BibTex RIS Cite

Long -term antibacterial properties of fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives

Year 2012, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 33 - 42, 03.01.2012

Fırat Ozturk , Ebubekir Toy Ugur Arslan Erdem Hatunoglu Sertac Aksakalli

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1056
Cited By: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare antibacterial properties of 3 different fluoride-releasing orthodontic adhesives during three months by using the direct contact test (DCT).

Materials and Methods: The materials tested in the present study were Transbond Plus (3M Unitek, Monrovia, USA), Light Bond (Reliance Ortho Prod. Inc. Itasca, IL, USA), and Kurasper F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan). Eight specimens of each material type were prepared for estimation. For the DCT, wells of 96-microtitre plates were coated with each of three bonding adhesives. Eight uncoated wells, using identical inocula size, served as a positive control (bacteria with medium). A Streptococcus mutans suspension was placed on the surface of each specimen that was held for 1 hour at 37°C. Bacterial growth was monitored for 16 hours with a temperature-controlled microplate spectrophotometer. The kinetics of the growth in each well was recorded continuously at 650 nm in every 30 minutes. Three additional measurements were performed on these tested materials after aging for 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. One-way ANOVA and Tamhane’s T2 multiple comparison tests were applied to the data. The level of significance was set as p<0.05.

Results: The DCT showed that there were significant differences found in freshly mixed samples between four groups (p<0.001, F=20.901). Freshly mixed samples of Transbond Plus showed antibacterial activity (p<0.001). Kurasper F and Light Bond did not differ from positive control. In the measurements of aged specimens, all materials showed an increase in the logarithmic growth rate of Streptococcus mutans.

Conclusion: Only Transbond Plus showed antibacterial properties in freshly mixed specimens. However, none of the tested orthodontics composites showed antibacterial properties after aging.

Keywords

Antibacterial agents direct contact test fluorides orthodontic adhesives streptococcus mutans

References

  • 1. Demling A, Elter C, Heidenblut T, Bach Fr-W, Hahn A, Schwestka-Polly R, Stiesch M, Heuer W. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:414- 418. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Tufekci E, Casagrande ZA, Lindauer SJ, Fowler CE, Williams KT. Effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2008;78:294-298. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Buren JL, Staley RN, Wefel J, Qian F. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by an enamel sealant, Pro Seal: an invitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:88-94. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Kocak MM, Ozcan S, Kocak S, Topuz O, Erten H. Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Dent 2009;3:57-61.
  • 5. Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N. Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:35-37. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Duran I, Sengun A, Hadimli HH, Ulker M. Evaluation of antibacterial effectiveness of desensitizers against oral bacteria. Eur J Dent 2008;2:43- 47.
  • 7. Poeta P, Igrejas G, Gonçalves A, Martins E, Araújo C, Carvalho C, Rodrigues J, Vinué L, López M, Torres C. Influence of oral hygiene in patients with fixed appliances in the oral carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococcus isolates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:557-564. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Sbordone L, Bortolaia C. Oral microbial biofilms and plaque related diseases: microbial communities and their role in the shift from oral health to disease. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:181-188. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D. Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 2009;3:127-134.
  • 10. Ahn SJ, Lim BS, Lee SJ. Prevalence of cariogenic streptococci on incisor brackets detected by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:736-741. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Naranjo AA, Trivino ML, Jaramillo A, Betancourth M, Botero JE. Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:275.e17-22. [CrossRef]
