Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 2, 198 - 210, 31.05.2019

Rukiye Durkan , Perihan Oyar , Gonca Deste

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.505807

Abstract

References

  • Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt H. A 10-year followup study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:36-42.
  • Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:22-38.
  • Salamanca E, Lin JCY, Tsai CY, Hsu YS, Huang HM, Teng NC, Wang PD, Feng SW, Chen MS, Chang WJ. Dental implant surrounding marginal bone level evaluation: platform switching versus platform matching-one-year retrospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7191534.
  • Fanghanel J, Gedrange T, Proff P. Bone quality, quantity and metabolism in terms of dental implantation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2008;53:215-9.
  • Liu Y, Wang J. Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant–abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck. Archives Oral Biology 2017;83:153-160.
  • Hagiwara Y. Does platform switching really prevent crestal bone loss around implants? Japanese Dent Sci Review 2010;46:122-31.
  • Singh R, Singh SV, Arora V. Platform switching: a narrative review. Implant Dent 2013;22:453-9.
  • Alvarez-Arenal A, Segura-Mori L, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, DeLlanos-Lanchares H, Sanchez-Lasheras F, Ellacuria-Echevarria J. Stress distribution in the transitional peri-implant bone in a single implant-supported prosthesis with platform-switching under different angulated loads. Odontology 2017;105:68-75.
  • Valles C, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Clementini M, Baglivo M, Paniagua B, Nart J. Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations 2018;22:555-570.
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  • Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 1998;80:641.
  • de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC Jr, Freitas MM Jr. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1108-14.
  • Shapoff CA, Lahey B, Wasserlauf PA, Kim DM. Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels around Laser-Lok collar dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:129-37.
  • Misch CE. Dental İmplant Protezler. Kutay Ö. 1. Basım, İstanbul, Nobel Matbaacılık, 2009;189-195.
  • Wu AY, Lung H, Huang HL, Chee W. Biomechanical investigations of the expanded platform-switching concept in immediately loaded small diameter implants. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:20-5.
  • Ferraz CC, Anchieta RB, de Almeida EO, Freitas AC Jr, Ferraz FC, Machado LS, Rocha EP. Influence of microthreads and platform switching on stress distribution in bone using angled abutments. J Prosthodont Res 2012;56:256-63.
  • Cumbo C, Marigo L, Somma F, La Torre G, Minciacchi I, D'Addona A. Implant platform switching concept: a literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:392-7.
  • Minatel L, Verri FR, Kudo GAH, Almeida DAF, Batista VES, Lemos CAA, Pellizzer EP, Junior JFS. Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses. Mater Sci Engineering C 2017;71:35-42.
  • Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
  • Junior JFS, Batista VE, Verri FR, Honório HM, de Mello CC, Almeida DA, Pellizzer EP. Platform-switching implants and bone preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:332-45.
  • Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Moy PK. Three-year post-loading results of a randomised, controlled, split-mouth trial comparing implants with different prosthetic interfaces and design in partially posterior edentulous mandibles. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7:47-61.
  • Guerra F, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Rocha S, Moergel M, Behrens E, Nicolau P. Platform switch versus platform match in the posterior mandible- 1-year results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41:521-9.
  • Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform-switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:138-45.
  • Lago L, da Silva L, Gude F, Rilo B. Bone and Soft Tissue Response in Bone-Level Implants Restored with Platform Switching: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2017;32:919-926.
  • Arora V, Rao J, Singh SV, Mishra N, Singh K, Kumar L, Agrawal KK, Mohammad S. An in vivo 24-month study to compare crestal bone loss and pocket depth of platform-switched implants placed in maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior regions. J Prosthodont 2016;25:371-4.
  • Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2272-7.
  • Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2010;81: 1350-66.
  • Prasad DK, Shetty M, Bansal N, Hegde C. Crestal bone preservation: a review of different approaches for successful implant therapy. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:317-23.
  • Yun HJ, Park JC, Yun JH, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, et al. A short-term clinical study of marginal bone level change around microthreaded and platform-switched implants. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2011;41:211-7.
  • Lindhe J, Meyle J. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:282-5.
  • Lang NP, Berglundh T. Periimplant diseases: where are we now? Consensus of the seventh European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:178-81.
  • Freitas-Júnior AC, Rocha EP, Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Anchieta RB, Martini AP, Assunção WG, Silva NR, Coelho PG. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2012;28:218-28.
  • Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:342-358.
  • Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence ofimplant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:422-31.
  • Hammerle CH, Bragger U, Burgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:111– 119.
  • Lee J, Fiorini T, Gamborena I, Wenzel BA, Schüpbach P, Wikesjö UM, Susin C. Effect of Platform Shift/Switch on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flapless Surgery and Crestal/Subcrestal Implant Placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:73-81.
  • Palaska I, Tsaousoglou P, Vouros I, Konstantinidis A, Menexes G. Influence of placement depth and abutment connection pattern on bone remodeling around 1-stage implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016,27:47-56.
  • Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:568-572.
  • Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Méndez-Blanco V, Tarnow DP. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:141-151.
  • Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
  • Duyck J, Vandamme K, Geris L, Van Oosterwyck H, De Cooman M, Vandersloten J, Puers R, Naert I. The influence of micromotion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:1–9.
