BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2015, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 214 - 227, 24.04.2015

Hüseyin Aktöre Sevcan Kurtulmuş-yılmaz

Abstract

Passive fitting implant supported prosthesis is the key for a successful treatment. In order to achieve a passive fit prosthesis, it is very important to get an accurate impression. Factors affecting the accuracy of such impressions include: Impression technique, splinting or not splinting the impression copings, implant angulation, the number of implants, dimensional stability of the impression material, the setting expansion of stone, and the design and rigidity of the impression tray are the factors that affect the accuracy of implant impressions. Inaccurate impressions may result in both mechanical and biological complications such as screw loosening, screw fracture, increase of plaque accumulation, loss of osteointegration and even in implant fracture. The purpose of this review is to evaluate different impression techniques and materials and to discuss the clinical factors including angulation and number of implants that affect accuracy of the implant impressions

Keywords

Passive fit closed tray open tray impression coping

References

  • KAYNAKLAR
  • Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001;10:85-92.
  • Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Cal E, Ow RK. Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:662-667.
  • Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-178.
  • Duygu G, Özkurt Z, Şençift K, Kazazoğlu E. İmplant destekli sabit ve hareketli protezlerde implant kırığı komplikasyonu: 2 olgu sunumu. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2013;16:308-318
  • Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-331.
  • Ma J, Rubenstein JE. Complete arch implant impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:405-410.
  • Lee H, So .S, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-291.
  • Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-455.
  • Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, Delong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:349-356.
  • Bhakta S, Vere J, Calder I, Patel R. Impressions in implant dentistry. Br Dent J 2011;211:361-367.
  • Choi J, Lim Y, Yim S, Kim C. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:761-8.
  • Chee W, Jivraj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. Br Dent J 2006;201:429-432.
  • Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik, JS. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:377-383.
  • Kempler, J (2011). The Effect of Impression Technique, Connection Type and Implant Angulation on Impression Accuracy. Master Tezi, Faculty of Graduate School of the University of Maryland, Maryland.
  • Lee SJ, Cho SB. Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:177-185.
  • Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence,1985:253.
  • Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-447.
  • Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75.
  • Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-8.
  • Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:186-192.
  • Dumbrigue HB, Gurun DC, Javid NS. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:108-110.
  • Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:684-688.
  • Ivanhoe JR, Adrian HD, Krantz WA, Edqe MJ. An impression technique for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:410-411.
  • Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:112-121.
  • Inturrequi JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-509.
  • Filho HG, Mazaro JVQ, Vedovatto E, Assunçao WG, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. J Prosthodont 2009;18:172-176.
  • Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1512-1520.
  • Öngül D, Gökçen B, Şermet B, Keskin H. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants. Aust Dent J 2012;5:184-189.
  • Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-198.
  • Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar AA, Weiner S. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques. Quintessence Int 2012;43:119-125.
  • Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Happe A, Beuer F. Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1137-1142.
  • Gallucci GO, Papaspyridakos P, Ashy LM, Kim GE, Brady NJ, Weber HP. Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:469-472.
  • Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:676-681.
  • Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci GO. An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:420-423.
  • Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:187-191.
  • Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-1304.
  • Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-115.
  • Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:20-24.
  • Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:34-46.
  • Grossmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger, IM. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:258-261.
  • Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. The use of a coded healing abutment as an impression coping to design and mill an individualized anatomic abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:282-285.
  • Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:30-38.
  • Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, Knapik G. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:228-240.
  • Asuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-366.
  • Barrett MG, de Rijk WG, Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993;2:75-82.
  • Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:629-638.
  • Aguilar ML, Elias A, Vizcarrondo CE, Psoter WJ. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:202-209.
  • Akça K, Cehreli MC. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:517-523.
  • Cehreli MC, Akça K. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:379-385.
  • Chang W, Vahidi F, Bae K, Lim B. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:44-47.
  • Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:152-158.
  • Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M. Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int 2007;38:67-73.
  • Mostafa TMN, Elgendy MNM, Kashef NA, Halim MM. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:525-528.
  • Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:39-47.
  • Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-113.
  • Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:63-76.
  • Del’Acqua MA, Chavez AM, Amaral AL, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A. Jr. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:771-776.
  • Nassar U, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Flores-Mir C. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:172-178.
  • Enkling N, Bayer S, Jöhren P, Mericske-Stern R. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:144-151.
  • Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SM, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:265-268.
  • Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:468-475.
  • Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, Song KY, Park JM, Ahn SG. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:128-133.
  • Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A, Chowdhary R. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16:279-284.
  • Assuncao WG, Cardoso A, Gomes EA, Tabata LF, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion. J Prosthodont 2008;17:641-647.
  • Rutkunas V, Sveikata K, Savickas R. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:512-515.
  • Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:470-476.
  • Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:149-157.
  • Fernandez MA, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations. J Prosthodont 2013;22:367-376.
  • Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B. Implant Cast Accuracy as a Function of Impression Techniques and Impression Material Viscosity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:669-674.
  • Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:218-225.

