BibTex RIS Cite

Metal-seramik sistemlerde estetik başarıyı sağlamak için önerilen teknikler

Year 2012, , 348 - 356, 31.10.2012
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.986

Abstract

Metal-ceramic restorations continue to be a traditional treatment modality in the treatment of tooth losses due to their structural durability and predictability. These restorations have been used successfully for many years in patients who have clenching and who needs splinting of mobile teeth. The use metal-ceramic restorations have succeeded for many years because of their functional and esthetic yields and have been the most appropriate treatment option for the treatment of complex patients. Besides the advantages of metal-ceramic restorations such as high strength, the ability to use the metal framework to resist the stresses, thermal harmony, deficiency of the possibility of crack formation and high resistance against fracture; they have have some disadvantages like the possibility of deficiency of ceramic thickness due to metal framework, reflection of metal color in the anterior region, metal exposure resulting from gingival recession and problems due to the formation of oxide layer in metal-porcelain bond. Recent advances in dental materials resulted in the improvement of metal-ceramic restorations. The development of new generation porcelains which have improved physical properties and have less wear then feldspathic porcelains, new metal alloy and ceramic combinations and pressable porcelains over preparation and metal are some of the recent developments.

Keywords: Metal ceramic alloys, esthetic.

 

ÖZET

Yapısal sağlamlık ve tahmin edilebilir sonuçlarının bulunması sayesinde metal seramik restorasyonlar (MSR), diş kayıplarının tedavisinde geleneksel bir tedavi seçeneği olmaya devam etmektedir.  Bu restorasyonlar diş sıkan hastalar veya splintleme ihtiyacı olan sallanan dişlerin olduğu vakalarda yıllardır başarıyla kullanılmaktadır. MSR’ın kullanımı fonksiyonel ve estetik getirileri sayesinde uzun yıllar başarı sağlamış ve karmaşık vakaların çözümünde en uygun seçenek olmuştur.  Metal seramik restorasyonların, yüksek dayanıklılık, streslere karşı koyabilmek için metal altyapıyı kullanabilmesi, ısısal uyum, çatlak oluşma olasılığının azlığı ve  kırılmaya karşı yüksek direncinin olması gibi bir çok avantajının olması yanında  metal altyapı nedeniyle seramik kalınlığının yetersiz kalabilmesi, ön bölgede transparan metal rengi yansıması, diş eti çekilmesi sonucunda metal açığa çıkması, porselen metal bağlantısında oksit tabakası oluşumuna bağlı problemler oluşabilmesi gibi bir takım dezavantajları vardır. Dental materyallerdeki güncel gelişmeler MSR’ın da gelişmesine neden olmuştur. Bu gelişmeler arasında, fiziksel özellikleri geliştirilmiş ve feldspatik porselenlerden daha az aşınan yeni jenerasyon seramiklerin geliştirilmesi, daha yeni metal alaşım ve seramik kombinasyonları, preperasyonları ve metal üzerine preslenebilir porselenler sayılabilir.


