Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türk Popülasyonu Üzerinde Dental Maloklüzyonlar ve Diş Anomalileri Arasındaki İlişkinin Radyografik Olarak İncelenmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 343 - 349, 30.12.2018

Zeliha Uğur Aydın , Yasemin Nur Korkmaz Burak Sarıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.444383

Abstract

Amaç: Bu
çalışmanın amacı çeşitli dental anomaliler ile dental malokluzyonlar / dikey
büyüme paternleri arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma,
yaş ortalaması 15.46 ± 4.52 yıl olan 756 hastanın panoramik radyografileri
üzerinde yapıldı. Hastaların% 64.6 'sı  (n = 488) kadındı ve% 35.4'ü (n = 268)
erkekti. Hastaların panoramik radyografileri üzerinde aşağıda belirtilen diş
anomalileri araştırıldı: süpernümerer diş, agenez, transpozisyon, mikrodonti,
dileserasyon ve taurodontizm. Elde edilen veriler Ki-kare veya Fisher exact
testleri kullanılarak% 5'lik bir anlamlılık düzeyinde analiz edildi.

Bulgular:
Gömülü diş (% 14.4) ve mikrodonti (% 8.5) en sık rastlanan anomalilerdi. Dental
anomalilerin prevalansı iskelet Sınıf II maloklüzyon (% 9.9) ve hipodiverjan (%
11.6) büyüme paterninde en yüksekti (p˂0.05).







 Sonuç: Diş agenezi, gömülü diş,
transpozisyon ve taurodontizm için iskelet maloklüzyon / dikey büyüme paterni
ve dental anomaliler arasında bir ilişki olduğu gözlendi. Süpernümerer diş,
mikrodonti ve dilaserasyon maloklüzyon grupları arasında anlamlı olarak farklı
değildi. 

Keywords

Dental Anomali ; Dental Maloklüzyon; Büyüme Paterni.

References

  • Dang HQ, Constantine S, Anderson PJ. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J 2017;62:161-164.
  • Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:529-535.
  • Rozsa N, Nagy K, Vajo Z, Gabris K, Soos A, Alberth M, Tarjan I. Prevalence and distribution of permanent canine agenesis in dental paediatric and orthodontic patients in Hungary. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31:374-379.
  • Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Ceylan I, Kamak H. Frequency and distribution of developmental anomalies in the permanent teeth of a Turkish orthodontic patient population. J Dent Sci 2011; 6:82-89.
  • Montasser MA, Taha M. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2012;13:52-59.
  • Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:328-335.
  • Al-Amiri A, Tabbaa S, Preston CB, Al-Jewair T. The prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients at the State University of New York at Buffalo. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14:518.
  • Yılmaz H, Turkkahraman H, Sayın M. Prevalence of tooth transpositions and associated dental anomalies in a Turkish population. Dentomaxıllofac Rad 2005; 34:32-35.
  • Wang X-X, Zhang J, Wei F-C. Autosomal dominant inherence of multiple supernumerary teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:756-758.
  • De Coster P, Marks L, Martens L, Huysseune A. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009; 38:1-17. 11. Talbot TQ, Hill AJ. Transposed and impacted maxillary canine with ipsilateral congenitally missing lateral incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:316-323.
  • Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:436-441.
  • Stephen A, Cengiz SB. The use of overdentures in the management of severe hypodontia associated with microdontia: a case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 27:219-222.
  • Hamasha A, Al-Khateeb T, Darwazeh A. Prevalence of dilaceration in Jordanian adults. Int Endod J 2002;35:910-912.
  • Jafarzadeh H, Azarpazhooh A, Mayhall J. Taurodontism: a review of the condition and endodontic treatment challenges. Int Endod J 2008;41:375-388.
  • Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39:729-755.
  • Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:529-535.
  • White S, Pharoah M. Dental anomalies. Oral Radiology Principles and interpretation. White S, Pharoah M, 2,2004.
  • Ardakani FE, Sheikhha M, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health 2007; 24:140.
  • Stecker SS, Beiraghi S, Hodges JS, Peterson VS, Myers SL. Prevalence of dental anomalies in a Southeast Asian population in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul metropolitan area. Northwest dentistry 2007;86:25-28.
  • Küchler EC, Risso PA, de Castro Costa M, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of school children. Arch Oral Biol 2008;53:941-946.
  • Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53:231-238.
  • Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN dentistry 2012
  • Yassin SM. Prevalence and distribution of selected dental anomalies among saudi children in Abha, Saudi Arabia. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8:485.
  • Dang H, Constantine S, Anderson P. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J 2017; 62:161-164.
  • Esenlik E, Sayın MÖ, Atilla AO, Özen T, Altun C, Başak F. Supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136:848-852.
  • Gündüz K, Açikgöz A, Egrioglu E. Radiologic investigation of prevalence, associated pathologies and dental anomalies of non-third molar impacted teeth in Turkish oral patients. Chin J Dent Res 2011; 14:141.
  • Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:510-514.
  • Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J 1998; 43:395-398.
  • Fernandez CCA, Pereira CVCA, Luiz RR, Vieira AR, De Castro Costa M. Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2017;88:195-201.
  • Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:29-35.
  • Alberti G, Mondani P, Parodi V. Eruption of supernumerary permanent teeth in a sample of urban primary school population in Genoa, Italy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006; 7:89-92.
  • Kocabalkan E, Ozyemişci N. Restoration of severe hypodontia associated with microdontia by using an overdenture: a clinical report. Chin Med J 2005; 118:350.
  • Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
  • Aydin U, Yilmaz H, Yildirim D. Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a patient population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:164-169.
  • Darwazeh A, Hamasha A, Pillai K. Prevalence of taurodontism in Jordanian dental patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27:163-165.
  • Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou MN, Komposch G. Congenital tooth anomalies and malocclusions: a genetic link? Eur J Orthod 2001;23:145-152.