İmplant destekli protezlerde ölçünün doğruluğunu etkileyen faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi The evaluation of factors that affect the accuracy of implant impressions

Year 2015, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 214 - 227, 24.04.2015

Hüseyin Aktöre Sevcan Kurtulmuş-yılmaz

Abstract

ÖZET

İmplant destekli protezlerde başarılı bir tedavinin anahtarı pasif oturan protetik restorasyonlardır. Bunu elde etmek için, doğru bir ölçü alınması oldukça önemlidir. Ölçü tekniği, ölçü kopinglerinin splintlenmesi veya splintlenmemesi, implantların açıları, implant sayıları, ölçü materyallerinin boyutsal stabilitesi, alçının sertleşme sırasındaki genleşmesi ve ölçü kaşığının tasarım ve rijiditesi ölçünün doğruluğunu etkileyen faktörlerdir. Hatalı alınan bir ölçü ve buna bağlı olarak imlant komponentleri arasında meydana gelen uyumsuzluk, vida gevşemesi veya kırığı, plak akümülasyonunda artış, osteointegrasyon kaybı, implant kırığı gibi hem mekanik hem de biyolojik komplikasyonları meydana getirebilmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı, implant destekli protezlerin fabrikasyonunda kullanılan farklı ölçü teknikleri, ölçü materyalleri ile implant açısı ve sayısı gibi klinik faktörlerin ölçünün doğruluğuna etkilerinin tartışılmasıdır. 

ABSTRACT

Passive fitting implant supported prosthesis is the key for a successful treatment. In order to achieve a passive fit prosthesis, it is important to get an accurate impression. Factors affecting the accuracy of such impressions include: Impression technique, splinting or not splinting the impression copings, implant angulation, the number of implants, dimensional stability of the impression material, the setting expansion of stone, and the design and rigidity of the impression tray are the factors that affect the accuracy of implant impressions. Inaccurate impressions may result in both mechanical and biological complications such as screw loosening, screw fracture, increase of plaque accumulation, loss of osteointegration and even in implant fracture. The purpose of this review is to evaluate different impression techniques and materials and to discuss the clinical factors including angulation and number of implants that affect accuracy of the implant impressions.

Keywords

Anahtar kelimeler: Pasif uyum kapalı kaşık açık kaşık splint polieter polivinil siloksan vinil polieter silikon açılı implant ölçü kopingi

