Should We Use the Digital Models in Pediatric Dentistry?

Sibel Çayönü; Akif Demirel; Şaziye Sarı

doi:10.7126/cumudj.612646

TR EN

Öz

References

Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:571-96.
Kırzıoğlu Z, Çiftçi ZZ, Yetiş CÇ. Clinical Success of Fiber-reinforced Composite Resin as a Space Maintainer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18:188-193.
Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas DR. Prediction of first molar occlusion. Am J Orthod 1973;63:610-21.
Terlaje RD, Donly KJ. Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. ASDC J Dent Child 2001;68:109-14.
Russell KA. Orthodontic treatment in the mixed dentition. J Can Dent Assoc 1996;62:418-21.
Garg A, Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S. ‘Metal to resin’: a comparative evalution of conventional band and loop space maintainer with the fiber reinforced composite resin space maintainer in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:111-6.
Kargul B, Caglar E, Kabalay U. Glass fiber-reinfored composite resin as fixed space maintainers in children: 12-month clinical follow-up. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005;72:109-12.
Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013;41:612-8.

Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a prospective study. Pediatr Dent 1998;20:267-72.
Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. ASDC Dent Child 1999;66:383-6.
Setia V, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Sekhon HK. Space Maintainers in Dentistry: Past to Present. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2402-5.
Tunison W, Flores-Mir C, ElBadrawy H, Nassar U, El-Bialy T. Dental Arch Space Changes Following Premature Loss of Primary First Molars: A Systematic Rewiew. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:297-302.
Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the Validity of Tooth Size and Arch Width Measurements Using Conventional and Three-dimensional Virtual Orthodontic Models, Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16.
Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World Journal of Orthodontics 2002;3:250-254.
Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:86-94.
Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.
Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: Part II. J Orthod 2004;31:154-62.
Pani SC, Hedge AM. Impressions in cleft lip and palate--a novel two stage technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;33:93-6.
Türköz Ç. Dijital Ortodontik Modeller. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2009;26:181-7.
Okunami TR, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Evans CA, Sadowsky C, Fadavi S. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:51-6.
Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impresion technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21.
Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ. Tooth-size discrepancy: A comparison between manual and digital methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2014;19:107-13.
Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobsan A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300-4.
Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.
Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:1-4.
Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:269-73.