Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Dört Kavite Dezenfektan Solüsyonunun Ve İki Farklı Lazer Sisteminin Dentin Adezivlerin Mikro Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Etkinliği

Year 2018, , 9 - 17, 24.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.389990

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, dört farklı
dezenfektan solüsyonu ve iki farklı lazer sisteminin, self-etch ve
etch-and-rinse adeziv sistemlerin mikro-makaslama bağlanma dayanımı üzerine etkinliğinin
in-vitro olarak araştırılmasıdır.

Materyal ve Metotlar: Bu çalışmada, 70
daimi insan molar dişin orta-kronal dentin yüzeyini açığa çıkaracak şekilde,
oklüzal yüzeye paralel su soğutması altında, düşük hızlı elmas disk ile
kesildi. Örnekler rastgele olarak 7 ana grubuna ayrıldı (n=10) ve sonrasında
kavite dezenfeksiyon işlemleri uygulandı. Grup 1, Serum Fizyolojik (Kontrol
Grubu); Grup 2, Sodyum Hipoklorit (NaOCl); Grup 3, Klorheksidin Glukonat (CHX);
Grup 4, Süperokside su (SPO); Grup 5, Ozonlu su (OS); Grup 6, KTP Lazer; Grup
7, Er:YAG Lazer. Sonra ana gruplar self-etch (Clearfil S3 Bond Plus) ve
etch-and-rinse (Bisco All-Bond Universal) adeziv sistem olarak iki alt gruba
ayrıldı. Dört adet kompozit rezin (Cavex Quadrant Universal LC) silindiri,
tygon tüpleri kullanılarak bondlanmış dentin yüzeyine uygulandı. Örnekler
mikro-makaslama modunda üniversal test cihazında test edildi. Sonuçlar iki yönlü
varyans analizi ve Tukey testi ile değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara
göre, self-etch adeziv grupları en düşükten en yükseğe doğru sırasıyla şu
şekilde sıralanabilir; CHX<Kontrol, OS, SPO<KTP<NaOCl<Er:YAG
(p<0,05). Ayrıca, etch-and-rinse adeziv grupları istatistiksel olarak en
düşükten en yükseğe doğru şu şekilde sıralanabilir; CHX<Kontrol,OS,
SPO<KTP<Er:YAG<NaOCl (p<0,05). Her iki adeziv sistemde de, kontol,
OS ve SPO grupları arasındaki farklar istatistiksel olarak önemsiz bulunmuştur
(p>0,05). Adeziv sistemlere birbirleri ile karşılaştırıldığında; NaOCl
gruplarının, KTP lazer ve gruplarının ve Er:YAG lazer gruplarının kendi
aralarındaki farkları istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0,05).


























Sonuçlar: Er:YAG ve KTP lazer sistemleri, CHX,
SPO ve OS ile karşılaştırıldığında her iki sistemde bağlanma dayanımını
artırabilir.
Bu nedenle, restoratif diş hekimliğinde kavite
dezenfeksiyonu için her iki lazer sistem de önerilebilir.

