Abstract
Aesthetics has gained significant importance in
restorative dentistry besides the potential requirements including the
continuity and integrity of tissue and regaining the function and phonation.
The demand for esthetic posterior restorations gave way to the use of resin
composites in the posterior region as well as the anterior restorations. However,
polymerization shrinkage of resin composites limits this application to only
with small sized restorations. In order to eliminate the disadvantage of
polymerization shrinkage, various methods have been suggested to improve the
properties and application methods of resins with the aim of increasing the
longevity and function of restorative materials. For this purpose, computer
aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems have been used for the
past 10 years to fabricate indirect restorations with resin composites as an
alternative material in digital system. This review aims to provide an update
on the resin composite materials used with indirect restorations and CAD/CAM
systems.
References
- 1. Ural Ç. Diş hekimliği pratiğinde tamamı seramik ve CAD/CAM uygulamaları. Dirim Tıp Gazetesi 2011; 86(1): 27-38.
- 2. Giardano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM–produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(9): 14-21.
- 3. Karaarslan EŞ, Ertaş E. İndirekt posterior kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg 2010; 10(3): 116-24.
- 4. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 529–34.
- 5. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspect of CAD/CAM composite resin restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 273-75.
- 6. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93(12): 1232-4.
- 7. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29–38.
- 8. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. PPAD 2001; 13(1):51-8.
- 9. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri 2011.p: 504,505, 611, 614, 652.
- 10. Arıkan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2005; 8(1):1-8.
- 21. Mörmann WH. The origin of the CEREC method: a personal review of the first 5 years. Int J Comput Dent 2004; 7(1):11-24.
- 22. Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC2 CAD/CAM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(1): 47–53.
- 23. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505.
- 24. Fasbinder DJ. Chairside CAD/CAM: An overview of restorative material options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012; 33(1):50-8.
- 25. Batalha-Silva S, Caldeira de Andrada MA, Maia HP, Magne P. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: direct versus CAD/CAM inlays. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 324-31.
- 26. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007; 35: 68-73.
- 27. Liu X, Fok A, Li H. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 327-33.
- 28. Zaruba M, Kasper R, Kazama R, Wegehaupt FJ, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive MOD cavities. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 579-87.
- 29. Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R. Influence of proximal box evaluation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Invest 2015; 19: 1021-28.
- 30. Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 545-54.
- 41. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Oki M, Arksornnukit M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2015; 34(4):495-502.
- 42. Telio. The compatible system solution for temporary restorations. (2014). (p.2-8). Access: 08.11.2015,http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zooluwebsite/media/document/28279/Telio+Chairside+System.
- 43. Wanner M. Scientific documentation of Telio CAD. (2010). (p. 2-11). Access: 19.10.2015, http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/products/chairside-cad_cam-blocks/telio-cad
- 44. VITA CAD-Temp Disc (p. 1-2). Access:16.10.2015, http://vitanorthamerica.com/wp content/uploads/2008/12/VITA-1806-Nr.-1806-VITA-CAD-Temp-DISC-en-Screen.pdf
- 45. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital Dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204(9): 505-11.
- 46. Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. JOI 2014; 7(3): 57–70.
- 47. Cerasmart: Force absorbing flexible nanoceramic CAD/CAM block. Access: 15.1.2016, http://www.gcamerica.com/lab/products/CERASMART/GCA_CERASMART_Bro-iPad.pdf
- 48. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y,Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2014; 33(5):705-10.
- 49. Koottathape N, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Kanehira, Finger WJ. Quantitive wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 29: 508-16.
- 50. Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia P, Baratieri LN. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104:149-57.
Abstract
References
- 1. Ural Ç. Diş hekimliği pratiğinde tamamı seramik ve CAD/CAM uygulamaları. Dirim Tıp Gazetesi 2011; 86(1): 27-38.
- 2. Giardano R. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM–produced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(9): 14-21.
- 3. Karaarslan EŞ, Ertaş E. İndirekt posterior kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg 2010; 10(3): 116-24.
- 4. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 529–34.
- 5. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I. A technique to improve the esthetic aspect of CAD/CAM composite resin restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104: 273-75.
- 6. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014; 93(12): 1232-4.
- 7. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29–38.
- 8. Terry DA, Touati B. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. PPAD 2001; 13(1):51-8.
- 9. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri 2011.p: 504,505, 611, 614, 652.
- 10. Arıkan S. Posterior kompozit restorasyonlar. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2005; 8(1):1-8.
- 21. Mörmann WH. The origin of the CEREC method: a personal review of the first 5 years. Int J Comput Dent 2004; 7(1):11-24.
- 22. Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC2 CAD/CAM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(1): 47–53.
- 23. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505.
- 24. Fasbinder DJ. Chairside CAD/CAM: An overview of restorative material options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012; 33(1):50-8.
- 25. Batalha-Silva S, Caldeira de Andrada MA, Maia HP, Magne P. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: direct versus CAD/CAM inlays. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 324-31.
- 26. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 2007; 35: 68-73.
- 27. Liu X, Fok A, Li H. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 327-33.
- 28. Zaruba M, Kasper R, Kazama R, Wegehaupt FJ, Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. Marginal adaptation of ceramic and composite inlays in minimally invasive MOD cavities. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 579-87.
- 29. Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R. Influence of proximal box evaluation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Invest 2015; 19: 1021-28.
- 30. Ramirez-Sebastia A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 545-54.
- 41. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Oki M, Arksornnukit M, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2015; 34(4):495-502.
- 42. Telio. The compatible system solution for temporary restorations. (2014). (p.2-8). Access: 08.11.2015,http://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zooluwebsite/media/document/28279/Telio+Chairside+System.
- 43. Wanner M. Scientific documentation of Telio CAD. (2010). (p. 2-11). Access: 19.10.2015, http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/products/chairside-cad_cam-blocks/telio-cad
- 44. VITA CAD-Temp Disc (p. 1-2). Access:16.10.2015, http://vitanorthamerica.com/wp content/uploads/2008/12/VITA-1806-Nr.-1806-VITA-CAD-Temp-DISC-en-Screen.pdf
- 45. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital Dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008; 204(9): 505-11.
- 46. Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. JOI 2014; 7(3): 57–70.
- 47. Cerasmart: Force absorbing flexible nanoceramic CAD/CAM block. Access: 15.1.2016, http://www.gcamerica.com/lab/products/CERASMART/GCA_CERASMART_Bro-iPad.pdf
- 48. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, Iwasaki N, Asakawa Y,Oki M, Finger WJ, Arksornnukit M. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater 2014; 33(5):705-10.
- 49. Koottathape N, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Kanehira, Finger WJ. Quantitive wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 29: 508-16.
- 50. Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia P, Baratieri LN. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104:149-57.
Details
| Subjects | Health Care Administration |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Review |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 24, 2017 |
| Submission Date | March 3, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016Volume: 19 Issue: 3 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.