Research Article
Year 2024,
, 240 - 244, 30.12.2024
Abstract
References
- 1. Pal TK. Fundamentals and history of implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization 2015;7:6.
- 2. Peres MA. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet 2019;394:249-260.
- 3. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2017;3:5.
- 4. Cunha-Cruz J, Hujoel PP, Nadanovsky P. Secular Trends in Socio-economic Disparities in Edentulism: USA, 1972–2001. Journal of Dental Research 2007;86:131–136.
- 5. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002;87:5–8.
- 6. Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The Impact of Edentulism on Oral and General Health. International Journal of Dentistry 2013;8:1-7.
- 7. Dogan BG, Gokalp S. Tooth loss and edentulism in the Turkish elderly. Europian Journal of Public Health 2010;20:162-166.
- 8. Müller F, Naharro M, Carlsson GE. What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2007;18:2–14.
- 9. Carlsson GE. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998;79:17–23.
- 10. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement dentures. Journal of Canadian Dental Association 2003;69:662.
- 11. Divaris K, Ntounis A, Marinis A, Polyzois G, Polychronopoulou A. Loss of natural dentition: multi-level effects among a geriatric population. Gerodontology 2012;29:192–199.
- 12. Gaviria, L., Salcido, J. P., Guda, T. and Ong, J. L. (2014). Current trends in dental implants. Journal of Korean Association in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 40(2), 50–60.
- 13. Guan H, Van Staden R, Loo YC, Johnson N, Ivanovski S, Meredith N. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study. Internatioan Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2009;24:866–876. 243 Hurmuzlu and Mollaoglu/ Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 27(4): 240-244, 2024
- 14. Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, Konvic̆ková S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2004;91:20–25.
- 15. Nelson C. Factors Affecting the Success of Dental Implants. Implant Dentistry A Rapidly Evolving Practice, 2011, Chapter 14.
- 16. Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2010;21:1 12.
- 17. Vehemente VA, Chuang SK, Daher S, Muftu A, Dodson TB. Risk Factors Affecting Dental Implant Survival. Journal of Oral Implantology 2002;28:74–81.
- 18. Gürbüz Urvasizoğlu G, Saruhan N, Ataol M. Dental i̇mplant uygulamalarinin demografi̇k ve klinik özelli̇klerini̇n değerlendiri̇lmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği. Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;26:394-398.
- 19. Uslu MÖ, Bozkurt E. Dental İmplant Uygulamalarının Demografik Ve Klinik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg., 2021;11:143-150.
- 20. Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1999;14:748–7.
- 21. Eltas A, Dündar S, Uzun İH, Malkoç MA. Dental İmplant Başarısının Ve Hasta Profilinin Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2013;23:1–8.
- 22. Hong SJ, Paik JW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Lee KW, Chai JK, Kim CK, Cho KS. The study of implant patient's type and implant distribution. The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology 2002;32:539-554.
- 23. Gac OL, Grunder U. Six-year survival and early failure rate of 2918 implants with hydrophobic and hydrophilic enossal surfaces. Dentistry Journal 2015;3:15-23.
- 24. Sullivan RM. Implant dentistry and the concept of osseointegration: a historical perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc 2001;29:737-745.
- 25. Bayarchimeg D. Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:30-36
- 26. Jang HW, Kang JK, Lee K, Lee YS, Park PK. A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2011;3:204 215.
- 27. Polat ME, Saruhan N, Gojayeva G. Dental İmplant Uygulanan Hastaların Demografik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research 2019;3:85-90.
- 28. Drago CJ. Rates of osseointegration of dental implants with regard to anatomical location. Journal of Prosthodontics 1992;1:29-31.
- 29. Wang B. “Effects of local infiltration of insulin around titanium implants in diabetic rats”, Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., c. 49, sayı 3, ss. 225–229, Nis. 2011,
- 30. Yildirim G, Aktas C, Polat TN, Aygun EBG. Demographic evaluation of implant locations among 1000 adult patients in Turkiye. Avicenna Journal of Dental Research 2018;10:22–27
- 31. Bornstein MM, Halbritter S, Harnisch H, Weber HP, Buser D. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: Indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2008;23:1109–1116.
DENTAL IMPLANT OPERATIONS PERFORMED AT GAZI UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF DENTISTRY DEPARTMENT OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY FOR THE LAST SIX YEARS; PREVALANCE AND DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Abstract
The main purpose of dental implant treatments is to provide functional integrity, which is important for the oral health of patients who have lost their teeth, as well as to eliminate aesthetic and psychological problems. Thus, demographic information to be provided together with the retrospective studies performed in areas with high patient density forms a basis for other parameters to be used in the evaluation of the success criteria of dental implants. For this purpose, in our study, total of 1892 cases among 7345 cases who received implant treatment at Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between January 2017 and June 2022 was examined retrospectively according to years, gender, age, dental regions and tooth numbers. Among 1892 patients who underwent implant application, it was determined that female patients received more implant treatment than male patients by 51.7%. In addition, it was determined that the lower jaw and maxilla posterior regions were the most implanted regions. It was also observed that the most implanted age range was between the ages of 50 and 59 years (the 5th decade) by 31.1%. Looking at the monthly average, the most dental implant treatment was done in 2019 before the pandemic started.