References

  • 1. Imazato S, Torii Y, Takatsuka T, Inoue K, Ebi N, Ebisu S. Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(4):314-9.
  • 2. Sharma V, Rampal P, Kumar S. Shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin after application of cavity disinfectants - SEM study. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(3):155-9.
  • 3. Elkassas DW, Fawzi EM, El Zohairy A. The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. Eur J Dent 2014;8(2):184-90.
  • 4. Varoni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61(9):399-419.
  • 5. Meiers JC, Kresin JC. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent 1996;21(4):153-9.
  • 6. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2008;58(6):329-41.
  • 7. Perdigao J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 2000;16(5):311-23.
  • 8. Kumar A, Bhagawati S, Tyagi P, Kumar P. Current interpretations and scientific rationale of the ozone usage in dentistry: A systematic review of literature. European Journal of General Dentistry 2014;3(3):175.
  • 9. Tapper R, Smith J, Cocking C, Beech I. Atomic force microscopy study of the biocidal effect of super-oxidised water, Sterilox. 1998.
  • 10. Cabiscol E, Tamarit J, Ros J. Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species. Int Microbiol 2000;3(1):3-8.
  • 11. Solovyeva AM, Dummer PM. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Int Endod J 2000;33(6):494-504.
  • 12. Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Shida K, Kitasako Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of dentin pretreatment with mild acidic HOCl solution on microtensile bond strength and surface pH. J Dent 2010;38(3):261-8.
  • 13. Celik C, Ozel Y, Bagis B, Erkut S. Effect of laser irradiation and cavity disinfectant application on the microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28(2):267-72.
  • 14. De Moor RJ, Vanderstricht K. The use of the KTP laser, an added value for tooth bleaching. Journal of Oral Laser Applications 2009;9(4):219.
  • 15. Palaia G, Gaimari G, Giudice RL, Galanakis A, Tenore G, Romeo U. Excision of an oral angiolipoma by KTP laser: a case report. Ann Stomatol 2011;2(1-2):28-31.
  • 16. Asnaashari M, Safavi N. Disinfection of Contaminated Canals by Different Laser Wavelengths, while Performing Root Canal Therapy. J Lasers Med Sci 2013;4(1):8-16.
  • 17. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Hartley PG, Tyas MJ. The influence of the modification of etched bovine dentin on bond strengths. Dent Mater 2000;16(4):255-65.
  • 18. Arias VG, Bedran-de-Castro AK, Pimenta LA. Effects of sodium hypochlorite gel and sodium hypochlorite solution on dentin bond strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72(2):339-44.
  • 19. Ercan E, Erdemir A, Zorba YO, Eldeniz AU, Dalli M, Ince B, et al. Effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(5):343-6.
  • 20. Reddy MS, Mahesh MC, Bhandary S, Pramod J, Shetty A, Prashanth MB. Evaluation of effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin using two-step self-etch and one-step self-etch bonding systems: a comparative in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):275-80.
  • 21. Gurgan S, Bolay S, Kiremitci A. Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(10):836-40.
  • 22. Oznurhan F, Ozturk C, Ekci ES. Effects of different cavity-disinfectants and potassium titanyl phosphate laser on microtensile bond strength to primary dentin. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18(3):400-4.
  • 23. Mainnemare A, Megarbane B, Soueidan A, Daniel A, Chapple IL. Hypochlorous acid and taurine-N-monochloramine in periodontal diseases. J Dent Res 2004;83(11):823-31.
  • 24. Rossi-Fedele G, Figueiredo JA, Steier L, Canullo L, Steier G, Roberts AP. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of super-oxidized water (Sterilox(R)) and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis in a bovine root canal model. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18(5):498-502.
  • 25. Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of pretreatment with mildly acidic hypochlorous acid on adhesion to caries-affected dentin using a self-etch adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119(1):86-92.
  • 26. Pithon MM, dos Santos RL. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets? Aust Orthod J 2010;26(1):73-7.
  • 27. Celiberti P, Pazera P, Lussi A. The impact of ozone treatment on enamel physical properties. Am J Dent 2006;19(1):67-72.
  • 28. Schmidlin PR, Zimmermann J, Bindl A. Effect of ozone on enamel and dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2005;7(1):29-32.
  • 29. Magni E, Ferrari M, Hickel R, Huth KC, Ilie N. Effect of ozone gas application on the mechanical properties of dental adhesives bonded to dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24(10):1428-34.
  • 30. Schein MT, Bocangel JS, Nogueira GE, Schein PA. SEM evaluation of the interaction pattern between dentin and resin after cavity preparation using ER:YAG laser. J Dent 2003;31(2):127-35.
  • 31. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, et al. Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 1998;77(6):1404-14.
  • 32. Geraldo-Martins VR, Robles FR, Matos AB. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8(5):26-33.
  • 33. Guven Y, Aktoren O. Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30(2):769-78.
  • 34. Ramos TM, Ramos-Oliveira TM, de Freitas PM, Azambuja N, Jr., Esteves-Oliveira M, Gutknecht N, et al. Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the adhesion to eroded dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30(1):17-26.
  • 35. Schoop U, Kluger W, Dervisbegovic S, Goharkhay K, Wernisch J, Georgopoulos A, et al. Innovative wavelengths in endodontic treatment. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38(6):624-30.
  • 36. Rolla JN, Mota EG, Oshima HM, Junior LH, Spohr AM. Nd:YAG laser influence on microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems for human dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24(6):730-4.

