Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of dental anomalies in the Middle Black Sea population.Materials and Methods: The present study was carried out on panoramic radiographies of 3795 patients (2357 female, 1438 male). Patients who attended the Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziosmanpaşa University to treatment for various dental problems, were from 15 to 60 years old. Radiograpies were evaluated in terms of tooth impaction, lower incisor tooth agenesis, tooth transposition and supernumerary tooth. 3. molar tooth was excluded from the study.Results: The total prevalence of dental anomalies which were evaluated in the study was diagnosed % 6.58 (%6.27 female, %7.09 male). The prevalence of tooth impaction, lower incisor tooth agenesis, transposition and supernumerary tooth were detected %4.29 (%4.28 female, %4.31 male), %1.10 (%1.10 female, %1.11 male), %0.28 (%0.38 female, %0.13 male) and %0.89 (%0.50, %1.52), respectively. The prevalence of transmigrated canines was also detected %0,13 (%0,12 female, %0,14 male). In supernumerary tooth group, statistically significant gender difference was noted and there was no statistically significant gender difference in other groups.Conclusions: The most frequently ocurred dental anomaly which was evaluated in the study was tooth impaction and lower incisor tooth agenesis, supernumarary tooth, transposition have followed, respectly. Dentists must be aware of situations which can not be detected by only clinical examination and radiograpic examination doesn’t must be neglected.ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ
References
- 1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2009.
- 2. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
- 3. Brook AH. Multi level complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:3-17.
- 4. Xianghhong Bu, Khalaf K, Hobsonc RS. Dental arch dimensions in oligodontia patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:768-772.
- 5. Harris EF, Clark LL. Hypodontia: an epidemiologic study of American black and white people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134:761-767.
- 6. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dent 2012; 2012:837270
- 7. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 231-238.
- 8. Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Bhargava P, Bathi RJ. Frequency of developmental dental anomalies in the Indian population.Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 263-269.
- 9. Thongudomporn U1, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. AustDent J. 1998 Dec;43(6):395-398.
- 10. Shokri A1, Poorolajal J2, Khajeh S1, Faramarzi F3, Kahnamoui HM3. Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar;44(1):7-13.
- 11. Ezoddini AF1, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):140-144.
- 12. Murray P, Brown NL: The conservative approach to managing unerupted lower premolars two case reports. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003,13:198–203.
- 13. Karapanou V: Endodontic management of an impacted premolar. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005,29:293–298.
- 14. Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumeraryteeth: a review of the literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J 1997;42:160-165.
- 15. Sedano HO, Gorlin RJ. Familial occurrence of mesiodens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;27:360-361.
- 16. Salcido-García JF, Ledesmamontes C, Hernández-flores F, Pérez D, Garcés-ortíz M. Frequency of supernumeraryteeth in Mexican population. Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal 2004;9:403–409.
- 17. Joshi MR, Shetye SB. Transmigration of mandibular canines: A review of the literature and report of two cases. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25: 291-294.
- 18. Alaejos-Algarra C, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Transmigration of mandibular canines: Report of six cases and review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 395-398.
- 19. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Intrabony migration of impacted teeth. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:738-743.
- 20. Buyukkurt MC, Aras MH, Caglaroglu M, Gungormus M. Transmigrant mandibular canines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(10):2025-2029.
- 21. Kumar S, Jayaswal P, Pentapati KC, Valiathan A, Kotak N. Investigation of the transmigrated canine in an orthodontic patient population. J Orthod. 2012;39(2):89-94.
- 22. Torres-Lagares D, Flores-Ruiz R, Infante-Cossio P, GarciaCalderon M, GutierresPerez JL: Transmigration of impacted lower canine. Case report andreview of theliterature. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Cirugia Bucal 2006, 11:171–174.