  • Clementini M, Rossetti PH, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela WC, Canullo L. Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:323-334.
  • Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 2006. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:9-17.
  • Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, Sogo M. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:581-4.
  • Romanos G, Grizas E, Laukart E, Nentwig GH. Effects of Early Moderate Loading on Implant Stability: A Retrospective Investigation of 634 Implants with Platform Switching and Morse-Tapered Connections. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:301-9.
  • Tabata LF, Assunção WG, Adelino Ricardo Barão V, et al. Implant Platform Switching: Biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:182-7.
  • Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Brandetti G, Calasso S. A 36-month follow-up prospective cohort study on peri-implant bone loss of morse taper connection implants with platform switching. J Oral Sci 2016;58:49-57.
  • Barwacz CA, Stanford CM, Diehl UA, Qian F, Cooper LF, Feine J, McGuire M. Electronic assessment of peri-implant mucosal esthetics around three implant-abutment configurations: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:707-15.
  • Carinci F, Brunelli G, Danza M. Platform switching and bone platform switching. J Oral Implantol 2009;35:245-50.
  • Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Platform switch and dental implants: A meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:629-46.
  • Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71:34-7.
  • Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:735-40.
  • Canay S, Akça K. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18:239-248.
  • Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, Higginbottom FL, Jones AA, Jung RE, Wieland M, Dard M. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2009;80:609-17.
  • Becker J, Ferrari D, Herten M, Kirsch A, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:1089-96.
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb D, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  • Calvo-Guirado JL, Gómez-Moreno G, López-Marí L, Guardia J, Negri B, Martínez-González JM. Crestal bone loss evaluation in osseotite expanded platform implants: a 5-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1409-14.
  • Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hürzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:577-81.
  • Sivolella S, Guazzo R, Bressan E, Berengo M, Stellini E. Platform switching on wide-diameter external hex implants: a finite element analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:77-82.
  • Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants used in an immediate loading protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:920-6.
  • Desai MH, Patil VA. Platform switching: A panacea for bone loss? J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17:681-3.
  • Girolamo M, Calcaterra R, Gianfilippo R, Arcuri C, Baggi L. Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2016 ;13;9:1-10.
  • de Carvalho BA, Vedovatto E, de Carvalho PS, Mazaro JV, Falcón-Antenucci RM. Effect of mechanical cycling on screw torque in external hexagon implants with and without platform switching. Braz Dent J 2015;26:284-7.
  • Deshpande SS, Sarin SP, Parkhedkar RD. Platform switching of dental implants: Panacea for crestal bone loss? J Clin Diagn Res 2009;3:1348-1352. 65. Baggi L, Di Girolamo M, Vairo G, Sannino G.
  • Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance. Comput Math Methods Med 2013;2013:250929.
  • MoonSY, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:31-37.
  • Cimen H,Yengin E. Analyzing the effects of the platform-switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by 3-dimensional fem analysis. J Oral Implantol 2012;38:21-6.
  • Pellizzer EP, Falcón-Antenucci RM, de Carvalho PS, Santiago JF, de Moraes SL, de Carvalho BM. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:419-24.
  • Khurana P, Sharma A, Sodhi KK. Influence of fine threads and platform-switching on crestal bone stress around implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:697-703.
  • Vargas LC, de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Kina S, Anchieta RB, Júnior AC, França FM. Regular and switching platform: bone stress analysis with varying implant diameter. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:326-31.
  • Bouazza-Juanes K, Martínez-González A, Peiró G, Ródenas JJ, López-Mollá MV. Effect of platform switching on the peri-implant bone: A finite element study. J Clin Exp Dent 2015 1;7:e483-8.
  • Sahabi M, Adibrad M, Mirhashemi FS, Habibzadeh S. Biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:338-50.
  • Lago L, da Silva L, Martinez-Silva I, Rilo B. Crestal bone level around tissue-level ımplants restored with platform matching and bone-level implants restored with platform switching: a 5-year randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:448-456.
  • Spinato S, Galindo-Moreno P, Bernardello F, Zaffe D. Minimum abutment height to eliminate bone loss: influence of implant neck design and platform switching. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:405-411.
  • Hsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL. Effects of platform-switching on peri-implant soft and hard tissue outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:9-24.
  • Rocha S, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Nicolau P, Moergel M, Messias A, Behrens E, Guerra F. Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2016;43:374-82.
  • Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Monje A, Ortega-Oller I, O'Valle F, Catena A. Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:167-73.
  • Wang YC, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:220-7.
  • Al-Qutaib AY. There is no clear evidence of superiority concerning the platform-switching in the preservation of the marginal bone level. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2015;15:118-20.
  • Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:347-55.
  • Al Amri MD, Kellesarian SV, Al-Kheraif AA, Malmstrom H, Javed F, Romanos GE. Effect of oral hygiene maintenance on HbA1c levels and peri-implant parameters around immediately-loaded dental implants placed in type-2 diabetic patients: 2 years follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1439-1443.
  • Del Fabbro M, Bianchessi C, Del Lupo R, Landi L, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Platform switching vs standard implants in partially edentulous patients using the Dental Tech Implant System: clinical and radiological results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2233-44.
  • Liu S, Tang C, Yu J, Dai 1, Bao Y, Hu D. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1111-8.

