Research Article
Year 2019,
Volume: 22 Issue: 2, 226 - 234, 31.05.2019
Abstract
References
- Reference1. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, et al. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487-495.
- Reference2. Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, et al. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-495.
- Reference3. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227-235.
- Reference4. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, et al. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-962.
- Reference5. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:531-540.
- Reference6. Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, et al. Marjinal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer- composite Class II restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:500-509.
- Reference7. Armstrong DJ, Kimball D. Fiber-reinforced polymer ceramic fixed partial dentures in the esthetic zone: a clinical and laboratory case perspective. Quintessence Dent Technol 2000;25:104-113.
- Reference8. Kurt EÇ, Özdoğan MS, Yılmaz H. Ceromers and fiber-reinforced composites. The Journal of Dental Faculty of Atatürk University 2006;16:52-60.
- Reference9. Waki T, Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K et al. Adesive strength between fiber reinforced composites and veneering composites and fracture load of combinations of these materials. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:364-368.
- Reference10. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:163–169.
- Reference11. Elsaka SE. Effect of surface treatments on the bonding strength of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramics. Quintessence Int 2013;44:407.
- Reference12. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-290.
- Reference13. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-257.
- Reference14. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71.
- Reference15. Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, et al. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014;30:147-162.
- Reference16. Güngör MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, et al. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/ CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:259-266.
- Reference17. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, et al. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155-164.
- Reference18. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484.
- Reference19. Loomans BA, Mesko ME, Moraes RR, et al. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J Dent 2017;59,18-25.
- Reference20. Kömürcüoğlu MB, Sağırkaya E, Tulga A. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:439-446.
- Reference21. Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:20-24.
- Reference22. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, et al. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2003;19:575-583.
- Reference23. Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR. Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater 2011;27:99-105.
- Reference24. Colares RC, Neri JR, Souza AM, et al. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Braz Dent J 2013;24:349-352.
- Reference25. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308.
- Reference26. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-167.
- Reference27. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N., Kleverlaan CJ, et al. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-991.
- Reference28. Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, et al. Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic. J Dent 2007;35:282-288.
- Reference29. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, et al. Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:265-273.
- Reference30. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/ CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
- Reference31. Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior L Jr, et al. Influence of acid etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012;60:79-85.
- Reference32. Ikemura K, Tanaka H, Fujii T, et al. Development of a new single-bottle multi-purpose primer for bonding to dental porcelain, alumina, zirconia, and dental gold alloy. Dent Mater J 2011;30:478–484.
- Reference33. Li R. Development of a ceramic primer with higher bond durability for resin cement. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:560-568.
- Reference34. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, et al. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1477-1483.
- Reference35. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508-513.
- Reference36. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, et al. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-855.
- Reference37. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885-892.
- Reference38. Pollington S, Fabianelli A, van Noort R. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass ceramic following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010;26:864-872.
Effects of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic or Ceromer to Resin Cement
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the micro-tensile
bond strength (MTBS) of two different indirect restoration materials (resin nano ceramic CAD/CAM
material [Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE]; ceromer
material [Estenia C&B, Kuraray Medical]).
Materials and Methods: Specimens
were prepared from each test material in dimensions of 3×10×10 mm. The specimens were divided into five
different surface treatment groups: group 1 (control [C]), no treatment; group
2 (acid etching [A]); group 3 (acid etching + universal adhesive [AA]); group 4
(sandblasting [S]); and group 5 (sandblasting + universal adhesive [SA]). The
prepared specimens were cemented to composite parts (Filtek Z250 Universal
Restorative, 3M
ESPE) of the same size using dual-cure adhesive resin
cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray Medical). A total, 100 bar-shaped specimens
(6×1×1 mm) were cut using a low-speed diamond saw (n=10 in each group). The MTBS test was performed in all groups (Shimadzu AG-50 kNG, Kyoto,
Japan, 1 mm/min). Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
Tukey’s multiple comparison tests at a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: The MTBS values were significantly influenced by the
type of restorative material and surface treatment (p<0.05). There were
statistically significant differences between the materials and surface
treatments procedures (p<0.05). For Lava Ultimate and Estenia C&B
materials, the highest MTBS value was obtained in the SA surface treatment (p<0.05)
and the lowest MTBS value was obtained in the control groups (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The application of silane-containing universal
adhesive material after sandblasting was the ideal surface treatment for both
materials.
