Dentin Bond Strength and Microleakage Comparison of Three Different Universal Adhesives

Seda Özkanoğlu; Gulsah Akin

doi:10.7126/cumudj.747021

EN

Dentin Bond Strength and Microleakage Comparison of Three Different Universal Adhesives

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the bond strengths and microleakage values of three different universal adhesive systems applied in self-etch to dentin. Materials and Methods: The study consists of two tests as the bond strength (SBS) test and microleakage test. In the SBS test, the mid-coronal dentin surfaces of forty-five human molars were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups [Single Bond Universal, Optibond XTR, and Tokuyama Universal] and adhesive systems were applied to dentin surfaces. The SBS test was performed after composite build-up. Then, the fracture surfaces were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). In the microleakage test, identifical adhesive systems were applied to forty-five human premolars with fasial class V cavities were prepared as in the groups specified in the SBS. After composite resin restoration of cavities, the specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles and then immersed in basic fuchsine, sectioned, and examined under a stereo-microscope. Data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Chi-square and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest (p<0.05). When evaluated for microleakage, no significant difference was reported in occlusal margins. In gingival margins, Optibond XTR showed less leakage compared to Tokuyama Universal (p<0.05). Conclusions: One-step universal adhesive systems did not show bond strength and leakage resistance that was as good as the two-step universal adhesive system.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Sivas Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects

Project Number

DIS-215

References

1. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Dorigo EDS. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24(1):90-101.
2. Reis A, Grande R, Oliveira G, Lopes G, Loguercio A. A 2-year evaluation of moisture on microtensile bond strength and nanoleakage. Dent Mater 2007;23(7):862-70.
3. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26(12):1176-84.
4. Tuncer D, Çelik Ç, Çehreli SB, Arhun N. Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations. J Adh Sci Technol 2014;28(13):1288-97.
5. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode’adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40(6):475-84.
6. St AG, Wilder JA, Perdigão J, Swift JE. Microleakage of class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002; 15(4):244-47.
7. Taschner M, Kümmerling M, Lohbauer U, Breschi L, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Effect of double-layer application on dentin bond durability of one-step self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2014;39(4):416-26.
8. Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Regalheiro R. Dentin bond strengths of four adhesion strategies after thermal fatigue and 6‐month water storage. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24(5),345-55.

9. Rengo C, Goracci C, Juloski J, Chieffi N, Giovannetti A, Vichi A, et al. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self‐etch adhesive and a self‐adhering composite. Aust Dent J 2012;57(2):220-26.
10. Krämer N, Tilch D, Lücker S, Frankenberger R. Status of ten self‐etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014;24(3):192-99.
11. Sezinando A, Perdigao J, Regalheiro R. Dentin bond strengths of four adhesion strategies after thermal fatigue and 6‐month water storage. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24(5):345-55.
12. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Visintini E, Diolosà M, Turco G, Salgarello S, et al. Influence of ageing on self‐etch adhesives: one‐step vs. two‐step systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2013;121(1), 43-49.
13. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24(1):1-13.
14. Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA, Vermelho PM, Fronza BM, Nikaido T, et al. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015;26(1):3-10.
15. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83(6):454-58.
16. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41(5):404-11.
17. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Erickson RL, et al. Influence of different smear layers on bond durability of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2018;34(2):246-59.
18. Michaud P-L, Brown M. Effect of universal adhesive etching modes on bond strength to dual-polymerizing composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(4):657-62.
19. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, et al. Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode. Eur J Oral Sci 2017;125(3):215-22.
20. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Okihara T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of glycero-phosphate dimethacrylate (GPDM) with hydroxyapatite and dentin. Dent Mater 2018;34(7):1072-1081.
21. Kameyama A, Hoshika S, Suyama Y, Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Immediate and aged bond strength to differently prepared dentin surfaces. IADR/CED 2011. Date:2011/01/02-2011/01/09.
22. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28(3):215-35.
23. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26(2):100-21.
24. Katsumata A, Saikaew P, Ting S, Katsumata T, Hoshika T, Sano H, et al. Microtensile bond strength bonded to dentin of a newly universal adhesive. J Oral Tissue Engin 2017;15(1):18-24.
25. Pleffken PR, de Almeida Lourenco AP, Torres C, Buhler Borges A. Influence of application methods of self-etching adhesive systems on adhesive bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2011;13(6):517-25.
26. Amano S, Yamamoto A, Tsubota K, Rikuta A, Miyazaki M, Platt JA, et al. Effect of thermal cycling on enamel bond strength of single-step self-etch systems. Oper Dent 2006;31(5):616-22.
27. Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, et al. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005;84(2):183-88.
28. Tay FR PD, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Iitthqgarun A. Single- step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371–382.
29. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent 2005;7(2):133-41.
30. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002;30(2-3):83-90.
31. Rueggeberg F, Margeson D. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69(10):1652-58.
32. Sadeghi M. Microleakage comparison of three types of adhesive systems versus GIC-based adhesive in class V composite restorations. JDMT 2016;5(2):86-93.
33. Baygin O KF, Arslan I. Effects of different types of adhesive systems on the microleakage of compomer restorations in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser in primary teeth. Dent Mater J 2012;31(2):20614.
34. Delme K, Deman P, De Moor R. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J Oral Rehab 2005;32(9):676-85.
35. da Cunha Mello FS-T, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997;13(5-6):372-76.
36. Santini A, Mitchell S. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Am J Dent 1998;11(5):219-24.
37. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 1998;10(6):296-304.
38. Owens B, Johnson W. Effect of single step adhesives on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composites. Oper Dent 2007;32(1):67-72.
39. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around class v restorations bonded with seven self‐etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16(2):128-35.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Seda Özkanoğlu ^*
0000-0001-7451-5013
Türkiye

Gulsah Akin
0000-0001-9183-4032
Türkiye

Publication Date

February 24, 2021

Submission Date

June 2, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 27, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 24 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.747021

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA32PB64TX

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

EndNote

Özkanoğlu S, Akin G (February 1, 2021) Dentin Bond Strength and Microleakage Comparison of Three Different Universal Adhesives. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24 1 10–20.

Cited By

Micro-shear Bond Strength of an Alternative Self-etch Application of “No Wait” Universal Adhesive to Caries-affected and Sound Dentin in Permanent and Primary Teeth

Operative Dentistry

https://doi.org/10.2341/23-065-L

The Effect of Different Multimode Adhesives On Microleakage of Class V Composite Restorations in Three Etching Modes

ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1568236

Evaluation of composite restoration in class II cavities of primary molars using two different types of adhesive systems

Tanta Dental Journal

https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_114_25