The Efficacy Of Four Cavity Disinfectant Solutions And Two Different Types Of Laser On The Micro-Shear Bond Strength Of Dentin Adhesives

Year 2018, , 9 - 17, 24.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.389990

Abstract

Objective: The
aim of this study, was to investigate the efficacy of four cavity disinfectant
solutions and two different types of laser on the micro-shear bond strength of
dentin adhesives as in-vitro. Methods: Seventy permanent human
molar teeth were sectioned parallel to the occlusal surface to expose dentin in
the midcoronal. The specimens were randomly divided into seven main groups (n=10)
Then cavity disinfection procedures were applied; Saline(Control); Sodium
Hypochlorite (NaOCl); Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX); Super-oxidized water (SPO);
Aqueous ozone (AO); KTP laser; Er:YAG laser. Then the main groups were randomly
divided into two subgroups as self-etch (Clearfil S3 Bond Plus) and
etch-and-rinse (Bisco All-Bond Universal) adhesive systems. Four cylinders of
composite resin were applied to each bonded dentin surface using a tygon tube.
The specimens were tested with universal testing machine. The results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Results:
Statistical comparisons of the groups could be listed respectively from lowest
to highest as; self-etch adhesive system, CHX<Control,AO,SPO<KTP<NaOCl<Er:YAG
(p<0.05); etch-and-rinse adhesive system, CHX<Control
=AO=SPO<KTP<Er:YAG<NaOCl (p<0.05).
When adhesive systems were compared with each other; there were found
statistically significant differences within NaOCl groups, KTP laser groups and
Er:YAG laser groups. Conclusions: Er:YAG and KTP laser systems
may increase the bond strength of both adhesive systems compared to CHX, SPO
and AO. Therefore, both of laser systems may advisable for cavity disinfection
in restorative dentistry.