Radiographic Investigation of The Relationship Between Dental Malocclusions And Dental Anomalies on the Turkish Population

Year 2018, Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 343 - 349, 30.12.2018

Zeliha Uğur Aydın , Yasemin Nur Korkmaz Burak Sarıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.444383

Abstract

Objectives:
The aim of this
study was to investigate the relationship between various dental anomalies and
dental malocclusions/vertical growth patterns.



Materials and Methods: The study was carried out on panoramic radiographs of
756 patients with a mean age of 15.46 ± 4.52 years. 64.6% (n = 488) of the
total patients were female and 35.4% (n = 268) were male. The panoramic
radiographs of the patients were detected for the following dental anomalies:
supernumerary tooth, agenesis, transposition, microdontia, dileseration and
taurodontism. The obtained data were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact
tests at a significance level of 5%.



Results: Impaction (14.4%) and microdontia (8.5%) were the
most common anomalies.The prevalence of dental anomalies were the highest in
skeletal Class II malocclusion (9.9%) and hypodivergent (11.6%) growth pattern
(p˂0.05).



Conclusion:The presence of an association between skeletal malocclusion/vertical
growth pattern and dental anomalies was observed for tooth agenesis, impaction,
transposition and taurodontism. Supernumerary tooth, microdontia and
dilaceration were not significantly different among malocclusion groups.

Keywords

Dental anomalies; Dental Malocclusion; Growth Pattern.