References
- Reference1. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, et al. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95:487-495.
- Reference2. Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, et al. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-495.
- Reference3. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:227-235.
- Reference4. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, et al. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014;30:954-962.
- Reference5. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:531-540.
- Reference6. Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I, et al. Marjinal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer- composite Class II restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:500-509.
- Reference7. Armstrong DJ, Kimball D. Fiber-reinforced polymer ceramic fixed partial dentures in the esthetic zone: a clinical and laboratory case perspective. Quintessence Dent Technol 2000;25:104-113.
- Reference8. Kurt EÇ, Özdoğan MS, Yılmaz H. Ceromers and fiber-reinforced composites. The Journal of Dental Faculty of Atatürk University 2006;16:52-60.
- Reference9. Waki T, Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K et al. Adesive strength between fiber reinforced composites and veneering composites and fracture load of combinations of these materials. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:364-368.
- Reference10. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:163–169.
- Reference11. Elsaka SE. Effect of surface treatments on the bonding strength of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramics. Quintessence Int 2013;44:407.
- Reference12. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006;22:283-290.
- Reference13. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998;23:250-257.
- Reference14. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64-71.
- Reference15. Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, et al. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater 2014;30:147-162.
- Reference16. Güngör MB, Nemli SK, Bal BT, et al. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/ CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:259-266.
- Reference17. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, et al. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155-164.
- Reference18. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484.
- Reference19. Loomans BA, Mesko ME, Moraes RR, et al. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J Dent 2017;59,18-25.
- Reference20. Kömürcüoğlu MB, Sağırkaya E, Tulga A. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:439-446.
- Reference21. Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:20-24.
- Reference22. El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, et al. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater 2003;19:575-583.
- Reference23. Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR. Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater 2011;27:99-105.
- Reference24. Colares RC, Neri JR, Souza AM, et al. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Braz Dent J 2013;24:349-352.
- Reference25. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:299-308.
- Reference26. Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J 2015;34:161-167.
- Reference27. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N., Kleverlaan CJ, et al. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-991.
- Reference28. Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, et al. Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic. J Dent 2007;35:282-288.
- Reference29. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, et al. Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:265-273.
- Reference30. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/ CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015;18:9-20.
- Reference31. Queiroz JR, Souza RO, Nogueira Junior L Jr, et al. Influence of acid etching and ceramic primers on the repair of a glass ceramic. Gen Dent 2012;60:79-85.
- Reference32. Ikemura K, Tanaka H, Fujii T, et al. Development of a new single-bottle multi-purpose primer for bonding to dental porcelain, alumina, zirconia, and dental gold alloy. Dent Mater J 2011;30:478–484.
- Reference33. Li R. Development of a ceramic primer with higher bond durability for resin cement. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:560-568.
- Reference34. Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Amaral R, et al. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent Mater 2009;25:1477-1483.
- Reference35. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:508-513.
- Reference36. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, et al. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-855.
- Reference37. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, et al. Durability of resin-dentin bonds: effects of direct/indirect exposure and storage media. Dent Mater 2007;23:885-892.
- Reference38. Pollington S, Fabianelli A, van Noort R. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to a novel fluorcanasite glass ceramic following different surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010;26:864-872.
There are 38 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 31, 2019 |
| Submission Date | December 16, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 2 |
Cited By
Effects of Cuspal Inclination and Luting Agent on Fracture Load Values in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crowns
The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College
https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2020-0017
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.