The Impact of Platform-Switched Implants on the Marginal Bone Level and Soft Tissue Dimensions

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 2, 198 - 210, 31.05.2019

Rukiye Durkan , Perihan Oyar , Gonca Deste

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.505807

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this
study is to compare the characteristics of the concept of platform-switched
implants (PSW) that have recently emerged in implant dentistry and its effects
on the marginal bone loss (MBL) around the implant with platform-matched
implants (PMI).

Data: In the study, PSW
implant-abutment connection system, MBL, and peri-implant hard and soft tissue
changes were examined. The research terms used in the study are dental implant, platform switching concept,
switched platform, platform mismatch, platform-matched implants, and dental
implant-abutment design.

Sources: In the electronic
research, the language was selected as English and studies conducted until
March 2018 were investigated without year limitation. The electronic studies
include the National Library of Medicine, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science,
Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled
Trials.

Study selection: Studies, retrospective
or prospective clinical human studies, either randomized systematic review and meta-analyses, and finite
element analyses (FEA) were examined. Case reports and studies of animal
experiments were excluded from the review.









Conclusions: It was observed that
clinical trials consisted of short and medium-term follow-ups and biomechanical
studies were limited. It was observed that PSW implant systems obtain positive
results in reducing the MBL and are more aesthetic
in terms of soft tissue formation compared to PMI systems, and interest has
been gradually increasing in the PSW system in recent years. It was revealed
that long-term clinical trials for the PSW system are required.

Keywords

platform-switching dental implant-abutment design dental abutments dental implants alveolar bone loss

