Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, , 79 - 84, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1375582

Abstract

References

  • 1. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of sulphide methacrylate materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 9-20.
  • 2. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 993-1000.
  • 3. Panchal AC, Asthana G. Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved. J Conserv Dent. 2020; 23: 254-258.
  • 4. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16: 316-323.
  • 5. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self‐adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 295-314.
  • 6. Cotes C, Cardoso M, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 71-78.
  • 7. Chen KK, Chen JH, Wu JH, Du JK. Influence of commercial adhesive with/without silane on the bond strength of resin-based composite repaired within twenty four hours. J Dent Sci. 2021; 16: 877-884.
  • 8. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7: 41-49.
  • 9. Ghivari S, Chandak M, Manvar N. Role of oxygen inhibited layer on shear bond strength of composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13: 39-41.
  • 10. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 25-31.
  • 11. Musanje L, Shu M, Darvell BW. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 394-401.
  • 12. Gregson K, Beiswanger AJ, Platt J. The impact of sorption, buffering, and proteins on leaching of organic and inorganic substances from dental resin core material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 84: 256-264.
  • 13. Söderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1692-1699.
  • 14. Dos Santos VH, Griza S, de Moraes RR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39: 12-16.
  • 15. Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25: 485-491.
  • 16. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25:442-451.
  • 17. Akgül S, Kedici Alp C, Bala O. Repair potential of a bulk-fill resin composite: Effect of different surface-treatment protocols. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021; 129: e12814.
  • 18. Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Júnior CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 231-237.
  • 19. Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent. 2013; 38: E1-E9.
  • 20. Nagasawa Y, Eda Y, Shigeta H, Ferrari M, Nakajima H, Hibino Y. Effect of sandblasting and/or priming treatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Odontology. 2022; 110: 70-80.
  • 21. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 467-477.
  • 22. Guiterrez NC, Moecke SE, Caneppele TM, Perote LC, Batista GR, Huhtalla MF et al. Bond strength of composite resin restoration repair: influence of silane and adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20: 880-886.
  • 23. Papacchini F, Monticelli F, Hasa I, Radovic I, Fabianelli A, Polimeni A, et al. Effect of air-drying temperature on the effectiveness of silane primers and coupling blends in the repair of a microhybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 391-397.

Influence of mechanochemical treatment and oxygen inhibited layer on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to bulk-fill composite resin

Year 2024, , 79 - 84, 30.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1375582

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) to bulk-fill composite resins (BFCR) following mechanical and chemical surface treatments.
Materials and Methods: The BFCR discs fabricated were divided into four groups, based on the presence or absence oxygen inhibited layer (OIL) and mechanical surface treatment, as follows; group I: OIL+no surface treatment (NT), group II: no OIL+NT, group III: no OIL+diamond abrasive (DA), group IV: no OIL+air abrasion (AA). Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on chemical treatment using a silane agent. Following this, SARC cylinders were bonded to the surfaces of the treated BFCR samples. SBS was evaluated for all samples and failure analysis was carried out. The data were analyzed using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test, and a p value of <0.05 was set as statistically significant.
Results: The highest SBS was recorded in group IV (no OIL+AA) without silane application (25.66±4.49 MPa), while the lowest was observed in group I (OIL+NT) with silane treatment (0.4±0.24 MPa). Mechanical surface treatment succeeded in significantly improving the SBS, while chemical surface treatment using silane application failed to do so.
Conclusion: Mechanical surface treatment with air abrasion on the BFCR enhanced its bonding ability with SARC. However, OIL and chemical treatment using a silane agent did not improve the SBS.

Ethical Statement

Ethical policy and Institutional Review board statement: Institutional ethical committee clearance obtained (Ref. no. 21046)

Thanks

We would like to thank Dr. Amitha Lewis, an Associate Professor in the Dept. of Oral Pathology and Microbiology at Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India as well as Dr. Kishore Ginjupalli an Associate Professor in the Dept. Dental Materials at Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, India, for their technical support rendered in conducting this study.

