Amaçlar: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, mavi ışık
yayan diyot (LED) ve diyot lazer ile foto aktive olan ofis tipi beyazlatma
prosedürleri esnasında altı farklı restoratif materyalin yüzey pürüzlülüğünü
değerlendirmektir.
Materyal ve Metotlar: Bu çalışmada Filtek TM supreme,
Tetric Evo Ceram, Tescera ATL, Clearfill Majesty Esthetic, Durafill VS ve IPS
Empress 2 materyalleri kullanıldı. Yirmi örnek;
her biri 10 mm çapında 2 mm kalınlığında olacak şekilde teflon kalıp
kullanılarak oluşturuldu. Bütün örnekler rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı (n=10).
Grup 1’ de topikal uygulanan %35’lik hidrojen peroksit LED kullanılarak 20
saniye süreyle foto aktive edildi. Grup 2’ de %46’lık hidrojen peroksit diode
lazer kullanılarak topikal olarak uygulandı. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerleri
başlangıç ve beyazlatma işlemleri sonrasında olmak üzere profilometre
yardımıyla ölçüldü. Veriler tek-yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), Tamhane's T2 ve
bağımsız t testleri yapılarak istatiksel olarak analiz edildi.
Sonuçlar: Yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerleri test edilen
tüm restoratif materyallerde her iki beyazlatma prosedüründe de artmıştır
(p<0,05). Diode lazer foto aktivasyonu ile beyazlatılan Tescera ATL, LED ile
aktive edilenden daha yüksek yüzey pürüzlülüğü değeri gösterdi (p<0,05).
Fakat diğer restoratif materyaller için iki beyazlatma prosedüründe de önemli
farklılıklar ortaya çıkmadı (p>0,05).
Çıkarımlar: Klinik etkiler in-vivo şartlara bağlı olmasına rağmen ofis tipi
beyazlatma ajanlarının etkileri bilinmeli ve renklenmiş bir restorasyon
beyazlatıldığında veya beyazlatılmış diş ile komşu restorasyon varlığında
dikkatle kullanılmalıdır.
Estetik restoratif materyaller Dental porselen Diş beyazlatma Yüzey pürüzlülüğü Yarı iletken lazerler
Objectives:
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate surface roughness
of six different restorative materials during office bleaching procedures with
blue light emitted diode (LED) and diode laser photo activation.
Materials
and Methods: Filtek TM supreme, Tetric Evo Ceram, Tescera ATL,
Clearfill Majesty Esthetic, Durafill VS and IPS Empress 2 materials were
evaluated in this study. Twenty specimens, 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick,
were fabricated from each material using a teflon mold. All specimens were
randomly assigned to two groups (n=10). Group 1 received two topical applications
of 35% hydrogen peroxide for 20 s. And was photoactivated using LED. Group 2
received topical application of 46% hydrogen peroxide using diode laser.
Surface roughness values were measured prior to and following bleaching
procedures by using a profilometer. Data were analyzed statistically, by
one-way-analysis of variance (ANOVA), post-hoc Tamhane's T2 and independent t
tests.
Results:
Surface roughness values for all restorative materials tested
increased after both bleaching procedures (p<0.05). Tescera ATL bleached
with diode laser photo activation showed higher surface roughness value than
LED activation (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in
two bleaching methods for other restorative materials (p>0.05).
Conclusions:
Although clinical effects depend on in-vivo conditions, the effects of office bleaching agents should
be known and applied cautiously when a colored restoration is bleached or a
restoration is neighboured with the tooth bleached.
Keywords:
Esthetic restorative materials, Dental porcelain, Teeth
bleaching, Surface roughness, Semiconductor lasers
Esthetic restorative materials Dental porcelain Teeth bleaching Surface roughness Semiconductor lasers
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
---|---|
Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 22, 2017 |
Submission Date | June 16, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017Volume: 20 Issue: 3 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.