EN
Comparison Of Shear Bond Strength And Adhesive Remnant Index Between Different Adhesive Systems In Bonding and Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index of stainless-steel brackets bonded with different orthodontic adhesive systems.
Materials and Methods: In our study performed on 60 premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons, MBT prescription 0.022'' stainless-steel brackets (Discovery Smart®, Dentaurum, Germany) were used. In teeth randomly divided into 3 groups, bonding was performed with Group 1: Trulock Light Activated Bonding System (RMO, USA), Group 2: Bisco Ortho Bracket Paste LC (Bisco, USA), Group 3: Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive (3M, USA). SBS and residual adhesive indexes (ARI) were evaluated by breaking the samples. Adhesive residues were cleaned with tungsten carbide burs from the surfaces of the teeth, rebonding was made after sanding the brackets’ surfaces. SBS and ARI values were re-evaluated. One-way ANOVA, two-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis of the data, p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
Statistically significant differences were observed between Group 1 and Group 2 in comparison to the first SBS values of three different orthodontic adhesive systems to enamel (p <0.05). Among the adhesive systems, only a statistically significant difference was found between the first bonding values and the rebonding values of Group 2 (p <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the first and rebond strengths of the other two adhesive systems. Rebonding values of three different orthodontic adhesive systems were very close to each other.
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the adhesive systems developed for the bonding of orthodontic brackets to the enamel can show clinically enough bond strength even if the rebonding strengths of the falling stainless-steel brackets to the same enamel surfaces decrease slightly.
Keywords
References
- 1. Russell JS. Aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthod 2005;32:146-63.
- 2. Vaheed NA, Gupta M, David SA, Sam G, Ramanna PK, Bhagvandas SC. In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19:1047-1051,
- 3. Lavernhe P, Estivalèzes E, Lachaud F, Lodter C, Piquet R. Orthodontic bonding: Finite element for standardized evaluations. Int J Adhes Adhes 2010;30:21-29.
- 4. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968;13:61-70.
- 5. Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. Aus Orthod J. 2011;27:28-32.
- 6. Lai PY, Woods MG, Tyas MJ. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces. Aust Orthod J. 1999;15:235-245.
- 7. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119(6):621-624.
- 8. Sachdeva A, Raghav S, Goel M, Raghav N, Tiwari S. A comparison of the shear bond strength of conventional acid etching, self‑etching primer, and single bottle self‑adhesive-an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Sci 2017;9(3):170-175.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
October 1, 2022
Submission Date
August 23, 2021
Acceptance Date
June 29, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 25 Number: 3