References

  • Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt H. A 10-year followup study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:36-42.
  • Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:22-38.
  • Salamanca E, Lin JCY, Tsai CY, Hsu YS, Huang HM, Teng NC, Wang PD, Feng SW, Chen MS, Chang WJ. Dental implant surrounding marginal bone level evaluation: platform switching versus platform matching-one-year retrospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7191534.
  • Fanghanel J, Gedrange T, Proff P. Bone quality, quantity and metabolism in terms of dental implantation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2008;53:215-9.
  • Liu Y, Wang J. Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant–abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck. Archives Oral Biology 2017;83:153-160.
  • Hagiwara Y. Does platform switching really prevent crestal bone loss around implants? Japanese Dent Sci Review 2010;46:122-31.
  • Singh R, Singh SV, Arora V. Platform switching: a narrative review. Implant Dent 2013;22:453-9.
  • Alvarez-Arenal A, Segura-Mori L, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, DeLlanos-Lanchares H, Sanchez-Lasheras F, Ellacuria-Echevarria J. Stress distribution in the transitional peri-implant bone in a single implant-supported prosthesis with platform-switching under different angulated loads. Odontology 2017;105:68-75.
  • Valles C, Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Clementini M, Baglivo M, Paniagua B, Nart J. Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations 2018;22:555-570.
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  • Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 1998;80:641.
  • de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC Jr, Freitas MM Jr. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:1108-14.
  • Shapoff CA, Lahey B, Wasserlauf PA, Kim DM. Radiographic analysis of crestal bone levels around Laser-Lok collar dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:129-37.
  • Misch CE. Dental İmplant Protezler. Kutay Ö. 1. Basım, İstanbul, Nobel Matbaacılık, 2009;189-195.
  • Wu AY, Lung H, Huang HL, Chee W. Biomechanical investigations of the expanded platform-switching concept in immediately loaded small diameter implants. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:20-5.
  • Ferraz CC, Anchieta RB, de Almeida EO, Freitas AC Jr, Ferraz FC, Machado LS, Rocha EP. Influence of microthreads and platform switching on stress distribution in bone using angled abutments. J Prosthodont Res 2012;56:256-63.
  • Cumbo C, Marigo L, Somma F, La Torre G, Minciacchi I, D'Addona A. Implant platform switching concept: a literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17:392-7.
  • Minatel L, Verri FR, Kudo GAH, Almeida DAF, Batista VES, Lemos CAA, Pellizzer EP, Junior JFS. Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses. Mater Sci Engineering C 2017;71:35-42.
  • Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
  • Junior JFS, Batista VE, Verri FR, Honório HM, de Mello CC, Almeida DA, Pellizzer EP. Platform-switching implants and bone preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:332-45.
  • Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Moy PK. Three-year post-loading results of a randomised, controlled, split-mouth trial comparing implants with different prosthetic interfaces and design in partially posterior edentulous mandibles. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7:47-61.
  • Guerra F, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Rocha S, Moergel M, Behrens E, Nicolau P. Platform switch versus platform match in the posterior mandible- 1-year results of a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41:521-9.
  • Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform-switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:138-45.
  • Lago L, da Silva L, Gude F, Rilo B. Bone and Soft Tissue Response in Bone-Level Implants Restored with Platform Switching: A 5-Year Clinical Prospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2017;32:919-926.
  • Arora V, Rao J, Singh SV, Mishra N, Singh K, Kumar L, Agrawal KK, Mohammad S. An in vivo 24-month study to compare crestal bone loss and pocket depth of platform-switched implants placed in maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior regions. J Prosthodont 2016;25:371-4.
  • Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2272-7.
  • Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2010;81: 1350-66.
  • Prasad DK, Shetty M, Bansal N, Hegde C. Crestal bone preservation: a review of different approaches for successful implant therapy. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22:317-23.