References

  • 1. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of sulphide methacrylate materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 9-20.
  • 2. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014; 42: 993-1000.
  • 3. Panchal AC, Asthana G. Oxygen inhibition layer: A dilemma to be solved. J Conserv Dent. 2020; 23: 254-258.
  • 4. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16: 316-323.
  • 5. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self‐adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 295-314.
  • 6. Cotes C, Cardoso M, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23: 71-78.
  • 7. Chen KK, Chen JH, Wu JH, Du JK. Influence of commercial adhesive with/without silane on the bond strength of resin-based composite repaired within twenty four hours. J Dent Sci. 2021; 16: 877-884.
  • 8. Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7: 41-49.
  • 9. Ghivari S, Chandak M, Manvar N. Role of oxygen inhibited layer on shear bond strength of composites. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13: 39-41.
  • 10. Papacchini F, Dall’Oca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, et al. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 25-31.
  • 11. Musanje L, Shu M, Darvell BW. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 394-401.
  • 12. Gregson K, Beiswanger AJ, Platt J. The impact of sorption, buffering, and proteins on leaching of organic and inorganic substances from dental resin core material. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008; 84: 256-264.
  • 13. Söderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1692-1699.
  • 14. Dos Santos VH, Griza S, de Moraes RR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments. Restor Dent Endod. 2014; 39: 12-16.
  • 15. Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25: 485-491.
  • 16. Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009; 25:442-451.
  • 17. Akgül S, Kedici Alp C, Bala O. Repair potential of a bulk-fill resin composite: Effect of different surface-treatment protocols. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021; 129: e12814.
  • 18. Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Júnior CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper Dent. 2010; 35: 231-237.
  • 19. Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent. 2013; 38: E1-E9.
  • 20. Nagasawa Y, Eda Y, Shigeta H, Ferrari M, Nakajima H, Hibino Y. Effect of sandblasting and/or priming treatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to CAD/CAM blocks. Odontology. 2022; 110: 70-80.
  • 21. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012; 28: 467-477.
  • 22. Guiterrez NC, Moecke SE, Caneppele TM, Perote LC, Batista GR, Huhtalla MF et al. Bond strength of composite resin restoration repair: influence of silane and adhesive systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20: 880-886.
  • 23. Papacchini F, Monticelli F, Hasa I, Radovic I, Fabianelli A, Polimeni A, et al. Effect of air-drying temperature on the effectiveness of silane primers and coupling blends in the repair of a microhybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 391-397.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dental Materials
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Sreya Dutta 0000-0003-4001-9083

Samikhya Priyadarsani Sahu 0000-0001-8955-8454

Anushka Arora 0000-0002-0231-5263

Srikant Natarajan 0000-0002-2686-0397

Abhishek Parolia 0000-0002-3364-6743

Manuel Thomas 0000-0002-3042-0669

Publication Date June 30, 2024
Submission Date October 15, 2023
Acceptance Date April 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

EndNote Dutta S, Priyadarsani Sahu S, Arora A, Natarajan S, Parolia A, Thomas M (June 1, 2024) Influence of mechanochemical treatment and oxygen inhibited layer on the adhesion of self-adhesive resin cement to bulk-fill composite resin. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 27 2 79–84.

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal (Cumhuriyet Dent J, CDJ) is the official publication of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry. CDJ is an international journal dedicated to the latest advancement of dentistry. The aim of this journal is to provide a platform for scientists and academicians all over the world to promote, share, and discuss various new issues and developments in different areas of dentistry. First issue of the Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry was published in 1998. In 2010, journal's name was changed as Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. Journal’s publication language is English.


CDJ accepts articles in English. Submitting a paper to CDJ is free of charges. In addition, CDJ has not have article processing charges.

Frequency: Four times a year (March, June, September, and December)

IMPORTANT NOTICE

All users of Cumhuriyet Dental Journal should visit to their user's home page through the "https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/user" " or "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/user" links to update their incomplete information shown in blue or yellow warnings and update their e-mail addresses and information to the DergiPark system. Otherwise, the e-mails from the journal will not be seen or fall into the SPAM folder. Please fill in all missing part in the relevant field.

Please visit journal's AUTHOR GUIDELINE to see revised policy and submission rules to be held since 2020.