Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Intraoperative Pain During Glide Path Creation with the Use of a Rotary or Reciprocating System

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 66 - 73, 13.03.2019

Pelin Tufenkci , Mehmet Adıguzel Koray Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.492598
Cited By: 4

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the intraoperative pain levels of patients caused from using different glide path systems in creating the glide path before the root canal shaping the teeth with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Materials and Methods: The study included 88 patient with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molar tooth. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups according to use of glide path files: R-pilot (RP), WaveOne Gold Glider (WOG G), One G (OG), Proglider (PG). In all the groups, the patients were asked to specify the pain level by using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U was used to determine significant differences at p< 0.05.

Results: In the present study, it was determined that the lowest intraoperative pain level was observed in PG, followed by OG, RP, and WOG G. Statistically significant differences were observed between PG and RP and between PG and WOG G groups (p<.05).

Conclusion: All of the file systems used in creating the glide path in root canal treatment caused intraoperative pain. The minimum intraoperative pain was found with PG glide path file, whereas RP and WOG G caused higher level of intraoperative pain.

Keywords

endodontics pain root canal treatment

References

  • [1] López-López J, Jané-Salas E, Estrugo-Devesa A, et al. Frequency and distribution of root filled teeth and apical periodontitis in an adult population of Barcelona, Spain. Int Dent J. 2012;62:40-46.
  • [2] Hargreaves KM, Keiser K. New advances in the management of endodontic pain emergencies. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2004;32:469-473.
  • [3] Subbiya A, Cherkas PS, Vivekanandhan P, et al. Effect of three different rotary instrumentation systems on postinstrumentation pain: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:467-473.
  • [4] Gale EN, Ayer WA. Treatment of dental phobias. J Am Dent Assoc. 1969;78:1304-1307.
  • [5] Kayaoglu G, Gürel M, Saricam E, Ilhan MN, et al. Predictive Model of Intraoperative Pain during Endodontic Treatment: Prospective Observational Clinical Study. J Endod. 2016;42:36-41.
  • [6] Martín-González J, Echevarría-Pérez M, Sánchez-Domínguez B, et al. Influence of root canal instrumentation and obturation techniques on intra-operative pain during endodontic therapy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e912-918.
  • [7] Çapar ID, Arslan H. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J. 2016;49:119-135.
  • [8] Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, et al. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2016;42:171-176.
  • [9] Hou XM, Su Z, Hou BX. Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:86.
  • [10] Talebzadeh B, Nezafati S, Rahimi S, et al. Comparison of Manual and Rotary Instrumentation on Postoperative Pain in Teeth with Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:273-279.
  • [11] Yılmaz K, Uslu G, Özyürek T. In vitro comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of HyFlex EDM, One G, and ProGlider nickel titanium glide path instruments in single and double curvature canals. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:282-289.
  • [12] Mollashahi NF, Saberi EA, Havaei SR, et al. Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Preparation with Two Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J. 2017;12:15-19.
  • [13] Rousseau WH, Clark SJ, Newcomb BE, et al. A comparison of pain levels during pulpectomy, extractions, and restorative procedures. J Endod. 2002;28:108-110.
  • [14] Keskin C, Sarıyılmaz E, Demiral M. Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12:63-67.
  • [15] Keskin C, İnan U, Demiral M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 2018 Feb 17.
  • [16] Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F. Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals. J Endod. 2018;44:853-855.
  • [17] Coelho MS, Fontana CE, Kato AS, et al. Effects of Glide Path on the Centering Ability and Preparation Time of Two Reciprocating Instruments. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:33-37.
  • [18] Nishijo M, Ebihara A, Tokita D, et al. Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of NiTi rotary glide path files manufactured from controlled memory wires. Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul 29;37(4):549-554.
  • [19] Dagna A, El Abed R, Hussain S, et al. Comparison of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria by various glide-path establishing systems: an in vitro study. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:316-323.
  • [20] Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012;38:850-852. [21] Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011;37:429-438.
  • [22] Gomes AC, Soares AJ, Souza EM, et al. Intraoperative discomfort associated with the use of a rotary or reciprocating system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:140-145.
  • [23] Comparin D, Moreira EJL, Souza EM, et al. Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2017;43:1084-1088.
  • [24] Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Akpek F, et al. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals. Int Endod J. 2016;49:599-603.
  • [25] Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae MS, Meraji N, et al. Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2015;41:575-578.

