BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of saliva leakage amounts into internal implant cavities in three different internal implant-abutment interface configurations

Year 2015, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 156 - 169, 12.01.2015

Cumhur Sipahi , Bülent Pişkin Simel Ayyıldız Alper Uyar

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare the saliva leakage degrees of 3 different implant-abutment interface configurations.

Materials and Methods: Implant systems with 3 different implant-abutment interfaces; internal perpendicular hexagon (IPH) (n=10), 11-degree angle morse-taper (IMT) (n=10), and 1.5-degree-angle cold welding type joints (ICW) (n=10) were selected. Totally 30 implant-abutment specimens were obtained by connecting the abutments to relevant implants. Initial (dry) weights (g) of the specimens were measured, recorded and all specimens were stored into artificial saliva. Subsequent weight measurements were performed at the end of 1st day, 7th day and 30th day storage.

Results: Significant weight differences were found both between experimental groups and between 4 weighting times within groups. Group ICW displayed significantly lowest weight difference values (lowest leakage) at all weighting times compared to groups IMT and IPH. Group IMT displayed higher but not significant weight difference values compared to group IPH at all weighting times.

Conclusion: All tested systems displayed significant weight increases in each of the subsequent measurement times. Cold welding type implant-abutment configuration showed the lowest leakage values and was found the most suitable interface geometry for the minimization of leakage compared to other systems. Perpendicular hexagonal and morse taper type joint configurations displayed similar leakage values.

Keywords

Microleakage Implant configuration Abutment Implant-Abutment Interface

References

  • Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG, Carvalho RM, Silva NFA, Suzuki M, Silva TL, Bonfante EA. Sealing capability and SEM observation of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Dent 2014, doi:10.1155/2011/864183.
  • Coelho PG, Sudack P, Suzuki M, Kurtz KS, Romanos GE, Silva FA. In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 917-924.
  • Dibart S, Warbington M, Ming FS, Skobe Z. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 732-737.
  • Tesmer M, Wallet S, Koutouzis T, Lundgren T. Bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1991-1997.
  • Guindy CS, Besimo CE, Besimo R, Schiel H, Meyer J. Bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained implant-borne crowns in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 403-408.
  • Quirinen M, Bollen CM, Eyssen H, van Steeberghe D. Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark system. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 239-244.
  • Broggini N, Mc Manus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant - abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 473-478.
  • Romanos GE, Biltucci MT, Kokaras A, Paster BJ. Bacterial composition at the implant -abutment connection under loading in vivo. Clin Imp Dent Related Research 2014, doi: 10.1111/cid.12270.
  • Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 875-881.
  • Alani A, Bishop K. Peri-implantitis. Part 2: Prevention and maintenance of peri-implant health. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 289-297.
  • Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of periimplantitis. Periodontol 2000, 1998; 17: 63-76.
  • Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 527-540.
  • Scarano A, Assenza B, Piatelli M. A 16-years study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol 2005; 31: 269-275.
  • Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Imp Res 1997; 8: 161-172.
  • Canullo L, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Soldini C, Mazzocco F, Penarrocha M, Covani U. Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading. Clin Oral Imp Res 2014; doi: 10.1111/clr.12383.
  • Nascimento C, Barbosa RE, Issa JP, Watanabe E, Ito IY, Albuquerque RF Jr. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of pre-machined or cast components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008, 37: 177-180.
  • Silva-Neto JP, Prudente MS, Carneiro T de A, Nobilo MA, Penatti MP, Neves FD. Micro-leakage at the implant-abutment interface with different tightening torques in vitro. J Appl Oral Sci, 2012; 20: 581-587.
  • Harder S, Dimaczek B, Açil Y, Terheyden H, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connection – in vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implant-abutment connections against endotoxin penetration. Clin Oral Investig 2010: 14: 427-432.
  • Piatelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Assenza B, Leghissa GC, di Bonaventura G. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1146-1150.16.
  • Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 353-359.
  • Berberi A, Tehini G, Rifai K, Eddine FBN, El Zein N, Badran B, Akl H. In vitro evaluation of leakage at implant-abutment connection of three implant systems having the same prosthetic interface using Rhodamine B. Int J Dent 2014; dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/351263.
  • Besimo CE, Guindy JS, Lewetag D, Meyer J. Prevention of bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained crowns on implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1999; 14: 654-660.
  • Ribeiro CG, Maia ML, Scherrer SS, Cardozo AC, Wiskott HW. Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 413-420.
  • Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 88-97.
  • Kasemo B, Lausma J. Biomaterial and implant surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 247-259.
  • Pintinha M, Camarini ET, Sabio S, Pereira JR. Effect of mechanical loading on the removal torque of different types of tapered connection abutments for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110: 383-388.
  • Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 159-166.
  • Baggi L, Di Girolamo M, Mirisola C, Calcaterra R. Microbiological evaluation of bacterial and mycotic seal in implant systems with different implant-abutment interfaces and closing torque values. Imp Dent 2013; 22: 344-350.
  • Nascimento C, Miani PK, Pedrazzi V, Gonçalves RB, Ribeiro RF, Faria ACL, Macedo AP, De Albuquerque RF Jr. Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012, 27:551-560.