References

  • Dang HQ, Constantine S, Anderson PJ. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J 2017;62:161-164.
  • Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22:529-535.
  • Rozsa N, Nagy K, Vajo Z, Gabris K, Soos A, Alberth M, Tarjan I. Prevalence and distribution of permanent canine agenesis in dental paediatric and orthodontic patients in Hungary. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31:374-379.
  • Kazanci F, Celikoglu M, Miloglu O, Ceylan I, Kamak H. Frequency and distribution of developmental anomalies in the permanent teeth of a Turkish orthodontic patient population. J Dent Sci 2011; 6:82-89.
  • Montasser MA, Taha M. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Orthodontics (Chic.) 2012;13:52-59.
  • Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:328-335.
  • Al-Amiri A, Tabbaa S, Preston CB, Al-Jewair T. The prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients at the State University of New York at Buffalo. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14:518.
  • Yılmaz H, Turkkahraman H, Sayın M. Prevalence of tooth transpositions and associated dental anomalies in a Turkish population. Dentomaxıllofac Rad 2005; 34:32-35.
  • Wang X-X, Zhang J, Wei F-C. Autosomal dominant inherence of multiple supernumerary teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:756-758.
  • De Coster P, Marks L, Martens L, Huysseune A. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009; 38:1-17. 11. Talbot TQ, Hill AJ. Transposed and impacted maxillary canine with ipsilateral congenitally missing lateral incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:316-323.
  • Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:436-441.
  • Stephen A, Cengiz SB. The use of overdentures in the management of severe hypodontia associated with microdontia: a case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2003; 27:219-222.
  • Hamasha A, Al-Khateeb T, Darwazeh A. Prevalence of dilaceration in Jordanian adults. Int Endod J 2002;35:910-912.
  • Jafarzadeh H, Azarpazhooh A, Mayhall J. Taurodontism: a review of the condition and endodontic treatment challenges. Int Endod J 2008;41:375-388.
  • Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953; 39:729-755.
  • Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The Class II Division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:529-535.
  • White S, Pharoah M. Dental anomalies. Oral Radiology Principles and interpretation. White S, Pharoah M, 2,2004.
  • Ardakani FE, Sheikhha M, Ahmadi H. Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies: a radiographic study. Community Dent Health 2007; 24:140.
  • Stecker SS, Beiraghi S, Hodges JS, Peterson VS, Myers SL. Prevalence of dental anomalies in a Southeast Asian population in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul metropolitan area. Northwest dentistry 2007;86:25-28.
  • Küchler EC, Risso PA, de Castro Costa M, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of school children. Arch Oral Biol 2008;53:941-946.
  • Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. J Oral Sci 2011; 53:231-238.
  • Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN dentistry 2012
  • Yassin SM. Prevalence and distribution of selected dental anomalies among saudi children in Abha, Saudi Arabia. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8:485.
  • Dang H, Constantine S, Anderson P. The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population. Aust Dent J 2017; 62:161-164.
  • Esenlik E, Sayın MÖ, Atilla AO, Özen T, Altun C, Başak F. Supernumerary teeth in a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136:848-852.
  • Gündüz K, Açikgöz A, Egrioglu E. Radiologic investigation of prevalence, associated pathologies and dental anomalies of non-third molar impacted teeth in Turkish oral patients. Chin J Dent Res 2011; 14:141.
  • Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:510-514.
  • Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust Dent J 1998; 43:395-398.
  • Fernandez CCA, Pereira CVCA, Luiz RR, Vieira AR, De Castro Costa M. Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2017;88:195-201.
  • Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:29-35.
  • Alberti G, Mondani P, Parodi V. Eruption of supernumerary permanent teeth in a sample of urban primary school population in Genoa, Italy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006; 7:89-92.
  • Kocabalkan E, Ozyemişci N. Restoration of severe hypodontia associated with microdontia by using an overdenture: a clinical report. Chin Med J 2005; 118:350.
  • Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
  • Aydin U, Yilmaz H, Yildirim D. Incidence of canine impaction and transmigration in a patient population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:164-169.
  • Darwazeh A, Hamasha A, Pillai K. Prevalence of taurodontism in Jordanian dental patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27:163-165.
  • Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou MN, Komposch G. Congenital tooth anomalies and malocclusions: a genetic link? Eur J Orthod 2001;23:145-152.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Zeliha Uğur Aydın

Yasemin Nur Korkmaz

Burak Sarıoğlu

Publication Date December 30, 2018
Submission Date July 17, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018Volume: 21 Issue: 4

Cite

EndNote Uğur Aydın Z, Korkmaz YN, Sarıoğlu B (December 1, 2018) Radiographic Investigation of The Relationship Between Dental Malocclusions And Dental Anomalies on the Turkish Population. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 21 4 343–349.
 Download Cover Image

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.