Abstract
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Orta Karadeniz toplumunda dental anomalilerin görülme sıklığının değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma çeşitli dental problemlerden dolayı, tedavi olmak amacıyla Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine başvuran, 15- 60 yaş arası toplam 3795 (2357 kadın, 1438 erkek) bireyin muayeneleri amacıyla rutin olarak alınmış olan, panoramik röntgen filmleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Filmler üzerinde; gömülü dişler, alt keser diş eksiklikleri, transpozisyona uğramış dişler ve sürnümerer dişler değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmaya 3. molar dişler dahil edilmemiştir.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen bireylerde, incelenen dental anomalilerin toplam görülme sıklığı %6,58 (kadın:148 birey, %6,27, erkek:102 birey, %7,09) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bu anomaliler içerisinde gömülü diş görülme sıklığı %4,29 (kadın:101 birey, %4,28; erkek:62 birey, %4,31), alt keser diş eksikliği görülme sıklığı %1,10 (kadın:26 birey, %1,10; erkek:16 birey, %1,11), transpozisyon görülme sıklığı %0,28 (kadın:9 birey, %0,38; erkek:2 birey, %0,13) ve sürnümerer diş görülme sıklığı %0,89 (kadın:12 birey, %0,50; erkek:22 birey, %1,52) olarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca transmigrasyona uğramış gömülü mandibuler kanin prevalansı %0,13 (kadın:3 birey, %0,12; erkek:2 birey, %0,14) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan istatistiksel analiz sonucunda yalnızca sürnümerer dişlerin değerlendirilmesinde cinsiyetler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark elde edilmiş, diğer anomalilerde cinsiyetler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark tespit edilememiştir.
Sonuç: Çalışmamızda incelenen dental anomaliler arasında görülme sıklığı en fazla olan anomalinin diş gömülülüğü olduğu tespit edilmiş olup, daha sonra sırasıyla alt keser diş eksikliği, sürnümerer diş ve transpozisyon gelmektedir. Diş hekimlerinin yalnızca klinik muayene ile tespit edilemeyecek dental anomaliler ile karşılaşabileceklerinin farkında olmaları ve radyografik muayenelerini ihmal etmemeleri gerekmektedir.
References
- 1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2009.
- 2. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
- 3. Brook AH. Multi level complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54:3-17.
- 4. Xianghhong Bu, Khalaf K, Hobsonc RS. Dental arch dimensions in oligodontia patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:768-772.
- 5. Harris EF, Clark LL. Hypodontia: an epidemiologic study of American black and white people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134:761-767.
- 6. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dent 2012; 2012:837270
- 7. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 231-238.
- 8. Guttal KS, Naikmasur VG, Bhargava P, Bathi RJ. Frequency of developmental dental anomalies in the Indian population.Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 263-269.
- 9. Thongudomporn U1, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. AustDent J. 1998 Dec;43(6):395-398.
- 10. Shokri A1, Poorolajal J2, Khajeh S1, Faramarzi F3, Kahnamoui HM3. Prevalence of dental anomalies among 7- to 35-year old people in Hamadan, Iran in 2012-2013 as observed using panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Mar;44(1):7-13.
- 11. Ezoddini AF1, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):140-144.
- 12. Murray P, Brown NL: The conservative approach to managing unerupted lower premolars two case reports. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003,13:198–203.
- 13. Karapanou V: Endodontic management of an impacted premolar. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005,29:293–298.
- 14. Scheiner MA, Sampson WJ. Supernumeraryteeth: a review of the literature and four case reports. Aust Dent J 1997;42:160-165.
- 15. Sedano HO, Gorlin RJ. Familial occurrence of mesiodens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;27:360-361.
- 16. Salcido-García JF, Ledesmamontes C, Hernández-flores F, Pérez D, Garcés-ortíz M. Frequency of supernumeraryteeth in Mexican population. Med Oral Patol Oral CirBucal 2004;9:403–409.
- 17. Joshi MR, Shetye SB. Transmigration of mandibular canines: A review of the literature and report of two cases. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25: 291-294.
- 18. Alaejos-Algarra C, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Transmigration of mandibular canines: Report of six cases and review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 395-398.
- 19. Shapira Y, Kuftinec MM. Intrabony migration of impacted teeth. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:738-743.
- 20. Buyukkurt MC, Aras MH, Caglaroglu M, Gungormus M. Transmigrant mandibular canines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(10):2025-2029.
- 21. Kumar S, Jayaswal P, Pentapati KC, Valiathan A, Kotak N. Investigation of the transmigrated canine in an orthodontic patient population. J Orthod. 2012;39(2):89-94.
- 22. Torres-Lagares D, Flores-Ruiz R, Infante-Cossio P, GarciaCalderon M, GutierresPerez JL: Transmigration of impacted lower canine. Case report andreview of theliterature. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Cirugia Bucal 2006, 11:171–174.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | April 9, 2015 |
| Submission Date | April 9, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015Volume: 18 Issue: 4 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.