. Ramazani N, Mohammadi A, Amirabadi F, Ramazani M, Ehsani F. In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(1):49-56.
  • 12. Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):379-85.
  • 13. Pinheiro SL, Silva JN, Goncalves RO, Villalpando KT. Manual and rotary instrumentation ability to reduce Enterococcus Faecalis associated with photodynamic therapy in deciduous molars. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(6):502-7.
  • 14. Subramaniam P, Tabrez TA, Babu KL. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38(2):123-7.
  • 15. Selvakumar H, Kavitha S, Thomas E, Anadhan V, Vijayakumar R. computed tomographic evaluation of K3 rotary and stainless steel K file instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):5-8.
  • 16. Kaya E, Elbay M, Yigit D. Evaluation of the Self-Adjusting File system (SAF) for the instrumentation of primary molar root canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(2):105-10.
  • 17. Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediat Dent. 2006;28(6):518-23.
  • 18. Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2):113-20.
  • 19. Deshpande AN, Joshi NH, Naik KS. In vitro comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy and volumetric filling in primary molars: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(1):33-7.
  • 20. Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, Pimpale J, Shitoot A, Rusawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):311-6.
  • 21. Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Tabrez TA. Effectiveness of rotary endodontic instruments on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):141-6.
  • 22. Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dental Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(2):146-51.
  • 23. Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(2):363.
  • 24. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):295-8.
  • 25. Zeren AE, Çelik BN, Arıkan V, Akçay M, Sarı Ş. Dört farklı döner alet sistemi ve K tipi eğe ile prepare edilen süt azı dişlerinde apikal mikrosızıntının in vitro olarak karşılaştırılması. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2012;39(1):7-15.
  • 26. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(3):376-9.
  • 27. Poornima P, Disha P, Nagaveni NB, Roopa KB, Bharath KP, Neena IE. Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography - an invitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(3):193-8.
  • 28. Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(2):84-9.
  • 29. Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS, Akpek F. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(5):357-63.
  • 30. Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S, Saygili G, Uysal B. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems in primary teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(11):864-8.
  • 31. Singh A, Arunagiri D, Pushpa S, Sawhny A, Misra A, Khetan K. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: an ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(5):405-8.
  • 32. Topcuoglu G, Topcuoglu HS, Delikan E, Aydinbelge M, Dogan S. Postoperative pain after root canal preparation with hand and rotary files in primary molar teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(3):192-6.
  • 33. Arıkan V, Akçay M, Zeren A, Sarı Ş. Comparison of A Ni-Ti rotary system (ProTaper) with K Files in primary tooth root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2011;17(2):170.
  • 34. Prabhakar AR, Yavagal C, Dixit K, Naik SV. Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):45-9.
  • 35. Jeevanandan G. Kedo-S paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth - case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):3-5.
  • 36. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):75-9.
  • 37. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77-8.

Usage of Rotary Instruments in Root Canal Therapy of Deciduous Teeth - Review

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 3, 351 - 357, 09.09.2019

İnci Kırmızıgül , Pınar Demir

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.554999
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Maintaining the deciduous teeth in the mouth until
the time of physiological exfoliation is of great importance for the health of
the permanent dentition. Root canal treatment, also called pulpectomy,
performed in cases of inflammation or necrosis of the deciduous teeth pulp, is
indicated as a successful method to preserve the tooth functionally. Conventional
pulpectomy procedure is performed with stainless steel files, however, the low
elasticity of these files may cause undesirable canal shapes and the
time-taking treatment period may lead to deterioration of the patient's
cooperation, especially in pedodontics. Ni-Ti rotary instrument systems
eliminate these disadvantages and provide better quality canal fillings in a
shorter duration. The present article reviewed the studies that are comparing
the traditional stainless steel files and Ni-Ti rotating instrument for the
root canal treatment of deciduous teeth.