References

  • Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. Philadelphia:PA:Mosby;2002.p.25
  • McLean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics. 1st Ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; p.43-51. Deany IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7(2):134-143.
  • Craig GR, Powers MJ. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th Ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 2002;17:288-293.
  • McLean JW, Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. ;85(1):61-66. Phillips RW. Elements of Dental Materials. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.;1984.p.247-257.
  • Yavuzyılmaz H, Turhan B, Bavbek B, Kurt E. Tam porselen sistemleri I (All ceramic systems I). GÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2005;22(1):41-44.
  • Meyenberg KH. Modified porcelain- fused-to-metal porcelain laminates for anterior aesthetics. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1995;7(7):33-44.
  • Jendresen M, Allen E, Bayne S, Donovan T, Goldman S, Kors J. Annual review of selected dental literature: Report of the committee on scientific investigation of the American academy of restorative dentistry. ;80(1):81-120. Ed. J Prosthet Dent restoration and J Prosthet Dent Akman S, Seçilmiş A, İnan Ö. Deformation of metal frameworks with different thickness during cementation. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2009;15(3):161-166.
  • Cho GC, Donovan T, Chee WW. Rational use of contemporary all- ceramic crowns system. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26(2):113-120.
  • Culp L, Mc Laren EA, Ritter RG, Roberts M, Trinkner T. Selection of ceramic materials aesthetics and function. ;15:13-18. Hygiene Aherne T, Nepute C. Aesthetic rehabilitation of discolored dentition with metal-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent ;11(8):943-945. Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(5):437-440.
  • McLaren EA. Modern metal-ceramic restorations. Inside Dent 2006;1-3.
  • Mclean JW, Sced IR. Reinforcement of aliminous dental porcelain crowns using a platinium alloy performed coping technique. Br Dent J ;163(11):347-352. Captek; a new era in procelain-fused- to-metal esthetics. Contemp Esthet Rest Pract 1999;3(2):64-68.
  • Zappala C, Shoher I, Battaini P. Microstructural aspects of the Captek alloy for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. ;8(4):151-156 Esthet Dent Goldstein MB. Contemporary quadrant restoration using current crown and bridge materials and techniques. ;23(11):72-76. Today Radz GM, Stubblefield J. Current clinical solutions for a single missing tooth: MID techniques.Dent Today ;28(6):94-95. Goodson JM, Shoher I, Imber S, Som S, Nathanson D. Reduced dental plaque accumulation on composite gold alloy margins.J Periodontal Res 2001;36(4):252-259.
  • Drummond JL King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. ;16(3):226-233. Mater Grossman DC. Cast glass ceramics. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29(4):725
  • Venkatachalam B, Goldstein GR, Pines MS, Hittelman EL. Ceramic pressed to metal versus feldspathic porcelain comparative study of bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(1):94-100.
  • Schweitzer DM, Goldstein GR, Ricci JL, Silva NR, Comparison of bond strength of pressed ceramic fused to metal versus to feldspathic porcelain fused to Hittelman EL. ;14(4):239-47. Prosthodont Goldin EB, Boyd NW 3rd, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic pressed-to-metal Prosthet Dent 2005;93(2);143-147.
  • Holden EJ, Goldstein GR, Eugene L, EL, J Hittelman Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. ;18(8):645–648. Clark EA. J Prosthodont Bagby M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. Metal ceramic compatibility: A review of literature. J Prosthet Dent ;63(1):21-25. Pask JE, Fulrath RM. Fundamentalis of glass-to-metal bonding: VIII, nature of wetting and adherence. J Amer Ceram Soc 1962;45:592-596.
  • Philips RW. Skinner’s Science of Materials. dental Philedelphia: WB Saunders, 1982. p.523-524. th Ed.
  • Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett DL. Prosthodontics. 2th Ed. Chicago: Quintessence p.419,425,434. of Fixed Publising;1981.
  • Hammad IA, Talic YF. Design of bond strength tested for metal ceramic complexes: review of the literature. :75(6):608-613. Dent Bühler-Zemp P, Völkel T. IPS InLine®PoM Ceramic: Scientific Documentation, Press-on-Metal Ivoclar Vivadent AG Research and Development Scientific Services. August 2007.

Metal-seramik sistemlerde estetik başarıyı sağlamak için önerilen teknikler

Year 2012, , 348 - 356, 31.10.2012
https://doi.org/10.7126/cdj.2012.986

Abstract

Yapısal sağlamlık ve tahmin edilebilir sonuçlarının bulunması sayesinde metal seramik restorasyonlar (MSR), diş kayıplarının tedavisinde geleneksel bir tedavi seçeneği olmaya devam etmektedir. Bu restorasyonlar diş sıkan hastalar veya splintleme ihtiyacı olan sallanan dişlerin olduğu kullanılmaktadır. MSR’ın kullanımı fonksiyonel ve estetik getirileri sayesinde uzun yıllar başarı sağlamış ve karmaşık vakaların çözümünde en uygun seçenek olmuştur. Metal seramik restorasyonların, yüksek dayanıklılık, streslere karşı koyabilmek için metal altyapıyı kullanabilmesi, ısısal uyum, çatlak oluşma olasılığının azlığı ve kırılmaya karşı yüksek direncinin olması gibi bir çok avantajının olması yanında metal altyapı nedeniyle seramik kalınlığının yetersiz kalabilmesi, ön bölgede transparan metal rengi yansıması, diş eti çekilmesi sonucunda metal açığa çıkması, porselen metal bağlantısında oksit tabakası oluşumuna bağlı problemler dezavantajları vardır. Dental materyallerdeki güncel gelişmeler MSR’ın da gelişmesine neden olmuştur. Bu gelişmeler arasında, fiziksel özellikleri geliştirilmiş ve feldspatik porselenlerden daha az aşınan yeni jenerasyon seramiklerin geliştirilmesi, daha kombinasyonları, preperasyonları ve metal üzerine preslenebilir porselenler sayılabilir

