Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?

Sibel Çayönü; Akif Demirel; Şaziye Sarı

doi:10.7126/cumudj.612646

TR EN

Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the measurements of the extraction spaces in the plaster models and digital dental models and to investigate the usability of the digital models in preventive and interceptive appliances in pediatric dentistry clinics.

Material and Methods: In the dental models of 56 patients whose first molar teeth were extracted in the early period, the dental arch length of the extraction spaces were measured with a digital caliper in the plaster model (Control Group), with computer software in the digital model (Experimental Group). Measured values were compared using a t-test and statistical significance levels were determined.

Results: In plaster models and digital models, the measured mean arc length of the extraction spaces were 6.94 mm and 6.83 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two measurement methods (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The use of digital models is recommended in pediatric dentistry clinics due to shorter chair time in pediatric patients, effective treatment planning/follow-ups, reducing treatment costs and other advantages.

Keywords

Dental Model,Primary Tooth,Dental Occlusion

References

Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:571-96.
Kırzıoğlu Z, Çiftçi ZZ, Yetiş CÇ. Clinical Success of Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin as a Space Maintainer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:188-193.
Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas DR. Prediction of first molar occlusion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:610-21.
Terlaje RD, Donly KJ. Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:109-14.
Russell KA. Orthodontic treatment in the mixed dentition. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:418-21.
Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. ‘Metal to resin’: a comparative evalution of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:111-6.
Kargul B, Caglar E, Kabalay U. Glass fiber-reinfored composite resin as fixed space maintainers in children: 12-month clinical follow-up. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005;72:109-12.
Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013;41:612-8.

Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a prospective study. Pediatr Dent 1998;20:267-72.
Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. ASDC Dent Child 1999;66:383-6.
Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space Maintainers in Dentistry: Past to Present. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2402-5.
Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, Nassar U, El-Bialy T. Dental Arch Space Changes Following Premature Loss of Primary First Molars: A Systematic Rewiew. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:297-302.
Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the Validity of Tooth Size and Arch Width Measurements Using Conventional and Three-dimensional Virtual Orthodontic Models, Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.
Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World Journal of Orthodontics 2002;3:250-254.
Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:86-94.
Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part II. J Orthod 2004;31:154-62.
Pani SC, Hedge AM. Impressions in cleft lip and palate--a novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;33:93-6.
Türköz Ç. Dijital Ortodontik Modeller. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;26:181-7.
Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impresion technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21.
Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ. Tooth-size discrepancy: A comparison between manual and digital methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:107-13.
Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobsan A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300-4.
Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.
Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:1-4.
Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:269-73.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sibel Çayönü
0000-0002-9378-2499
Türkiye

Akif Demirel ^*
0000-0002-1433-0452
Türkiye

Şaziye Sarı
0000-0003-2202-5148
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 29, 2019

Submission Date

August 29, 2019

Acceptance Date

September 17, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 22 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.612646

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA34UG98KP

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çayönü, S., Demirel, A., & Sarı, Ş. (2019). Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry? Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 22(4), 376-381. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.612646

AMA

1.Çayönü S, Demirel A, Sarı Ş. Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry? Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2019;22(4):376-381. doi:10.7126/cumudj.612646

Chicago

Çayönü, Sibel, Akif Demirel, and Şaziye Sarı. 2019. “Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 (4): 376-81. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.612646.

EndNote

Çayönü S, Demirel A, Sarı Ş (December 1, 2019) Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry? Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22 4 376–381.

IEEE

[1]S. Çayönü, A. Demirel, and Ş. Sarı, “Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?”, Cumhuriyet Dent J, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 376–381, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.7126/cumudj.612646.

ISNAD

Çayönü, Sibel - Demirel, Akif - Sarı, Şaziye. “Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 22/4 (December 1, 2019): 376-381. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.612646.

JAMA

1.Çayönü S, Demirel A, Sarı Ş. Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry? Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2019;22:376–381.

MLA

Çayönü, Sibel, et al. “Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?”. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, Dec. 2019, pp. 376-81, doi:10.7126/cumudj.612646.

Vancouver

1.Sibel Çayönü, Akif Demirel, Şaziye Sarı. Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry? Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2019 Dec. 1;22(4):376-81. doi:10.7126/cumudj.612646

Cited By

Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners vs Conventional Method in Establishing Dental Measurements in Mixed Dentition

World Journal of Dentistry

https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2231

Occlusion development after premature loss of deciduous anterior teeth: preliminary results of a 24-month prospective cohort study

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.1.e2423285.oar

Comparative evaluation of anxiety level, comfort, and time taken using digital and conventional impression techniques among pediatric population aged 8–12 years: A cross-over randomized controlled study

SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences

https://doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_203_23

Comparison of three instruments (compass, digital caliper and 3d software) for dental linear measurements on plaster and digitalized models of infants and children: an agreement and reproducibility study

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.30.6.e2525164.oar