Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 294 - 299, 12.08.2015
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000071498

Abstract

Invention of new techniques and improvement of especially computer systems were provided better assessment of TMJ anatomy and functions. Pathophysiology of TMD was better understood with images associated clinical findings. Understanding of TMD’s improvements were caused emergence of new treatment approaches. TMJ imaging techniques can be arranged as direct radiographies, conventional tomography, panoramic radiography, kinetic X-  ray imaging, arthrography, ultrasonography, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine, cephalometric radiography. The technique is chosen which is best showing the pathology of hard and soft tissues, most easily accessible as equipment, the radiation dose of at least and most suitable for other contraindications. At this review, TMJ imaging techniques were summarized

References

  • Bean LR, Omnell KA, Oberg T. Comparisonbetweenradiologicobservationsandmacroscopictissuechanges in temporomandibularjoints. DentomaxillofacRadiol 1977; 6: 90-106.
  • Fallon SD, Fritz GW, Laskin DM. Panoramicimaging of thetemporomandibularjoint: an experimentalstudyusingcadavericskulls. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 2006: 64; 223-229.
  • Nakagawa S, Sakabe J, Nakajima I, Akasaka M. Relationshipbetweenfunctionaldiscpositionandmandibulardisplacement in adolescentfemales: posteroanteriorcephalogramsandmagneticresonanceimagingretrospectivestudy J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 417-422.
  • Pooley R, McKinney JM, Miller DA. The AAPM/RSNA physicstutorialforresidents: digitalfluoroscopy. Radiographics 2001; 21: 521-534.
  • Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Helms CA, Hopens T, Bales DJ, Coggs GC. Arthrotomography of thetemporomandibularjoint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134: 995-1003.
  • Tognini F, Manfredini D, Melchiorre D, Bosco M. Comparison of ultrasonographyandmagneticresonanceimaging in theevaluation of temporomandibularjointdiscdisplacement. J Oral Rehabil 2005: 32; 248–253.
  • Hayashi T, Ito J, Yamada K Theaccuracy of sonographyforevaluation of internalderangement of thetemporomandibularjoint in asymptomaticelementaryschoolchildren: comprasionwith MR and CT AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 728-734.
  • Kraus SL. TempromandibularDisorders 2. Edition, Churchill Livingstone 1994, 115-123.
  • Burnett KR, Davis CL, Read J. Dynamicdisplay of thetemporomandibularjointmeniscusbyusing ‘fast-scan’ MR imaging .Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 959-962.
  • Marguelles-Bonnet RE, Carpentier P, Yung JP, Defrennes D, Pharaboz C. Clinicaldiagnosiscomparedwithfindings of magneticresonanceimaging in 242 patientswithinternalderangement of the TMJ. OrofacPain 1995; 9: 244-253.
  • Larheim TA. Currenttrends in temporomandibularjointimaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 1995; 80: 555-576.
  • AmericanDentalAssociation, Council on DentalMaterials, Instruments andEquipment. Panoramicandcephalometricextraoraldentalradiographsystems. J AmDentAssoc 2002; 133: 1696-1697.

Temporomandibular Eklem Görüntüleme Yöntemleri

Year 2015, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 294 - 299, 12.08.2015
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.58140.5000071498

Abstract

Yeni tekniklerin bulunması ve özellikle bil­gisayar alanındaki gelişmeler, TME anatomisi ve fonk­siyonlarını daha iyi değerlendirmemizi sağlamıştır.Klinik bulgularla bağlantılı görüntüler sayesinde temporomandibular eklem düzensizliklerinin (TMD)patofizyolojisini daha iyi anlaşılabilir. TMD’ nin geli­şimini anlamak yeni tedavi yaklaşımlarının doğmasına yol açar. Temporomandibular görüntüleme yöntemleri; direkt radyografiler, konvansiyonel tomografi, panoramik radyografi, kinetik x-ışını görüntüleme, artrografi, ultrasonografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi, manyetik rezonans görüntüleme, nükleer tıp, sefalometri olarak sınıflandırılabilir. Sert ve yumuşak doku patolojilerini en iyi gösteren, donanım olarak en rahat ulaşılabilen, radyasyon dozu­ en az olan ve diğer kontrendikasyonlar açısından en uygun olan teknik seçilir.Bu derleme çalışmasında, temporomandibular eklem sert ve yumuşak dokularının görüntülenmesinde kullanılan yöntemler özetlenmiştir.

References

  • Bean LR, Omnell KA, Oberg T. Comparisonbetweenradiologicobservationsandmacroscopictissuechanges in temporomandibularjoints. DentomaxillofacRadiol 1977; 6: 90-106.
  • Fallon SD, Fritz GW, Laskin DM. Panoramicimaging of thetemporomandibularjoint: an experimentalstudyusingcadavericskulls. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 2006: 64; 223-229.
  • Nakagawa S, Sakabe J, Nakajima I, Akasaka M. Relationshipbetweenfunctionaldiscpositionandmandibulardisplacement in adolescentfemales: posteroanteriorcephalogramsandmagneticresonanceimagingretrospectivestudy J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 417-422.
  • Pooley R, McKinney JM, Miller DA. The AAPM/RSNA physicstutorialforresidents: digitalfluoroscopy. Radiographics 2001; 21: 521-534.
  • Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF, Helms CA, Hopens T, Bales DJ, Coggs GC. Arthrotomography of thetemporomandibularjoint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134: 995-1003.
  • Tognini F, Manfredini D, Melchiorre D, Bosco M. Comparison of ultrasonographyandmagneticresonanceimaging in theevaluation of temporomandibularjointdiscdisplacement. J Oral Rehabil 2005: 32; 248–253.
  • Hayashi T, Ito J, Yamada K Theaccuracy of sonographyforevaluation of internalderangement of thetemporomandibularjoint in asymptomaticelementaryschoolchildren: comprasionwith MR and CT AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 728-734.
  • Kraus SL. TempromandibularDisorders 2. Edition, Churchill Livingstone 1994, 115-123.
  • Burnett KR, Davis CL, Read J. Dynamicdisplay of thetemporomandibularjointmeniscusbyusing ‘fast-scan’ MR imaging .Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 959-962.
  • Marguelles-Bonnet RE, Carpentier P, Yung JP, Defrennes D, Pharaboz C. Clinicaldiagnosiscomparedwithfindings of magneticresonanceimaging in 242 patientswithinternalderangement of the TMJ. OrofacPain 1995; 9: 244-253.
  • Larheim TA. Currenttrends in temporomandibularjointimaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod 1995; 80: 555-576.
  • AmericanDentalAssociation, Council on DentalMaterials, Instruments andEquipment. Panoramicandcephalometricextraoraldentalradiographsystems. J AmDentAssoc 2002; 133: 1696-1697.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Review
Authors

Zeliha Şanıvar

Kübra Yıldız Domaniç

Yılmaz Aslan

Coşkun Yıldız

Publication Date August 12, 2015
Submission Date October 21, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2015Volume: 18 Issue: 3

Cite

EndNote Şanıvar Z, Yıldız Domaniç K, Aslan Y, Yıldız C (August 1, 2015) Temporomandibular Eklem Görüntüleme Yöntemleri. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18 3 294–299.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.