Year 2019, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 66 - 73, 13.03.2019

Pelin Tufenkci , Mehmet Adıguzel Koray Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.492598
Cited By: 4

Abstract

References

  • [1] López-López J, Jané-Salas E, Estrugo-Devesa A, et al. Frequency and distribution of root filled teeth and apical periodontitis in an adult population of Barcelona, Spain. Int Dent J. 2012;62:40-46.
  • [2] Hargreaves KM, Keiser K. New advances in the management of endodontic pain emergencies. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2004;32:469-473.
  • [3] Subbiya A, Cherkas PS, Vivekanandhan P, et al. Effect of three different rotary instrumentation systems on postinstrumentation pain: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:467-473.
  • [4] Gale EN, Ayer WA. Treatment of dental phobias. J Am Dent Assoc. 1969;78:1304-1307.
  • [5] Kayaoglu G, Gürel M, Saricam E, Ilhan MN, et al. Predictive Model of Intraoperative Pain during Endodontic Treatment: Prospective Observational Clinical Study. J Endod. 2016;42:36-41.
  • [6] Martín-González J, Echevarría-Pérez M, Sánchez-Domínguez B, et al. Influence of root canal instrumentation and obturation techniques on intra-operative pain during endodontic therapy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e912-918.
  • [7] Çapar ID, Arslan H. A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments. Int Endod J. 2016;49:119-135.
  • [8] Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, et al. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2016;42:171-176.
  • [9] Hou XM, Su Z, Hou BX. Post endodontic pain following single-visit root canal preparation with rotary vs reciprocating instruments: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:86.
  • [10] Talebzadeh B, Nezafati S, Rahimi S, et al. Comparison of Manual and Rotary Instrumentation on Postoperative Pain in Teeth with Asymptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:273-279.
  • [11] Yılmaz K, Uslu G, Özyürek T. In vitro comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of HyFlex EDM, One G, and ProGlider nickel titanium glide path instruments in single and double curvature canals. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:282-289.
  • [12] Mollashahi NF, Saberi EA, Havaei SR, et al. Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Preparation with Two Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J. 2017;12:15-19.
  • [13] Rousseau WH, Clark SJ, Newcomb BE, et al. A comparison of pain levels during pulpectomy, extractions, and restorative procedures. J Endod. 2002;28:108-110.
  • [14] Keskin C, Sarıyılmaz E, Demiral M. Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12:63-67.
  • [15] Keskin C, İnan U, Demiral M, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider, and ProGlider glide path instruments. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 2018 Feb 17.
  • [16] Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F. Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals. J Endod. 2018;44:853-855.
  • [17] Coelho MS, Fontana CE, Kato AS, et al. Effects of Glide Path on the Centering Ability and Preparation Time of Two Reciprocating Instruments. Iran Endod J. 2016;11:33-37.
  • [18] Nishijo M, Ebihara A, Tokita D, et al. Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of NiTi rotary glide path files manufactured from controlled memory wires. Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul 29;37(4):549-554.
  • [19] Dagna A, El Abed R, Hussain S, et al. Comparison of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria by various glide-path establishing systems: an in vitro study. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:316-323.
  • [20] Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012;38:850-852. [21] Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011;37:429-438.
  • [22] Gomes AC, Soares AJ, Souza EM, et al. Intraoperative discomfort associated with the use of a rotary or reciprocating system: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42:140-145.
  • [23] Comparin D, Moreira EJL, Souza EM, et al. Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Retreatment Using Rotary or Reciprocating Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2017;43:1084-1088.
  • [24] Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Akpek F, et al. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals. Int Endod J. 2016;49:599-603.
  • [25] Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae MS, Meraji N, et al. Comparison of the effect of root canal preparation by using WaveOne and ProTaper on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2015;41:575-578.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Pelin Tufenkci 0000-0001-9881-5395

Mehmet Adıguzel 0000-0002-9363-6264

Koray Yılmaz 0000-0001-6096-7385

Publication Date March 13, 2019
Submission Date December 5, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019Volume: 22 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Tufenkci P, Adıguzel M, Yılmaz K (March 1, 2019) Intraoperative Pain During Glide Path Creation with the Use of a Rotary or Reciprocating System. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 1 66–73.

Cited By

Glide Path in Endodontics: A Literature Review of Current Knowledge
Dentistry Journal
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12080257
Evaluation of Pain Following the Use of Different Single-file Glide Path Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Journal of Endodontics
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.017
Analysis of a glide path creation necessity at the initial stages of endodontic treatment
Endodontics Today
Z. S. Khabadze
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2021-19-1-39-44
Influence of glide path kinematics during endodontic treatment on the occurrence and intensity of intraoperative and postoperative pain: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
BMC Oral Health
Thaís Christina Cunha
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01164-w
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.