Keywords

Deciduous teeth root canal treatment stainless steel files rotary instruments

References

  • 1. Brustolin JP, Mariath AA, Ardenghi TM, Casagrande L. Survival and factors associated with failure of pulpectomies performed in primary teeth by dental students. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(1):121-8.
  • 2. Garip G, Nur BG, Altunsoy M, Ok E. Süt dişlerinde nikel titanyum döner aletlerinin kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;25(2):249-57.
  • 3. George S, Anandaraj S, Issac JS, John SA, Harris A. Rotary endodontics in primary teeth - a review. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(1):12-7.
  • 4. Katge F, Chimata VK, Poojari M, Shetty S, Rusawat B. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time between rotary and manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(2):124-7.
  • 5. Arıkan V, Akçay M, Zeren AE, Sarı Ş, Çelik BN. Süt dişi kök kanal tedavisinde Hero 642 Protaper Ni-Ti döner sistemler ve K tipi eğenin preparasyon güvenliği ve süresi açısından in-vitro olarak karşılaştırılması. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2010;37(2):89-96.
  • 6. Asgary S, Fazlyab M. Endodontic management of an infected primary molar in a child with agenesis of the permanent premolar. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(1):119-22.
  • 7. Kuo C, Wang Y, Chang H, Huang G, Lin C, Li U, Guo M. Application of Ni-Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars. J Dent. 2006;1(1):10.
  • 8. Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006;24(4):186-91.
  • 9. de Melo Ribeiro MV, Silva-Sousa YT, Versiani MA, Lamira A, Steier L, Pecora JD, de Sousa-Neto MD. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of self-adjusting file and rotary systems in the apical third of oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2013;39(3):398-401.
  • 10. Ramezanali F, Afkhami F, Soleimani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Rafiee F. Comparison of cleaning efficacy and instrumentation time in primary molars: Mtwo rotary instruments vs. hand K-files. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(4):240-3.
  • 11. Ramazani N, Mohammadi A, Amirabadi F, Ramazani M, Ehsani F. In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(1):49-56.
  • 12. Pinheiro SL, Araujo G, Bincelli I, Cunha R, Bueno C. Evaluation of cleaning capacity and instrumentation time of manual, hybrid and rotary instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Int Endod J. 2012;45(4):379-85.
  • 13. Pinheiro SL, Silva JN, Goncalves RO, Villalpando KT. Manual and rotary instrumentation ability to reduce Enterococcus Faecalis associated with photodynamic therapy in deciduous molars. Braz Dent J. 2014;25(6):502-7.
  • 14. Subramaniam P, Tabrez TA, Babu KL. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;38(2):123-7.
  • 15. Selvakumar H, Kavitha S, Thomas E, Anadhan V, Vijayakumar R. computed tomographic evaluation of K3 rotary and stainless steel K file instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(1):5-8.
  • 16. Kaya E, Elbay M, Yigit D. Evaluation of the Self-Adjusting File system (SAF) for the instrumentation of primary molar root canals: a micro-computed tomographic study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18(2):105-10.
  • 17. Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediat Dent. 2006;28(6):518-23.
  • 18. Musale PK, Mujawar SA. Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2):113-20.
  • 19. Deshpande AN, Joshi NH, Naik KS. In vitro comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy and volumetric filling in primary molars: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(1):33-7.
  • 20. Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, Pimpale J, Shitoot A, Rusawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):311-6.
  • 21. Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Tabrez TA. Effectiveness of rotary endodontic instruments on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):141-6.
  • 22. Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dental Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(2):146-51.
  • 23. Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(2):363.
  • 24. Crespo S, Cortes O, Garcia C, Perez L. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008;32(4):295-8.
  • 25. Zeren AE, Çelik BN, Arıkan V, Akçay M, Sarı Ş. Dört farklı döner alet sistemi ve K tipi eğe ile prepare edilen süt azı dişlerinde apikal mikrosızıntının in vitro olarak karşılaştırılması. AÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2012;39(1):7-15.
  • 26. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(3):376-9.
  • 27. Poornima P, Disha P, Nagaveni NB, Roopa KB, Bharath KP, Neena IE. Volumetric analysis of hand and rotary root canal instrumentation and filling in primary teeth using Spiral Computed Tomography - an invitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(3):193-8.
  • 28. Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(2):84-9.
  • 29. Topçuoğlu G, Topçuoğlu HS, Akpek F. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(5):357-63.
  • 30. Kucukyilmaz E, Savas S, Saygili G, Uysal B. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems in primary teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(11):864-8.
  • 31. Singh A, Arunagiri D, Pushpa S, Sawhny A, Misra A, Khetan K. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using ProTaper hand, M-two rotary and WaveOne single file reciprocating system: an ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(5):405-8.
  • 32. Topcuoglu G, Topcuoglu HS, Delikan E, Aydinbelge M, Dogan S. Postoperative pain after root canal preparation with hand and rotary files in primary molar teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(3):192-6.
  • 33. Arıkan V, Akçay M, Zeren A, Sarı Ş. Comparison of A Ni-Ti rotary system (ProTaper) with K Files in primary tooth root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2011;17(2):170.
  • 34. Prabhakar AR, Yavagal C, Dixit K, Naik SV. Reciprocating vs rotary instrumentation in pediatric endodontics: cone beam computed tomographic analysis of deciduous root canals using two single-file systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(1):45-9.
  • 35. Jeevanandan G. Kedo-S paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth - case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3):3-5.
  • 36. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):75-9.
  • 37. Barr ES, Kleier DJ, Barr NV. Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(1):77-8.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Review
Authors

İnci Kırmızıgül 0000-0003-1236-965X

Pınar Demir 0000-0003-2030-5429

Publication Date September 9, 2019
Submission Date April 17, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 3

Cite

EndNote Kırmızıgül İ, Demir P (September 1, 2019) Usage of Rotary Instruments in Root Canal Therapy of Deciduous Teeth - Review. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 3 351–357.

Cited By

Comparative Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time Using Different File Systems in Deciduous Molars: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Advances in Human Biology
https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_22_22
Update in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Root Canal Therapy in Temporary Dentition through Different Rotatory Systems: A Systematic Review
Diagnostics
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112775
Preference and Perception of Pediatric Dentists about Usage of Hand and Rotary Endodontic Files for Treatment of Primary Teeth: A Cross-sectional Study
Journal of Contemporary Dentistry
HN Subhadra
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1278
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.