Case Report
BibTex RIS Cite

REMOVAL OF SEPARATED INSTRUMENTS WITH MASSERANN TECHNIQUES: TWO CASE REPORTS

Year 2017, , 185 - 190, 22.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.369127

Abstract

Instrument fracture is a procedural mishap that
prevents efficient cleaning and shaping of the root canal. When bypassing the
fracture fails, the fragment must be removed. Many techniques and devices have
been described to remove fragments from the root canal. The Masserann Kit is a
widely used instrument for the removal of fragments. These clinical cases
describe use of the Masserann Kit to remove separated instruments blocking the
entire canal in posterior teeth. 

References

  • 1. Gencoglu N, Helvacioglu D. Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems. Eur J Dent 2009;3:90-95.
  • 2. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2006;32:1048-1052.
  • 3. Agrawal V, Kapoor S, Patel M. Ultrasonic technique to retrieve a rotary nickel-titanium file broken beyond the apex and a stainless steel file from the root canal of a mandibular molar: a case report. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12:532-536.
  • 4. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32:1031-1043.
  • 5. Gerek M, Baser ED, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Bayirli G. Comparison of the force required to fracture roots vertically after ultrasonic and Masserann removal of broken instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:429-434.
  • 6. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod 2003;29:756-763.
  • 7. Alomairy KH. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study. J Endod 2009;35:559-562.
  • 8. Cuje J, Bargholz C, Hulsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int Endod J 2010;43:545-554.
  • 9. Panitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C, Messer HH. Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010;36:775-780.
  • 10. Jadhav GR. Endodontic management of a two rooted, three canaled mandibular canine with a fractured instrument. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:192-195.
  • 11. Brito-Junior M, Normanha JA, Camilo CC, Faria-e-Silva AL, Saquy PC, Ferraz MA, et al. Alternative techniques to remove fractured instrument fragments from the apical third of root canals: report of two cases. Braz Dent J 2015;26:79-85.
  • 12. Yoldas O, Oztunc H, Tinaz C, Alparslan N. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:513-517.
  • 13. Thirumalai AK, Sekar M, Mylswamy S. Retrieval of a separated instrument using Masserann technique. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:42-45.
  • 14. Masserann J. "Entfernen metallischer Fragmente aus Wurzelkanalen" (Removal of metal fragments from the root canal). J Br Endod Soc 1971;5:55-59.
  • 15. Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:605-610.
  • 16. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod 2005;31:863-6.

Masserann Tekniği ile Kırık Aletlerin Uzaklaştırılması: İki Olgu Sunumu

Year 2017, , 185 - 190, 22.12.2017
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.369127

Abstract

Enstrüman kırığı, kök kanalının etkin şekilde temizlenmesini ve
şekillenmesini önleyen bir prosedür hatasıdır. Kırık parçayı atlayarak yanından
geçilmesi (bypass) başarısız olduğunda, parça çıkarılmalıdır. Kırık parçanın
kök kanalından uzaklaştırılması için birçok teknik ve cihaz geliştirilmiştir.
Masserann Kit, kırık parçaların çıkarılması için yaygın olarak kullanılan bir
alettir. Bu klinik olgularda, arka bölgedeki dişlerde tüm kanalı tıkayan kırık
parçaları uzaklaştırmak için Masserann Kit kullanımını sunulmuştur.

References

  • 1. Gencoglu N, Helvacioglu D. Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems. Eur J Dent 2009;3:90-95.
  • 2. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2006;32:1048-1052.
  • 3. Agrawal V, Kapoor S, Patel M. Ultrasonic technique to retrieve a rotary nickel-titanium file broken beyond the apex and a stainless steel file from the root canal of a mandibular molar: a case report. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12:532-536.
  • 4. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32:1031-1043.
  • 5. Gerek M, Baser ED, Kayahan MB, Sunay H, Kaptan RF, Bayirli G. Comparison of the force required to fracture roots vertically after ultrasonic and Masserann removal of broken instruments. Int Endod J 2012;45:429-434.
  • 6. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod 2003;29:756-763.
  • 7. Alomairy KH. Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study. J Endod 2009;35:559-562.
  • 8. Cuje J, Bargholz C, Hulsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int Endod J 2010;43:545-554.
  • 9. Panitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C, Messer HH. Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010;36:775-780.
  • 10. Jadhav GR. Endodontic management of a two rooted, three canaled mandibular canine with a fractured instrument. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:192-195.
  • 11. Brito-Junior M, Normanha JA, Camilo CC, Faria-e-Silva AL, Saquy PC, Ferraz MA, et al. Alternative techniques to remove fractured instrument fragments from the apical third of root canals: report of two cases. Braz Dent J 2015;26:79-85.
  • 12. Yoldas O, Oztunc H, Tinaz C, Alparslan N. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:513-517.
  • 13. Thirumalai AK, Sekar M, Mylswamy S. Retrieval of a separated instrument using Masserann technique. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:42-45.
  • 14. Masserann J. "Entfernen metallischer Fragmente aus Wurzelkanalen" (Removal of metal fragments from the root canal). J Br Endod Soc 1971;5:55-59.
  • 15. Shen Y, Peng B, Cheung GS. Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:605-610.
  • 16. Waltimo T, Trope M, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing. J Endod 2005;31:863-6.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Case Reports
Authors

Hakan Göktürk

İsmail Özkoçak

Publication Date December 22, 2017
Submission Date October 23, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2017

Cite

EndNote Göktürk H, Özkoçak İ (December 1, 2017) REMOVAL OF SEPARATED INSTRUMENTS WITH MASSERANN TECHNIQUES: TWO CASE REPORTS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 20 3 185–190.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.