Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Assesment of Youtube™ Videos about all-on-four implant supported fixed prostheses maintenance using the Global Quality Score, the DISCERN tool, and Journal of American Medical Association benchmarks

Year 2024, , 230 - 235, 30.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1475403

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the information on “all-on-four fixed implant prostheses maintenance” videos shared on Youtube.
Materials and Methods: A search was made on YouTube at 09:00 on August 14, 2023, with the search term "all-on-four fixed implant prostheses maintenance". Videos uploaded in the last year are sorted by relevance. The first 60 videos were viewed and analyzed for content by 2 independent prosthodontists. GQS (Global Quality Score), DISCERN, and JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) scales were used for the evaluation of the videos.
Results: Some of the videos obtained for the study were excluded from evaluation because they did not meet the "all-on-four fixed implant prostheses maintenance" requirements (n=39). A statistically significant relationship was found between GQS scores and DISCERN scores (p<0.05) that as the DISCERN score increases, the GQS score increases. Also, videos with DISCERN scores of 4 and 5 are longer than videos with scores of 3. JAMA scores of videos with a longer duration and more time since they were uploaded were found to be statistically significantly higher (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The quality of Youtube videos are generally poor. Patients should consider this when they want to obtain information about “all-on-four fixed implant prostheses maintenance" from YouTube.

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was not required because of the use of the publicly available data.

References

  • 1. Giannobile W V, Lang NP. Are Dental Implants a Panacea or Should We Better Strive to Save Teeth? J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):5-6.
  • 2. Wu AY-J, Hsu J-T, Fuh L-J, Huang H-L. Biomechanical effect of implant design on four implants supporting mandibular full-arch fixed dentures: In vitro test and finite element analysis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(10):1514-1523.
  • 3. Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):612-621.
  • 4. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9.
  • 5. Menini M, Setti P, Dellepiane E, Zunino P, Pera P, Pesce P. Comparison of biofilm removal using glycine air polishing versus sodium bicarbonate air polishing or hand instrumentation on full-arch fixed implant rehabilitations: a split-mouth study. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(9):722-730.
  • 6. Setti P, Pesce P, Dellepiane E, Bagnasco F, Zunino P, Menini M. Angled implant brush for hygienic maintenance of full-arch fixed-implant rehabilitations: a pilot study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020;50(5):340-354.
  • 7. Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian W-S, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube™. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30.
  • 8. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 1998;17:63-76.
  • 9. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube™ Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(9):1776-1783. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004
  • 10. Kılınç DD, Sayar G. Assessment of Reliability of YouTube™™ Videos on Orthodontics. Turkish J Orthod. 2019;32(3):145-150. doi:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18064
  • 11. Duman C. YouTube™TM quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18(3):261-267. doi:10.1111/idh.12445
  • 12. Özişçi Ö. Assessing the quality of YouTube™TM videos on fixed dental implant home-care and maintenance protocols. Int J Dent Hyg. Published online December 2022.
  • 13. Eksi Ozsoy H. Evaluation of YouTube™ videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(1):151-154. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.016
  • 14. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube™. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469.
  • 15. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube™TM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2017;44(2):90-96.
  • 16. Lo AS, Esser MJ, Gordon KE. YouTube™: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17(4):541-545. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.02.004
  • 17. Abukaraky A, Hamdan A-A, Ameera M-N, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube™ TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23(4):e463-e468. doi:10.4317/medoral.22447
  • 18. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-2077.
  • 19. Yagci F. Evaluation of YouTube™ as an information source for denture care. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(4):623-629. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.045
  • 20. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111.
  • 21. Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA, Aras B. The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA. J Orthod. 2019;46(1):20-26.
  • 22. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-1245.
  • 23. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube™ for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
  • 24. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube™. Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478-485.
  • 25. Lewis SP, Heath NL, Sornberger MJ, Arbuthnott AE. Helpful or harmful? An examination of viewers’ responses to nonsuicidal self-injury videos on YouTube™. J Adolesc Heal Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2012;51(4):380-385.
  • 26. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube™ videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(6):661-664. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.022
  • 27. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(3):e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17
  • 28. Rachmawati YL, Putri DW, Hariyani N, Bahar A, Maharani DA. Analysis of Quality, Usefulness, Reliability, Visibility, and Popularity of Videos about Dental Caries on YouTube™: A Cross-sectional Analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(2):245-251.
  • 29. Kurian N, Varghese KG, Daniel S, Varghese VS, Kaur T, Verma R. Are YouTube™ videos on complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses useful for patient education? J Prosthet Dent. Published online March 2022.
  • 30. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube™ as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(6):437-443.

