Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 48 - 55, 13.03.2019

Meryem Gülce Subaşı Gülce Alp

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.500975
Cited By: 2

Abstract

References

  • 1. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:770-777.
  • 2. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-560.
  • 3. Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Suppl 1):84–96.
  • 4. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64.
  • 5. Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM–produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:14S-21S.
  • 6. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(1):22-30.
  • 7. Niu E, Agustin M, Douglas RD. Color match of machinable lithium disilicate ceramics: effects of foundation restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110(6):501–509.
  • 8. Barizon KT, Bergeron C, Vargas MA, Qian F, Cobb DS, Gratton DG, Geraldeli S. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers. Part I: Correlation between translucency parameters and contrast ratio. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:397-401.
  • 9. Spink LS, Rungruanganut P, Megremis S, Kelly JR. Comparison of an absolute and surrogate measure of relative translucency in dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29:702-707.
  • 10. de Oliveira AL, Botta AC, Campos JÁ, Garcia PP. Effects of immersion media and repolishing on color stability and superficial morphology of nanofilled composite resin. Microsc Microanal 2014;20(4):1234-1239.
  • 11. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM. Effects of sports drinks on color stability of nanofilled and microhybrid composites after long-term immersion. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 2:e55-63.
  • 12. Lund PS, Piotrowski TJ. Color changes of porcelain surface colorants resulting from firing. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5(1):22-27.
  • 13. Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14(5):405-409.
  • 14.Wang H, Xiong F, Zhenhua L. Influence of varied surface texture of dentin porcelain on optical properties of porcelain specimens. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(4):242-248.
  • 15. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 2:e64-70.
  • 16. Niu E, Agustin M, Douglas RD. Color match of machinable lithium disilicate ceramics: Effects of cement color and thickness. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(1):42-50.
  • 17. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(1):4-9.
  • 18. Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 2012;37:617-624.
  • 19.Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments and coffee thermocycling on the color and translucency of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120(2):263-268.
  • 20.Mota EG, Smidt LN, Fracasso LM, Burnett LH Jr, Spohr AM. The effect of milling and postmilling procedures on the surface roughness of CAD/CAM materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(6):450-458.
  • 21.Basso GR, Kodama AB, Pimentel AH, Kaizer MR, Bona AD, Moraes RR, Boscato N. Masking Colored Substrates Using Monolithic and Bilayer CAD-CAM Ceramic Structures. Oper Dent 2017;42(4):387-395.
  • 22.Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Dogan S, Mancl LA. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(2):257-263.
  • 23.Gunal B, Ulusoy MM. Optical properties of contemporary monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials at different thicknesses. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30(5):434-441.
  • 24.Subaşı MG, Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of thickness on optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics. J Dent 2018;71:38-42.
  • 25.Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(1):71-75.
  • 26.Vichi A, Fonzar RF, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Ferrari M. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on Roughness and Gloss of Lithium Disilicate and Lithium Silicate Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ceramic for CAD/CAM Systems. Oper Dent 2018;43(1):90-100.
  • 27.Yuan JC, Barão VAR, Wee AG, Alfaro MF, Afshari FS, Sukotjo C. Effect of brushing and thermocycling on the shade and surface roughness of CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(6):1000-1006.
  • 28.IPS e.max CAD Labside Instructions for Use. Ivoclar Vivadent. Pages 19-34.http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu-website/media/download/1263/IPS+e-max+CAD+Monolithic+Soluition+Labside?v=2.
  • 29. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, CIE 015. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
  • 30.Gürdal I, Atay A, Eichberger M, Cal E, Üsümez A, Stawarczyk B. Color change of CAD-CAM materials and composite resin cements after thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120(4):546-552.
  • 31. Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8(1):37-42.
  • 32.Jurišić S, Jurišić G, Zlatarić DK. In Vitro Evaluation and Comparison of the Translucency of Two Different All-Ceramic Systems. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015;49(3):195-203.
  • 33. Bayindir F, Ozbayram O. Effect of number of firings on the color and translucency of ceramic core materials with veneer ceramic of different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(1):152-158.
  • 34. Gonuldas F, Yılmaz K, Ozturk C. The effect of repeated firings on the color change and surface roughness of dental ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6(4):309-316.
  • 35. Yılmaz K, Gonuldas F, Ozturk C. The effect of repeated firings on the color change of dental ceramics using different glazing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6(6):427-433.
  • 36. Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:295-308.
  • 37. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.

Effects of Different Glaze Treatments on the Optical Properties and Roughness of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 48 - 55, 13.03.2019

Meryem Gülce Subaşı Gülce Alp

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.500975
Cited By: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate effects of different glaze procedures on the colour, translucency, and roughness of lithium disilicate (LDS) ceramics after short-term ageing.

Materials and Methods: Eighteen LDS specimens (thickness: 0.6 mm) were divided into three groups (paste (EP), spray (ES), and powder–liquid glaze (EL)) based on the type of glaze treatment (n=6). After glaze firings, specimens were thermally aged (5000 cycles). Before and after thermocycling, the colour, translucency, and roughness values of the specimens were measured. Before and after thermocycling, the translucency and roughness data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Changes in colour, translucency, and roughness data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, and the correlations between them were analysed using Spearman’s correlation analysis (p=.05).

Results: The EL group showed the highest and clinically unacceptable colour change value (p≤.005). Before and after ageing, the EL group exhibited higher translucency than the other groups (p<.001), and the EL and EP groups exhibited higher roughness values than the ES group (p≤.001). Wilcoxon signed-rank test results showed that although a significant difference between the initial and final translucency values was observed in the EL group (p=.028), no significant differences between the initial and final roughness values were observed in each group. Only in the EL group, a significant correlation was found between the colour and translucency change values (r=0.943, p=.005).