  • Yun HJ, Park JC, Yun JH, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, et al. A short-term clinical study of marginal bone level change around microthreaded and platform-switched implants. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2011;41:211-7.
  • Lindhe J, Meyle J. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:282-5.
  • Lang NP, Berglundh T. Periimplant diseases: where are we now? Consensus of the seventh European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:178-81.
  • Freitas-Júnior AC, Rocha EP, Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Anchieta RB, Martini AP, Assunção WG, Silva NR, Coelho PG. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2012;28:218-28.
  • Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:342-358.
  • Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence ofimplant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:422-31.
  • Hammerle CH, Bragger U, Burgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:111– 119.
  • Lee J, Fiorini T, Gamborena I, Wenzel BA, Schüpbach P, Wikesjö UM, Susin C. Effect of Platform Shift/Switch on Crestal Bone Levels and Mucosal Profile Following Flapless Surgery and Crestal/Subcrestal Implant Placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:73-81.
  • Palaska I, Tsaousoglou P, Vouros I, Konstantinidis A, Menexes G. Influence of placement depth and abutment connection pattern on bone remodeling around 1-stage implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016,27:47-56.
  • Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:568-572.
  • Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Méndez-Blanco V, Tarnow DP. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:141-151.
  • Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
  • Duyck J, Vandamme K, Geris L, Van Oosterwyck H, De Cooman M, Vandersloten J, Puers R, Naert I. The influence of micromotion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Arch Oral Biol 2006;51:1–9.
  • Clementini M, Rossetti PH, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela WC, Canullo L. Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:323-334.
  • Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 2006. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:9-17.
  • Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, Sogo M. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:581-4.
  • Romanos G, Grizas E, Laukart E, Nentwig GH. Effects of Early Moderate Loading on Implant Stability: A Retrospective Investigation of 634 Implants with Platform Switching and Morse-Tapered Connections. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:301-9.
  • Tabata LF, Assunção WG, Adelino Ricardo Barão V, et al. Implant Platform Switching: Biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:182-7.
  • Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Brandetti G, Calasso S. A 36-month follow-up prospective cohort study on peri-implant bone loss of morse taper connection implants with platform switching. J Oral Sci 2016;58:49-57.
  • Barwacz CA, Stanford CM, Diehl UA, Qian F, Cooper LF, Feine J, McGuire M. Electronic assessment of peri-implant mucosal esthetics around three implant-abutment configurations: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:707-15.
  • Carinci F, Brunelli G, Danza M. Platform switching and bone platform switching. J Oral Implantol 2009;35:245-50.
  • Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Platform switch and dental implants: A meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:629-46.
  • Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71:34-7.
  • Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, Meltzer A, Porter S. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:735-40.
  • Canay S, Akça K. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18:239-248.
  • Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, Higginbottom FL, Jones AA, Jung RE, Wieland M, Dard M. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2009;80:609-17.
  • Becker J, Ferrari D, Herten M, Kirsch A, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:1089-96.
  • Albrektsson T, Zarb D, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  • Calvo-Guirado JL, Gómez-Moreno G, López-Marí L, Guardia J, Negri B, Martínez-González JM. Crestal bone loss evaluation in osseotite expanded platform implants: a 5-year study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:1409-14.
  • Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hürzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:577-81.
  • Sivolella S, Guazzo R, Bressan E, Berengo M, Stellini E. Platform switching on wide-diameter external hex implants: a finite element analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:77-82.
  • Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around platform-switched and non-platform-switched implants used in an immediate loading protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:920-6.