Official Publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry

Year 2015, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 156 - 169, 12.01.2015

Cumhur Sipahi , Bülent Pişkin Simel Ayyıldız Alper Uyar

Abstract

References

  • Lorenzoni FC, Coelho PG, Carvalho RM, Silva NFA, Suzuki M, Silva TL, Bonfante EA. Sealing capability and SEM observation of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Dent 2014, doi:10.1155/2011/864183.
  • Coelho PG, Sudack P, Suzuki M, Kurtz KS, Romanos GE, Silva FA. In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 917-924.
  • Dibart S, Warbington M, Ming FS, Skobe Z. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 732-737.
  • Tesmer M, Wallet S, Koutouzis T, Lundgren T. Bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1991-1997.
  • Guindy CS, Besimo CE, Besimo R, Schiel H, Meyer J. Bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained implant-borne crowns in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 403-408.
  • Quirinen M, Bollen CM, Eyssen H, van Steeberghe D. Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark system. An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5: 239-244.
  • Broggini N, Mc Manus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant - abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 473-478.
  • Romanos GE, Biltucci MT, Kokaras A, Paster BJ. Bacterial composition at the implant -abutment connection under loading in vivo. Clin Imp Dent Related Research 2014, doi: 10.1111/cid.12270.
  • Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 875-881.
  • Alani A, Bishop K. Peri-implantitis. Part 2: Prevention and maintenance of peri-implant health. Br Dent J 2014; 217: 289-297.
  • Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of periimplantitis. Periodontol 2000, 1998; 17: 63-76.
  • Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 527-540.
  • Scarano A, Assenza B, Piatelli M. A 16-years study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol 2005; 31: 269-275.
  • Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Imp Res 1997; 8: 161-172.
  • Canullo L, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Soldini C, Mazzocco F, Penarrocha M, Covani U. Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading. Clin Oral Imp Res 2014; doi: 10.1111/clr.12383.
  • Nascimento C, Barbosa RE, Issa JP, Watanabe E, Ito IY, Albuquerque RF Jr. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of pre-machined or cast components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008, 37: 177-180.
  • Silva-Neto JP, Prudente MS, Carneiro T de A, Nobilo MA, Penatti MP, Neves FD. Micro-leakage at the implant-abutment interface with different tightening torques in vitro. J Appl Oral Sci, 2012; 20: 581-587.
  • Harder S, Dimaczek B, Açil Y, Terheyden H, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connection – in vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implant-abutment connections against endotoxin penetration. Clin Oral Investig 2010: 14: 427-432.
  • Piatelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Assenza B, Leghissa GC, di Bonaventura G. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1146-1150.16.
  • Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 353-359.
  • Berberi A, Tehini G, Rifai K, Eddine FBN, El Zein N, Badran B, Akl H. In vitro evaluation of leakage at implant-abutment connection of three implant systems having the same prosthetic interface using Rhodamine B. Int J Dent 2014; dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/351263.
  • Besimo CE, Guindy JS, Lewetag D, Meyer J. Prevention of bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained crowns on implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1999; 14: 654-660.
  • Ribeiro CG, Maia ML, Scherrer SS, Cardozo AC, Wiskott HW. Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 413-420.
  • Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 88-97.
  • Kasemo B, Lausma J. Biomaterial and implant surface science approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 247-259.
  • Pintinha M, Camarini ET, Sabio S, Pereira JR. Effect of mechanical loading on the removal torque of different types of tapered connection abutments for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 110: 383-388.
  • Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 159-166.
  • Baggi L, Di Girolamo M, Mirisola C, Calcaterra R. Microbiological evaluation of bacterial and mycotic seal in implant systems with different implant-abutment interfaces and closing torque values. Imp Dent 2013; 22: 344-350.
  • Nascimento C, Miani PK, Pedrazzi V, Gonçalves RB, Ribeiro RF, Faria ACL, Macedo AP, De Albuquerque RF Jr. Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012, 27:551-560.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Cumhur Sipahi

Bülent Pişkin

Simel Ayyıldız

Alper Uyar

Publication Date January 12, 2015
Submission Date January 12, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015Volume: 18 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Sipahi C, Pişkin B, Ayyıldız S, Uyar A (April 1, 2015) Comparison of saliva leakage amounts into internal implant cavities in three different internal implant-abutment interface configurations. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18 2 156–169.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.