Conclusions: After short-term ageing, based on the evaluation of the LDS ceramics' colour and translucency changes, ES and EP treatments are preferable for glazing. When dentists select a material (EP, EL, ES) for glazing LDS ceramics, they should consider the effects of this material on the optical properties and surface roughness of LDS ceramics.

Keywords

Lithia disilicate Color Surface Properties

References

  • 1. Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:770-777.
  • 2. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:555-560.
  • 3. Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011;56(Suppl 1):84–96.
  • 4. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:57-64.
  • 5. Giordano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM–produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:14S-21S.
  • 6. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(1):22-30.
  • 7. Niu E, Agustin M, Douglas RD. Color match of machinable lithium disilicate ceramics: effects of foundation restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110(6):501–509.
  • 8. Barizon KT, Bergeron C, Vargas MA, Qian F, Cobb DS, Gratton DG, Geraldeli S. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers. Part I: Correlation between translucency parameters and contrast ratio. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:397-401.
  • 9. Spink LS, Rungruanganut P, Megremis S, Kelly JR. Comparison of an absolute and surrogate measure of relative translucency in dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29:702-707.
  • 10. de Oliveira AL, Botta AC, Campos JÁ, Garcia PP. Effects of immersion media and repolishing on color stability and superficial morphology of nanofilled composite resin. Microsc Microanal 2014;20(4):1234-1239.
  • 11. Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM. Effects of sports drinks on color stability of nanofilled and microhybrid composites after long-term immersion. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 2:e55-63.
  • 12. Lund PS, Piotrowski TJ. Color changes of porcelain surface colorants resulting from firing. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5(1):22-27.
  • 13. Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14(5):405-409.
  • 14.Wang H, Xiong F, Zhenhua L. Influence of varied surface texture of dentin porcelain on optical properties of porcelain specimens. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(4):242-248.
  • 15. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent 2012;40 Suppl 2:e64-70.
  • 16. Niu E, Agustin M, Douglas RD. Color match of machinable lithium disilicate ceramics: Effects of cement color and thickness. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111(1):42-50.
  • 17. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(1):4-9.
  • 18. Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 2012;37:617-624.
  • 19.Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments and coffee thermocycling on the color and translucency of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120(2):263-268.
  • 20.Mota EG, Smidt LN, Fracasso LM, Burnett LH Jr, Spohr AM. The effect of milling and postmilling procedures on the surface roughness of CAD/CAM materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(6):450-458.
  • 21.Basso GR, Kodama AB, Pimentel AH, Kaizer MR, Bona AD, Moraes RR, Boscato N. Masking Colored Substrates Using Monolithic and Bilayer CAD-CAM Ceramic Structures. Oper Dent 2017;42(4):387-395.
  • 22.Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Dogan S, Mancl LA. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(2):257-263.
  • 23.Gunal B, Ulusoy MM. Optical properties of contemporary monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials at different thicknesses. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30(5):434-441.
  • 24.Subaşı MG, Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of thickness on optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics. J Dent 2018;71:38-42.
  • 25.Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, Chandrasekaran I, Johnston WM. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115(1):71-75.
  • 26.Vichi A, Fonzar RF, Goracci C, Carrabba M, Ferrari M. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on Roughness and Gloss of Lithium Disilicate and Lithium Silicate Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ceramic for CAD/CAM Systems. Oper Dent 2018;43(1):90-100.
  • 27.Yuan JC, Barão VAR, Wee AG, Alfaro MF, Afshari FS, Sukotjo C. Effect of brushing and thermocycling on the shade and surface roughness of CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(6):1000-1006.
  • 28.IPS e.max CAD Labside Instructions for Use. Ivoclar Vivadent. Pages 19-34.http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu-website/media/download/1263/IPS+e-max+CAD+Monolithic+Soluition+Labside?v=2.
  • 29. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, CIE 015. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
  • 30.Gürdal I, Atay A, Eichberger M, Cal E, Üsümez A, Stawarczyk B. Color change of CAD-CAM materials and composite resin cements after thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120(4):546-552.
  • 31. Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8(1):37-42.
  • 32.Jurišić S, Jurišić G, Zlatarić DK. In Vitro Evaluation and Comparison of the Translucency of Two Different All-Ceramic Systems. Acta Stomatol Croat 2015;49(3):195-203.
  • 33. Bayindir F, Ozbayram O. Effect of number of firings on the color and translucency of ceramic core materials with veneer ceramic of different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(1):152-158.
  • 34. Gonuldas F, Yılmaz K, Ozturk C. The effect of repeated firings on the color change and surface roughness of dental ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6(4):309-316.
  • 35. Yılmaz K, Gonuldas F, Ozturk C. The effect of repeated firings on the color change of dental ceramics using different glazing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6(6):427-433.
  • 36. Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:295-308.
  • 37. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Meryem Gülce Subaşı 0000-0002-2510-9745

Gülce Alp 0000-0003-1751-9207

Publication Date March 13, 2019
Submission Date December 25, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Subaşı MG, Alp G (March 1, 2019) Effects of Different Glaze Treatments on the Optical Properties and Roughness of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 1 48–55.

Cited By

The Effect of Thermocycling and Surface Treatments on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Three Heat-Pressed Ceramics Systems
Crystals
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10030160
Color comparison of glaze-treated multi-coloured lithium disilicate and zirconia
Korean Journal of Dental Materials
Byeol Hwang
https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2021.48.1.1
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.