References
- 1. Pal TK. Fundamentals and history of implant dentistry. Journal of the International Clinical Dental Research Organization 2015;7:6.
- 2. Peres MA. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet 2019;394:249-260.
- 3. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2017;3:5.
- 4. Cunha-Cruz J, Hujoel PP, Nadanovsky P. Secular Trends in Socio-economic Disparities in Edentulism: USA, 1972–2001. Journal of Dental Research 2007;86:131–136.
- 5. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002;87:5–8.
- 6. Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The Impact of Edentulism on Oral and General Health. International Journal of Dentistry 2013;8:1-7.
- 7. Dogan BG, Gokalp S. Tooth loss and edentulism in the Turkish elderly. Europian Journal of Public Health 2010;20:162-166.
- 8. Müller F, Naharro M, Carlsson GE. What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2007;18:2–14.
- 9. Carlsson GE. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998;79:17–23.
- 10. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement dentures. Journal of Canadian Dental Association 2003;69:662.
- 11. Divaris K, Ntounis A, Marinis A, Polyzois G, Polychronopoulou A. Loss of natural dentition: multi-level effects among a geriatric population. Gerodontology 2012;29:192–199.
- 12. Gaviria, L., Salcido, J. P., Guda, T. and Ong, J. L. (2014). Current trends in dental implants. Journal of Korean Association in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 40(2), 50–60.
- 13. Guan H, Van Staden R, Loo YC, Johnson N, Ivanovski S, Meredith N. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study. Internatioan Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2009;24:866–876. 243 Hurmuzlu and Mollaoglu/ Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 27(4): 240-244, 2024
- 14. Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, Konvic̆ková S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2004;91:20–25.
- 15. Nelson C. Factors Affecting the Success of Dental Implants. Implant Dentistry A Rapidly Evolving Practice, 2011, Chapter 14.
- 16. Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2010;21:1 12.
- 17. Vehemente VA, Chuang SK, Daher S, Muftu A, Dodson TB. Risk Factors Affecting Dental Implant Survival. Journal of Oral Implantology 2002;28:74–81.
- 18. Gürbüz Urvasizoğlu G, Saruhan N, Ataol M. Dental i̇mplant uygulamalarinin demografi̇k ve klinik özelli̇klerini̇n değerlendiri̇lmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği. Fakültesi Dergisi 2016;26:394-398.
- 19. Uslu MÖ, Bozkurt E. Dental İmplant Uygulamalarının Demografik Ve Klinik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg., 2021;11:143-150.
- 20. Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1999;14:748–7.
- 21. Eltas A, Dündar S, Uzun İH, Malkoç MA. Dental İmplant Başarısının Ve Hasta Profilinin Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif Bir Çalışma. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2013;23:1–8.
- 22. Hong SJ, Paik JW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Lee KW, Chai JK, Kim CK, Cho KS. The study of implant patient's type and implant distribution. The Journal of the Korean Academy of Periodontology 2002;32:539-554.
- 23. Gac OL, Grunder U. Six-year survival and early failure rate of 2918 implants with hydrophobic and hydrophilic enossal surfaces. Dentistry Journal 2015;3:15-23.
- 24. Sullivan RM. Implant dentistry and the concept of osseointegration: a historical perspective. J Calif Dent Assoc 2001;29:737-745.
- 25. Bayarchimeg D. Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:30-36
- 26. Jang HW, Kang JK, Lee K, Lee YS, Park PK. A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2011;3:204 215.
- 27. Polat ME, Saruhan N, Gojayeva G. Dental İmplant Uygulanan Hastaların Demografik Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research 2019;3:85-90.
- 28. Drago CJ. Rates of osseointegration of dental implants with regard to anatomical location. Journal of Prosthodontics 1992;1:29-31.
- 29. Wang B. “Effects of local infiltration of insulin around titanium implants in diabetic rats”, Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., c. 49, sayı 3, ss. 225–229, Nis. 2011,
- 30. Yildirim G, Aktas C, Polat TN, Aygun EBG. Demographic evaluation of implant locations among 1000 adult patients in Turkiye. Avicenna Journal of Dental Research 2018;10:22–27
- 31. Bornstein MM, Halbritter S, Harnisch H, Weber HP, Buser D. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: Indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2008;23:1109–1116.
There are 31 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery |
| Journal Section | Original Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 30, 2024 |
| Submission Date | August 2, 2024 |
| Acceptance Date | December 5, 2024 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2024 |
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.
CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.
Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)
IMPORTANT NOTICE
All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.
Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.