  • 12. O’Reilly MM, Featherstone JDB. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:33-40. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007;23:343-362. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Rogers S, Chadwick B, Treasure E. Fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives and decalcification in patients with fixed appliances: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:390.e1- 390.e8. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Chadwick BL, Roy J, Knox J, Treasure ET. The effect of topical fluorides on decalcification in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:601- 606. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Mota SM, Enoki C, Ito IY, Elias AM, Matsumoto MAN. Streptococcus mutans counts in plaque adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement or resin-based composite. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:55-60. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Rix D, Foley TF, Banting D, Mamandras A. A comparison of fluoride release by resin-modified GIC and polyacidmodified composite resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:398-405.
  • 18. Dijkman GE, de Vries J, Lodding A, Arends J. Long-term fluoride release of visible light-activated composites in vitro: a correlation with in situ demineralization data. Caries Res 1993;27:117-123.
  • 19. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials 2003;24:2451-2461. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Weiss EI, Shlhav M, Fuss Z. Assessment of antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by a direct contact test. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:179-184. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Lewinstein I, Matalon S, Slutzkey S, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of aged dental cements evaluated by direct-contact and agar diffusion tests. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:364-371. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of 4 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:56-63. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Beyth N, Yudovin-Fearber I, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Long-term antibacterial surface properties of composite resin incorporating polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. Quintessence Int 2010;41(10):827-835.
  • 24. Feuerstein O, Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of self-etching dental adhesive systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:349-354.
  • 25. Stratemann MW, Shannon IL. Control of decalcification in orthodontic patients by daily self-administered application of a water-free 0.4 per cent stannous fluoride gel. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:273-279. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Zimmer BW, Rottwinkel Y. Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:318-324. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Herrera M, Carrion P, Baca P, Liebana J, Castillo A. In vitro antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements. Microbios 2001;104:141-148.
  • 28. Tobias RS. Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. Int Endod J 1988;21:155-160. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Ristic M, Vlahovic M, Svabic M, Sasic M, Zelic O. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:187-195. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Imazato S, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y, McCabe JF, Russell RR. Incorporation of bacterial inhibitor into resin composite. J Dent Res 1994;73:1437- 1443.
  • 31. Fan C, Chu L, Rawls HR, Norling BK, Cardenas HL, Whang K. Development of an antimicrobial resin-a pilot study. Dent Mater 2011;27(4):322-328. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Spencer CG, Campbell PM, Buschang PH, Cai J, Honeyman AL. Antimicrobial effects of zinc oxide in an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod 2009;79(2):317-322. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Øgaard B, Larsson E, Henriksson T, Birkhed D, Bishara SE. Effects of combined application of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:28-35.
  • 34. Hu W, Featherstone JD. Prevention of enamel demineralization:an in-vitro study using light-cured filled sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:592-600. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Benson PE, Parkin N, Millett DT, Dyer FE, Vine S, Shah A. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization. A systematic review. J Orthod 2005;32:102-114. [CrossRef]
  • 36. Eminkahyagil N, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S, Baseren M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with newly developed antibacterial self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 2005;75:843- 848.
  • 37. Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, Selighini M, Pashley DH. Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993;9:338-343. [CrossRef]
  • 38. Baturina O, Tufekci E, Guney-Altay O, Khan SM, Wnek GE, Lindauer SJ. Development of a sustained fluoride delivery system. Angle Orthod 2010;80(6):1129-1135. [CrossRef]
  • 39. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Tagliani P, Klersy C. In-vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:656-662. [CrossRef]
  • 40. McNeill CJ, Wiltshire WA, Dawes C, Lavelle CL. Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:392-397. [CrossRef]
  • 41. Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoridereleasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003;28:395-402.