All-On-Four İmplant Destekli Sabit Protezlerin İdamesi Hakkındaki Youtube™ Videolarının Global Kalite Skoru, DISCERN ve Journal Of American Medical Association Araçları ile Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2024, , 230 - 235, 30.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1475403

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı Youtube'da paylaşılan “all-on-four implant destekli sabit protez idamesi” videolarına ilişkin bilgilerin değerlendirilmesidir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: 14 Ağustos 2023 saat 09:00'da YouTube'da "all-on-four sabit implant protez idamesi" anahtar sözcüğü ile arama yapılmıştır. Son bir yıl içinde yüklenen videolar alaka düzeyine göre sıralanmıştır. İlk 60 video 2 bağımsız protez uzmanı tarafından değerledirilmiş ve içerik açısından analiz edilmiştir. Videoların değerlendirilmesinde GQS (Global Quality Score), DISCERN ve JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) ölçekleri kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışma için elde edilen videolardan bazıları "all-on-four sabit implant protez idamesi" gerekliliklerini (n=39) karşılamadığı için değerlendirme dışı bırakılmuştır. GQS puanları ile DISCERN puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuş (p<0,05), DISCERN puanı arttıkça GQS puanın da arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca DISCERN puanı 4 ve 5 olan videolar, puanı 3 olan videolara göre daha uzun olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Süresi daha uzun olan ve yüklendikten sonra daha uzun süre geçen videoların JAMA puanları istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bulunmuştur (p<0,05).
Sonuçlar: Youtube videolarının kalitesi genellikle düşüktür. Hastalar YouTube'dan “all-on-four sabit implant protez idamesi” hakkında bilgi almak istediklerinde bunu göz önünde bulundurmalıdırlar.

Ethical Statement

Kamuya açık verilerin kullanılması nedeniyle etik onay gerekmemiştir.

References

  • 1. Giannobile W V, Lang NP. Are Dental Implants a Panacea or Should We Better Strive to Save Teeth? J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):5-6.
  • 2. Wu AY-J, Hsu J-T, Fuh L-J, Huang H-L. Biomechanical effect of implant design on four implants supporting mandibular full-arch fixed dentures: In vitro test and finite element analysis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(10):1514-1523.
  • 3. Del Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):612-621.
  • 4. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9.
  • 5. Menini M, Setti P, Dellepiane E, Zunino P, Pera P, Pesce P. Comparison of biofilm removal using glycine air polishing versus sodium bicarbonate air polishing or hand instrumentation on full-arch fixed implant rehabilitations: a split-mouth study. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(9):722-730.
  • 6. Setti P, Pesce P, Dellepiane E, Bagnasco F, Zunino P, Menini M. Angled implant brush for hygienic maintenance of full-arch fixed-implant rehabilitations: a pilot study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020;50(5):340-354.
  • 7. Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian W-S, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube™. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30.
  • 8. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 1998;17:63-76.
  • 9. Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube™ Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? J oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(9):1776-1783. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.004
  • 10. Kılınç DD, Sayar G. Assessment of Reliability of YouTube™™ Videos on Orthodontics. Turkish J Orthod. 2019;32(3):145-150. doi:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18064
  • 11. Duman C. YouTube™TM quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18(3):261-267. doi:10.1111/idh.12445
  • 12. Özişçi Ö. Assessing the quality of YouTube™TM videos on fixed dental implant home-care and maintenance protocols. Int J Dent Hyg. Published online December 2022.
  • 13. Eksi Ozsoy H. Evaluation of YouTube™ videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(1):151-154. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.016
  • 14. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public’s response to medical videos on YouTube™. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469.
  • 15. Hegarty E, Campbell C, Grammatopoulos E, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. YouTube™TM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2017;44(2):90-96.
  • 16. Lo AS, Esser MJ, Gordon KE. YouTube™: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17(4):541-545. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.02.004
  • 17. Abukaraky A, Hamdan A-A, Ameera M-N, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube™ TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23(4):e463-e468. doi:10.4317/medoral.22447
  • 18. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-2077.
  • 19. Yagci F. Evaluation of YouTube™ as an information source for denture care. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(4):623-629. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.045
  • 20. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111.
  • 21. Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA, Aras B. The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA. J Orthod. 2019;46(1):20-26.
  • 22. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-1245.
  • 23. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube™ for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
  • 24. Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube™. Health Commun. 2012;27(5):478-485.
  • 25. Lewis SP, Heath NL, Sornberger MJ, Arbuthnott AE. Helpful or harmful? An examination of viewers’ responses to nonsuicidal self-injury videos on YouTube™. J Adolesc Heal Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2012;51(4):380-385.
  • 26. Menziletoglu D, Guler AY, Isik BK. Are YouTube™ videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? J Stomatol oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(6):661-664. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.022
  • 27. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(3):e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17
  • 28. Rachmawati YL, Putri DW, Hariyani N, Bahar A, Maharani DA. Analysis of Quality, Usefulness, Reliability, Visibility, and Popularity of Videos about Dental Caries on YouTube™: A Cross-sectional Analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(2):245-251.
  • 29. Kurian N, Varghese KG, Daniel S, Varghese VS, Kaur T, Verma R. Are YouTube™ videos on complete arch fixed implant-supported prostheses useful for patient education? J Prosthet Dent. Published online March 2022.
  • 30. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube™ as a source for parents’ education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(6):437-443.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Prosthodontics, Dentistry (Other)
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Elif Tuba Akçin 0000-0002-0450-9352

Gül Ateş 0000-0002-1181-3045

Publication Date December 30, 2024
Submission Date April 29, 2024
Acceptance Date October 25, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

EndNote Akçin ET, Ateş G (December 1, 2024) Assesment of Youtube™ Videos about all-on-four implant supported fixed prostheses maintenance using the Global Quality Score, the DISCERN tool, and Journal of American Medical Association benchmarks. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 27 4 230–235.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.