References

  • Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. Philadelphia:PA:Mosby;2002.p.25
  • McLean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics. 1st Ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; p.43-51. Deany IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7(2):134-143.
  • Craig GR, Powers MJ. Restorative Dental Materials. 11th Ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 2002;17:288-293.
  • McLean JW, Odont D. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. ;85(1):61-66. Phillips RW. Elements of Dental Materials. 4th Ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.;1984.p.247-257.
  • Yavuzyılmaz H, Turhan B, Bavbek B, Kurt E. Tam porselen sistemleri I (All ceramic systems I). GÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2005;22(1):41-44.
  • Meyenberg KH. Modified porcelain- fused-to-metal porcelain laminates for anterior aesthetics. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1995;7(7):33-44.
  • Jendresen M, Allen E, Bayne S, Donovan T, Goldman S, Kors J. Annual review of selected dental literature: Report of the committee on scientific investigation of the American academy of restorative dentistry. ;80(1):81-120. Ed. J Prosthet Dent restoration and J Prosthet Dent Akman S, Seçilmiş A, İnan Ö. Deformation of metal frameworks with different thickness during cementation. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2009;15(3):161-166.
  • Cho GC, Donovan T, Chee WW. Rational use of contemporary all- ceramic crowns system. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26(2):113-120.
  • Culp L, Mc Laren EA, Ritter RG, Roberts M, Trinkner T. Selection of ceramic materials aesthetics and function. ;15:13-18. Hygiene Aherne T, Nepute C. Aesthetic rehabilitation of discolored dentition with metal-ceramic restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent ;11(8):943-945. Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(5):437-440.
  • McLaren EA. Modern metal-ceramic restorations. Inside Dent 2006;1-3.
  • Mclean JW, Sced IR. Reinforcement of aliminous dental porcelain crowns using a platinium alloy performed coping technique. Br Dent J ;163(11):347-352. Captek; a new era in procelain-fused- to-metal esthetics. Contemp Esthet Rest Pract 1999;3(2):64-68.
  • Zappala C, Shoher I, Battaini P. Microstructural aspects of the Captek alloy for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. ;8(4):151-156 Esthet Dent Goldstein MB. Contemporary quadrant restoration using current crown and bridge materials and techniques. ;23(11):72-76. Today Radz GM, Stubblefield J. Current clinical solutions for a single missing tooth: MID techniques.Dent Today ;28(6):94-95. Goodson JM, Shoher I, Imber S, Som S, Nathanson D. Reduced dental plaque accumulation on composite gold alloy margins.J Periodontal Res 2001;36(4):252-259.
  • Drummond JL King TJ, Bapna MS, Koperski RD. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. ;16(3):226-233. Mater Grossman DC. Cast glass ceramics. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29(4):725
  • Venkatachalam B, Goldstein GR, Pines MS, Hittelman EL. Ceramic pressed to metal versus feldspathic porcelain comparative study of bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(1):94-100.
  • Schweitzer DM, Goldstein GR, Ricci JL, Silva NR, Comparison of bond strength of pressed ceramic fused to metal versus to feldspathic porcelain fused to Hittelman EL. ;14(4):239-47. Prosthodont Goldin EB, Boyd NW 3rd, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Thompson VP. Marginal fit of leucite glass pressable ceramic restorations and ceramic pressed-to-metal Prosthet Dent 2005;93(2);143-147.
  • Holden EJ, Goldstein GR, Eugene L, EL, J Hittelman Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations. ;18(8):645–648. Clark EA. J Prosthodont Bagby M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. Metal ceramic compatibility: A review of literature. J Prosthet Dent ;63(1):21-25. Pask JE, Fulrath RM. Fundamentalis of glass-to-metal bonding: VIII, nature of wetting and adherence. J Amer Ceram Soc 1962;45:592-596.
  • Philips RW. Skinner’s Science of Materials. dental Philedelphia: WB Saunders, 1982. p.523-524. th Ed.
  • Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett DL. Prosthodontics. 2th Ed. Chicago: Quintessence p.419,425,434. of Fixed Publising;1981.
  • Hammad IA, Talic YF. Design of bond strength tested for metal ceramic complexes: review of the literature. :75(6):608-613. Dent Bühler-Zemp P, Völkel T. IPS InLine®PoM Ceramic: Scientific Documentation, Press-on-Metal Ivoclar Vivadent AG Research and Development Scientific Services. August 2007.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Review
Authors

Yasemin Özkan

Altay Uludamar

Buket Akalin Evren

Rifat Gozneli

Publication Date October 31, 2012
Submission Date August 16, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2012

Cite

EndNote Özkan Y, Uludamar A, Akalin Evren B, Gozneli R (October 1, 2012) Metal-seramik sistemlerde estetik başarıyı sağlamak için önerilen teknikler. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 15 4 348–356.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.