Year 2012, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 33 - 42, 03.01.2012

Fırat Ozturk , Ebubekir Toy Ugur Arslan Erdem Hatunoglu Sertac Aksakalli

https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.1056
Cited By: 2

Abstract

References

  • 1. Demling A, Elter C, Heidenblut T, Bach Fr-W, Hahn A, Schwestka-Polly R, Stiesch M, Heuer W. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:414- 418. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Tufekci E, Casagrande ZA, Lindauer SJ, Fowler CE, Williams KT. Effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2008;78:294-298. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Buren JL, Staley RN, Wefel J, Qian F. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by an enamel sealant, Pro Seal: an invitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:88-94. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Kocak MM, Ozcan S, Kocak S, Topuz O, Erten H. Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Dent 2009;3:57-61.
  • 5. Rosenbloom RG, Tinanoff N. Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:35-37. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Duran I, Sengun A, Hadimli HH, Ulker M. Evaluation of antibacterial effectiveness of desensitizers against oral bacteria. Eur J Dent 2008;2:43- 47.
  • 7. Poeta P, Igrejas G, Gonçalves A, Martins E, Araújo C, Carvalho C, Rodrigues J, Vinué L, López M, Torres C. Influence of oral hygiene in patients with fixed appliances in the oral carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococcus isolates. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:557-564. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Sbordone L, Bortolaia C. Oral microbial biofilms and plaque related diseases: microbial communities and their role in the shift from oral health to disease. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:181-188. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Uysal T, Amasyali M, Koyuturk AE, Sagdic D. Efficiency of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite and resin modified glass ionomer on demineralization evaluated by a new laser fluorescence device. Eur J Dent 2009;3:127-134.
  • 10. Ahn SJ, Lim BS, Lee SJ. Prevalence of cariogenic streptococci on incisor brackets detected by polymerase chain reaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:736-741. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Naranjo AA, Trivino ML, Jaramillo A, Betancourth M, Botero JE. Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:275.e17-22. [CrossRef]
  • 12. O’Reilly MM, Featherstone JDB. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:33-40. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater 2007;23:343-362. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Rogers S, Chadwick B, Treasure E. Fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives and decalcification in patients with fixed appliances: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:390.e1- 390.e8. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Chadwick BL, Roy J, Knox J, Treasure ET. The effect of topical fluorides on decalcification in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:601- 606. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Mota SM, Enoki C, Ito IY, Elias AM, Matsumoto MAN. Streptococcus mutans counts in plaque adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement or resin-based composite. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:55-60. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Rix D, Foley TF, Banting D, Mamandras A. A comparison of fluoride release by resin-modified GIC and polyacidmodified composite resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:398-405.
  • 18. Dijkman GE, de Vries J, Lodding A, Arends J. Long-term fluoride release of visible light-activated composites in vitro: a correlation with in situ demineralization data. Caries Res 1993;27:117-123.
  • 19. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials 2003;24:2451-2461. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Weiss EI, Shlhav M, Fuss Z. Assessment of antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by a direct contact test. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:179-184. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Lewinstein I, Matalon S, Slutzkey S, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of aged dental cements evaluated by direct-contact and agar diffusion tests. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:364-371. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of 4 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:56-63. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Beyth N, Yudovin-Fearber I, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Long-term antibacterial surface properties of composite resin incorporating polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. Quintessence Int 2010;41(10):827-835.
  • 24. Feuerstein O, Matalon S, Slutzky H, Weiss EI. Antibacterial properties of self-etching dental adhesive systems. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:349-354.
  • 25. Stratemann MW, Shannon IL. Control of decalcification in orthodontic patients by daily self-administered application of a water-free 0.4 per cent stannous fluoride gel. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:273-279. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Zimmer BW, Rottwinkel Y. Assessing patient-specific decalcification risk in fixed orthodontic treatment and its impact on prophylactic procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:318-324. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Herrera M, Carrion P, Baca P, Liebana J, Castillo A. In vitro antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements. Microbios 2001;104:141-148.
  • 28. Tobias RS. Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. Int Endod J 1988;21:155-160. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Ristic M, Vlahovic M, Svabic M, Sasic M, Zelic O. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res 2007;10:187-195. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Imazato S, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y, McCabe JF, Russell RR. Incorporation of bacterial inhibitor into resin composite. J Dent Res 1994;73:1437- 1443.
  • 31. Fan C, Chu L, Rawls HR, Norling BK, Cardenas HL, Whang K. Development of an antimicrobial resin-a pilot study. Dent Mater 2011;27(4):322-328. [CrossRef]
  • 32. Spencer CG, Campbell PM, Buschang PH, Cai J, Honeyman AL. Antimicrobial effects of zinc oxide in an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod 2009;79(2):317-322. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Øgaard B, Larsson E, Henriksson T, Birkhed D, Bishara SE. Effects of combined application of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:28-35.
  • 34. Hu W, Featherstone JD. Prevention of enamel demineralization:an in-vitro study using light-cured filled sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:592-600. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Benson PE, Parkin N, Millett DT, Dyer FE, Vine S, Shah A. Fluorides, orthodontics and demineralization. A systematic review. J Orthod 2005;32:102-114. [CrossRef]
  • 36. Eminkahyagil N, Korkmaz Y, Gokalp S, Baseren M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with newly developed antibacterial self-etch adhesive. Angle Orthod 2005;75:843- 848.
  • 37. Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, Selighini M, Pashley DH. Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993;9:338-343. [CrossRef]
  • 38. Baturina O, Tufekci E, Guney-Altay O, Khan SM, Wnek GE, Lindauer SJ. Development of a sustained fluoride delivery system. Angle Orthod 2010;80(6):1129-1135. [CrossRef]
  • 39. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Tagliani P, Klersy C. In-vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:656-662. [CrossRef]
  • 40. McNeill CJ, Wiltshire WA, Dawes C, Lavelle CL. Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:392-397. [CrossRef]
  • 41. Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoridereleasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003;28:395-402.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Fırat Ozturk

Ebubekir Toy

Ugur Arslan

Erdem Hatunoglu

Sertac Aksakalli

Publication Date January 3, 2012
Submission Date September 27, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2012Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

EndNote Ozturk F, Toy E, Arslan U, Hatunoglu E, Aksakalli S (January 1, 2012) Long -term antibacterial properties of fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 15 1 33–42.

Cited By

Effect of calcium fluoride nanoparticles in prevention of demineralization during orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a randomized clinical trial
European Journal of Orthodontics
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjac055
Evaluation of antibacterial effects of contemporary orthodontic bonding materials
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
Zeliha Muge Baka
https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1307798

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.