Is there a difference between the primary stability of anodized and non-anodized mini-screws subjected to repeated cycles of autoclave sterilization?
Abstract
Objective: To determine if autoclave sterilization has any deleterious effects on the clinical stability of anodized versus non-anodized mini-screws.
Materials and Methods: Thirty anodized and thirty non-anodized Aarhus System mini-screws (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI) were utilized. Each group was divided into three test groups. In each group, mini-screws that were sterilized once using a steam autoclave (Statim 5000, SciCan USA, Canonsburg, Pa) served as the control group (n=10). The other two test groups involved mini-screws that were subjected to a repeated cycles of sterilization for five (n=10) and ten (n=10) times. All sixty mini-screws were inserted at a 90° angle into custom-designed synthetic blocks that simulated the average mandible of a healthy adult. The maximum insertion torque and the lateral displacement at 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mm were recorded for each sample and subjected to statistical testing. A two-way ANOVA, and a three-way mixed ANOVA were used for statistical analyses.
Results: Maximum insertion torque values displayed significant differences between the anodized and non-anodized groups (p<0.001) as well as the sterilization cycles (p<0.001). No significant group and cycle interaction was observed. No significant differences were found between the groups and sterilization cycles in the evaluation of the lateral displacement test. However, there was a significant group/cycle/displacement interaction (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Surface treatment of mini-screws with anodization produced differences when compared to standard surface mini-screws following autoclave sterilization. The differences between the two types of mini-screws did not indicate a potential stability concern.
Keywords
References
- 1. Petrey JS, Saunders MM, Kluemper GT, Cunningham LL, Beeman CS. Angle Orthod 2010;80:634-641.
- 2. El H, Kan H, Adiloglu I, Aktas G, Kocadereli İ. Orthodontic treatment of relapse using the preinserted endosseous dental implants. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2011;14:119-124.
- 3. Hyde JD, King GJ. Survey of orthodontists’ attitudes and experiences regarding miniscrew implants. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:481- 486.
- 4. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic miniimplant. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006;17:109-114.
- 5. Pithon MM, Nojima MG, Nojima LI. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic miniimplants. Intl J Oral Max. Surg 2011;40:80-85.
- 6. Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:825-829.
- 7. Cleveland J, Kohn W. CDC weighs in on TADs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:622- 623.
- 8. Scholz RP, Cook A. Sterilization requirements for the placement of temporary anchorage devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:S20-S22.
- 9. Smith GA, Von fraunhofer JA, Casey GR. The effect of clinical use and sterilization on selected orthodontic archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:153- 159.
- 10. Doundoulakis JH. Surface analysis of titanium after sterilization: Role in implant-tissue interface and bioadhesion. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1987;58(4):471-478.
- 11. Hartman LC, Meenaghan MA, Norman GS, Hawker PB. Effects of pretreatment sterilization and cleaning methods on materials properties and osseoinductivity of a threaded implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:11-18.
- 12. Keller JC, Draughn RA, Wightman JP, Dougherty WJ, Meletiou SD. Characterization of sterilized CP titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:360-367.
- 13. Akyalcin S, McIver HP, English JD, Ontiveros JC, Gallerano RL. Effects of repeated sterilization cycles on primary stability of orthodontic mini- screws. Angle Orthod 2013;83:674- 679.
- 14. Trisi P, Rebaudi A. Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:31-43.
- 15. Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Bone to implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans subjected to horizontal loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:348–353.
- 16. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-106.
- 17. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:42–47.
Abstract
References
- 1. Petrey JS, Saunders MM, Kluemper GT, Cunningham LL, Beeman CS. Angle Orthod 2010;80:634-641.
- 2. El H, Kan H, Adiloglu I, Aktas G, Kocadereli İ. Orthodontic treatment of relapse using the preinserted endosseous dental implants. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2011;14:119-124.
- 3. Hyde JD, King GJ. Survey of orthodontists’ attitudes and experiences regarding miniscrew implants. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:481- 486.
- 4. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic miniimplant. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006;17:109-114.
- 5. Pithon MM, Nojima MG, Nojima LI. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic miniimplants. Intl J Oral Max. Surg 2011;40:80-85.
- 6. Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:825-829.
- 7. Cleveland J, Kohn W. CDC weighs in on TADs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:622- 623.
- 8. Scholz RP, Cook A. Sterilization requirements for the placement of temporary anchorage devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:S20-S22.
- 9. Smith GA, Von fraunhofer JA, Casey GR. The effect of clinical use and sterilization on selected orthodontic archwires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:153- 159.
- 10. Doundoulakis JH. Surface analysis of titanium after sterilization: Role in implant-tissue interface and bioadhesion. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1987;58(4):471-478.
- 11. Hartman LC, Meenaghan MA, Norman GS, Hawker PB. Effects of pretreatment sterilization and cleaning methods on materials properties and osseoinductivity of a threaded implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:11-18.
- 12. Keller JC, Draughn RA, Wightman JP, Dougherty WJ, Meletiou SD. Characterization of sterilized CP titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:360-367.
- 13. Akyalcin S, McIver HP, English JD, Ontiveros JC, Gallerano RL. Effects of repeated sterilization cycles on primary stability of orthodontic mini- screws. Angle Orthod 2013;83:674- 679.
- 14. Trisi P, Rebaudi A. Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:31-43.
- 15. Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Bone to implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans subjected to horizontal loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:348–353.
- 16. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-106.
- 17. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:42–47.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 2, 2014 |
| Submission Date | June 14, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2014Volume: 17 Issue: 2 |
Cited By
Effect of photodynamic therapy on surface decontamination in clinical orthodontic instruments
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Augusto Alberto Foggiato
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.09.003
Effect of steam and dry heat sterilization on the insertion and fracture torque of orthodontic miniscrews
Dental Research Journal
Shiva Alavi
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.284729
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.