  • Desai MH, Patil VA. Platform switching: A panacea for bone loss? J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17:681-3.
  • Girolamo M, Calcaterra R, Gianfilippo R, Arcuri C, Baggi L. Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2016 ;13;9:1-10.
  • de Carvalho BA, Vedovatto E, de Carvalho PS, Mazaro JV, Falcón-Antenucci RM. Effect of mechanical cycling on screw torque in external hexagon implants with and without platform switching. Braz Dent J 2015;26:284-7.
  • Deshpande SS, Sarin SP, Parkhedkar RD. Platform switching of dental implants: Panacea for crestal bone loss? J Clin Diagn Res 2009;3:1348-1352. 65. Baggi L, Di Girolamo M, Vairo G, Sannino G.
  • Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance. Comput Math Methods Med 2013;2013:250929.
  • MoonSY, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:31-37.
  • Cimen H,Yengin E. Analyzing the effects of the platform-switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by 3-dimensional fem analysis. J Oral Implantol 2012;38:21-6.
  • Pellizzer EP, Falcón-Antenucci RM, de Carvalho PS, Santiago JF, de Moraes SL, de Carvalho BM. Photoelastic analysis of the influence of platform switching on stress distribution in implants. J Oral Implantol 2010;36:419-24.
  • Khurana P, Sharma A, Sodhi KK. Influence of fine threads and platform-switching on crestal bone stress around implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:697-703.
  • Vargas LC, de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Kina S, Anchieta RB, Júnior AC, França FM. Regular and switching platform: bone stress analysis with varying implant diameter. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:326-31.
  • Bouazza-Juanes K, Martínez-González A, Peiró G, Ródenas JJ, López-Mollá MV. Effect of platform switching on the peri-implant bone: A finite element study. J Clin Exp Dent 2015 1;7:e483-8.
  • Sahabi M, Adibrad M, Mirhashemi FS, Habibzadeh S. Biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:338-50.
  • Lago L, da Silva L, Martinez-Silva I, Rilo B. Crestal bone level around tissue-level ımplants restored with platform matching and bone-level implants restored with platform switching: a 5-year randomized controlled trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:448-456.
  • Spinato S, Galindo-Moreno P, Bernardello F, Zaffe D. Minimum abutment height to eliminate bone loss: influence of implant neck design and platform switching. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:405-411.
  • Hsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL. Effects of platform-switching on peri-implant soft and hard tissue outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:9-24.
  • Rocha S, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Nicolau P, Moergel M, Messias A, Behrens E, Guerra F. Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2016;43:374-82.
  • Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Monje A, Ortega-Oller I, O'Valle F, Catena A. Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:167-73.
  • Wang YC, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:220-7.
  • Al-Qutaib AY. There is no clear evidence of superiority concerning the platform-switching in the preservation of the marginal bone level. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2015;15:118-20.
  • Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platformswitched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:347-55.
  • Al Amri MD, Kellesarian SV, Al-Kheraif AA, Malmstrom H, Javed F, Romanos GE. Effect of oral hygiene maintenance on HbA1c levels and peri-implant parameters around immediately-loaded dental implants placed in type-2 diabetic patients: 2 years follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1439-1443.
  • Del Fabbro M, Bianchessi C, Del Lupo R, Landi L, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Platform switching vs standard implants in partially edentulous patients using the Dental Tech Implant System: clinical and radiological results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2233-44.
  • Liu S, Tang C, Yu J, Dai 1, Bao Y, Hu D. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1111-8.
There are 83 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Rukiye Durkan 0000-0002-3381-4073

Perihan Oyar 0000-0003-3849-9153

Gonca Deste 0000-0002-5481-0063

Publication Date May 31, 2019
Submission Date December 31, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Durkan R, Oyar P, Deste G (May 1, 2019) The Impact of Platform-Switched Implants on the Marginal Bone Level and Soft Tissue Dimensions. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 2 198–210.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.