References

  • KAYNAKLAR
  • Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001;10:85-92.
  • Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Cal E, Ow RK. Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:662-667.
  • Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-178.
  • Duygu G, Özkurt Z, Şençift K, Kazazoğlu E. İmplant destekli sabit ve hareketli protezlerde implant kırığı komplikasyonu: 2 olgu sunumu. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2013;16:308-318
  • Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-331.
  • Ma J, Rubenstein JE. Complete arch implant impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:405-410.
  • Lee H, So .S, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-291.
  • Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-455.
  • Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, Delong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:349-356.
  • Bhakta S, Vere J, Calder I, Patel R. Impressions in implant dentistry. Br Dent J 2011;211:361-367.
  • Choi J, Lim Y, Yim S, Kim C. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:761-8.
  • Chee W, Jivraj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. Br Dent J 2006;201:429-432.
  • Liou AD, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA, Brudvik, JS. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:377-383.
  • Kempler, J (2011). The Effect of Impression Technique, Connection Type and Implant Angulation on Impression Accuracy. Master Tezi, Faculty of Graduate School of the University of Maryland, Maryland.
  • Lee SJ, Cho SB. Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:177-185.
  • Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence,1985:253.
  • Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-447.
  • Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75.
  • Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-8.
  • Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:186-192.
  • Dumbrigue HB, Gurun DC, Javid NS. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:108-110.
  • Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:684-688.
  • Ivanhoe JR, Adrian HD, Krantz WA, Edqe MJ. An impression technique for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:410-411.
  • Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:112-121.
  • Inturrequi JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-509.
  • Filho HG, Mazaro JVQ, Vedovatto E, Assunçao WG, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. J Prosthodont 2009;18:172-176.
  • Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1512-1520.
  • Öngül D, Gökçen B, Şermet B, Keskin H. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants. Aust Dent J 2012;5:184-189.
  • Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-198.
  • Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar AA, Weiner S. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques. Quintessence Int 2012;43:119-125.
  • Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Happe A, Beuer F. Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model--a digital approach. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1137-1142.
  • Gallucci GO, Papaspyridakos P, Ashy LM, Kim GE, Brady NJ, Weber HP. Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:469-472.
  • Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:676-681.
  • Lee SJ, Macarthur RX 4th, Gallucci GO. An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:420-423.
  • Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:187-191.
  • Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-1304.
  • Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-115.
  • Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:20-24.
  • Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:34-46.
  • Grossmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger, IM. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:258-261.
  • Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. The use of a coded healing abutment as an impression coping to design and mill an individualized anatomic abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:282-285.
  • Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:30-38.
  • Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, Knapik G. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:228-240.
  • Asuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-366.
  • Barrett MG, de Rijk WG, Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993;2:75-82.
  • Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polansky R, Sedaj B, Wegscheider WA. Comparison of the transfer precision of three different impression materials in combination with transfer caps for the Frialit-2 system. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:629-638.
  • Aguilar ML, Elias A, Vizcarrondo CE, Psoter WJ. Analysis of three-dimensional distortion of two impression materials in the transfer of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:202-209.
  • Akça K, Cehreli MC. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:517-523.
  • Cehreli MC, Akça K. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:379-385.
  • Chang W, Vahidi F, Bae K, Lim B. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:44-47.
  • Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:152-158.
  • Holst S, Blatz MB, Bergler M, Goellner M, Wichmann M. Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int 2007;38:67-73.
  • Mostafa TMN, Elgendy MNM, Kashef NA, Halim MM. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:525-528.
  • Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:39-47.
  • Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-113.
  • Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:63-76.
  • Del’Acqua MA, Chavez AM, Amaral AL, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A. Jr. Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:771-776.
  • Nassar U, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Flores-Mir C. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:172-178.
  • Enkling N, Bayer S, Jöhren P, Mericske-Stern R. Vinylsiloxanether: a new impression material. Clinical study of implant impressions with vinylsiloxanether versus polyether materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:144-151.
  • Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SM, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:265-268.
  • Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:468-475.
  • Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, Song KY, Park JM, Ahn SG. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:128-133.
  • Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A, Chowdhary R. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16:279-284.
  • Assuncao WG, Cardoso A, Gomes EA, Tabata LF, dos Santos PH. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion. J Prosthodont 2008;17:641-647.
  • Rutkunas V, Sveikata K, Savickas R. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:512-515.
  • Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:470-476.
  • Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:149-157.
  • Fernandez MA, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations. J Prosthodont 2013;22:367-376.
  • Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B. Implant Cast Accuracy as a Function of Impression Techniques and Impression Material Viscosity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:669-674.
  • Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:218-225.
There are 71 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Review
Authors

Hüseyin Aktöre

Sevcan Kurtulmuş-yılmaz

Publication Date April 24, 2015
Submission Date June 3, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2015Volume: 18 Issue: 2

Cite

EndNote Aktöre H, Kurtulmuş-yılmaz S (April 1, 2015) İmplant destekli protezlerde ölçünün doğruluğunu etkileyen faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi The evaluation of factors that affect the accuracy of implant impressions. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 18 2 214–227.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.