References

  • 1. Imazato S, Torii Y, Takatsuka T, Inoue K, Ebi N, Ebisu S. Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28(4):314-9.
  • 2. Sharma V, Rampal P, Kumar S. Shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin after application of cavity disinfectants - SEM study. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(3):155-9.
  • 3. Elkassas DW, Fawzi EM, El Zohairy A. The effect of cavity disinfectants on the micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesives. Eur J Dent 2014;8(2):184-90.
  • 4. Varoni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61(9):399-419.
  • 5. Meiers JC, Kresin JC. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent 1996;21(4):153-9.
  • 6. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2008;58(6):329-41.
  • 7. Perdigao J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 2000;16(5):311-23.
  • 8. Kumar A, Bhagawati S, Tyagi P, Kumar P. Current interpretations and scientific rationale of the ozone usage in dentistry: A systematic review of literature. European Journal of General Dentistry 2014;3(3):175.
  • 9. Tapper R, Smith J, Cocking C, Beech I. Atomic force microscopy study of the biocidal effect of super-oxidised water, Sterilox. 1998.
  • 10. Cabiscol E, Tamarit J, Ros J. Oxidative stress in bacteria and protein damage by reactive oxygen species. Int Microbiol 2000;3(1):3-8.
  • 11. Solovyeva AM, Dummer PM. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study. Int Endod J 2000;33(6):494-504.
  • 12. Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Shida K, Kitasako Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of dentin pretreatment with mild acidic HOCl solution on microtensile bond strength and surface pH. J Dent 2010;38(3):261-8.
  • 13. Celik C, Ozel Y, Bagis B, Erkut S. Effect of laser irradiation and cavity disinfectant application on the microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28(2):267-72.
  • 14. De Moor RJ, Vanderstricht K. The use of the KTP laser, an added value for tooth bleaching. Journal of Oral Laser Applications 2009;9(4):219.
  • 15. Palaia G, Gaimari G, Giudice RL, Galanakis A, Tenore G, Romeo U. Excision of an oral angiolipoma by KTP laser: a case report. Ann Stomatol 2011;2(1-2):28-31.
  • 16. Asnaashari M, Safavi N. Disinfection of Contaminated Canals by Different Laser Wavelengths, while Performing Root Canal Therapy. J Lasers Med Sci 2013;4(1):8-16.
  • 17. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Hartley PG, Tyas MJ. The influence of the modification of etched bovine dentin on bond strengths. Dent Mater 2000;16(4):255-65.
  • 18. Arias VG, Bedran-de-Castro AK, Pimenta LA. Effects of sodium hypochlorite gel and sodium hypochlorite solution on dentin bond strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72(2):339-44.
  • 19. Ercan E, Erdemir A, Zorba YO, Eldeniz AU, Dalli M, Ince B, et al. Effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(5):343-6.
  • 20. Reddy MS, Mahesh MC, Bhandary S, Pramod J, Shetty A, Prashanth MB. Evaluation of effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin using two-step self-etch and one-step self-etch bonding systems: a comparative in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):275-80.
  • 21. Gurgan S, Bolay S, Kiremitci A. Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(10):836-40.
  • 22. Oznurhan F, Ozturk C, Ekci ES. Effects of different cavity-disinfectants and potassium titanyl phosphate laser on microtensile bond strength to primary dentin. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18(3):400-4.
  • 23. Mainnemare A, Megarbane B, Soueidan A, Daniel A, Chapple IL. Hypochlorous acid and taurine-N-monochloramine in periodontal diseases. J Dent Res 2004;83(11):823-31.
  • 24. Rossi-Fedele G, Figueiredo JA, Steier L, Canullo L, Steier G, Roberts AP. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of super-oxidized water (Sterilox(R)) and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis in a bovine root canal model. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18(5):498-502.
  • 25. Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of pretreatment with mildly acidic hypochlorous acid on adhesion to caries-affected dentin using a self-etch adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119(1):86-92.
  • 26. Pithon MM, dos Santos RL. Does ozone water affect the bond strengths of orthodontic brackets? Aust Orthod J 2010;26(1):73-7.
  • 27. Celiberti P, Pazera P, Lussi A. The impact of ozone treatment on enamel physical properties. Am J Dent 2006;19(1):67-72.
  • 28. Schmidlin PR, Zimmermann J, Bindl A. Effect of ozone on enamel and dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2005;7(1):29-32.
  • 29. Magni E, Ferrari M, Hickel R, Huth KC, Ilie N. Effect of ozone gas application on the mechanical properties of dental adhesives bonded to dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24(10):1428-34.
  • 30. Schein MT, Bocangel JS, Nogueira GE, Schein PA. SEM evaluation of the interaction pattern between dentin and resin after cavity preparation using ER:YAG laser. J Dent 2003;31(2):127-35.
  • 31. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, et al. Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 1998;77(6):1404-14.
  • 32. Geraldo-Martins VR, Robles FR, Matos AB. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8(5):26-33.
  • 33. Guven Y, Aktoren O. Shear bond strength and ultrastructural interface analysis of different adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30(2):769-78.
  • 34. Ramos TM, Ramos-Oliveira TM, de Freitas PM, Azambuja N, Jr., Esteves-Oliveira M, Gutknecht N, et al. Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the adhesion to eroded dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2015;30(1):17-26.
  • 35. Schoop U, Kluger W, Dervisbegovic S, Goharkhay K, Wernisch J, Georgopoulos A, et al. Innovative wavelengths in endodontic treatment. Lasers Surg Med 2006;38(6):624-30.
  • 36. Rolla JN, Mota EG, Oshima HM, Junior LH, Spohr AM. Nd:YAG laser influence on microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems for human dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2006;24(6):730-4.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

İhsan Hubbezoğlu

Oğuzhan Alıcı

Publication Date April 24, 2018
Submission Date February 4, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

EndNote Hubbezoğlu İ, Alıcı O (April 1, 2018) The Efficacy Of Four Cavity Disinfectant Solutions And Two Different Types Of Laser On The Micro-Shear Bond Strength Of Dentin Adhesives. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 21 1 9–17.

Cited By












Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.